Nutritional and Metabolic DiseasesNCT02692495
Evaluation of Potential Screening Tools for Metabolic Body Odor and Halitosis
An observational study of Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases, run by Mebo Research, Inc. at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
This study is designed as a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the potential of diagnostic procedures in defining populations of patients self-reporting unexpected and uncontrollable episodes of body odor and/or halitosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- How many people
- 16 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Apr 2009to Feb 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Individuals reporting idiopathic malodor production
Who may be able to join
- idiopathic malodor experienced over a period of several months or years
- willing and able to complete the study
- good general health
Who cannot join
- elect not to participate in the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Gastrointestinal and Nutritional Diagnostic Tests as Potential Screening Tools for Metabolic Body Odor and Halitosis
This study is designed as a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the potential of diagnostic procedures in defining populations of patients self-reporting unexpected and uncontrollable episodes of body odor and/or halitosis. The cohort - generally healthy individuals who had underwent multiple diagnostic tests recommended by their physicians and had not been diagnosed with any known medical condition - expressed their interest in trying gastrointestinal and nutritional diagnostic tests offered by Biolab Medical Unit. Our retrospective analysis will determine if these tests were useful as potential screening tools for metabolic body odor and halitosis.
Read the detailed description
Many yet uncharacterized medical conditions including inborn and acquired errors of metabolism or skewed microbiome could be responsible for unpredictable and uncontrollable episodes of body odor and halitosis. These conditions have dramatic impact on the quality of life and socioeconomic outcomes of sufferers. Yet clinics and specialized malodor centers do not provide tests for diagnosing malodor other than trimethylaminuria (TMAU). Self-reported odor problems are often dismissed if are not organoleptically evaluated by trained odor judges that are not readily available during malodor flare-ups.
The aim of this study is to analyze effectiveness of existing gastrointestinal and nutritional tests for the assessment and investigation of self-reported malodors.
Diagnostic tests included:
- Gut Permeability Profile. PEG 400 is used as a probe and measured in urine passed for the following 6 hours at 11 different molecular weights to establish the quantity of each absorbed through the gut wall. Extraction and separation of PEG from urine is done by ion exchange chromatography and capillary GLC.
- Gut Fermentation Profile. Blood alcohols - ethanol, methanol, butanol, propanol and short chain fatty acids - are measured by gas-liquid chromatography.
- D-lactate test. D-lactate is measured by centrifugal analysis using the specific enzyme D-lactate dehydrogenase, which does not react with L-lactate
- The urine indicans (Obermeyer) test. Detection of indican in the urine depends upon its decomposition and subsequent oxidation of indoxyl to indigo blue and its absorption into a chloroform layer
- Breath test for small intestinal dysbiosis. Breath hydrogen and methane are measured by gas-liquid chromatography. The patient is given 10 gm of lactulose in 200 ml of water and alveolar air samples are collected every 20 minutes for 3 hours
- Functional B vitamins profile, by measuring the activation of a red cell enzyme that is dependent upon an adequate concentration of a particular vitamin for full activity. The assay relies on normal metabolism of the vitamin to its native form and the presence of other non-vitamin cofactors.
- Conditions
- Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases
- Keywords
- body odor, halitosis, dysbiosis, leaky gut, microbiome, PATM, breath odor
- Medical subject headings
- Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases, Body Odor, Halitosis, Dysbiosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Body odor | individuals self-reporting recurrent episodes of uncontrollable body odor with or without halitosis | |
| Halitosis | individuals with extra-oral halitosis, not complaining of body odors |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Test Results Outside the Normal Range
The investigators would like to evaluate the strength of evidence in diagnostic accuracy of laboratory tests taken by participants (listed in the detailed description of the study), for diagnosing malodor syndromes. Values measured by the laboratory (Biolab Medical Unit) will be compared against the reference range specific to that laboratory.
Measured: four years
Secondary outcomes (3)
Discriminative Biomarkers in the Subgroups of Malodor
The investigators have comprehensively analyzed diagnostic ability of tests taken by participants to correlate with their symptoms using several statistical techniques known to bring out strong patterns in a dataset. Principal component analysis (PCA) allowed to clearly separate data into two clusters ("Sour" and "Sweet") shown below along with the "Lactic" subgroup from the "Sour" group.
Measured: three years
Number of Test Results Outside the Normal Range in Different Subgroups of Malodor
Disciminative biomarkers for groups of malodor discovered using PCA, compared to control group
Measured: Three years
Average Daily Added Sugar Intake Inferred From Self-reported Dietary Data in the Subgroups of Malodor
The measurement of dietary intake of selected nutrients from self-reported food intakes and diet history questionnaires. Correlation of symptoms with added sugar in the diet were noted independently on the source of malodor.
Measured: Three years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2009
- Primary completionDec 2013
- Study completionFeb 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nutritional and Metabolic DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mebo Research, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Irene Gabashvili, PhD, Principal investigator, MeBO Research
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02692495
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 200904010001MEBO
- Status last verified
- Jan 2018
- First submitted
- 16 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 22 Feb 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: de-identified individual participant data will be made partially available
Publications
Chadwick VS, Phillips SF, Hofmann AF. Measurements of intestinal permeability using low molecular weight polyethylene glycols (PEG 400). I. Chemical analysis and biological properties of PEG 400. Gastroenterology. 1977 Aug;73(2):241-6.
PubMed 873124Sivakumaran T, Jenkins RT, Walker WH, Goodacre RL. Simplified measurement of polyethylene glycol 400 in urine. Clin Chem. 1982 Dec;28(12):2452-3. No abstract available.
PubMed 7139937Hunnisett A., Howard J., Davies S. Gut fermentation (or the 'Auto-brewery') Syndrome: A new clinical test with initial observations and discussion of clinical and biochemical implications J.Nutr.Med.1:33-8, 1990
Sheedy JR, Wettenhall RE, Scanlon D, Gooley PR, Lewis DP, McGregor N, Stapleton DI, Butt HL, DE Meirleir KL. Increased d-lactic Acid intestinal bacteria in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. In Vivo. 2009 Jul-Aug;23(4):621-8.
PubMed 19567398Ludvigsen CW, Thurn JR, Pierpont GL, Eckfeldt JH. Kinetic enzymic assay for D(-)-lactate, with use of a centrifugal analyzer. Clin Chem. 1983 Oct;29(10):1823-5.
PubMed 6616831Jenq RR. How's your microbiota? Let's check your urine. Blood. 2015 Oct 1;126(14):1641-2. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-08-661504.
PubMed 26429966Khoshini R, Dai SC, Lezcano S, Pimentel M. A systematic review of diagnostic tests for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Dig Dis Sci. 2008 Jun;53(6):1443-54. doi: 10.1007/s10620-007-0065-1.
PubMed 17990113Drossman DA. The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome III process. Gastroenterology. 2006 Apr;130(5):1377-90. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.03.008. No abstract available.
PubMed 16678553Mount JN, Heduan E, Herd C, Jupp R, Kearney E, Marsh A. Adaptation of coenzyme stimulation assays for the nutritional assessment of vitamins B1, B2 and B6 using the Cobas Bio centrifugal analyser. Ann Clin Biochem. 1987 Jan;24 ( Pt 1):41-6. doi: 10.1177/000456328702400106.
PubMed 3827183
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Feb 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Gastrointestinal and Nutritional Diagnostic Tests as Potential Screening Tools for Metabolic Body Odor and Halitosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02692495
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 200904010001MEBO
- Conditions
- Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases
- Keywords
- body odor, halitosis, dysbiosis, leaky gut, microbiome, PATM, breath odor
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mebo Research, Inc.University, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2009
- Primary completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Jan 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is designed as a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the potential of diagnostic procedures in defining populations of patients self-reporting unexpected and uncontrollable episodes of body odor and/or halitosis. The cohort - generally healthy individuals who had underwent multiple diagnostic tests recommended by their physicians and had not been diagnosed with any known medical condition - expressed their interest in trying gastrointestinal and nutritional diagnostic tests offered by Biolab Medical Unit. Our retrospective analysis will determine if these tests were useful as potential screening tools for metabolic body odor and halitosis.
Detailed description
Many yet uncharacterized medical conditions including inborn and acquired errors of metabolism or skewed microbiome could be responsible for unpredictable and uncontrollable episodes of body odor and halitosis. These conditions have dramatic impact on the quality of life and socioeconomic outcomes of sufferers. Yet clinics and specialized malodor centers do not provide tests for diagnosing malodor other than trimethylaminuria (TMAU). Self-reported odor problems are often dismissed if are not organoleptically evaluated by trained odor judges that are not readily available during malodor flare-ups.
The aim of this study is to analyze effectiveness of existing gastrointestinal and nutritional tests for the assessment and investigation of self-reported malodors.
Diagnostic tests included:
- Gut Permeability Profile. PEG 400 is used as a probe and measured in urine passed for the following 6 hours at 11 different molecular weights to establish the quantity of each absorbed through the gut wall. Extraction and separation of PEG from urine is done by ion exchange chromatography and capillary GLC.
- Gut Fermentation Profile. Blood alcohols - ethanol, methanol, butanol, propanol and short chain fatty acids - are measured by gas-liquid chromatography.
- D-lactate test. D-lactate is measured by centrifugal analysis using the specific enzyme D-lactate dehydrogenase, which does not react with L-lactate
- The urine indicans (Obermeyer) test. Detection of indican in the urine depends upon its decomposition and subsequent oxidation of indoxyl to indigo blue and its absorption into a chloroform layer
- Breath test for small intestinal dysbiosis. Breath hydrogen and methane are measured by gas-liquid chromatography. The patient is given 10 gm of lactulose in 200 ml of water and alveolar air samples are collected every 20 minutes for 3 hours
- Functional B vitamins profile, by measuring the activation of a red cell enzyme that is dependent upon an adequate concentration of a particular vitamin for full activity. The assay relies on normal metabolism of the vitamin to its native form and the presence of other non-vitamin cofactors.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Body odor | – | –individuals self-reporting recurrent episodes of uncontrollable body odor with or without halitosis |
| Halitosis | – | –individuals with extra-oral halitosis, not complaining of body odors |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Individuals reporting idiopathic malodor production
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- idiopathic malodor experienced over a period of several months or years
- willing and able to complete the study
- good general health
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- elect not to participate in the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Number of Test Results Outside the Normal Range
Time frame: four years
The investigators would like to evaluate the strength of evidence in diagnostic accuracy of laboratory tests taken by participants (listed in the detailed description of the study), for diagnosing malodor syndromes. Values measured by the laboratory (Biolab Medical Unit) will be compared against the reference range specific to that laboratory.
3 secondary outcomes
Discriminative Biomarkers in the Subgroups of Malodor
Time frame: three years
Number of Test Results Outside the Normal Range in Different Subgroups of Malodor
Time frame: Three years
Average Daily Added Sugar Intake Inferred From Self-reported Dietary Data in the Subgroups of Malodor
Time frame: Three years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Feb 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 873124Chadwick VS, Phillips SF, Hofmann AF. Measurements of intestinal permeability using low molecular weight polyethylene glycols (PEG 400). I. Chemical analysis and biological properties of PEG 400. Gastroenterology. 1977 Aug;73(2):241-6.
- Background: PubMed 7139937Sivakumaran T, Jenkins RT, Walker WH, Goodacre RL. Simplified measurement of polyethylene glycol 400 in urine. Clin Chem. 1982 Dec;28(12):2452-3. No abstract available.
- BackgroundHunnisett A., Howard J., Davies S. Gut fermentation (or the 'Auto-brewery') Syndrome: A new clinical test with initial observations and discussion of clinical and biochemical implications J.Nutr.Med.1:33-8, 1990
- Background: PubMed 19567398Sheedy JR, Wettenhall RE, Scanlon D, Gooley PR, Lewis DP, McGregor N, Stapleton DI, Butt HL, DE Meirleir KL. Increased d-lactic Acid intestinal bacteria in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. In Vivo. 2009 Jul-Aug;23(4):621-8.
- Background: PubMed 6616831Ludvigsen CW, Thurn JR, Pierpont GL, Eckfeldt JH. Kinetic enzymic assay for D(-)-lactate, with use of a centrifugal analyzer. Clin Chem. 1983 Oct;29(10):1823-5.
- Background: PubMed 26429966Jenq RR. How's your microbiota? Let's check your urine. Blood. 2015 Oct 1;126(14):1641-2. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-08-661504.
- Background: PubMed 17990113Khoshini R, Dai SC, Lezcano S, Pimentel M. A systematic review of diagnostic tests for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Dig Dis Sci. 2008 Jun;53(6):1443-54. doi: 10.1007/s10620-007-0065-1.
- Background: PubMed 16678553Drossman DA. The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome III process. Gastroenterology. 2006 Apr;130(5):1377-90. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.03.008. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 3827183Mount JN, Heduan E, Herd C, Jupp R, Kearney E, Marsh A. Adaptation of coenzyme stimulation assays for the nutritional assessment of vitamins B1, B2 and B6 using the Cobas Bio centrifugal analyser. Ann Clin Biochem. 1987 Jan;24 ( Pt 1):41-6. doi: 10.1177/000456328702400106.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. de-identified individual participant data will be made partially available
Related trials for Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
RecruitingObservational study
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) Prospective Trial for Obesity (EGO-Trial)
Obesity
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Irene Gabashvili, PhD principal investigator
MeBO Research
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases, run by Mebo Research, Inc. at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Jan 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Test Results Outside the Normal Range (time frame: four years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02692495, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Feb 2018.