Cold Agglutinin DiseasePhase 2CAD5NCT02689986
Bendamustine and Rituximab Combination Therapy for Cold Agglutinin Disease
A Phase 2 study testing Bendamustine, Rituximab in people with Cold Agglutinin Disease and Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia, run by Helse Fonna at 8 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
Prospective, non-randomized multicenter study on the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with bendamustine and rituximab for chronic cold agglutinin disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cold Agglutinin Disease, Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
- What is being tested?
- Bendamustine, Rituximab
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 43 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2013to Dec 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- CAD diagnosis defined by the combination of -
- Chronic hemolysis
- Cold agglutinin titer 64 or higher
- Positive direct antiglobulin test when performed with polyspecific antiserum, negative (or only weakly positive) with anti-IgG, and strongly positive with anti-C3d
- The presence of a clonal B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder defined by -
- Monoclonal band by serum electrophoresis with immunofixation, and/or
Show all 9Show fewer
- CD20 positive lymphocyte population with cellular kappa/lamda-ratio higher than 3.5 or less than 0.9, using flowcytometric immunophenotyping of bone marrow aspirates
- Indication for therapy, i.e. significant anemia and/or considerable cold-induced circulatory symptoms
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- An aggressive lymphoma
- Non-lymphatic malignant disease other than basal cell carcinoma of the skin. A history of probably cured cancer is not an exclusion criterion.
- Known HIV infection
- Acute or chronic hepatitis B or C
- Liver failure or active parenchymal liver disease. Bilirubin levels higher than 51 mol/L (3.0 mg/dL) when due to hepatic impairment. Elevated serum bilirubin level due to hemolysis is not an exclusion criterion.
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding
Show all 10Show fewer
- Patients of childbearing age who are not willing to use safe contraception during the entire study period and 6 months following its cessation
- All contraindications to the study drugs will be regarded as exclusion criteria.
- Age below 18 years
- Inability to cooperate
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 3 countries.
8 sites in 3 countries
Norway6 sites
Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen, NO-5021
Vestre Viken Hospital
Drammen, NO-3000
Haugesund Hospital
Haugesund, NO-5504
Akershus University Hospital
Nordbyhagen
Oslo University Hospital
Oslo, NO-0027
St Olav University Hospital
Trondheim, NO-7006
About this study
Official title: The CAD5 Study::Therapy for Chronic Cold Agglutinin Disease: A Prospective, Non-randomized International Multicenter Trial on the Safety and Efficacy of Bendamustine and Rituximab Combination Therapy
Prospective, non-randomized multicenter study on the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with bendamustine and rituximab for chronic cold agglutinin disease.
Read the detailed description
Background
Chronic cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is mediated by monoclonal cold-reactive autoantibodies that bind to erythrocyte surface antigens, causing hemagglutination and complement-mediated hemolysis. Anemia is severe in one-third of patients (hemoglobin level 8.0 g/dL or lower). Cold-induced circulatory symptoms are present in more than 90% of patients and may be disabling. CAD not associated with overt lymphoma or other disease has traditionally been classified as primary or idiopathic. A monoclonal lymphoproliferative bone marrow disorder can, however, be demonstrated by flow cytometry in 90% and by histology in approximately 75% of these patients, characterized by clonal proliferation of CD20+, kappa+ B-cells.
Approximately two-thirds of the patients experience exacerbation during febrile illnesses. During steady-state CAD, a majority of patients have low levels of complement proteins C3 and C4 because of a continuous consumption. These low levels, in particular low C4 availability, seem to be rate-limiting for hemolysis and prevent full-blown activation of the complement cascade with C5 cleavage and intravascular hemolysis. During acute phase reaction, C3 and C4 levels increase due to an enhanced production, resulting in exacerbation of hemolysis.
Counseling on cold avoidance has been recommended as the treatment of choice for most patients with primary CAD. A systematic review showed, however, that in more than 70% of cases, the physician and/or the patient did not perceive such measures as sufficient). Many standard therapies used in other autoimmune diseases or indolent lymphomas are inefficient, e.g. corticosteroids, alkylating agents, interferon-α and, probably, purine analogue single agent therapy. Treatment with the chimeric monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody rituximab has been shown in prospective studies to induce remission in more than half of patients. Almost all responses were partial, and the median response duration was less than one year. In a subsequent, prospective non-randomized trial of fludarabine and rituximab combination therapy in 29 patients, 22 patients (76%) responded, 6 (21%) achieving CR and 16 (55%) achieving PR. Among 10 patients non-responsive to rituximab monotherapy, CR was observed after the combination therapy in one patient and PR in six. Median increase in Hb level was 3.1 g/dL in the responders and 4.0 g/dL among those who achieved CR. Median time to response was 4.0 months. Lower quartile of response duration was not reached after 33 months, and estimated median response duration was more than 66 months. Targeting the pathogenic B-cell clone efficiently seems important for the achievement of remission.
Though the rituximab-based therapies have been a first major achievement in therapy for CAD, some problems remain to be solved. First, a considerable number of patients do not respond to rituximab monotherapy. Second, although the use of fludarabine and rituximab in combination has resulted in high response rates and prolonged response duration, toxicity is significant and there are still some non-responders. Third, the therapeutic approaches should probably be individualized; e.g., fludarabine therapy may bring about problems in the younger patients because of late-occurring adverse events and in the older ones because of short-term hematologic toxicity.
The antineoplastic drug, bendamustine hydrochloride, combines the 2-chlorethylamine group of the nitrogen mustard derived alkylating agents with the benzimidazole ring structures of the purine analogue. Bendamustine has been shown to be highly active in a variety of lymphoproliferative disorders. The combination of bendamustine and rituximab has produced high overall and complete response rates and prolonged remissions with only moderate and manageable toxicity in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia, which is closely related to primary CAD. In an attempt to improve on the therapeutic efficacy achieved with the rituximab-based regimens and the toxicity profile of the fludarabine-rituximab combination, the investigators want to study the safety and efficacy of bendamustine and rituximab combination therapy in patients with primary CAD.
Clinical study
The study is a prospective, non-randomized multicenter trial designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of bendamustine and rituximab combination therapy in patients with CAD requiring treatment.
Because of the low prevalence of CAD, it will be unrealistic to undertake a statistically robust randomized study. The investigators aim to include 50 patients during a study period of three years.
2.1 Study objective
The objective is to assess safety and efficacy of combination therapy with bendamustine and rituximab in patients with CAD.
Primary endpoints: Rate of complete and partial responses, respectively. Secondary endpoints: Time to response; time to best response; hematological toxicity grade 4; frequency of dose reduction; response duration.
2.2. Ethics
The trial will be carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and the current statutory requirements and legislation in the participating countries. The study has been approved by the relevant Medical Research Ethics Committees, the Norwegian Medicines Agency and the relevant regulatory authorities of each participating country. Data will be recorded anonymously, but a numeric code will be assigned in order to be able to track the data. All investigators as well as the ethics committees and relevant health authorities, however, will have access to the source data. The principal investigator in each country will establish monitoring of the study by an independent monitor as required.
2.3 Study design
Prospective, non-randomized international multicenter study.
2.4 Study population
In principle, individuals aged at least 18 years can be included, although enrollment of patients younger than 40 years is unlikely due to the age-specific prevalence of the disease.
3 The drugs
3.1 Rituximab
Rituximab is a humanized, chimeric monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody. Treatment with rituximab is considered an established, not experimental therapy for CAD, and involved physicians and nurses should be familiar with its administration, therapeutic and adverse effects and safety issues. In particular, they should be able to identify and manage any infusion-related side effects.
3.2 Bendamustine
Bendamustine is the experimental drug of this trial, marketed by Mundipharma/Norpharma. The drug is approved in the participating countries for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and multiple myeloma. It is a cytotoxic agent combining the 2-chlorethylamine group of the nitrogen mustard derived alkylating agents with the benzimidazole ring structures of the purine nucleoside analogues. Precautions and warnings include the possibility of myelosuppression, infections, skin reactions, caution in patients with cardiac disorders, nausea, vomiting, tumor lysis syndrome (very unlikely in primary CAD), anaphylaxis and extravasation.
4 Inclusion of patients.
Examination at inclusion
4.1 History.
Clinical and radiological examination Year of first occurrence of clinical symptoms is registered along with data on hemolytic anemia, circulatory symptoms, cold- or fever-induced exacerbation, previous therapies, lymph node enlargement and spleen enlargement (clinical assessment). Chest radiograph and abdominal ultrasonography should be done if not already performed during the last four months.
4.2 Blood tests
Hemolysis is detected and quantified based on Hb, MCV, reticulocyte count (x 109/L), LDH, bilirubin and haptoglobin. These measurements should be done twice during the last two months before treatment.
Hematological, biochemical and immunological assessments should be done once at inclusion + 2 weeks:
- WBC, leukocyte differential count, platelet count
- Iron, transferrin (or TIBC), ferritin, cobalamine and folate
- CRP
- Quantification of IgM, IgG and IgA Serum electrophoresis for detection and identification of monoclonal immunoglobulins (including immunofixation when appropriate)
- Cold agglutinin titer
- Specific direct antiglobulin test (DAT, direct Coombs' test), i.e. using polyspecific antiserum, anti-C3d and anti-IgG)
- Complement assessments (C3 and C4)
- CMV and VZV antibodies
- Serological tests for hepatitis B and C
- Freezing of 5 ml EDTA-blood for possible later DNA-based studies 5 Therapy
Treatment schedule Day 1: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 1-2: Bendamustine; dosage: see Section 5.2 Day 29: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 29-30: Bendamustine; dosage: see Section 5.2 and 5.4 Day 57: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 57-58: Bendamustine; dosage: see Section 5.2 and 5.4 Day 85: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 85-86: Bendamustine; dosage: see Section 5.2 and 5.4 5.2 Initial bendamustine dose Patients with no previous cytotoxic therapy and no history of myelosuppression receive bendamustin at an initial dose of 90 mg/m2 day 1 and 2 (dose level A).
In patients who have been previously treated with a fludarabine-containing regimen, the initial bendamustine dose is 70 mg/m2 day 1 and 2 (dose level B).
In patients who have previously received myelosuppressive agents other than purine analogues, the choice of initial dose level A or B is based on an individualized assessment.
Bendamustine solution for infusion should be prepared according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The solution should be administered by intravenous infusion over 60 minutes. Antiemetic prophylaxis is given according to local routines or based on an individualized assessment.
Rituximab should be administered according to the manufacturer's recommendations and the routines of the participating hospital. Rapid (90 minutes) infusion is allowed during cycle 2-4 provided there has been no infusion-related adverse event during the preceding rituximab infusion.
For drug stability reasons, an in-line blood warmer should not be used for the infusion of bendamustine or rituximab. The infusion solution should have room temperature; and the patient, in particular the extremity chosen for infusion, should be kept warm during the procedure.
Dose adjustments
In case of significant toxicity, the dose of bendamustine should be reduced as specified by protocol. Any adverse event should be recorded in the appropriate CRF. For reporting of SAEs and SUSARs, see Protocol
6 Follow-up
6.1 Follow-up first 6 months after therapy
- The following measurements must be done monthly during the first six months after the last cycle of any combination therapy:
- All measurements listed in Paragraph 6.1.B.
II) In case of reduction of a previously elevated IgM level to the normal range, serum electrophoresis and immunofixation should be performed at the next visit.
III) Number of blood transfusions after the previous monthly visit. B.) At the fourth monthly visit after completion of the last combination therapy cycle, bone marrow biopsy and flow cytometric immunophenotyping of bone marrow aspirate are performed.
- Being tested
- Bendamustine, Rituximab
- Keywords
- Cold agglutinin, Cold agglutinin disease, Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune, Bendamustine, Rituximab
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune, Anemia, Hemolysis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bendamustine, RituximabDrug
Also called Levact, MabThera
Bendamustine, Rituximab
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment arm | Experimental | Bendamustine, Rituximab Receives: Drug: Bendamustine, Rituximab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Frequency of complete and partial responses (CR/PR)
Responses will be assessed using the following, previously published definitions:
Complete response (CR), Absence of anemia, no signs of hemolysis, no clinical symptoms of CAD, undetectable serum monoclonal protein, and no signs of clonal lymphoproliferation by bone marrow histology, immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry.
Partial response (PR), Stable increase in hemoglobin levels by at least 2.0 g/dL or to the normal range, combined with a reduction of serum IgM concentrations by at least 50% or to the normal range, improvement of clinical symptoms, and transfusion independency.
Non-response (NR), Patients not meeting the criteria for CR or PR.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Time to response (TTR)
Time to response (TTR) is the time from start of therapy to the achievement of any degree of response.
Measured: 6 months
Time to best response (TTBR)
Time to best response (TTBR) is the time from start of therapy to the observation of the highest hemoglobin level achieved + 0.5 g/dL.
Measured: 1 year
Response duration
Response duration is the time from achievement of any degree of response to relapse. Relapse is defined by one or more of the following events: A decline in hemoglobin level by at least 2.0 g/dL from the highest level achieved or to below 10.0 g/dL; transfusion requirement; or recurrence of significant cold-induced circulatory symptoms.
Measured: Through study completion; an average of 2 years
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by current CTCAE criteria
Measured: Through study completion; an average of 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2013
- Primary completionDec 2016
- Study completionDec 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cold Agglutinin DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Helse Fonna
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sigbjorn Berentsen, Helse Fonna
- Investigators
- Sigbjorn Berentsen, MD, PhD, Study chair, Department of Research and Innovation, Haugesund HospitalMarkku Oksman, MD, Principal investigator, Turku University Hospital, Turku, FinlandHenrik Birgens, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Herlev University Hospital, Copenhagen, DenmarkGeir E Tjonnfjord, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Oslo University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02689986
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CAD5
- Acronym
- CAD5
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 16 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 9 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data are to be shared between authors before final analysis and publication.
Publications
Michel M. Classification and therapeutic approaches in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: an update. Expert Rev Hematol. 2011 Dec;4(6):607-18. doi: 10.1586/ehm.11.60.
PubMed 22077525Randen U, Troen G, Tierens A, Steen C, Warsame A, Beiske K, Tjonnfjord GE, Berentsen S, Delabie J. Primary cold agglutinin-associated lymphoproliferative disease: a B-cell lymphoma of the bone marrow distinct from lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. Haematologica. 2014 Mar;99(3):497-504. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.091702. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
PubMed 24143001Berentsen S, Tjonnfjord GE. Diagnosis and treatment of cold agglutinin mediated autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Blood Rev. 2012 May;26(3):107-15. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Feb 12.
PubMed 22330255Berentsen S, Randen U, Vagan AM, Hjorth-Hansen H, Vik A, Dalgaard J, Jacobsen EM, Thoresen AS, Beiske K, Tjonnfjord GE. High response rate and durable remissions following fludarabine and rituximab combination therapy for chronic cold agglutinin disease. Blood. 2010 Oct 28;116(17):3180-4. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-06-288647. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
PubMed 20634373Berentsen S, Beiske K, Tjonnfjord GE. Primary chronic cold agglutinin disease: an update on pathogenesis, clinical features and therapy. Hematology. 2007 Oct;12(5):361-70. doi: 10.1080/10245330701445392.
PubMed 17891600Berentsen S, Ulvestad E, Langholm R, Beiske K, Hjorth-Hansen H, Ghanima W, Sorbo JH, Tjonnfjord GE. Primary chronic cold agglutinin disease: a population based clinical study of 86 patients. Haematologica. 2006 Apr;91(4):460-6.
PubMed 16585012Berentsen S, Ulvestad E, Gjertsen BT, Hjorth-Hansen H, Langholm R, Knutsen H, Ghanima W, Shammas FV, Tjonnfjord GE. Rituximab for primary chronic cold agglutinin disease: a prospective study of 37 courses of therapy in 27 patients. Blood. 2004 Apr 15;103(8):2925-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-10-3597. Epub 2003 Dec 30.
PubMed 15070665Schollkopf C, Kjeldsen L, Bjerrum OW, Mourits-Andersen HT, Nielsen JL, Christensen BE, Jensen BA, Pedersen BB, Taaning EB, Klausen TW, Birgens H. Rituximab in chronic cold agglutinin disease: a prospective study of 20 patients. Leuk Lymphoma. 2006 Feb;47(2):253-60. doi: 10.1080/10428190500286481.
PubMed 16321854Gueli A, Gottardi D, Hu H, Ricca I, De Crescenzo A, Tarella C. Efficacy of rituximab-bendamustine in cold agglutinin haemolytic anaemia refractory to previous chemo-immunotherapy: a case report. Blood Transfus. 2013 Apr;11(2):311-4. doi: 10.2450/2012.0166-12. Epub 2013 Jan 22. No abstract available.
PubMed 23399352Berentsen S, Ulvestad E, Tjonnfjord GE. B-lymphocytes as targets for therapy in chronic cold agglutinin disease. Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets. 2007 Sep;7(3):219-27. doi: 10.2174/187152907781745279.
PubMed 17896962Ulvestad E, Berentsen S, Bo K, Shammas FV. Clinical immunology of chronic cold agglutinin disease. Eur J Haematol. 1999 Oct;63(4):259-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1999.tb01887.x.
PubMed 10530415Ulvestad E, Berentsen S, Mollnes TE. Acute phase haemolysis in chronic cold agglutinin disease. Scand J Immunol. 2001 Jul-Aug;54(1-2):239-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.2001.00960.x.
PubMed 11439172Berentsen S. How I manage cold agglutinin disease. Br J Haematol. 2011 May;153(3):309-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08643.x. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
PubMed 21385173Swiecicki PL, Hegerova LT, Gertz MA. Cold agglutinin disease. Blood. 2013 Aug 15;122(7):1114-21. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-02-474437. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
PubMed 23757733Stone MJ. Heating up cold agglutinins. Blood. 2010 Oct 28;116(17):3119-20. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-297523.
PubMed 21030565
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The CAD5 Study::Therapy for Chronic Cold Agglutinin Disease: A Prospective, Non-randomized International Multicenter Trial on the Safety and Efficacy of Bendamustine and Rituximab Combination Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02689986
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CAD5 / CAD5
- Keywords
- Cold agglutinin, Cold agglutinin disease, Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune, Bendamustine, Rituximab
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Helse FonnaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2013
- Primary completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prospective, non-randomized multicenter study on the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with bendamustine and rituximab for chronic cold agglutinin disease.
Detailed description
Background
Chronic cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is mediated by monoclonal cold-reactive autoantibodies that bind to erythrocyte surface antigens, causing hemagglutination and complement-mediated hemolysis. Anemia is severe in one-third of patients (hemoglobin level 8.0 g/dL or lower). Cold-induced circulatory symptoms are present in more than 90% of patients and may be disabling. CAD not associated with overt lymphoma or other disease has traditionally been classified as primary or idiopathic. A monoclonal lymphoproliferative bone marrow disorder can, however, be demonstrated by flow cytometry in 90% and by histology in approximately 75% of these patients, characterized by clonal proliferation of CD20+, kappa+ B-cells.
Approximately two-thirds of the patients experience exacerbation during febrile illnesses. During steady-state CAD, a majority of patients have low levels of complement proteins C3 and C4 because of a continuous consumption. These low levels, in particular low C4 availability, seem to be rate-limiting for hemolysis and prevent full-blown activation of the complement cascade with C5 cleavage and intravascular hemolysis. During acute phase reaction, C3 and C4 levels increase due to an enhanced production, resulting in exacerbation of hemolysis.
Counseling on cold avoidance has been recommended as the treatment of choice for most patients with primary CAD. A systematic review showed, however, that in more than 70% of cases, the physician and/or the patient did not perceive such measures as sufficient). Many standard therapies used in other autoimmune diseases or indolent lymphomas are inefficient, e.g. corticosteroids, alkylating agents, interferon-α and, probably, purine analogue single agent therapy. Treatment with the chimeric monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody rituximab has been shown in prospective studies to induce remission in more than half of patients. Almost all responses were partial, and the median response duration was less than one year. In a subsequent, prospective non-randomized trial of fludarabine and rituximab combination therapy in 29 patients, 22 patients (76%) responded, 6 (21%) achieving CR and 16 (55%) achieving PR. Among 10 patients non-responsive to rituximab monotherapy, CR was observed after the combination therapy in one patient and PR in six. Median increase in Hb level was 3.1 g/dL in the responders and 4.0 g/dL among those who achieved CR. Median time to response was 4.0 months. Lower quartile of response duration was not reached after 33 months, and estimated median response duration was more than 66 months. Targeting the pathogenic B-cell clone efficiently seems important for the achievement of remission.
Though the rituximab-based therapies have been a first major achievement in therapy for CAD, some problems remain to be solved. First, a considerable number of patients do not respond to rituximab monotherapy. Second, although the use of fludarabine and rituximab in combination has resulted in high response rates and prolonged response duration, toxicity is significant and there are still some non-responders. Third, the therapeutic approaches should probably be individualized; e.g., fludarabine therapy may bring about problems in the younger patients because of late-occurring adverse events and in the older ones because of short-term hematologic toxicity.
The antineoplastic drug, bendamustine hydrochloride, combines the 2-chlorethylamine group of the nitrogen mustard derived alkylating agents with the benzimidazole ring structures of the purine analogue. Bendamustine has been shown to be highly active in a variety of lymphoproliferative disorders. The combination of bendamustine and rituximab has produced high overall and complete response rates and prolonged remissions with only moderate and manageable toxicity in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia, which is closely related to primary CAD. In an attempt to improve on the therapeutic efficacy achieved with the rituximab-based regimens and the toxicity profile of the fludarabine-rituximab combination, the investigators want to study the safety and efficacy of bendamustine and rituximab combination therapy in patients with primary CAD.
Clinical study
The study is a prospective, non-randomized multicenter trial designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of bendamustine and rituximab combination therapy in patients with CAD requiring treatment.
Because of the low prevalence of CAD, it will be unrealistic to undertake a statistically robust randomized study. The investigators aim to include 50 patients during a study period of three years.
2.1 Study objective
The objective is to assess safety and efficacy of combination therapy with bendamustine and rituximab in patients with CAD.
Primary endpoints: Rate of complete and partial responses, respectively. Secondary endpoints: Time to response; time to best response; hematological toxicity grade 4; frequency of dose reduction; response duration.
2.2. Ethics
The trial will be carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and the current statutory requirements and legislation in the participating countries. The study has been approved by the relevant Medical Research Ethics Committees, the Norwegian Medicines Agency and the relevant regulatory authorities of each participating country. Data will be recorded anonymously, but a numeric code will be assigned in order to be able to track the data. All investigators as well as the ethics committees and relevant health authorities, however, will have access to the source data. The principal investigator in each country will establish monitoring of the study by an independent monitor as required.
2.3 Study design
Prospective, non-randomized international multicenter study.
2.4 Study population
In principle, individuals aged at least 18 years can be included, although enrollment of patients younger than 40 years is unlikely due to the age-specific prevalence of the disease.
3 The drugs
3.1 Rituximab
Rituximab is a humanized, chimeric monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody. Treatment with rituximab is considered an established, not experimental therapy for CAD, and involved physicians and nurses should be familiar with its administration, therapeutic and adverse effects and safety issues. In particular, they should be able to identify and manage any infusion-related side effects.
3.2 Bendamustine
Bendamustine is the experimental drug of this trial, marketed by Mundipharma/Norpharma. The drug is approved in the participating countries for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and multiple myeloma. It is a cytotoxic agent combining the 2-chlorethylamine group of the nitrogen mustard derived alkylating agents with the benzimidazole ring structures of the purine nucleoside analogues. Precautions and warnings include the possibility of myelosuppression, infections, skin reactions, caution in patients with cardiac disorders, nausea, vomiting, tumor lysis syndrome (very unlikely in primary CAD), anaphylaxis and extravasation.
4 Inclusion of patients.
Examination at inclusion
4.1 History.
Clinical and radiological examination Year of first occurrence of clinical symptoms is registered along with data on hemolytic anemia, circulatory symptoms, cold- or fever-induced exacerbation, previous therapies, lymph node enlargement and spleen enlargement (clinical assessment). Chest radiograph and abdominal ultrasonography should be done if not already performed during the last four months.
4.2 Blood tests
Hemolysis is detected and quantified based on Hb, MCV, reticulocyte count (x 109/L), LDH, bilirubin and haptoglobin. These measurements should be done twice during the last two months before treatment.
Hematological, biochemical and immunological assessments should be done once at inclusion + 2 weeks:
- WBC, leukocyte differential count, platelet count
- Iron, transferrin (or TIBC), ferritin, cobalamine and folate
- CRP
- Quantification of IgM, IgG and IgA Serum electrophoresis for detection and identification of monoclonal immunoglobulins (including immunofixation when appropriate)
- Cold agglutinin titer
- Specific direct antiglobulin test (DAT, direct Coombs' test), i.e. using polyspecific antiserum, anti-C3d and anti-IgG)
- Complement assessments (C3 and C4)
- CMV and VZV antibodies
- Serological tests for hepatitis B and C
- Freezing of 5 ml EDTA-blood for possible later DNA-based studies 5 Therapy
Treatment schedule Day 1: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 1-2: Bendamustine; dosage: see Section 5.2 Day 29: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 29-30: Bendamustine; dosage: see Section 5.2 and 5.4 Day 57: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 57-58: Bendamustine; dosage: see Section 5.2 and 5.4 Day 85: Rituximab; 375 mg/m2 Day 85-86: Bendamustine; dosage: see Section 5.2 and 5.4 5.2 Initial bendamustine dose Patients with no previous cytotoxic therapy and no history of myelosuppression receive bendamustin at an initial dose of 90 mg/m2 day 1 and 2 (dose level A).
In patients who have been previously treated with a fludarabine-containing regimen, the initial bendamustine dose is 70 mg/m2 day 1 and 2 (dose level B).
In patients who have previously received myelosuppressive agents other than purine analogues, the choice of initial dose level A or B is based on an individualized assessment.
Bendamustine solution for infusion should be prepared according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The solution should be administered by intravenous infusion over 60 minutes. Antiemetic prophylaxis is given according to local routines or based on an individualized assessment.
Rituximab should be administered according to the manufacturer's recommendations and the routines of the participating hospital. Rapid (90 minutes) infusion is allowed during cycle 2-4 provided there has been no infusion-related adverse event during the preceding rituximab infusion.
For drug stability reasons, an in-line blood warmer should not be used for the infusion of bendamustine or rituximab. The infusion solution should have room temperature; and the patient, in particular the extremity chosen for infusion, should be kept warm during the procedure.
Dose adjustments
In case of significant toxicity, the dose of bendamustine should be reduced as specified by protocol. Any adverse event should be recorded in the appropriate CRF. For reporting of SAEs and SUSARs, see Protocol
6 Follow-up
6.1 Follow-up first 6 months after therapy
- The following measurements must be done monthly during the first six months after the last cycle of any combination therapy:
- All measurements listed in Paragraph 6.1.B.
II) In case of reduction of a previously elevated IgM level to the normal range, serum electrophoresis and immunofixation should be performed at the next visit.
III) Number of blood transfusions after the previous monthly visit. B.) At the fourth monthly visit after completion of the last combination therapy cycle, bone marrow biopsy and flow cytometric immunophenotyping of bone marrow aspirate are performed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment arm | Experimental | Drug: Bendamustine, RituximabBendamustine, Rituximab |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- CAD diagnosis defined by the combination of -
- The presence of a clonal B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder defined by -
- Indication for therapy, i.e. significant anemia and/or considerable cold-induced circulatory symptoms
- Written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- An aggressive lymphoma
- Non-lymphatic malignant disease other than basal cell carcinoma of the skin. A history of probably cured cancer is not an exclusion criterion.
- Known HIV infection
- Acute or chronic hepatitis B or C
- Liver failure or active parenchymal liver disease. Bilirubin levels higher than 51 mol/L (3.0 mg/dL) when due to hepatic impairment. Elevated serum bilirubin level due to hemolysis is not an exclusion criterion.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bendamustine, RituximabAlso: Levact, MabTheraBendamustine, Rituximab | Drug | Treatment arm |
Primary outcome
Frequency of complete and partial responses (CR/PR)
Time frame: 6 months
Responses will be assessed using the following, previously published definitions: Complete response (CR), Absence of anemia, no signs of hemolysis, no clinical symptoms of CAD, undetectable serum monoclonal protein, and no signs of clonal lymphoproliferation by bone marrow histology, immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. Partial response (PR), Stable increase in hemoglobin levels by at least 2.0 g/dL or to the normal range, combined with a reduction of serum IgM concentrations by at least 50% or to the normal range, improvement of clinical symptoms, and transfusion independency. Non-response (NR), Patients not meeting the criteria for CR or PR.
4 secondary outcomes
Time to response (TTR)
Time frame: 6 months
Time to best response (TTBR)
Time frame: 1 year
Response duration
Time frame: Through study completion; an average of 2 years
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by current CTCAE criteria
Time frame: Through study completion; an average of 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jan 2017.
- Background: PubMed 22077525Michel M. Classification and therapeutic approaches in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: an update. Expert Rev Hematol. 2011 Dec;4(6):607-18. doi: 10.1586/ehm.11.60.
- Background: PubMed 24143001Randen U, Troen G, Tierens A, Steen C, Warsame A, Beiske K, Tjonnfjord GE, Berentsen S, Delabie J. Primary cold agglutinin-associated lymphoproliferative disease: a B-cell lymphoma of the bone marrow distinct from lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. Haematologica. 2014 Mar;99(3):497-504. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.091702. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
- Background: PubMed 22330255Berentsen S, Tjonnfjord GE. Diagnosis and treatment of cold agglutinin mediated autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Blood Rev. 2012 May;26(3):107-15. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Feb 12.
- Background: PubMed 20634373Berentsen S, Randen U, Vagan AM, Hjorth-Hansen H, Vik A, Dalgaard J, Jacobsen EM, Thoresen AS, Beiske K, Tjonnfjord GE. High response rate and durable remissions following fludarabine and rituximab combination therapy for chronic cold agglutinin disease. Blood. 2010 Oct 28;116(17):3180-4. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-06-288647. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
- Background: PubMed 17891600Berentsen S, Beiske K, Tjonnfjord GE. Primary chronic cold agglutinin disease: an update on pathogenesis, clinical features and therapy. Hematology. 2007 Oct;12(5):361-70. doi: 10.1080/10245330701445392.
- Background: PubMed 16585012Berentsen S, Ulvestad E, Langholm R, Beiske K, Hjorth-Hansen H, Ghanima W, Sorbo JH, Tjonnfjord GE. Primary chronic cold agglutinin disease: a population based clinical study of 86 patients. Haematologica. 2006 Apr;91(4):460-6.
- Background: PubMed 15070665Berentsen S, Ulvestad E, Gjertsen BT, Hjorth-Hansen H, Langholm R, Knutsen H, Ghanima W, Shammas FV, Tjonnfjord GE. Rituximab for primary chronic cold agglutinin disease: a prospective study of 37 courses of therapy in 27 patients. Blood. 2004 Apr 15;103(8):2925-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-10-3597. Epub 2003 Dec 30.
- Background: PubMed 16321854Schollkopf C, Kjeldsen L, Bjerrum OW, Mourits-Andersen HT, Nielsen JL, Christensen BE, Jensen BA, Pedersen BB, Taaning EB, Klausen TW, Birgens H. Rituximab in chronic cold agglutinin disease: a prospective study of 20 patients. Leuk Lymphoma. 2006 Feb;47(2):253-60. doi: 10.1080/10428190500286481.
- Background: PubMed 23399352Gueli A, Gottardi D, Hu H, Ricca I, De Crescenzo A, Tarella C. Efficacy of rituximab-bendamustine in cold agglutinin haemolytic anaemia refractory to previous chemo-immunotherapy: a case report. Blood Transfus. 2013 Apr;11(2):311-4. doi: 10.2450/2012.0166-12. Epub 2013 Jan 22. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 17896962Berentsen S, Ulvestad E, Tjonnfjord GE. B-lymphocytes as targets for therapy in chronic cold agglutinin disease. Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets. 2007 Sep;7(3):219-27. doi: 10.2174/187152907781745279.
- Background: PubMed 10530415Ulvestad E, Berentsen S, Bo K, Shammas FV. Clinical immunology of chronic cold agglutinin disease. Eur J Haematol. 1999 Oct;63(4):259-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1999.tb01887.x.
- Background: PubMed 11439172Ulvestad E, Berentsen S, Mollnes TE. Acute phase haemolysis in chronic cold agglutinin disease. Scand J Immunol. 2001 Jul-Aug;54(1-2):239-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.2001.00960.x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data are to be shared between authors before final analysis and publication.
Related trials for Cold Agglutinin Disease
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Cold Agglutinin Disease Real World Evidence Registry
Cold Agglutinin Disease (CAD), Cold Agglutinin Syndrome (CAS)
RecruitingObservational study
Prospective Evaluation of Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Autoimmune Cytopenias Including Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia, Immune Thrombocytopenia, and Chronic Idiopathic/Autoimmune Neutropenia
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia, Immune Thrombocytopenia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sigbjorn Berentsen, MD, PhD study chair
Department of Research and Innovation, Haugesund Hospital
Markku Oksman, MD principal investigator
Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
Henrik Birgens, MD, PhD principal investigator
Herlev University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
8 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Bendamustine, Rituximab in people with Cold Agglutinin Disease and Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia, run by Helse Fonna at 8 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in Norway, Denmark, Finland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Frequency of complete and partial responses (CR/PR) (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02689986, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.