Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis BullosaPhase 1/2NCT02698735
Gentamicin Therapy for Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (RDEB) Nonsense Mutation Patients
A Phase 1/2 study testing Gentamicin in people with Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa, run by University of Southern California.
Trial summary
Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is an incurable, devastating, inherited skin disease for which there is only supportive care. RDEB is due to mutations in COL7A1 gene that encodes for type VII collagen (C7), the major component of anchoring fibrils (AFs) mediating epidermal-dermal adherence. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa
- What is being tested?
- Gentamicin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 5 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 25 Feb 2016to 30 Jun 2017
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- RDEB patients with a nonsense mutation in COL7A1 in either one or two alleles (ii) An absence or decrease in C7 expression at their DEJ when compared to that of normal human skin.
Who cannot join
- Pre-existing renal or auditory impairment (ii) Allergies to aminoglycosides or sulfate compounds (iii) Pregnancy (iv) Exposure to gentamicin within the past 6 weeks.
About this study
Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is an incurable, devastating, inherited skin disease for which there is only supportive care. RDEB is due to mutations in COL7A1 gene that encodes for type VII collagen (C7), the major component of anchoring fibrils (AFs) mediating epidermal-dermal adherence. Approximately 20% of COL7A1 mutations are nonsense mutations leading to premature stop codons and a truncated C7 with diminished function. The investigators demonstrated that aminoglycosides such as gentamicin readily induce premature termination codon (PTC) "read through" and produce biologically functional C7 in 22 reported COL7A1 nonsense mutations. Importantly, aminoglycoside-induced C7 reversed the abnormal RDEB cell phenotype and incorporated into the dermal-epidermal junction. Herein, the investigators propose the first clinical trial of gentamicin (topical and intradermal) in RDEB patients with nonsense mutations that the investigators have fully characterized. The milestones include increased C7 and AFs at the patients' dermal-epidermal junction and absence of significant gentamicin side effects.
Read the detailed description
Evaluate C7 and AF expression with topical and intradermal gentamicin treatment Topical application of gentamicin to skin lesion: We will apply commercially available gentamicin 0.1% ointment three times a day under Tegaderm occlusion for two weeks to a target RDEB skin erosion. Likewise, we will apply the ointment control vehicle three times a day to a similarly sized RDEB erosion. This dosage schedule is based on the successful clinical trial in CF patients that resulted in clinical efficacy without side effects.19 In our in vitro cell culture studies, we showed that a single dose of gentamicin (400 ug/ml) induced C7 expression at a level of 20-40% of that seen in normal cells (Figure 1A and 1B).23 In our clinical trial, the experimental ointment will contain 1 milligram of gentamicin per milliliter of ointment vehicle.
Injection of gentamicin into the high dermis of RDEB patient skin: In addition, we will identify target 2.0 cm x 2.0 cm areas of unwounded intact skin within areas prone to blister formation and intradermally inject commercially available sterile gentamicin solution (40 mg/ml in saline). A similar control area will be injected with equal volumes of saline. We will inject 200 ul (8 milligrams) into each site once on day 0 and once again on day 1. A single injection will be administered to the site on each of the two days. The total dose will be 16 milligrams injected into the upper dermis where it will contact the patient's dermal fibroblasts and basal keratinocytes. In our published in vitro read-through study, each 1 cm2 of cultured cells was exposed to 400 ugs/ml of gentamicin that showed read-through activity with no cytoxocity. For the proposed intradermal study, we will be using a total dose approximately 5-fold greater than the in vitro dose.
Initial and follow-up Parameters: Prior to any treatment, the RDEB patients will be subjected to a 9 mm shave biopsy of intact skin that will be divided into 3 parts and evaluated for H\&E histology, transmission electron microscopy and direct immunofluorescence for C7 expression. At 1 and 3 months after gentamicin treatment of RDEB erosions or intact skin in blister prone areas, we will biopsy the treated sites and repeat the histological, ultrastructural and C7 expression evaluations. For the assessment of C7 expression at the DEJ by immunofluorescence (IF), 5 micron cryosections will be probed with anti-C7 polyclonal antibodies to the NC1 and NC2 domains of C7. The increased expression of the NC2 domain of C7 at the DEJ of gentamicin-treated skin or erosions will serve as one major "milestone" in this study since it would indicate PTC read-through and restoration of a full-length C7. The third part of the biopsy will be evaluated ultrastructurally, and AFs will be enumerated by computer-assisted morphometry. These studies will assess if there is restoration of normal AFs. Skin sections from normal human subjects will serve as positive controls, while skin sections from the vehicle control site will serve as negative controls.
Patient clinical assessment: Skin Erosion Sites: Patients will be blinded to the gentamicin and vehicle treatments of the Experimental Site and Control Site. Each week, the patients will assess the sites and grade their healing as follows: - 1 = enlargement of the erosion compared to its initial size; 0 = no change in the size of the erosion; +1 = partial healing and a smaller erosion than its initial size, and +2 = complete closure of the wound.
Secondly, baseline photographs of the erosions will be generated and the area of the erosions calculated by computer-assisted planimetry. Identical assessments will be made at 1 and 3 months post treatment. Therefore, a second "milestone" for this study will be decreased surface areas of gentamicin-treated erosions compared with vehicle control-treated erosions.
Evaluation of RDEB intact skin treated by intradermal injections of gentamicin: Patients and Investigators will be blinded to the treatments of the Experimental Area and Control Area. Each week, the patient will evaluate the areas and grade them as follows: - 1 = new blister or erosion formation in the site, and +1 = no new blisters or erosions. At USC visits at 1 and 3 months, biopsies will be obtained from the sites and evaluated as above for the expression of C7 at the DEJ and enumeration of AFs.
Evaluation of Patients' Safety: Patients will have baseline histories, review of systems (ROS), vital signs (including weight) and physical examinations on Day 0 before treatment, and at Day 1 (one day after treatment) and then at 1 and 3 months during their visits to USC. At these same time points, blood tests will be performed and include a complete blood count, electrolytes, liver enzymes, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, creatinine, and BUN. Creatinine clearances will be also calculated, and the patient's treatment sites will be evaluated for erythema, edema, blistering and erosions. At Day 0, 1 month and 3 months after treatment, audiometry evaluations will be done. Patients will complete a ROS questionnaire daily at home, and be telephoned weekly by a USC study member inquiring about any new signs, symptoms, or ROS changes.
- Characterization of Immune Responses to Gentamicin-Induced C7: Our study patients all express lower levels of C7 including the NC1 domain, which is the most antigenic domain of C7. Therefore, with the exception of patient B, we doubt that reading through the patient's PTC will induce a protein that is viewed as antigenic by the patient's immune system. Nevertheless, we hope that gentamicin will generate a functional, rather than non-functional, species of C7. To evaluate if this change triggers an immune response and generates anti-C7 antibodies, patient serum will be obtained at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months for evaluation of anti-C7 antibodies by salt-split IIF and ELISA. If a patient develops antibodies to C7, we will then examine their skin for C7 antibody deposits by DIF.
- Being tested
- Gentamicin, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Epidermolysis Bullosa Dystrophica
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GentamicinDrug
Also called Gentamicin Sulfate, Garamycin
Gentamicin was either formulated into a 0.1% ointment or solutions for injection were purchased directly from suppliers.
PlaceboDrug
Also called Vehicle
There are two placebos used in this study. The ointment vehicle (same as used to formulate gentamicin) and vehicle solution for injection.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Gentamicin | Experimental | Gentamicin antibiotic Receives: Drug: Gentamicin |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Vehicle control Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Restoration of Full-length Type VII Collagen as Assessed by Immunofluorescence.
The expression of type VII collagen at the patients' dermal-epidermal junction was assessed by immunofluorescence (IF) using an antibody specific to type VII collagen. The expression was semi-quantitated using NIH Image J software. The IF expression of type VII collagen was assessed before treatment and at one and three months after treatment for each patient. All treated and untreated sites for all patients were also analyzed to determine statistical significance of treatment versus placebo for topical and intradermal administrations. At each assessment time point, type VII collagen expression was also measured in normal human skin. The expression of type VII collagen was then expressed as a percentage of the type VII collagen expressed in normal human skin.
Measured: 3 months
Number of Participants With Anchoring Fibrils as Assessed by Immuno-electron Microscopy
The expression of anchoring fibril structures at the patients' dermal-epidermal junction was assessed by immuno-electron microscopy (IEM) using an antibody specific to type VII collagen. The IEM expression of anchoring fibrils was assessed before treatment and at one and three months after treatment. At each assessment time point, anchoring fibrils were compared with normal human skin. Baseline pre-treatment and one and three month post-treatment sites were compared for the presence of anchoring fibrils after gentamicin treatment (or increase if anchoring fibrils were detected at baseline in patients). Comparisons were also made between placebo-treated and gentamicin-treated sites.
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study start25 Feb 2016
- Primary completion31 Mar 2017
- Study completion30 Jun 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis BullosaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Southern CaliforniaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Each participant will receive gentamicin ointment, and placebo ointment to treat two separate matched wounds (each ointment used exclusively on one wound) for 14 days as well as receive a intradermal injections of gentamicin and placebo at two intact skin sites (one site for each treatment).
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southern California
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, David Woodley, University of Southern California
- Investigators
- David Woodley, MD, Principal investigator, University of Southern California Department of Dermatology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02698735
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HS-15-00821
- Status last verified
- Oct 2019
- First submitted
- 19 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 29 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Woodley DT, Cogan J, Hou Y, Lyu C, Marinkovich MP, Keene D, Chen M. Gentamicin induces functional type VII collagen in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa patients. J Clin Invest. 2017 Aug 1;127(8):3028-3038. doi: 10.1172/JCI92707. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
PubMed 28691931
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Gentamicin Therapy for Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (RDEB) Nonsense Mutation Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02698735
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HS-15-00821
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southern CaliforniaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Feb 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 14 Aug 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is an incurable, devastating, inherited skin disease for which there is only supportive care. RDEB is due to mutations in COL7A1 gene that encodes for type VII collagen (C7), the major component of anchoring fibrils (AFs) mediating epidermal-dermal adherence. Approximately 20% of COL7A1 mutations are nonsense mutations leading to premature stop codons and a truncated C7 with diminished function. The investigators demonstrated that aminoglycosides such as gentamicin readily induce premature termination codon (PTC) "read through" and produce biologically functional C7 in 22 reported COL7A1 nonsense mutations. Importantly, aminoglycoside-induced C7 reversed the abnormal RDEB cell phenotype and incorporated into the dermal-epidermal junction. Herein, the investigators propose the first clinical trial of gentamicin (topical and intradermal) in RDEB patients with nonsense mutations that the investigators have fully characterized. The milestones include increased C7 and AFs at the patients' dermal-epidermal junction and absence of significant gentamicin side effects.
Detailed description
Evaluate C7 and AF expression with topical and intradermal gentamicin treatment Topical application of gentamicin to skin lesion: We will apply commercially available gentamicin 0.1% ointment three times a day under Tegaderm occlusion for two weeks to a target RDEB skin erosion. Likewise, we will apply the ointment control vehicle three times a day to a similarly sized RDEB erosion. This dosage schedule is based on the successful clinical trial in CF patients that resulted in clinical efficacy without side effects.19 In our in vitro cell culture studies, we showed that a single dose of gentamicin (400 ug/ml) induced C7 expression at a level of 20-40% of that seen in normal cells (Figure 1A and 1B).23 In our clinical trial, the experimental ointment will contain 1 milligram of gentamicin per milliliter of ointment vehicle.
Injection of gentamicin into the high dermis of RDEB patient skin: In addition, we will identify target 2.0 cm x 2.0 cm areas of unwounded intact skin within areas prone to blister formation and intradermally inject commercially available sterile gentamicin solution (40 mg/ml in saline). A similar control area will be injected with equal volumes of saline. We will inject 200 ul (8 milligrams) into each site once on day 0 and once again on day 1. A single injection will be administered to the site on each of the two days. The total dose will be 16 milligrams injected into the upper dermis where it will contact the patient's dermal fibroblasts and basal keratinocytes. In our published in vitro read-through study, each 1 cm2 of cultured cells was exposed to 400 ugs/ml of gentamicin that showed read-through activity with no cytoxocity. For the proposed intradermal study, we will be using a total dose approximately 5-fold greater than the in vitro dose.
Initial and follow-up Parameters: Prior to any treatment, the RDEB patients will be subjected to a 9 mm shave biopsy of intact skin that will be divided into 3 parts and evaluated for H\&E histology, transmission electron microscopy and direct immunofluorescence for C7 expression. At 1 and 3 months after gentamicin treatment of RDEB erosions or intact skin in blister prone areas, we will biopsy the treated sites and repeat the histological, ultrastructural and C7 expression evaluations. For the assessment of C7 expression at the DEJ by immunofluorescence (IF), 5 micron cryosections will be probed with anti-C7 polyclonal antibodies to the NC1 and NC2 domains of C7. The increased expression of the NC2 domain of C7 at the DEJ of gentamicin-treated skin or erosions will serve as one major "milestone" in this study since it would indicate PTC read-through and restoration of a full-length C7. The third part of the biopsy will be evaluated ultrastructurally, and AFs will be enumerated by computer-assisted morphometry. These studies will assess if there is restoration of normal AFs. Skin sections from normal human subjects will serve as positive controls, while skin sections from the vehicle control site will serve as negative controls.
Patient clinical assessment: Skin Erosion Sites: Patients will be blinded to the gentamicin and vehicle treatments of the Experimental Site and Control Site. Each week, the patients will assess the sites and grade their healing as follows: - 1 = enlargement of the erosion compared to its initial size; 0 = no change in the size of the erosion; +1 = partial healing and a smaller erosion than its initial size, and +2 = complete closure of the wound.
Secondly, baseline photographs of the erosions will be generated and the area of the erosions calculated by computer-assisted planimetry. Identical assessments will be made at 1 and 3 months post treatment. Therefore, a second "milestone" for this study will be decreased surface areas of gentamicin-treated erosions compared with vehicle control-treated erosions.
Evaluation of RDEB intact skin treated by intradermal injections of gentamicin: Patients and Investigators will be blinded to the treatments of the Experimental Area and Control Area. Each week, the patient will evaluate the areas and grade them as follows: - 1 = new blister or erosion formation in the site, and +1 = no new blisters or erosions. At USC visits at 1 and 3 months, biopsies will be obtained from the sites and evaluated as above for the expression of C7 at the DEJ and enumeration of AFs.
Evaluation of Patients' Safety: Patients will have baseline histories, review of systems (ROS), vital signs (including weight) and physical examinations on Day 0 before treatment, and at Day 1 (one day after treatment) and then at 1 and 3 months during their visits to USC. At these same time points, blood tests will be performed and include a complete blood count, electrolytes, liver enzymes, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, creatinine, and BUN. Creatinine clearances will be also calculated, and the patient's treatment sites will be evaluated for erythema, edema, blistering and erosions. At Day 0, 1 month and 3 months after treatment, audiometry evaluations will be done. Patients will complete a ROS questionnaire daily at home, and be telephoned weekly by a USC study member inquiring about any new signs, symptoms, or ROS changes.
- Characterization of Immune Responses to Gentamicin-Induced C7: Our study patients all express lower levels of C7 including the NC1 domain, which is the most antigenic domain of C7. Therefore, with the exception of patient B, we doubt that reading through the patient's PTC will induce a protein that is viewed as antigenic by the patient's immune system. Nevertheless, we hope that gentamicin will generate a functional, rather than non-functional, species of C7. To evaluate if this change triggers an immune response and generates anti-C7 antibodies, patient serum will be obtained at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months for evaluation of anti-C7 antibodies by salt-split IIF and ELISA. If a patient develops antibodies to C7, we will then examine their skin for C7 antibody deposits by DIF.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Each participant will receive gentamicin ointment, and placebo ointment to treat two separate matched wounds (each ointment used exclusively on one wound) for 14 days as well as receive a intradermal injections of gentamicin and placebo at two intact skin sites (one site for each treatment).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Gentamicin | Experimental | Drug: GentamicinGentamicin antibiotic |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboVehicle control |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- RDEB patients with a nonsense mutation in COL7A1 in either one or two alleles (ii) An absence or decrease in C7 expression at their DEJ when compared to that of normal human skin.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Pre-existing renal or auditory impairment (ii) Allergies to aminoglycosides or sulfate compounds (iii) Pregnancy (iv) Exposure to gentamicin within the past 6 weeks.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GentamicinAlso: Gentamicin Sulfate, GaramycinGentamicin was either formulated into a 0.1% ointment or solutions for injection were purchased directly from suppliers. | Drug | Gentamicin |
| PlaceboAlso: VehicleThere are two placebos used in this study. The ointment vehicle (same as used to formulate gentamicin) and vehicle solution for injection. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Restoration of Full-length Type VII Collagen as Assessed by Immunofluorescence.
Time frame: 3 months
The expression of type VII collagen at the patients' dermal-epidermal junction was assessed by immunofluorescence (IF) using an antibody specific to type VII collagen. The expression was semi-quantitated using NIH Image J software. The IF expression of type VII collagen was assessed before treatment and at one and three months after treatment for each patient. All treated and untreated sites for all patients were also analyzed to determine statistical significance of treatment versus placebo for topical and intradermal administrations. At each assessment time point, type VII collagen expression was also measured in normal human skin. The expression of type VII collagen was then expressed as a percentage of the type VII collagen expressed in normal human skin.
Number of Participants With Anchoring Fibrils as Assessed by Immuno-electron Microscopy
Time frame: 3 months
The expression of anchoring fibril structures at the patients' dermal-epidermal junction was assessed by immuno-electron microscopy (IEM) using an antibody specific to type VII collagen. The IEM expression of anchoring fibrils was assessed before treatment and at one and three months after treatment. At each assessment time point, anchoring fibrils were compared with normal human skin. Baseline pre-treatment and one and three month post-treatment sites were compared for the presence of anchoring fibrils after gentamicin treatment (or increase if anchoring fibrils were detected at baseline in patients). Comparisons were also made between placebo-treated and gentamicin-treated sites.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Oct 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28691931Woodley DT, Cogan J, Hou Y, Lyu C, Marinkovich MP, Keene D, Chen M. Gentamicin induces functional type VII collagen in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa patients. J Clin Invest. 2017 Aug 1;127(8):3028-3038. doi: 10.1172/JCI92707. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
Related trials for Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Phase 4 Master Protocol for Patients Prescribed Prademagene Zamikeracel for the Treatment of Wounds
Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB), Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (RDEB)
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
A Long-Term Extension Study for Participants Previously Treated With EB-101 for the Treatment of RDEB
RDEB
RecruitingObservational study
A Long-Term Safety Follow-up Registry for Patients Who Received Treatment With Prademagene Zamikeracel for Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (RDEB) in the Post-Marketing Setting
Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa
Not yet recruiting
Treatment of Dysphagia in Patients With Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa With Budesonide: a Retrospective Bicentric Study Nice - Paris St Louis / Necker (EBUDE Study)
Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa, Dysphagia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Targeting Collagen VII Antibodies With IV IgG in Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa
Epidermolysis Bullosa, Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David Woodley, MD principal investigator
University of Southern California Department of Dermatology
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Gentamicin in people with Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa, run by University of Southern California.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Aug 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Restoration of Full-length Type VII Collagen as Assessed by Immunofluorescence. (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02698735, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2019.