SurgeryHIPARTINCT02692807
Arthroscopic Surgical Procedures vs Sham Surgery for Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement and/or Labral Tears.
A study testing Arthroscopic surgical procedures in people with Surgery, run by Oslo University Hospital at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The primary aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of hip arthroscopic surgery compared to a sham surgery (diagnostic arthroscopy only) for patients with symptomatic and radiological findings related to impingement (FAI) and/or labral tears using a randomized controlled design (HIPARTI Study: Primary aim and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Surgery
- What is being tested?
- Arthroscopic surgical procedures
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 140 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Feb 2016to Dec 2035
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- hip pain during daily and/or spor t ing activities;
- intra-articular hip pain with radiological signs of FAI and/or labral tears eligible for hip arthroscopy (to be determined in a pragmatic fashion by the surgeon based on clinical examination and imaging
- the patient is able to give written informed consent and to participate fully in the interventions and follow-up procedures
Who cannot join
- pain that is not confirmed by physical examination of the hip
- evidence of preexisting osteoarthritis, defined as Tonnis grade >1, or less than 3mm superior joint space width on AP pelvic radiograph
- center edge angle on radiograph <25°; (v) previous known hip pathology such as Perthes' disease, slipped upper femoral epiphysis or avascular necrosis
- previous hip injury such as acetabular fracture, hip dislocation or femoral neck fracture
- previous hip surgery
- medical conditions complicating surgery (ASA 3); (ix) inflammatory joint disease (RA, Bechterew etc)
Show all 10Show fewer
- physical inability to undertake testing procedures
- expected lack of compliance such as cognitive impairment, drug abuse or similar;
- inability to understand the written and spoken language of the treatment centre;
- contra-indications to placebo surgery, which will include large loose body, chondral flap >1cm2 detached at 3 sides, complete labral radial flap tear and labral bucket-handle tear with complete avulsion >1.5cm long
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries.
2 sites in 2 countries
Australia1 site
LaTrobe University, School Allied Health, College of Science, Helath and Engineering
Melbourne, Victoria, 3086
Norway1 site
Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital
Oslo, 4956
About this study
Official title: Arthroscopic Surgical Procedures Versus Sham Surgery for Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement and/or Labral Tears. A Multicentre, International, Double-blinded Randomized, Controlled Trial.
The primary aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of hip arthroscopic surgery compared to a sham surgery (diagnostic arthroscopy only) for patients with symptomatic and radiological findings related to impingement (FAI) and/or labral tears using a randomized controlled design (HIPARTI Study: Primary aim and the main paper: primary end point: iHOT 1 year follow-up)).
Our main hypothesis is that surgical procedures of the hip will demonstrate greater efficacy than sham surgery (diagnostic hip arthroscopy only) for hip related quality of life (iHOT-33) after 1 year and at further (HIPARTI Study).
The secondary aim of this study is to establish modifiable risk factors associated with pain, function, work participation and quality of life over 1 year in people aged 18-50 years with hip impingement and/or labral tears diagnosed at hip arthroscopy. (HARP Study: A separate paper will be published with this main aim for the HARP Study) Long-term follow-ups for HIPARTI Study as well as HARP Study will be performed at 2, 5 and 10 years (secondary aims and separate papers).
Read the detailed description
This is a multicenter, international, assessor and patient blinded clinical RCT with two groups (primary aim). the HIPARTI Study with The design of this trial conforms to the SPIRIT guidelines.
All patients with hip pain eligible for hip arthroscopy in our routine care pathways will be identified in our outpatient clinics. Consultant orthopedic surgeons will determine a patient's eligibility for the study (based on inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study) and members of their team introduce the study to the patients and refer them to the research coordinators for further information. Patients will be provided with oral and written information about the study and be introduced to our consent form. If interest continues the patient will be provided with further information and arrangements will be made for a baseline appointment for assessment and consenting.
The baseline assessment appointments will occur within one month of the initial approach. At the baseline appointment patients will meet with the research coordinator and the independent research assistant/tester (physical therapist) who will be the blinded tester. Patients will return their signed informed consent form and baseline questions completed. Those who are not willing to participate in the RCT (HIPARTI Study), will be asked if interested in being included in a prospective longitudinal cohort study including similar baseline and follow-up tests as those in the RCT (this will be the HARP Study with separate papers published). All patients in the HARP Study will undergo hip arthroscopy surgery. The Australian site will include most of their patients in the HARP Study, since the majority of orthopedic surgeons working privately will not participate in the HIPARTI Study. Data collection will be performed electronically for both the HIPARTI and the HARP Studies entering all data in the approved Checkware system (www.checkware.no).
Each collaborating center will apply to the ethical committee and the Data Inspectorate in each country/institution. Approval was confirmed for Oslo University Hospital (HIPARTI) and Australia (HARP Study) in January 2016.
Randomization (HIPARTI) will occur prior to surgery, after final eligibility is confirmed. Randomizations will be performed centrally using an automated computer generated system. Block randomization and stratification for each center will be performed.
All patients will undergo imaging (which may include CT scan or at least 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging MRI) prior to the surgical assessment as part of routine care. All patients will also undergo standardized radiographs of the hips and pelvis also as part of routine care. Plain radiographs will be examined for evidence of osteoarthritis as joint space narrowing, osteophytes, cysts and subchondral hypertrophy. Several radiographic measurements will be performed among them: the alpha angle and lateral center-edge angle will be determined for the presence of FAI. Radiographs will also be part of follow-ups.
Participating orthopedic surgeons will be asked to coordinate their waiting lists to ensure the hip arthroscopy patients are called for surgery in accordance with the study protocol. Ideally, patients will complete their baseline assessment as close to the randomized treatment as possible (within 1 months). In the event that surgery cannot be performed within 1 month after baseline assessment, the same questions and assessments completed at baseline will be completed again. The standard followed-ups at the 6 months and 1 year include primary and secondary outcomes. One year is the primary end point where randomization code will be broken according to a predefined published statistical protocol (HIPARTI).
At all follow-ups the research coordinator/independent tester will attend. At the 6 month follow-up an independent orthopedic surgeon will attend regularly and take care of patients who are not satisfied. The aim is to use the following criteria as subjective complaint: equal or worse than 10 points for the IHOT-33 score compared to baseline. All patients can withdraw without giving a reason at any time (stated in the consent form that all patients need to sign). An unblinded orthopedic surgeon will of course be able to have access to the medical record regarding performed procedures at any time if need for the health of the patient.
All patients (in both groups in the RCT (HIPARTI) as well as in the HARP study) will undergo a postoperative rehabilitation program based on the best available evidence. Each patient will be treated by physical therapists who will be trained and proficient in post-hip arthroscopy rehabilitation. Rehabilitation will be delivered a minimum of 8 sessions over 3-months and then once a month for the following three months. Details of rehabilitation are outlined in Appendix Rehabilitation. This contains a treatment algorithm to guide clinical reasoning and progression of treatment (manual therapy, exercises and education) through weeks 1-12.
Long term follow-ups will be performed at 2, 5 and 10 years Due to lack of studies published within this field: clinical relevant differences as well as changes within groups and SD are difficult to estimate. Our sample size calculations are based on primary outcome iHOT 33 at 1 year: estimated effect-size to 0.6 and a power of 90, will give 60 in each group, and with expected 15% dropout will give 138 patients in total. Electronic randomization lists will be generated, and estimations of inclusion rates per site are included. Statistical analysis procedures will be published and analysis performed prior to opening the group allocation when all patients are included and followed through to the 1 year follow-up (main outcome).
- Conditions
- Surgery
- Being tested
- Arthroscopic surgical procedures
- Keywords
- hip arthroscopy, femoroacetabular impingement, exercise therapy after hip arthroscopy, rehabilitation after hip arthroscopy
- Medical subject headings
- Femoracetabular Impingement
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Arthroscopic surgical proceduresProcedure or surgery
Also called Sham Surgery
See arm/group description of Arthroscopic surgery and sham surgery (HIPARTI). HARP: only arthroscopic surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hip arthroscopy surgical procedures (HIPARTI Study) | Active comparator | Surgery is performed under general anaesthesia. Traction and joint access is controlled by fluoroscopy. A diagnostic round in the central and peripheral compartment is performed. Labrum, cartilage, and other possible conditions are looked for and findings are documented. Any labral, chondral and bony pathology (cam or pincer) is treated. Labrum may be debrided, sutured, detached and refixed if needed to treat a pincer lesion. Labrum is secured with suture anchors. Pincer and cam resection is performed using an arthroscopic burr. Cartilage lesions maybe left untreated or treated with debridement or microfracture. Receives: Procedure: Arthroscopic surgical procedures |
| Sham surgery (HIPARTI Study) | Placebo comparator | The same arthroscopic procedures as stated above are preformed, but no surgical interventions related to Cam, Pincer, or labral tear are performed, only diagnostic round in the central and peripheral compartment is performed. Labrum, cartilage, and other possible conditions are looked for and findings are documented. Receives: Procedure: Arthroscopic surgical procedures |
| Prospective Cohort (HARP Study) | Active comparator | Those that are not willing to be included in the RCT (HIPARTI Study), will be asked if they are willing to be included in the prospective cohort, or ongoing in countries were ONLY the surgery is performed (Australia). They will sign an informed concent and will undergo surgical interventions as part of usual care. Outcomes collected and follow-ups will be the same as for the RCT (HIPARTI). Receives: Procedure: Arthroscopic surgical procedures |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
International Hip Outcome Tool (IHOT-33)
Patient-reported outcome measure (PRO)
Measured: Baseline, 6,12 an 24 months follow-ups - 1 year follow-up is main outcome
Secondary outcomes (11)
Expectations of surgery
Questionnaire
Measured: Baseline
HOOS - Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Patient-reported outcome measure (PRO) 5 subscales
Measured: Baseline, 6,12 an 24 months follow-ups - only in some study sites
ASES Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale
Self-Efficacy Scale questionnaire
Measured: Baseline, 6,12 an 24 months follow-ups
Tampa scale of Kinesiophobia
Fear of movement questionnaire
Measured: Baseline, 6,12 an 24 months follow-ups
Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS)
Activity Level (type)
Measured: Baseline, 6,12 an 24 months follow-ups
Work place Activity Limitation Survey (WALS)
Questionnaire (only for some of the study sites)- only in some study sites
Measured: Baseline, 6,12 an 24 months follow-ups
Patient Specific Functional Scale
Patient report on 3 specific activities and their limitations - only in some study sites
Measured: Baseline, 6,12 an 24 months follow-up
Measures of hip physical impairment:
Range of motion
Measured: Baseline, 6,12 an 24 months follow-ups
Hip muscle strength
Dynamometer
Measured: Baseline, 6,12 an 24 months follow-ups
Single leg squat performance
Performance tests - only in some study sites
Measured: Baseline, 6,12 an 24 months follow-ups
Total Hip Replacement.
Data from the Norwegian National Joint Registry on total hip joint arthroplasty (or similar registries from the other countries)
Measured: 1, 2, 5 and 10 years follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2016
- Primary completionMay 2024
- Study completionDec 2035 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Oslo University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The RCT part of the HIPARTI Study has 2 arms, but there is also a prospective longitudinal study of those who are either not willing to participate in the RCT, or where the study takes part in collaborating countries were there is ONLY the prospective longitudinal ongoing (Australia). This part of the study is the HARP study. The HIPARTI consists on one RCT trial with two parallel arms, and one prospective cohort, the HARP study.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oslo University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- La Trobe University, University of Aarhus, Lund University, University of Oxford, University of Ottawa
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, May Arna Risberg, Oslo University Hospital
- Investigators
- May Arna Risberg, PT, PhD, Principal investigator, Oslo University HospitalLars Nordsletten, MD, PhD, Study director, Oslo University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02692807
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NAR-1- 2016
- Other IDs
- 2015091
- Acronym
- HIPARTI
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 15 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 25 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Data will be shared across the sites participating in the HIPARTI and the HARP Study, according to the protocol and the decisions made by the Advisory Committee
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Arthroscopic Surgical Procedures Versus Sham Surgery for Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement and/or Labral Tears. A Multicentre, International, Double-blinded Randomized, Controlled Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02692807
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HIPARTI / NAR-1- 2016
- Conditions
- Surgery
- Keywords
- hip arthroscopy, femoroacetabular impingement, exercise therapy after hip arthroscopy, rehabilitation after hip arthroscopy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Oslo University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- La Trobe University, University of Aarhus, Lund University, University of Oxford, University of Ottawa
- Study start
- Feb 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- May 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2035 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of hip arthroscopic surgery compared to a sham surgery (diagnostic arthroscopy only) for patients with symptomatic and radiological findings related to impingement (FAI) and/or labral tears using a randomized controlled design (HIPARTI Study: Primary aim and the main paper: primary end point: iHOT 1 year follow-up)).
Our main hypothesis is that surgical procedures of the hip will demonstrate greater efficacy than sham surgery (diagnostic hip arthroscopy only) for hip related quality of life (iHOT-33) after 1 year and at further (HIPARTI Study).
The secondary aim of this study is to establish modifiable risk factors associated with pain, function, work participation and quality of life over 1 year in people aged 18-50 years with hip impingement and/or labral tears diagnosed at hip arthroscopy. (HARP Study: A separate paper will be published with this main aim for the HARP Study) Long-term follow-ups for HIPARTI Study as well as HARP Study will be performed at 2, 5 and 10 years (secondary aims and separate papers).
Detailed description
This is a multicenter, international, assessor and patient blinded clinical RCT with two groups (primary aim). the HIPARTI Study with The design of this trial conforms to the SPIRIT guidelines.
All patients with hip pain eligible for hip arthroscopy in our routine care pathways will be identified in our outpatient clinics. Consultant orthopedic surgeons will determine a patient's eligibility for the study (based on inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study) and members of their team introduce the study to the patients and refer them to the research coordinators for further information. Patients will be provided with oral and written information about the study and be introduced to our consent form. If interest continues the patient will be provided with further information and arrangements will be made for a baseline appointment for assessment and consenting.
The baseline assessment appointments will occur within one month of the initial approach. At the baseline appointment patients will meet with the research coordinator and the independent research assistant/tester (physical therapist) who will be the blinded tester. Patients will return their signed informed consent form and baseline questions completed. Those who are not willing to participate in the RCT (HIPARTI Study), will be asked if interested in being included in a prospective longitudinal cohort study including similar baseline and follow-up tests as those in the RCT (this will be the HARP Study with separate papers published). All patients in the HARP Study will undergo hip arthroscopy surgery. The Australian site will include most of their patients in the HARP Study, since the majority of orthopedic surgeons working privately will not participate in the HIPARTI Study. Data collection will be performed electronically for both the HIPARTI and the HARP Studies entering all data in the approved Checkware system (www.checkware.no).
Each collaborating center will apply to the ethical committee and the Data Inspectorate in each country/institution. Approval was confirmed for Oslo University Hospital (HIPARTI) and Australia (HARP Study) in January 2016.
Randomization (HIPARTI) will occur prior to surgery, after final eligibility is confirmed. Randomizations will be performed centrally using an automated computer generated system. Block randomization and stratification for each center will be performed.
All patients will undergo imaging (which may include CT scan or at least 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging MRI) prior to the surgical assessment as part of routine care. All patients will also undergo standardized radiographs of the hips and pelvis also as part of routine care. Plain radiographs will be examined for evidence of osteoarthritis as joint space narrowing, osteophytes, cysts and subchondral hypertrophy. Several radiographic measurements will be performed among them: the alpha angle and lateral center-edge angle will be determined for the presence of FAI. Radiographs will also be part of follow-ups.
Participating orthopedic surgeons will be asked to coordinate their waiting lists to ensure the hip arthroscopy patients are called for surgery in accordance with the study protocol. Ideally, patients will complete their baseline assessment as close to the randomized treatment as possible (within 1 months). In the event that surgery cannot be performed within 1 month after baseline assessment, the same questions and assessments completed at baseline will be completed again. The standard followed-ups at the 6 months and 1 year include primary and secondary outcomes. One year is the primary end point where randomization code will be broken according to a predefined published statistical protocol (HIPARTI).
At all follow-ups the research coordinator/independent tester will attend. At the 6 month follow-up an independent orthopedic surgeon will attend regularly and take care of patients who are not satisfied. The aim is to use the following criteria as subjective complaint: equal or worse than 10 points for the IHOT-33 score compared to baseline. All patients can withdraw without giving a reason at any time (stated in the consent form that all patients need to sign). An unblinded orthopedic surgeon will of course be able to have access to the medical record regarding performed procedures at any time if need for the health of the patient.
All patients (in both groups in the RCT (HIPARTI) as well as in the HARP study) will undergo a postoperative rehabilitation program based on the best available evidence. Each patient will be treated by physical therapists who will be trained and proficient in post-hip arthroscopy rehabilitation. Rehabilitation will be delivered a minimum of 8 sessions over 3-months and then once a month for the following three months. Details of rehabilitation are outlined in Appendix Rehabilitation. This contains a treatment algorithm to guide clinical reasoning and progression of treatment (manual therapy, exercises and education) through weeks 1-12.
Long term follow-ups will be performed at 2, 5 and 10 years Due to lack of studies published within this field: clinical relevant differences as well as changes within groups and SD are difficult to estimate. Our sample size calculations are based on primary outcome iHOT 33 at 1 year: estimated effect-size to 0.6 and a power of 90, will give 60 in each group, and with expected 15% dropout will give 138 patients in total. Electronic randomization lists will be generated, and estimations of inclusion rates per site are included. Statistical analysis procedures will be published and analysis performed prior to opening the group allocation when all patients are included and followed through to the 1 year follow-up (main outcome).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- The RCT part of the HIPARTI Study has 2 arms, but there is also a prospective longitudinal study of those who are either not willing to participate in the RCT, or where the study takes part in collaborating countries were there is ONLY the prospective longitudinal ongoing (Australia). This part of the study is the HARP study. The HIPARTI consists on one RCT trial with two parallel arms, and one prospective cohort, the HARP study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hip arthroscopy surgical procedures (HIPARTI Study) | Active comparator | Procedure: Arthroscopic surgical proceduresSurgery is performed under general anaesthesia. Traction and joint access is controlled by fluoroscopy. A diagnostic round in the central and peripheral compartment is performed. Labrum, cartilage, and other possible conditions are looked for and findings are documented. Any labral, chondral and bony pathology (cam or pincer) is treated. Labrum may be debrided, sutured, detached and refixed if needed to treat a pincer lesion. Labrum is secured with suture anchors. Pincer and cam resection is performed using an arthroscopic burr. Cartilage lesions maybe left untreated or treated with debridement or microfracture. |
| Sham surgery (HIPARTI Study) | Placebo comparator | Procedure: Arthroscopic surgical proceduresThe same arthroscopic procedures as stated above are preformed, but no surgical interventions related to Cam, Pincer, or labral tear are performed, only diagnostic round in the central and peripheral compartment is performed. Labrum, cartilage, and other possible conditions are looked for and findings are documented. |
| Prospective Cohort (HARP Study) | Active comparator | Procedure: Arthroscopic surgical proceduresThose that are not willing to be included in the RCT (HIPARTI Study), will be asked if they are willing to be included in the prospective cohort, or ongoing in countries were ONLY the surgery is performed (Australia). They will sign an informed concent and will undergo surgical interventions as part of usual care. Outcomes collected and follow-ups will be the same as for the RCT (HIPARTI). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- hip pain during daily and/or spor t ing activities;
- intra-articular hip pain with radiological signs of FAI and/or labral tears eligible for hip arthroscopy (to be determined in a pragmatic fashion by the surgeon based on clinical examination and imaging
- the patient is able to give written informed consent and to participate fully in the interventions and follow-up procedures
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- pain that is not confirmed by physical examination of the hip
- evidence of preexisting osteoarthritis, defined as Tonnis grade >1, or less than 3mm superior joint space width on AP pelvic radiograph
- center edge angle on radiograph <25°; (v) previous known hip pathology such as Perthes' disease, slipped upper femoral epiphysis or avascular necrosis
- previous hip injury such as acetabular fracture, hip dislocation or femoral neck fracture
- previous hip surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Arthroscopic surgical proceduresAlso: Sham SurgerySee arm/group description of Arthroscopic surgery and sham surgery (HIPARTI). HARP: only arthroscopic surgery | Procedure or surgery | Hip arthroscopy surgical procedures (HIPARTI Study), Prospective Cohort (HARP Study), Sham surgery (HIPARTI Study) |
Primary outcome
International Hip Outcome Tool (IHOT-33)
Time frame: Baseline, 6,12 an 24 months follow-ups - 1 year follow-up is main outcome
Patient-reported outcome measure (PRO)
11 secondary outcomes
Expectations of surgery
Time frame: Baseline
HOOS - Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Time frame: Baseline, 6,12 an 24 months follow-ups - only in some study sites
ASES Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale
Time frame: Baseline, 6,12 an 24 months follow-ups
Tampa scale of Kinesiophobia
Time frame: Baseline, 6,12 an 24 months follow-ups
Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS)
Time frame: Baseline, 6,12 an 24 months follow-ups
Work place Activity Limitation Survey (WALS)
Time frame: Baseline, 6,12 an 24 months follow-ups
Patient Specific Functional Scale
Time frame: Baseline, 6,12 an 24 months follow-up
Measures of hip physical impairment:
Time frame: Baseline, 6,12 an 24 months follow-ups
Hip muscle strength
Time frame: Baseline, 6,12 an 24 months follow-ups
Single leg squat performance
Time frame: Baseline, 6,12 an 24 months follow-ups
Total Hip Replacement.
Time frame: 1, 2, 5 and 10 years follow-up
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Mar 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Data will be shared across the sites participating in the HIPARTI and the HARP Study, according to the protocol and the decisions made by the Advisory Committee
Related trials for Surgery
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
RecruitingPhase 1
Serial Amnioinfusions as Regenerative Therapy for Pulmonary Hypoplasia
Renal Failure Congenital, Congenital Renal Anomaly Nos
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
May Arna Risberg, PT, PhD principal investigator
Oslo University Hospital
Lars Nordsletten, MD, PhD study director
Oslo University Hospital
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Arthroscopic surgical procedures in people with Surgery, run by Oslo University Hospital at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Australia, Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
International Hip Outcome Tool (IHOT-33) (time frame: Baseline, 6,12 an 24 months follow-ups - 1 year follow-up is main outcome). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Mar 2025.