Pressure UlcersNCT02690753
Pressure Ulcer Prevention: a Turn and Positioning System Combined With Incontinence Care and Tailored/Standard Repositioning
A study testing A protocol tailored to individual risk factors, The Prevalon® Turn and Position System 2.0 and Comfort Shield® barrier cream cloths in people with Pressure Ulcers and Incontinence-associated Dermatitis, run by University Ghent at 15 sites in Belgium.
Trial summary
The prevalence of pressure ulcer in hospitals is 7,3% - 23%. The primary etiological factors are pressure or pressure combined with shear. Prevention is very important and comprises: preventive skin care including cleansing and protecting the skin from exposure to moisture, the systematic repositioning of the patient… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pressure Ulcers, Incontinence-associated Dermatitis
- What is being tested?
- A protocol tailored to individual risk factors, The Prevalon® Turn and Position System 2.0 and Comfort Shield® barrier cream cloths
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 227 participants
- Where
- 15 sitesBelgium
- Study dates
- Feb 2016to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- At risk of developing pressure ulcers (Braden score < 17)
- Maximum 24hours admitted on the ward at the time of inclusion
- Expected lenght of stay: 8 days
- Free of pressure ulcers category II, II, IV and incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) category 2 at the start of the study
Who cannot join
- Patients with no active or supportive therapy
Trial locations and contacts
15 sites in 1 country.
15 sites in 1 country
Belgium15 sites
ASZ Aalst
Aalst
AZ Monica
Antwerp
ZNA Hoge Beuken
Antwerp
ZNA St. Elisabeth
Antwerp
AZ Nikolaas campus Beveren
Beveren, Oost-Vlaanderen
Imelda Ziekenhuis
Bonheiden
AZ St. Jan Brugge
Bruges
AZ St. Maarten
Duffel, Antwerpen, 2570
AZ St. Dimpna
Geel, Antwerpen
ASZ Geraardsbergen
Geraardsbergen
UZ Gent
Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen
AZ Delta Menen
Menen
AZ St. Jan Oostende
Ostend
AZ Oudenaarde
Oudenaarde, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9700
AZ Delta Roeselare
Roeselare
About this study
Official title: A Turn and Positioning System and Standardized Incontinence Care Combined With Tailored Repositioning Versus a Standard Repositioning Protocol for Pressure Ulcer Prevention: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial and Health Economical Analysis in a Hospital Setting
The prevalence of pressure ulcer in hospitals is 7,3% - 23%. The primary etiological factors are pressure or pressure combined with shear. Prevention is very important and comprises: preventive skin care including cleansing and protecting the skin from exposure to moisture, the systematic repositioning of the patient, the offloading of the heels from the surface of the bed, the use of adequate bed support surfaces and an adequate nutritional status. The development and implementation of a risk based prevention plan for individuals identified as being at risk is strongly recommended. Limited compliance exists towards pressure ulcer preventive interventions. 25,5% of the patients at risk receive fully adequate prevention in bed. The reposition frequence is adequate in 55% of patients at risk. There is a lack of rigorously performed research addressing the effectiveness of devices or risk based protocols to improve compliance. Health care budgets are limited, priorities should be set in the allocation of health care resources.
The primary aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the turn and position system (Prevalon®Turn and Position System 2.0, SAGE) versus standard care to improve reposition frequence in patients at risk. The second aim is to compare the effectiveness of a tailored protocol versus standard care to improve reposition frequence in patients at risk. The third aim is to compare the effectiveness of standardized incontinence care versus standard care to improve the incidence of pressure ulcers and incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD). Also a health economic evaluation will be performed.
The study will be performed in hospital setting (university and general hospitals) in a random sample of 226 patients aged > 18 who are at risk of developing pressure ulcers. Patients will be recruited from three types of wards: intensive care units, geriatric wards and rehabilitation wards. Patients will be included in the study for a period of 8 days.
- Being tested
- A protocol tailored to individual risk factors, The Prevalon® Turn and Position System 2.0, Comfort Shield® barrier cream cloths
- Keywords
- Repositioning, Incontinence care, Prevention
- Medical subject headings
- Pressure Ulcer
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
A protocol tailored to individual risk factorsProcedure or surgery
The Prevalon® Turn and Position System 2.0Device
Comfort Shield® barrier cream clothsDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tailored repositioning + Standardised incontinence care + TAP | Experimental | A protocol tailored to individual risk factors will be applied to patients at risk.Comfort Shield® barrier cream cloths will be used for incontinence care every morning and after each episode of incontinence. The Prevalon® Turn and Position System 2.0, SAGE will be used for turning and positioning patients at risk when laying in bed. Receives: Procedure: A protocol tailored to individual risk factors; Device: The Prevalon® Turn and Position System 2.0; Device: Comfort Shield® barrier cream cloths |
| Standard repositioning + Standardised incontinence care + TAP | Experimental | Instead of developing and using a tailored pressure ulcer prevention protocol, patients will receive standard care.Comfort Shield® barrier cream cloths will be used for incontinence care every morning and after each episode of incontinence. The Prevalon® Turn and Position System 2.0, SAGE will be used for turning and positioning patients at risk when laying in bed. Receives: Device: The Prevalon® Turn and Position System 2.0; Device: Comfort Shield® barrier cream cloths |
| Usual care | No intervention | Instead of developing and using a tailored pressure ulcer prevention protocol, patients will receive standard care. Instead of using comfort Shield® barrier cream cloths, incontinence care will be given to patients using the standard procedure on the ward. Instead of using the turn and position system, patients will be turned according to the standard procedure on the ward. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Turning compliance of nurses within the trial period as assessed by the researcher (unannounced)
The researcher wil collect and administer data about turning compliance and compliance with the protocol
Measured: within 8 days after the start of the study
Secondary outcomes (6)
Turning angle
Per patient the researcher will measure two times the turning angle in which the patient is positioned.
Measured: within 8 days after the start of the study
Sacrum free of pressure
Per patient the researcher will investigate two times if the sacrum is free of pressure while the patient is positioned.
Measured: within 8 days after the start of the study
Incidence of pressure ulcers and incontinence-associated dermatitis
Measured: within 8 days after the start of the study
Comfort and preferences of the caregiver
Questions on comfort and preferences of the TAP, comfort shield barrier cream cloths and tailored repositioning will be assessed. At baseline these questions will assess the traditional care.
Measured: On baseline and at day 8 (the end of the study)
Comfort and tolerance of the patient
Questions on comfort and tolerance of the TAP, comfort shield barrier cream cloths and repositioning will be assessed by the caregiver. At baseline these questions will assess the traditional care.
Measured: At day 8 (the end of the study)
Cost-effectiveness of the prevention of pressure ulcers
The following costs will be calculated to provide insight concerning cost-effectiveness:
Objective time analysis of repositioning (by using a chronometer), Subjective time analysis of repositioning, Daily consumption of comfort shield barrier cream cloths and microclimate body pads
Measured: For the duration of the study (8 days)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2016
- Primary completionDec 2017
- Study completionDec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pressure UlcersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University GhentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 227 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Ghent
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sage Products, LLC
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, UCVV, University Ghent
- Investigators
- Dimitri Beeckman, PhD, Principal investigator, University Ghent
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02690753
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PA2015/041
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 8 Dec 2015
- Last updated
- 9 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Beeckman D, Van Damme N, Schoonhoven L, Van Lancker A, Kottner J, Beele H, Gray M, Woodward S, Fader M, Van den Bussche K, Van Hecke A, De Meyer D, Verhaeghe S. Interventions for preventing and treating incontinence-associated dermatitis in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 10;11(11):CD011627. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011627.pub2.
PubMed 27841440Beeckman D, Van Lancker A, Van Hecke A, Verhaeghe S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of incontinence-associated dermatitis, incontinence, and moisture as risk factors for pressure ulcer development. Res Nurs Health. 2014 Jun;37(3):204-18. doi: 10.1002/nur.21593. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
PubMed 24700170De Meyer D, Van Hecke A, Verhaeghe S, Beeckman D. PROTECT - Trial: A cluster RCT to study the effectiveness of a repositioning aid and tailored repositioning to increase repositioning compliance. J Adv Nurs. 2019 May;75(5):1085-1098. doi: 10.1111/jan.13932. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
PubMed 30549321
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Turn and Positioning System and Standardized Incontinence Care Combined With Tailored Repositioning Versus a Standard Repositioning Protocol for Pressure Ulcer Prevention: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial and Health Economical Analysis in a Hospital Setting
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02690753
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PA2015/041
- Keywords
- Repositioning, Incontinence care, Prevention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 227 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University GhentUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sage Products, LLC
- Study start
- Feb 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The prevalence of pressure ulcer in hospitals is 7,3% - 23%. The primary etiological factors are pressure or pressure combined with shear. Prevention is very important and comprises: preventive skin care including cleansing and protecting the skin from exposure to moisture, the systematic repositioning of the patient, the offloading of the heels from the surface of the bed, the use of adequate bed support surfaces and an adequate nutritional status. The development and implementation of a risk based prevention plan for individuals identified as being at risk is strongly recommended. Limited compliance exists towards pressure ulcer preventive interventions. 25,5% of the patients at risk receive fully adequate prevention in bed. The reposition frequence is adequate in 55% of patients at risk. There is a lack of rigorously performed research addressing the effectiveness of devices or risk based protocols to improve compliance. Health care budgets are limited, priorities should be set in the allocation of health care resources.
The primary aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the turn and position system (Prevalon®Turn and Position System 2.0, SAGE) versus standard care to improve reposition frequence in patients at risk. The second aim is to compare the effectiveness of a tailored protocol versus standard care to improve reposition frequence in patients at risk. The third aim is to compare the effectiveness of standardized incontinence care versus standard care to improve the incidence of pressure ulcers and incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD). Also a health economic evaluation will be performed.
The study will be performed in hospital setting (university and general hospitals) in a random sample of 226 patients aged > 18 who are at risk of developing pressure ulcers. Patients will be recruited from three types of wards: intensive care units, geriatric wards and rehabilitation wards. Patients will be included in the study for a period of 8 days.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tailored repositioning + Standardised incontinence care + TAP | Experimental | Procedure: A protocol tailored to individual risk factors, Device: The Prevalon® Turn and Position System 2.0, Device: Comfort Shield® barrier cream clothsA protocol tailored to individual risk factors will be applied to patients at risk.Comfort Shield® barrier cream cloths will be used for incontinence care every morning and after each episode of incontinence. The Prevalon® Turn and Position System 2.0, SAGE will be used for turning and positioning patients at risk when laying in bed. |
| Standard repositioning + Standardised incontinence care + TAP | Experimental | Device: The Prevalon® Turn and Position System 2.0, Device: Comfort Shield® barrier cream clothsInstead of developing and using a tailored pressure ulcer prevention protocol, patients will receive standard care.Comfort Shield® barrier cream cloths will be used for incontinence care every morning and after each episode of incontinence. The Prevalon® Turn and Position System 2.0, SAGE will be used for turning and positioning patients at risk when laying in bed. |
| Usual care | No intervention | –Instead of developing and using a tailored pressure ulcer prevention protocol, patients will receive standard care. Instead of using comfort Shield® barrier cream cloths, incontinence care will be given to patients using the standard procedure on the ward. Instead of using the turn and position system, patients will be turned according to the standard procedure on the ward. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- At risk of developing pressure ulcers (Braden score < 17)
- Maximum 24hours admitted on the ward at the time of inclusion
- Expected lenght of stay: 8 days
- Free of pressure ulcers category II, II, IV and incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) category 2 at the start of the study
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with no active or supportive therapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| A protocol tailored to individual risk factors | Procedure or surgery | Tailored repositioning + Standardised incontinence care + TAP |
| The Prevalon® Turn and Position System 2.0 | Device | Standard repositioning + Standardised incontinence care + TAP, Tailored repositioning + Standardised incontinence care + TAP |
| Comfort Shield® barrier cream cloths | Device | Standard repositioning + Standardised incontinence care + TAP, Tailored repositioning + Standardised incontinence care + TAP |
Primary outcome
Turning compliance of nurses within the trial period as assessed by the researcher (unannounced)
Time frame: within 8 days after the start of the study
The researcher wil collect and administer data about turning compliance and compliance with the protocol
6 secondary outcomes
Turning angle
Time frame: within 8 days after the start of the study
Sacrum free of pressure
Time frame: within 8 days after the start of the study
Incidence of pressure ulcers and incontinence-associated dermatitis
Time frame: within 8 days after the start of the study
Comfort and preferences of the caregiver
Time frame: On baseline and at day 8 (the end of the study)
Comfort and tolerance of the patient
Time frame: At day 8 (the end of the study)
Cost-effectiveness of the prevention of pressure ulcers
Time frame: For the duration of the study (8 days)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Mar 2018.
- Background: PubMed 27841440Beeckman D, Van Damme N, Schoonhoven L, Van Lancker A, Kottner J, Beele H, Gray M, Woodward S, Fader M, Van den Bussche K, Van Hecke A, De Meyer D, Verhaeghe S. Interventions for preventing and treating incontinence-associated dermatitis in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 10;11(11):CD011627. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011627.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 24700170Beeckman D, Van Lancker A, Van Hecke A, Verhaeghe S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of incontinence-associated dermatitis, incontinence, and moisture as risk factors for pressure ulcer development. Res Nurs Health. 2014 Jun;37(3):204-18. doi: 10.1002/nur.21593. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30549321De Meyer D, Van Hecke A, Verhaeghe S, Beeckman D. PROTECT - Trial: A cluster RCT to study the effectiveness of a repositioning aid and tailored repositioning to increase repositioning compliance. J Adv Nurs. 2019 May;75(5):1085-1098. doi: 10.1111/jan.13932. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
- Website of the research groupLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Pressure Ulcers
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Not yet recruiting
Pulsed High Intensity Laser Versus Negative Pressure Therapy On Neuropathic Ulcers
Neuropathic Ulcers
Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of ZKARE® Gel and Its Accessory ZKAPI® in the Treatment of Chronic Ulcers.
Chronic Ulcers
Not yet recruiting
The Effectiveness of a Caregiver-Based Multicomponent Intervention to Prevent Pressure Ulcers in Home-Cared-For Individuals With Dementia
Dementia, Home Care for Elderly or Disabled Individuals
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Hypertrophic Scar Prosthetic Pressure in Burn Amputee
Amputation Stump, Burn Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dimitri Beeckman, PhD principal investigator
University Ghent
15 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing A protocol tailored to individual risk factors, The Prevalon® Turn and Position System 2.0 and Comfort Shield® barrier cream cloths in people with Pressure Ulcers and Incontinence-associated Dermatitis, run by University Ghent at 15 sites in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 15 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Turning compliance of nurses within the trial period as assessed by the researcher (unannounced) (time frame: within 8 days after the start of the study). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02690753, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Mar 2018.