Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG)COMPASS-XTNCT02700984
A Study to Assess Long-Term Safety of the CyPass Micro-Stent in Patients Completing the COMPASS Trial
A study testing CyPass Micro-Stent and Cataract Surgery in people with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG), run by Alcon Research at 22 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety of the CyPass Micro-Stent in subjects who completed Study Protocol TMI-09-01, COMPASS Trial. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG)
- What is being tested?
- CyPass Micro-Stent and Cataract Surgery
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 282 participants
- Where
- 22 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 30 Mar 2016to 18 Apr 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Completed the COMPASS Trial
- Understands study requirements and is willing to follow study instructions and return for study visits
Who cannot join
- Systemic disease that would put subject health at risk and/or prevent completion of required study visits.
- Early termination from the COMPASS Trial.
Trial locations and contacts
22 sites in 1 country.
22 sites in 1 country
United States22 sites
Alcon Investigative Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Alcon Investigative Site
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33426
Alcon Investigative Site
Cape Coral, Florida, 33904
Alcon Investigative Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242
Alcon Investigative Site
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Alcon Investigative Site
Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72704
Alcon Investigative Site
Fort Collins, Colorado, 80525
Alcon Investigative Site
Fort Worth, Texas, 76102
Alcon Investigative Site
Garden City, Kansas, 67846
Alcon Investigative Site
Glendale, Arizona, 85306
Alcon Investigative Site
Kingston, Pennsylvania, 18704
Alcon Investigative Site
La Jolla, California, 92037
Alcon Investigative Site
Maryville, Tennessee, 37803
Alcon Investigative Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Alcon Investigative Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Alcon Investigative Site
Orange, California, 92868
Alcon Investigative Site
Parker, Colorado, 80134
Alcon Investigative Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Alcon Investigative Site
Sioux City, Iowa, 51104
Alcon Investigative Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63131
Alcon Investigative Site
Vineland, New Jersey, 08361
Alcon Investigative Site
West Mifflin, Pennsylvania, 15122
About this study
Official title: An Observational Multicenter Clinical Study to Assess the Long-Term Safety of the CyPass Micro-Stent in Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Who Have Completed Participation in the COMPASS Trial
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety of the CyPass Micro-Stent in subjects who completed Study Protocol TMI-09-01, COMPASS Trial.
Read the detailed description
The COMPASS Trial (TMI-09-01) was a prospective, randomized, comparative multicenter study to assess the safety and effectiveness of the CyPass Micro-Stent in subjects with primary open angle glaucoma who were undergoing cataract surgery. In the study, 505 subjects were randomized to either the CyPass group, who underwent cataract surgery and received the CyPass Micro-Stent, or the Control group, who underwent cataract surgery alone. All subjects randomized were to be followed for 2 years postoperatively. Four hundred eighty (480) subjects completed this study.
The COMPASS-XT (TMI-09-01-E) Trial is designed to collect safety data beyond 24 months postoperatively for subjects who completed the COMPASS Trial. In COMPASS-XT, clinical data will be collected at 36 months, 48 months, and 60 months postoperatively for a total of 5 year follow-up across the 2 studies.
- Conditions
- Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG)
- Being tested
- CyPass Micro-Stent, Cataract Surgery
- Medical subject headings
- Glaucoma, Open-Angle
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CyPass Micro-StentDevice
The CyPass Micro-Stent is a small tube with a through-lumen designed to redirect aqueous fluid from the front into the back of the eye. The device is implanted after completion of cataract surgery.
Cataract SurgeryProcedure or surgery
Cataract surgery involves the removal of the natural lens, which has become clouded (called a cataract), and insertion of an artificial lens (called an intraocular lens). This procedure is done through a small surgical incision in the eye.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cataract Surgery + CyPass | Experimental | CyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial) Receives: Device: CyPass Micro-Stent; Procedure: Cataract Surgery |
| Cataract Surgery Only | Active comparator | Cataract Surgery (COMPASS trial) with no CyPass Micro-Stent implantation Receives: Procedure: Cataract Surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
5-year Annualized Rate (Percentage) of Sight-threatening Adverse Events, by Treatment Group
Sight-threatening adverse events occurring in the study eye included, but were not limited to: BCVA loss of ≥ 3 lines, endophthalmitis, corneal decompensation, severe retinal detachment, severe choroidal hemorrhage, severe choroidal detachment and aqueous misdirection. The number of events at the end of Year 5 was divided by the number of eyes at risk at the beginning of Year 1 for a 5-year annualized rate. The 5-year annualized rate is reported as a percentage, with the last annual non-censored rate divided by 5. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.
Measured: Up to Month 60 postoperative
Secondary outcomes (19)
Number of Subjects According to Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit
Best corrected (with spectacles or other visual corrective devices) VA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts at 1 or 4 meters and determined by total number of letters read correctly. 20/20 Snellen is considered 'normal' vision. A larger denominator indicates a lower visual acuity. Baseline, Month 12, and Month 24 data derived from previous COMPASS trial. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, Month 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Number of Subjects Who Reported at Least One Protocol-specified Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye
Ocular adverse events in the study eye could include, but were not limited to, BCVA loss of 2 lines (10 letters) or more on the ETDRS chart in comparison with the best BCVA reported in Study Protocol TMI-09-01, endophthalmitis, corneal edema, and corneal decompensation. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.
Measured: Up to Month 60 postoperative
Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Corneal Edema
Corneal Edema (swelling of the cornea) was assessed by the investigator during slit-lamp examination and rated on a 4-point scale: None (transparent and clear or less than mild), Mild (dull glassy appearance), Moderate (Dull glassy appearance of epithelium with large number of vacuoles), and Severe (epithelial bullae and/or stromal edema, localized or diffuse, with or without stromal striae). Only the categories with reported data are included. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.
Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Corneal Staining/Erosion
Corneal Staining (appearance of tissue disruption and other pathophysiological changes) and erosion (abrasion) were assessed by the investigator during slit-lamp examination and rated on a 4-point scale: None (no fluorescein staining of epithelium, OR less than mild), Mild (slight fluorescein staining confined to a small focus), Moderate (regionally dense fluorescein staining (1 mm or greater in diameter) with underlying structure moderately visible), and Severe (marked fluorescein staining or epithelial loss). Only the categories with reported data are included. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.
Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Anterior Chamber Cells
Inflammatory anterior chamber cells (cells in the front portion of the eye) were assessed by the investigator during slit-lamp examination and reported in one of 6 categories according to cells per 1x1 mm slit: 0-<1 cell, 1-5 cells, 6-15 cells, 16-25 cells, and 26-50 cells, and >50 cells. Only the categories with reported data are included. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.
Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Anterior Chamber Flare
Anterior Chamber Flare (protein escaping from dilated vessels) was assessed by the investigator during slit-lamp examination and rated on a 5-point scale: None, Faint, Moderate (iris and lens details clear), Marked (iris and lens details hazy), and Intense (fibrin or plastic aqueous). The presence of flare is a sign of intraocular inflammation. Only the categories with reported data are included. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.
Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Iris Atrophy/Erosion
Iris Atrophy/Erosion (deterioration) was assessed by the investigator during slit-lamp examination and rated on a 4-point scale: None, Mild, Moderate, and Severe. Only the categories with reported data are included. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.
Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Iris Peaking
Iris Peaking (one part of the iris pulled to a peak resulting in an irregular pupil) was assessed by the investigator during slit-lamp examination and rated on a 4-point scale: None, Mild, Moderate, and Severe. Only the categories with reported data are included. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.
Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Iris Rubeosis
Iris Rubeosis (abnormal blood vessels (formed by neovascularization) found on the surface of the iris) was assessed by the investigator during slit-lamp examination and rated on a 4-point scale: None, Mild, Moderate, and Severe. Only the categories with reported data are included. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.
Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) Severity
PCO (cloudy layer of scar tissue behind the lens implant) Severity was assessed by the investigator during slit-lamp examination and rated on a 6-point scale: None, Minimal, Mild, Moderate, Severe, and Unspecified. Only the categories with reported data are included. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.
Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Gonioscopy at Visits 36, 48, and 60, CyPass Subjects Only
For subjects in the CyPass group, gonioscopic examination was performed to assess the position of the CyPass Micro-Stent in the angle and with respect to the iris and the corneal endothelium. A visible CyPass Micro-Stent indicated a lack of adhesions (favorable). One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.
Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Findings Noted During Fundus Examinations
The dilated fundus examination was performed by the investigator to evaluate the health of the vitreous, retina, macula, choroid, and optic nerve. Clinically significant findings are reported categorically. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.
Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Change From Month 24 in Visual Field Mean Deviation
Visual field (how much one can see to each side while focusing the eyes on a central point (peripheral vision)) deviations were obtained with a Humphrey automated perimeter using the 24-2 SITA standard testing method. Normal deviation values are typically within 0 to -2 decibels (dB) and become more negative as the overall field worsens. Month 24 data derived from COMPASS trial. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.
Measured: Month 24, 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Change From Month 24 in Central Corneal Thickness
Central corneal thickness was evaluated by Pachymetry and measured in micrometers (μm). A negative number indicates a decrease in corneal thickness (unfavorable). Month 24 data derived from COMPASS trial. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.
Measured: Month 24, 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Central Corneal Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Visit
The endothelium maintains corneal hydration and reduced cell density can disrupt vision. Central endothelial cell counts were assessed using non-contact specular microscopy. Specular images were taken of the corneal endothelium and submitted to a reading center in order to standardize readings across all sites and optimize reading reliability. Baseline through Month 24 data were derived from COMPASS trial. A higher cell density indicates improvement. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Number of Subjects With CyPass Device Malposition, Dislodgement or Movement
Device position was a qualitative and subjective assessment by the investigator and evaluated based on visible number of rings of the device under the gonioscopic exam. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint. This outcome measure was prespecified for Cataract Surgery + CyPass arm only.
Measured: Up to 60 months postoperatively
Mean Reduction From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in millimeters mercury (mmHg). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A higher reduction from baseline (ie, a greater postitive number) indicates greater improvement. Baseline was derived from COMPASS trial. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Percentage of Subjects With ≥ 20% Reduction in IOP From Baseline (COMPASS Trial) Without the Use of Ocular Hypotensive Medications
IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.
Measured: Baseline, Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Percentage of Subjects Not Using Ocular Hypotensive Medication With IOP ≥ 6 mmHg and ≤ 18 mmHg
IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.
Measured: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study start30 Mar 2016
- Primary completion18 Apr 2018
- Study completion18 Apr 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Alcon ResearchThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 282 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alcon Research
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Transcend Medical, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Alcon, Research, Study director, Alcon Research
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02700984
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TMI-09-01-E
- Other IDs
- GLD122b-C001
- Acronym
- COMPASS-XT
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 28 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 24 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Observational Multicenter Clinical Study to Assess the Long-Term Safety of the CyPass Micro-Stent in Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Who Have Completed Participation in the COMPASS Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02700984
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COMPASS-XT / TMI-09-01-E
- Conditions
- Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG)
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 282 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Alcon ResearchIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Transcend Medical, Inc.
- Study start
- 30 Mar 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Apr 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 May 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety of the CyPass Micro-Stent in subjects who completed Study Protocol TMI-09-01, COMPASS Trial.
Detailed description
The COMPASS Trial (TMI-09-01) was a prospective, randomized, comparative multicenter study to assess the safety and effectiveness of the CyPass Micro-Stent in subjects with primary open angle glaucoma who were undergoing cataract surgery. In the study, 505 subjects were randomized to either the CyPass group, who underwent cataract surgery and received the CyPass Micro-Stent, or the Control group, who underwent cataract surgery alone. All subjects randomized were to be followed for 2 years postoperatively. Four hundred eighty (480) subjects completed this study.
The COMPASS-XT (TMI-09-01-E) Trial is designed to collect safety data beyond 24 months postoperatively for subjects who completed the COMPASS Trial. In COMPASS-XT, clinical data will be collected at 36 months, 48 months, and 60 months postoperatively for a total of 5 year follow-up across the 2 studies.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cataract Surgery + CyPass | Experimental | Device: CyPass Micro-Stent, Procedure: Cataract SurgeryCyPass Micro-Stent implanted at the conclusion of cataract surgery (COMPASS trial) |
| Cataract Surgery Only | Active comparator | Procedure: Cataract SurgeryCataract Surgery (COMPASS trial) with no CyPass Micro-Stent implantation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Completed the COMPASS Trial
- Understands study requirements and is willing to follow study instructions and return for study visits
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Systemic disease that would put subject health at risk and/or prevent completion of required study visits.
- Early termination from the COMPASS Trial.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CyPass Micro-StentThe CyPass Micro-Stent is a small tube with a through-lumen designed to redirect aqueous fluid from the front into the back of the eye. The device is implanted after completion of cataract surgery. | Device | Cataract Surgery + CyPass |
| Cataract SurgeryCataract surgery involves the removal of the natural lens, which has become clouded (called a cataract), and insertion of an artificial lens (called an intraocular lens). This procedure is done through a small surgical incision in the eye. | Procedure or surgery | Cataract Surgery + CyPass, Cataract Surgery Only |
Primary outcome
5-year Annualized Rate (Percentage) of Sight-threatening Adverse Events, by Treatment Group
Time frame: Up to Month 60 postoperative
Sight-threatening adverse events occurring in the study eye included, but were not limited to: BCVA loss of ≥ 3 lines, endophthalmitis, corneal decompensation, severe retinal detachment, severe choroidal hemorrhage, severe choroidal detachment and aqueous misdirection. The number of events at the end of Year 5 was divided by the number of eyes at risk at the beginning of Year 1 for a 5-year annualized rate. The 5-year annualized rate is reported as a percentage, with the last annual non-censored rate divided by 5. Inferential testing was not planned for this endpoint.
19 secondary outcomes
Number of Subjects According to Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Number of Subjects Who Reported at Least One Protocol-specified Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye
Time frame: Up to Month 60 postoperative
Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Corneal Edema
Time frame: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Corneal Staining/Erosion
Time frame: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Anterior Chamber Cells
Time frame: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Anterior Chamber Flare
Time frame: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Iris Atrophy/Erosion
Time frame: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Iris Peaking
Time frame: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Iris Rubeosis
Time frame: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Slit-lamp Examination Results at Visits 36, 48, and 60, by Treatment Group - Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) Severity
Time frame: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Gonioscopy at Visits 36, 48, and 60, CyPass Subjects Only
Time frame: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Findings Noted During Fundus Examinations
Time frame: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Change From Month 24 in Visual Field Mean Deviation
Time frame: Month 24, 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Change From Month 24 in Central Corneal Thickness
Time frame: Month 24, 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Central Corneal Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) by Visit
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Number of Subjects With CyPass Device Malposition, Dislodgement or Movement
Time frame: Up to 60 months postoperatively
Mean Reduction From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
Time frame: Baseline, Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Percentage of Subjects With ≥ 20% Reduction in IOP From Baseline (COMPASS Trial) Without the Use of Ocular Hypotensive Medications
Time frame: Baseline, Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Percentage of Subjects Not Using Ocular Hypotensive Medication With IOP ≥ 6 mmHg and ≤ 18 mmHg
Time frame: Month 36, 48, 60 postoperative
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jan 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2a Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Pregabalin Eye Drops Comparing With Timolol Eye Drops in Adults With Glaucoma or High Eye Pressure.
Primary Open - Angle Glaucoma (POAG), Ocular Hypertension (OHT)
Recruiting
The Acute Effect of Exercise Type And Timing on Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Intra-Ocular Pressure in Individuals With Glaucoma (The ACHIEVE-project).
Glaucoma Open-Angle Primary, Hypertension
RecruitingObservational study
PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt XI Observational PMCF Study With no Control Group
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Glaucoma, Visual Field Loss, and Their Association With Life Space in Older Adults
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Impact of Glaucoma and Visual Field Loss on Life Space
Primary Open-angle Glaucoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alcon, Research study director
Alcon Research
22 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CyPass Micro-Stent and Cataract Surgery in people with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG), run by Alcon Research at 22 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 22 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 May 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
5-year Annualized Rate (Percentage) of Sight-threatening Adverse Events, by Treatment Group (time frame: Up to Month 60 postoperative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jan 2024.