Preterm BirthPreProNCT02692820
Preventing Preterm Birth With Probiotics
A study testing Probiotic in people with Preterm Birth, run by Queen Mary University of London at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Babies born preterm (before completing 37 weeks in the womb) are at increased risk of long-term disability and death. The investigators do not fully understand the cause(s) of preterm birth but it occurs more frequently when the normal, healthy bacteria (called Lactobacilli) in a woman's birth canal are replaced with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Preterm Birth
- What is being tested?
- Probiotic
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 304 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- May 2016to Jun 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women aged 16 years and over at the time of the booking appointment.
- Women who are between 9-14 weeks gestation at the time of the dating scan.
Who cannot join
- Lack of informed, written consent
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom2 sites
Barts Health NHS Trust
London, E1 1BB
Homerton University Hospital
London, E9 6SR
About this study
Official title: Preventing Preterm Birth With Probiotics - Pilot Randomised Trial
Babies born preterm (before completing 37 weeks in the womb) are at increased risk of long-term disability and death. The investigators do not fully understand the cause(s) of preterm birth but it occurs more frequently when the normal, healthy bacteria (called Lactobacilli) in a woman's birth canal are replaced with unhealthy bacteria. Previous attempts to get rid of the unhealthy bacteria with antibiotics have not shown to affect the risk of preterm birth. The reason for this may be that what is required is the replacement of Lactobacilli in the birth canal. This can be done by asking women to take capsules containing lactobacilli once daily. To study whether oral Lactobacilli capsules compared with dummy capsules can reduce the risk of preterm birth, a large study involving approximately 10,000 women would be required. But the investigators do not know whether women would agree to take part in and complete such a study, and this is what the investigators wish to study in the small, initial study described here. The results of this study will show whether probiotics produce the desired biological effects on vaginal bacteria, and whether it would be feasible to perform the larger, definitive study of their effectiveness in prevention of preterm birth.
Read the detailed description
Preterm birth (PTB) is defined as the birth of a baby before the completion of 37 weeks gestation in the womb. It is the major cause of infant mortality particularly during the first month of life. Approximately 75 per cent of babies who die during the first 28 days of life are born before 37 weeks gestation. Survivors of PTB are at increased risk of long-term disabilities such as cerebral palsy, sight and hearing impairment, learning and behavioural problems, epilepsy, and hospital readmissions. Even late preterm births, defined as PTB at 34--36 weeks gestation, which account for 70% of all preterm births in England and Wales, are at increased risk of death and disability compared with babies born at term. Although the prevalence of adverse long--term outcome is highest among children born at the earliest gestational ages, the much higher number of births at 34--36 weeks of gestation compared with earlier gestations means that this group of children makes a major contribution to the number of children adversely affected. PTB and its consequences can have negative emotional and psychosocial impacts on parents and families.
In addition to its impact on individuals and families, the financial consequences for the public sector of caring for children born preterm are significant. The cost of care up to the age of 18 for children born preterm has been estimated to exceed £3 billion per year in England and Wales at 2006 prices. It has been estimated that a hypothetical intervention that delayed PTB by 1 week across all gestational age categories would reduce the public sector cost of PTB by £1 billion annually.
About one third of PTBs occur because early delivery is indicated due to complications in the mother or the unborn baby (fetus); the remaining two thirds occur spontaneously. The rate of PTB has increased by 19% from 1990 to 2010 in developed countries. At the same time, there has been a marked improvement in the survival rates of PTBs but a similar reduction in adverse outcomes has not been seen. Thus, the absolute numbers of individuals adversely affected is increasing.
Infection within the womb (intrauterine infection) is strongly associated with spontaneous PTB. The commonest pathway for intrauterine infection is the ascent of unhealthy bacteria from the vagina and cervix into the womb. Bacterial vaginosis (BV), in which the normally dominant healthy bacteria in the vagina (lactobacilli) are replaced with unhealthy bacteria, is strongly associated with PTB. Lactobacilli, principally the strains that produce higher levels of the chemical hydrogen peroxide, appear to protect against BV and reduce the risk of PTB.
Despite substantial evidence linking BV with PTB, the results of trials of antibiotic treatment of BV in pregnancy have not produced clear evidence of benefit. The reason for this might be that it is not the eradication of unhealthy bacteria that is required but rather the replacement of unhealthy bacteria with the normally dominant lactobacilli. One way of achieving this could be by administering lactobacilli-containing capsules (probiotics) to pregnant women. Oral probiotics taken during pregnancy may directly alter the vaginal bacteria and in so doing protect the cervical opening from ascending infection.
The investigators have formally reviewed the medical literature on the use of probiotics to prevent PTB. There is some evidence from medical trials which suggests that probiotics taken during pregnancy can reduce the risk of PTB but the trials have either been too small or of poor quality for the results to be conclusive. The results of an observational study on nearly 19,000 pregnant women suggested that probiotic- containing foods reduced the risk of spontaneous PTB.
The best way to determine whether probiotics can reduce the risk of PTB is by performing a type of study called a double-blind, randomised controlled trial (RCT). In such a trial, the participants are allocated to receive either probiotic supplements or dummy (placebo) supplements. The allocation to a particular supplement is purely by chance (random) and neither the participants nor the researchers know the allocation of any participant until the end of the trial (double-blind). Then, by looking at the difference in the rate of PTB between the groups it would be possible to say whether probiotics can reduce the rate of PTB. The investigators have estimated that an RCT that could detect a useful difference in the rate of PTB between the two groups would require the participation of approximately 10,000 women and cost several million pounds. Given that approximately 20,000 deliveries occur annually in inner North East London alone, there are sufficient women in this region who would be eligible for participation in such a RCT. However, the willingness of women to participate in and complete such a trial is unknown.
A small, pilot trial is required to determine what proportion of pregnant women would participate in a probiotics and PTB trial and the proportion that would complete the study. The proposal here, the PrePro trial, is designed to gather these data which will inform the feasibility, planning and execution of a large RCT looking at the effects of probiotics on PTB.
Potential risks and benefits of probiotics The World Health Organisation defines probiotics as live micro-organisms that confer a health benefit on the host when administered in adequate amounts. They can displace and kill pathogens, and modulate the immune response by interfering with the inflammatory cascade that can cause preterm labour. Administration of probiotics by mouth or intravaginally is safe and effective in reducing the incidence of or treating urogenital infections. There is no evidence of adverse consequences for mothers or their infants as a result of probiotic exposure during pregnancy. Acceptability of and compliance with daily ingestion of probiotic or placebo for a few weeks during mid-pregnancy was found to be high. The particular probiotic strains proposed for this study have been shown to be acceptable to and safe in pregnant women, and can colonise the vagina within 4 weeks of commencing oral intake.
A large intervention trial of ingesting oral capsules from early pregnancy to the end of gestation has not been performed in the UK. For such a trial to be successful, it is essential to gather data that will inform its feasibility, planning and execution. PrePro is designed to provide these data. This trial will be conducted in compliance with the study protocol, relevant regulations, and the MRC Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (GCP).
- Conditions
- Preterm Birth
- Being tested
- Probiotic, Placebo Comparator
- Keywords
- Preterm, Probiotic
- Medical subject headings
- Premature Birth
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ProbioticDietary supplement
The probiotic capsule contains the two probiotics Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 (GR-1) and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 (RC-14). The product contains freeze-dried bacteria and excipients in a gelatin capsule;
Placebo ComparatorOther
The placebo contains excipients alone in a gelatin capsule
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Probiotic | Experimental | Those who provide consent will be randomised to receive once daily for the remainder of their pregnancy capsules of probiotics (containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 (each at 2.5 x 109 colony forming units (CFUs)). The product contains freeze-dried bacteria and excipients in a gelatin capsule. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Probiotic |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Those who provide consent will be randomised to receive once daily for the remainder of their pregnancy capsules of the placebo containing excipients alone in a gelatin capsule Receives: Other: Placebo Comparator |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The microbiological effect of the probiotic on the vaginal flora during pregnancy,
To evaluate the microbiological effects of probiotics on vaginal flora the investigators will compare treatments groups regarding the proportion of women with bacterial vaginosis (BV) at delivery and the proportion of women with vaginal colonisation with intervention strains at delivery.
Measured: 18 months
The proportion of eligible women recruited into the trial
The primary analysis will also involve the estimation of the proportions of the primary outcomes (i.e. eligible women recruited into the trial, recruited women who complete the trial and adhere to the intervention treatment until delivery).
Measured: 18 months
The proportions of recruited women who complete the trial and adhere to the intervention until delivery
The primary analysis will also involve the estimation of the proportions of the primary outcomes (i.e. eligible women recruited into the trial, recruited women who complete the trial and adhere to the intervention treatment until delivery).
Measured: 18 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Questionnaire/interview assessment of reasons for participation and non-participation, trial attrition, and non-adherence to trial protocol by ethnic groups (subject to funding)
Subject to receipt of additional funding, a qualitative sub-study will examine the acceptability to women of using probiotics as a dietary supplement during pregnancy and participation in the trial, and the fidelity to treatment allocation. Methods will include direct observation of recruitment episodes and recorded interviews with participants and non-participants by a qualitative social researcher. Qualitative data analysis will use a framework approach supported by the use of dedicated software
Measured: 18 months
Core outcomes for use in studies on preterm birth prevention from case report forms
This is defined as new-born outcome before or at first discharge from hospital
Measured: 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2016
- Primary completionJun 2017
- Study completionJun 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (28)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Preterm BirthStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 304 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Queen Mary University of London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Khalid S Khan, Phd, Principal investigator, Queen Mary University of LondonRehan Khan, MD, Principal investigator, Barts Health NHS
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02692820
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 010294QM
- Acronym
- PrePro
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 28 Sep 2015
- Last updated
- 20 Sep 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Office for National Statistics, (2014a). Gestation-specific Infant Mortality in England and Wales, 2012 tables. [Internet] Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/child-health/gestation-specific-infant-mortality-in-england-and-wales/2012/rft-table-1.xls
Doyle LW, Ford G, Davis N. Health and hospitalistions after discharge in extremely low birth weight infants. Semin Neonatol. 2003 Apr;8(2):137-45. doi: 10.1016/S1084-2756(02)00221-X.
PubMed 15001150Arpino C, Compagnone E, Montanaro ML, Cacciatore D, De Luca A, Cerulli A, Di Girolamo S, Curatolo P. Preterm birth and neurodevelopmental outcome: a review. Childs Nerv Syst. 2010 Sep;26(9):1139-49. doi: 10.1007/s00381-010-1125-y. Epub 2010 Mar 27.
PubMed 20349187Boyle JD, Boyle EM. Born just a few weeks early: does it matter? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013 Jan;98(1):F85-8. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-300535. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
PubMed 21865487Saigal S, Doyle LW. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet. 2008 Jan 19;371(9608):261-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60136-1.
PubMed 18207020Mangham LJ, Petrou S, Doyle LW, Draper ES, Marlow N. The cost of preterm birth throughout childhood in England and Wales. Pediatrics. 2009 Feb;123(2):e312-27. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1827.
PubMed 19171583Goldenberg RL, Hauth JC, Andrews WW. Intrauterine infection and preterm delivery. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1500-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422007. No abstract available.
PubMed 10816189Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, Chou D, Moller AB, Narwal R, Adler A, Vera Garcia C, Rohde S, Say L, Lawn JE. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012 Jun 9;379(9832):2162-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60820-4.
PubMed 22682464Office for National Statistics, (2014b). Childhood, Infant and Perinatal Mortality in England and Wales, 2012. [Internet] Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/child-mortality-statistics--childhood--infant-and-perinatal/2012/rft-cms-2012.xls
Costeloe KL, Hennessy EM, Haider S, Stacey F, Marlow N, Draper ES. Short term outcomes after extreme preterm birth in England: comparison of two birth cohorts in 1995 and 2006 (the EPICure studies). BMJ. 2012 Dec 4;345:e7976. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7976.
PubMed 23212881Guaschino S, De Seta F, Piccoli M, Maso G, Alberico S. Aetiology of preterm labour: bacterial vaginosis. BJOG. 2006 Dec;113 Suppl 3:46-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01122.x.
PubMed 17206964Donders GG, Van Calsteren K, Bellen G, Reybrouck R, Van den Bosch T, Riphagen I, Van Lierde S. Predictive value for preterm birth of abnormal vaginal flora, bacterial vaginosis and aerobic vaginitis during the first trimester of pregnancy. BJOG. 2009 Sep;116(10):1315-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02237.x. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
PubMed 19538417Hawes SE, Hillier SL, Benedetti J, Stevens CE, Koutsky LA, Wolner-Hanssen P, Holmes KK. Hydrogen peroxide-producing lactobacilli and acquisition of vaginal infections. J Infect Dis. 1996 Nov;174(5):1058-63. doi: 10.1093/infdis/174.5.1058.
PubMed 8896509Wilks M, Wiggins R, Whiley A, Hennessy E, Warwick S, Porter H, Corfield A, Millar M. Identification and H(2)O(2) production of vaginal lactobacilli from pregnant women at high risk of preterm birth and relation with outcome. J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Feb;42(2):713-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.2.713-717.2004.
PubMed 14766841Mosbah A, Mesbah MR. (2009) A study of the role of hydrogen peroxide production by lactobacilli in preterm labor. Int J Med Med Sci, 1:388-95.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Sep 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Preventing Preterm Birth With Probiotics - Pilot Randomised Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02692820
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PrePro / 010294QM
- Conditions
- Preterm Birth
- Keywords
- Preterm, Probiotic
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 304 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Queen Mary University of LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2016
- Primary completion
- Jun 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Babies born preterm (before completing 37 weeks in the womb) are at increased risk of long-term disability and death. The investigators do not fully understand the cause(s) of preterm birth but it occurs more frequently when the normal, healthy bacteria (called Lactobacilli) in a woman's birth canal are replaced with unhealthy bacteria. Previous attempts to get rid of the unhealthy bacteria with antibiotics have not shown to affect the risk of preterm birth. The reason for this may be that what is required is the replacement of Lactobacilli in the birth canal. This can be done by asking women to take capsules containing lactobacilli once daily. To study whether oral Lactobacilli capsules compared with dummy capsules can reduce the risk of preterm birth, a large study involving approximately 10,000 women would be required. But the investigators do not know whether women would agree to take part in and complete such a study, and this is what the investigators wish to study in the small, initial study described here. The results of this study will show whether probiotics produce the desired biological effects on vaginal bacteria, and whether it would be feasible to perform the larger, definitive study of their effectiveness in prevention of preterm birth.
Detailed description
Preterm birth (PTB) is defined as the birth of a baby before the completion of 37 weeks gestation in the womb. It is the major cause of infant mortality particularly during the first month of life. Approximately 75 per cent of babies who die during the first 28 days of life are born before 37 weeks gestation. Survivors of PTB are at increased risk of long-term disabilities such as cerebral palsy, sight and hearing impairment, learning and behavioural problems, epilepsy, and hospital readmissions. Even late preterm births, defined as PTB at 34--36 weeks gestation, which account for 70% of all preterm births in England and Wales, are at increased risk of death and disability compared with babies born at term. Although the prevalence of adverse long--term outcome is highest among children born at the earliest gestational ages, the much higher number of births at 34--36 weeks of gestation compared with earlier gestations means that this group of children makes a major contribution to the number of children adversely affected. PTB and its consequences can have negative emotional and psychosocial impacts on parents and families.
In addition to its impact on individuals and families, the financial consequences for the public sector of caring for children born preterm are significant. The cost of care up to the age of 18 for children born preterm has been estimated to exceed £3 billion per year in England and Wales at 2006 prices. It has been estimated that a hypothetical intervention that delayed PTB by 1 week across all gestational age categories would reduce the public sector cost of PTB by £1 billion annually.
About one third of PTBs occur because early delivery is indicated due to complications in the mother or the unborn baby (fetus); the remaining two thirds occur spontaneously. The rate of PTB has increased by 19% from 1990 to 2010 in developed countries. At the same time, there has been a marked improvement in the survival rates of PTBs but a similar reduction in adverse outcomes has not been seen. Thus, the absolute numbers of individuals adversely affected is increasing.
Infection within the womb (intrauterine infection) is strongly associated with spontaneous PTB. The commonest pathway for intrauterine infection is the ascent of unhealthy bacteria from the vagina and cervix into the womb. Bacterial vaginosis (BV), in which the normally dominant healthy bacteria in the vagina (lactobacilli) are replaced with unhealthy bacteria, is strongly associated with PTB. Lactobacilli, principally the strains that produce higher levels of the chemical hydrogen peroxide, appear to protect against BV and reduce the risk of PTB.
Despite substantial evidence linking BV with PTB, the results of trials of antibiotic treatment of BV in pregnancy have not produced clear evidence of benefit. The reason for this might be that it is not the eradication of unhealthy bacteria that is required but rather the replacement of unhealthy bacteria with the normally dominant lactobacilli. One way of achieving this could be by administering lactobacilli-containing capsules (probiotics) to pregnant women. Oral probiotics taken during pregnancy may directly alter the vaginal bacteria and in so doing protect the cervical opening from ascending infection.
The investigators have formally reviewed the medical literature on the use of probiotics to prevent PTB. There is some evidence from medical trials which suggests that probiotics taken during pregnancy can reduce the risk of PTB but the trials have either been too small or of poor quality for the results to be conclusive. The results of an observational study on nearly 19,000 pregnant women suggested that probiotic- containing foods reduced the risk of spontaneous PTB.
The best way to determine whether probiotics can reduce the risk of PTB is by performing a type of study called a double-blind, randomised controlled trial (RCT). In such a trial, the participants are allocated to receive either probiotic supplements or dummy (placebo) supplements. The allocation to a particular supplement is purely by chance (random) and neither the participants nor the researchers know the allocation of any participant until the end of the trial (double-blind). Then, by looking at the difference in the rate of PTB between the groups it would be possible to say whether probiotics can reduce the rate of PTB. The investigators have estimated that an RCT that could detect a useful difference in the rate of PTB between the two groups would require the participation of approximately 10,000 women and cost several million pounds. Given that approximately 20,000 deliveries occur annually in inner North East London alone, there are sufficient women in this region who would be eligible for participation in such a RCT. However, the willingness of women to participate in and complete such a trial is unknown.
A small, pilot trial is required to determine what proportion of pregnant women would participate in a probiotics and PTB trial and the proportion that would complete the study. The proposal here, the PrePro trial, is designed to gather these data which will inform the feasibility, planning and execution of a large RCT looking at the effects of probiotics on PTB.
Potential risks and benefits of probiotics The World Health Organisation defines probiotics as live micro-organisms that confer a health benefit on the host when administered in adequate amounts. They can displace and kill pathogens, and modulate the immune response by interfering with the inflammatory cascade that can cause preterm labour. Administration of probiotics by mouth or intravaginally is safe and effective in reducing the incidence of or treating urogenital infections. There is no evidence of adverse consequences for mothers or their infants as a result of probiotic exposure during pregnancy. Acceptability of and compliance with daily ingestion of probiotic or placebo for a few weeks during mid-pregnancy was found to be high. The particular probiotic strains proposed for this study have been shown to be acceptable to and safe in pregnant women, and can colonise the vagina within 4 weeks of commencing oral intake.
A large intervention trial of ingesting oral capsules from early pregnancy to the end of gestation has not been performed in the UK. For such a trial to be successful, it is essential to gather data that will inform its feasibility, planning and execution. PrePro is designed to provide these data. This trial will be conducted in compliance with the study protocol, relevant regulations, and the MRC Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (GCP).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Probiotic | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: ProbioticThose who provide consent will be randomised to receive once daily for the remainder of their pregnancy capsules of probiotics (containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 (each at 2.5 x 109 colony forming units (CFUs)). The product contains freeze-dried bacteria and excipients in a gelatin capsule. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: Placebo ComparatorThose who provide consent will be randomised to receive once daily for the remainder of their pregnancy capsules of the placebo containing excipients alone in a gelatin capsule |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Women aged 16 years and over at the time of the booking appointment.
- Women who are between 9-14 weeks gestation at the time of the dating scan.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Lack of informed, written consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ProbioticThe probiotic capsule contains the two probiotics Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 (GR-1) and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 (RC-14). The product contains freeze-dried bacteria and excipients in a gelatin capsule; | Dietary supplement | Probiotic |
| Placebo ComparatorThe placebo contains excipients alone in a gelatin capsule | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
The microbiological effect of the probiotic on the vaginal flora during pregnancy,
Time frame: 18 months
To evaluate the microbiological effects of probiotics on vaginal flora the investigators will compare treatments groups regarding the proportion of women with bacterial vaginosis (BV) at delivery and the proportion of women with vaginal colonisation with intervention strains at delivery.
The proportion of eligible women recruited into the trial
Time frame: 18 months
The primary analysis will also involve the estimation of the proportions of the primary outcomes (i.e. eligible women recruited into the trial, recruited women who complete the trial and adhere to the intervention treatment until delivery).
The proportions of recruited women who complete the trial and adhere to the intervention until delivery
Time frame: 18 months
The primary analysis will also involve the estimation of the proportions of the primary outcomes (i.e. eligible women recruited into the trial, recruited women who complete the trial and adhere to the intervention treatment until delivery).
2 secondary outcomes
Questionnaire/interview assessment of reasons for participation and non-participation, trial attrition, and non-adherence to trial protocol by ethnic groups (subject to funding)
Time frame: 18 months
Core outcomes for use in studies on preterm birth prevention from case report forms
Time frame: 18 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Sep 2017.
- BackgroundOffice for National Statistics, (2014a). Gestation-specific Infant Mortality in England and Wales, 2012 tables. [Internet] Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/child-health/gestation-specific-infant-mortality-in-england-and-wales/2012/rft-table-1.xls
- Background: PubMed 15001150Doyle LW, Ford G, Davis N. Health and hospitalistions after discharge in extremely low birth weight infants. Semin Neonatol. 2003 Apr;8(2):137-45. doi: 10.1016/S1084-2756(02)00221-X.
- Background: PubMed 20349187Arpino C, Compagnone E, Montanaro ML, Cacciatore D, De Luca A, Cerulli A, Di Girolamo S, Curatolo P. Preterm birth and neurodevelopmental outcome: a review. Childs Nerv Syst. 2010 Sep;26(9):1139-49. doi: 10.1007/s00381-010-1125-y. Epub 2010 Mar 27.
- Background: PubMed 21865487Boyle JD, Boyle EM. Born just a few weeks early: does it matter? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013 Jan;98(1):F85-8. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-300535. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
- Background: PubMed 18207020Saigal S, Doyle LW. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet. 2008 Jan 19;371(9608):261-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60136-1.
- Background: PubMed 19171583Mangham LJ, Petrou S, Doyle LW, Draper ES, Marlow N. The cost of preterm birth throughout childhood in England and Wales. Pediatrics. 2009 Feb;123(2):e312-27. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1827.
- Background: PubMed 10816189Goldenberg RL, Hauth JC, Andrews WW. Intrauterine infection and preterm delivery. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1500-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422007. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 22682464Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, Chou D, Moller AB, Narwal R, Adler A, Vera Garcia C, Rohde S, Say L, Lawn JE. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012 Jun 9;379(9832):2162-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60820-4.
- BackgroundOffice for National Statistics, (2014b). Childhood, Infant and Perinatal Mortality in England and Wales, 2012. [Internet] Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/child-mortality-statistics--childhood--infant-and-perinatal/2012/rft-cms-2012.xls
- Background: PubMed 23212881Costeloe KL, Hennessy EM, Haider S, Stacey F, Marlow N, Draper ES. Short term outcomes after extreme preterm birth in England: comparison of two birth cohorts in 1995 and 2006 (the EPICure studies). BMJ. 2012 Dec 4;345:e7976. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7976.
- Background: PubMed 17206964Guaschino S, De Seta F, Piccoli M, Maso G, Alberico S. Aetiology of preterm labour: bacterial vaginosis. BJOG. 2006 Dec;113 Suppl 3:46-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01122.x.
- Background: PubMed 19538417Donders GG, Van Calsteren K, Bellen G, Reybrouck R, Van den Bosch T, Riphagen I, Van Lierde S. Predictive value for preterm birth of abnormal vaginal flora, bacterial vaginosis and aerobic vaginitis during the first trimester of pregnancy. BJOG. 2009 Sep;116(10):1315-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02237.x. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
Related trials for Preterm Birth
RecruitingPhase 3
Selective Antibiotics When Symptoms Develop Versus Universal Antibiotics for Preterm Neonates
Sepsis, PROM, Preterm (Pregnancy)
Recruiting
The Effect of Breast Milk, 10% and 20% Dextrose on Pain and Physiological Variables During Heel Puncture in Infants
Newborn Care, Pain Management
Not yet recruiting
The Hemodynamic Impact of High-frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Periodic Sighs in Preterm Infants
Preterm, Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant
Active, not recruiting
Prone Positioning During Delayed Cord Clamping
Delayed Cord Clamping
Not yet recruiting
Strap To Reduce Apnea in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Crossover Trial
Apnea of Prematurity, Intermittent Hypoxemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Khalid S Khan, Phd principal investigator
Queen Mary University of London
Rehan Khan, MD principal investigator
Barts Health NHS
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Probiotic in people with Preterm Birth, run by Queen Mary University of London at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The microbiological effect of the probiotic on the vaginal flora during pregnancy, (time frame: 18 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02692820, which also lists 28 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Sep 2017.