ArthrosisPhase 4NCT02697955
The Effect of Subsartorial Saphenous Block on Postoperative Pain Following Major Ankle and Hind Foot Surgery
A Phase 4 study testing Bupivacaine-epinephrine in people with Arthrosis and Arthritis, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
The study investigates the effect of a ultrasound-guided subsartorial saphenous block on postoperative pain following major ankle and hind foot surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- What is being tested?
- Bupivacaine-epinephrine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 21 Jun 2016to 28 Feb 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Elective ankle or hind foot surgery either: (1) total ankle arthroplasty, (2) ankle arthrodesis (3) subtalar arthrodesis or (4) triple arthrodesis
- Age ≥ 18
- American Society of Anaesthesiology Classification I-III
- Informed consent both orally and in writing after the patient has fully understood the protocol and its limitations.
Who cannot join
- Communication problems or dementia
- Allergies to any medical product used in the study
- Neuropathy of the sciatic or femoral nerve prior to the operation
- Morbus Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, diabetic neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease
- Daily use of opioids
- Coagulation disorders
- Infection at the site of injection or systemic infection
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site
Department of Anesthesiology, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, 8000
About this study
The study investigates the effect of a ultrasound-guided subsartorial saphenous block on postoperative pain following major ankle and hind foot surgery.
Read the detailed description
Major ankle and hind foot surgery causes intense postoperative pain. Implementation of continuous sciatic catheters has been a great success in reducing postoperative pain following these operations, but despite an effective sciatic catheter patients still report moderate to severe pain from the anteromedial side of the ankle. According to cadaver dissection studies the saphenous nerve innervates the anterior and medial parts of the ankle and talonavicular joint, and even though a saphenous block is standard procedure in many departments of anesthesiology worldwide, scientific evidence regarding the effect of the saphenous block on postoperative pain is lacking.
This study investigates the effect of a selective, ultrasound-guided subsartorial saphenous block on postoperative pain following major ankle and hind foot surgery.
- Being tested
- Bupivacaine-epinephrine, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Arthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bupivacaine-epinephrineDrug
Also called Marcain-adrenalin (combination drug), Marketing Authorisation Holder: AstraZeneca, Marketing Authorisation number: 10213
50 mg bupivacaine and 50 μg adrenalin
PlaceboOther
Also called Sodium chloride solution
9 mg sodium chloride pr. ml (0,9 %)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bupivacaine-epinephrine | Experimental | 10 mL of 5 mg/mL bupivacaine with 5 μg/mL epinephrine = 50 mg bupivacaine and 50 μg epinephrine Receives: Drug: Bupivacaine-epinephrine |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | 10 ml normal saline water (sodium chloride solution, 0,9%) Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Frequency of patients who experience significant pain at rest (change from no significant pain to significant pain)
Pain scores evaluated using NRS (numeric rating scale). Significant pain is defined as NRS > 3 from the anterior and/medial side of the ankle joint. In case of significant pain, patients receive a rescue saphenous block with 10 ml bupivacaine-adrenaline.
Measured: Arrival at the Perioperative Section (within 30 minutes after surgery) and at t = 30 min, t = 45 min, t = 60 min, t = 75 min, t = 90 min, t = 105 min, t = 120. The beginning of the observation period (t0) is the registered time for the end of surgery.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Sensory testing, infrapatellar branch (nociception is tested using a standardized Neuropen)
Test of nociceptive response in the cutaneous innervation area of the infrapatellar branch (branch of the saphenous nerve). The test is performed in an area from the medial femoral condyle to the midline between the apex of patella and tibial tuberosity.
Measured: At the time point when the patients report a change to significant pain during the observation period. In case of no significant pain during the observation period, sensory testing is conducted at t = 120 min.
Sensory testing, sciatic nerve (nociception is tested using a standardized Neuropen)
Test of nociceptive response in the sciatic cutaneous innervation area to confirm full sensory block of the sciatic nerve.
Measured: Sensory test is conducted at arrival at the Perioperative Section (within 30 minutes after surgery)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study start21 Jun 2016
- Primary completion28 Feb 2017
- Study completion28 Feb 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ArthrosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of AarhusThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Aarhus
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Thomas Fichtner Bendtsen, MD, phD, Study director, Department of Anesthesiology, Aarhus University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02697955
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ProtokolSB2
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 22 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 27 Mar 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Clendenen SR, Whalen JL. Saphenous nerve innervation of the medial ankle. Local Reg Anesth. 2013 Mar 6;6:13-6. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S42603. Print 2013.
PubMed 23630434Blumenthal S, Borgeat A, Neudorfer C, Bertolini R, Espinosa N, Aguirre J. Additional femoral catheter in combination with popliteal catheter for analgesia after major ankle surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Mar;106(3):387-93. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq365. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
PubMed 21169609White PF, Issioui T, Skrivanek GD, Early JS, Wakefield C. The use of a continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block after surgery involving the foot and ankle: does it improve the quality of recovery? Anesth Analg. 2003 Nov;97(5):1303-1309. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000082242.84015.D4.
PubMed 14570643Chen J, Lesser J, Hadzic A, Resta-Flarer F. The importance of the proximal saphenous nerve block for foot and ankle surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):372. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318295596a. No abstract available.
PubMed 23788076Kalthur SG, Sumalatha S, Nair N, Pandey AK, Sequeria S, Shobha L. Anatomic study of infrapatellar branch of saphenous nerve in male cadavers. Ir J Med Sci. 2015 Mar;184(1):201-6. doi: 10.1007/s11845-014-1087-2. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
PubMed 24535194Kerver AL, Leliveld MS, den Hartog D, Verhofstad MH, Kleinrensink GJ. The surgical anatomy of the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve in relation to incisions for anteromedial knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Dec 4;95(23):2119-25. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01297.
PubMed 24306699Fisker AK, Iversen BN, Christensen S, Linde F, Nielsen KK, Borglum J, Bendtsen TF. Combined saphenous and sciatic catheters for analgesia after major ankle surgery: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Aug;62(8):875-82. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0379-y. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
PubMed 25851020Bendtsen TF, Moriggl B, Chan V, Borglum J. Basic Topography of the Saphenous Nerve in the Femoral Triangle and the Adductor Canal. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):391-2. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000261. No abstract available.
PubMed 26079358Bjorn S, Wong WY, Baas J, Nielsen KK, Borglum J, Hauritz RW, Bendtsen TF. The Importance of the Saphenous Nerve Block for Analgesia Following Major Ankle Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Jul;43(5):474-479. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000764.
PubMed 29667940
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Mar 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Subsartorial Saphenous Block on Postoperative Pain Following Major Ankle and Hind Foot Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02697955
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ProtokolSB2
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AarhusUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 21 Jun 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study investigates the effect of a ultrasound-guided subsartorial saphenous block on postoperative pain following major ankle and hind foot surgery.
Detailed description
Major ankle and hind foot surgery causes intense postoperative pain. Implementation of continuous sciatic catheters has been a great success in reducing postoperative pain following these operations, but despite an effective sciatic catheter patients still report moderate to severe pain from the anteromedial side of the ankle. According to cadaver dissection studies the saphenous nerve innervates the anterior and medial parts of the ankle and talonavicular joint, and even though a saphenous block is standard procedure in many departments of anesthesiology worldwide, scientific evidence regarding the effect of the saphenous block on postoperative pain is lacking.
This study investigates the effect of a selective, ultrasound-guided subsartorial saphenous block on postoperative pain following major ankle and hind foot surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bupivacaine-epinephrine | Experimental | Drug: Bupivacaine-epinephrine10 mL of 5 mg/mL bupivacaine with 5 μg/mL epinephrine = 50 mg bupivacaine and 50 μg epinephrine |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: Placebo10 ml normal saline water (sodium chloride solution, 0,9%) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Elective ankle or hind foot surgery either: (1) total ankle arthroplasty, (2) ankle arthrodesis (3) subtalar arthrodesis or (4) triple arthrodesis
- Age ≥ 18
- American Society of Anaesthesiology Classification I-III
- Informed consent both orally and in writing after the patient has fully understood the protocol and its limitations.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Communication problems or dementia
- Allergies to any medical product used in the study
- Neuropathy of the sciatic or femoral nerve prior to the operation
- Morbus Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, diabetic neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease
- Daily use of opioids
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bupivacaine-epinephrineAlso: Marcain-adrenalin (combination drug), Marketing Authorisation Holder: AstraZeneca, Marketing Authorisation number: 1021350 mg bupivacaine and 50 μg adrenalin | Drug | Bupivacaine-epinephrine |
| PlaceboAlso: Sodium chloride solution9 mg sodium chloride pr. ml (0,9 %) | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Frequency of patients who experience significant pain at rest (change from no significant pain to significant pain)
Time frame: Arrival at the Perioperative Section (within 30 minutes after surgery) and at t = 30 min, t = 45 min, t = 60 min, t = 75 min, t = 90 min, t = 105 min, t = 120. The beginning of the observation period (t0) is the registered time for the end of surgery.
Pain scores evaluated using NRS (numeric rating scale). Significant pain is defined as NRS > 3 from the anterior and/medial side of the ankle joint. In case of significant pain, patients receive a rescue saphenous block with 10 ml bupivacaine-adrenaline.
2 secondary outcomes
Sensory testing, infrapatellar branch (nociception is tested using a standardized Neuropen)
Time frame: At the time point when the patients report a change to significant pain during the observation period. In case of no significant pain during the observation period, sensory testing is conducted at t = 120 min.
Sensory testing, sciatic nerve (nociception is tested using a standardized Neuropen)
Time frame: Sensory test is conducted at arrival at the Perioperative Section (within 30 minutes after surgery)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Mar 2017.
- Background: PubMed 23630434Clendenen SR, Whalen JL. Saphenous nerve innervation of the medial ankle. Local Reg Anesth. 2013 Mar 6;6:13-6. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S42603. Print 2013.
- Background: PubMed 21169609Blumenthal S, Borgeat A, Neudorfer C, Bertolini R, Espinosa N, Aguirre J. Additional femoral catheter in combination with popliteal catheter for analgesia after major ankle surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Mar;106(3):387-93. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq365. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
- Background: PubMed 14570643White PF, Issioui T, Skrivanek GD, Early JS, Wakefield C. The use of a continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block after surgery involving the foot and ankle: does it improve the quality of recovery? Anesth Analg. 2003 Nov;97(5):1303-1309. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000082242.84015.D4.
- Background: PubMed 23788076Chen J, Lesser J, Hadzic A, Resta-Flarer F. The importance of the proximal saphenous nerve block for foot and ankle surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):372. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318295596a. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24535194Kalthur SG, Sumalatha S, Nair N, Pandey AK, Sequeria S, Shobha L. Anatomic study of infrapatellar branch of saphenous nerve in male cadavers. Ir J Med Sci. 2015 Mar;184(1):201-6. doi: 10.1007/s11845-014-1087-2. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
- Background: PubMed 24306699Kerver AL, Leliveld MS, den Hartog D, Verhofstad MH, Kleinrensink GJ. The surgical anatomy of the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve in relation to incisions for anteromedial knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Dec 4;95(23):2119-25. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01297.
- Background: PubMed 25851020Fisker AK, Iversen BN, Christensen S, Linde F, Nielsen KK, Borglum J, Bendtsen TF. Combined saphenous and sciatic catheters for analgesia after major ankle surgery: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Aug;62(8):875-82. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0379-y. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
- Background: PubMed 26079358Bendtsen TF, Moriggl B, Chan V, Borglum J. Basic Topography of the Saphenous Nerve in the Femoral Triangle and the Adductor Canal. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):391-2. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000261. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29667940Bjorn S, Wong WY, Baas J, Nielsen KK, Borglum J, Hauritz RW, Bendtsen TF. The Importance of the Saphenous Nerve Block for Analgesia Following Major Ankle Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Jul;43(5):474-479. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000764.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Arthrosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Extension Study of Safety and Tolerability of DDY391 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis (CDDY391A12201-extension)
Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Recruiting
Effects of Cervicothoracic Mobilization in Patients With Supraspinatus Tendinitis
Rotator Cuff Tendonitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thomas Fichtner Bendtsen, MD, phD study director
Department of Anesthesiology, Aarhus University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Bupivacaine-epinephrine in people with Arthrosis and Arthritis, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Frequency of patients who experience significant pain at rest (change from no significant pain to significant pain) (time frame: Arrival at the Perioperative Section (within 30 minutes after surgery) and at t = 30 min, t = 45 min, t = 60 min, t = 75 min, t = 90 min, t = 105 min, t = 120. The beginning of the observation period (t0) is the registered time for the end of surgery.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02697955, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2017.