Peripheral Artery DiseaseNCT02701543
Compare I Pilot Study for the Treatment of Subjects With Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Artery Disease
A study testing Ranger Drug Eluting Balloon and In Pact Drug Eluting Balloon in people with Peripheral Artery Disease, run by University of Leipzig at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
To compare two different Paclitaxel coated balloons in the treatment of high grade stenotic or occluded lesions in Superficial femoropopliteal artery (SFA )and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery in Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) patients with Rutherford class 2-4. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Peripheral Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- Ranger Drug Eluting Balloon and In Pact Drug Eluting Balloon
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 414 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Oct 2015to Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject age ≥ 18
- Subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate, and has signed a Medical Ethics Committee approved consent form Subject understands the duration of the study, agrees to attend follow-up visits, and agrees to complete the required testing Rutherford category 2-4.
- Subject has a de novo or restenotic lesion with ≥ 70% stenosis documented angiographically and no prior stent in the target lesion.
- Target lesion length is ≤ 30cm
- Target lesion is at least 1cm below the origin of the profunda femoris and does not exceed the medial femoral epicondyle.
- Multiple lesions with max. 3cm healthy vessel segment in between lesions can be considered at the discretion of the operator as one lesion. Total lesion length should not exceed 30 cm.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥ 4 mm and ≤ 6.5 mm by visual estimation.
- Patency of at least one (1) infrapopliteal artery to the ankle (< 50% diameter stenosis) in continuity with the native femoropopliteal artery.
- A guidewire has successfully traversed the target treatment segment.
Who cannot join
- Failure to successfully cross the target lesion
- Angiographic evidence of severe calcification
- Presence of fresh thrombus in the lesion.
- Presence of aneurysm in the target vessel/s
- Presence of a stent in the target lesion
- Prior vascular surgery of the target lesion.
Show all 14Show fewer
- Stroke or heart attack within 3 months prior to enrollment
- Any surgical procedure or intervention performed within 30 days prior to or post index procedure
- Superficial femoropopliteal Artery or Proximal popliteal artery disease in the opposite leg that requires treatment at the index procedure
- Target lesion requires treatment with alternative therapies such as stenting, laser, atherectomy, cryoplasty, brachytherapy, re-entry devices
- Enrolled in another investigational drug, device or biologic study
- Life expectancy of less than one year
- Known allergies or sensitivity to heparin, aspirin, other anticoagulant/ antiplatelet therapies, paclitaxel or contrast media that cannot be adequately pre-treated prior to index procedure
- Rutherford classification of 0, 1, 5 or 6.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center Study for the Treatment of Subjects With Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Artery Disease With the Ranger Paclitaxel Coated PTA Balloon Catheter (Study Arm) Versus the IN.PACT Drug Eluting Balloon (Control Arm)
To compare two different Paclitaxel coated balloons in the treatment of high grade stenotic or occluded lesions in Superficial femoropopliteal artery (SFA )and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery in Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) patients with Rutherford class 2-4.
Read the detailed description
This study is a prospective, multi-center 1:1 randomized trial. Patients will be stratified according to lesion length (≤ 10 cm/ > 10 cm and < 20 cm / > 20 cm and ≤ 30 cm). Each strata will include approximately 138 patients.
The trial is to investigate the safety and efficacy of the Ranger™ Drug Coated Balloon in comparison to the IN.PACT™ Drug Coated Balloon in patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease.
All enrolled subjects will be followed through to 24 months to assess the incidence of restenosis by ultrasound and major adverse events (MAE). Follow-up visits occur at 1, 6, 12 and 24-month intervals per local standard of care. Telephone follow-up visits will occur at 36, 48 and 60 month.
Up to 414 patients will be enrolled at approximately 10-18 sites in Germany for comparison between the following two groups:
Treatment with the Ranger™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheter (Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, MA, USA) vs. the IN.PACT™ Drug Eluting Balloon (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MI, USA).
- Conditions
- Peripheral Artery Disease
- Being tested
- Ranger Drug Eluting Balloon, In Pact Drug Eluting Balloon
- Medical subject headings
- Peripheral Arterial Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ranger Drug Eluting BalloonDevice
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), in which a balloon is advanced and inflated in the obstructed artery for several seconds to minutes, has become the standard endovascular treatment for peripheral arteries
In Pact Drug Eluting BalloonDevice
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), in which a balloon is advanced and inflated in the obstructed artery for several seconds to minutes, has become the standard endovascular treatment for peripheral arteries
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ranger Drug Eluting Balloon | Active comparator | Intervention with Over the Wire (OTW) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA )balloon catheter with a semi-compliant balloon coated with a formulation of 2μg/mm2 paclitaxel and acetyl tri-n-butyl citrate (ATBC) as carrier substance Receives: Device: Ranger Drug Eluting Balloon |
| In Pact Drug Eluting Balloon | Active comparator | Intervention with Over the Wire (OTW) peripheral balloon catheter. The balloon surface is coated with a formulation of 3μg/mm2 paclitaxel and urea as carrier substance. Receives: Device: In Pact Drug Eluting Balloon |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patency rate
Efficacy: patency rate after one year defined as absence of clinically driven Target Lesion Revascularization (due to symptoms and drop of ABI of ≥ 20% or > 0.15 when compared to post-procedure ) or restenosis with Peak Velocity Ratio > 2.4 evaluated by Duplex Ultrasound
Measured: 1 year
Composite of freedom from device and procedure-related death through 12 months post procedure as well as freedom from both target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization
Composite of freedom from device and procedure-related death through 12 months post procedure as well as freedom from both target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (5)
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) rate
Target Lesion Revascularization rate at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Measured: 6,12,24 months
Walking capacity
Walking capacity assessment by Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) at 6, 12 and 24 months versus baseline.
Measured: 6,12,24 months
binary restenosis
Duplex-defined binary restenosis (Peak systolic velocity ratio >2.4) of the target lesion post-procedure and at 6, 12 and 24 months or at any time of re-intervention
Measured: 6,12,24 months
improvement shift in Rutherford classification
Sustained clinical improvement: an improvement shift in the Rutherford classification of one class in amputation and Target Vessel Revascularization free surviving patients at 12 months
Measured: 6,12,24 months
secondary Safety
Composite of freedom from device and procedure-related death through 60 months post procedure as well as freedom from both target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization
Measured: 60 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2015
- Primary completionOct 2018
- Study completionDec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Peripheral Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 414 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Leipzig
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dierk Scheinert, University of Leipzig
- Investigators
- Dierk Scheinert, Prof.Dr., Principal investigator, University Leipzig
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02701543
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CIP_14/001
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 19 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 20 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Steiner S, Schmidt A, Zeller T, Tepe G, Thieme M, Maiwald L, Schroder H, Euringer W, Popescu C, Brechtel K, Brucks S, Blessing E, Schuster J, Langhoff R, Schellong S, Weiss N, Beschorner U, Wittig T, Scheinert D. Low-Dose vs High-Dose Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for Femoropopliteal Lesions: 2-Year Results From the COMPARE Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Oct 24;15(20):2093-2102. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
PubMed 36265942Steiner S, Schmidt A, Zeller T, Tepe G, Thieme M, Maiwald L, Schroder H, Euringer W, Ulrich M, Brechtel K, Brucks S, Blessing E, Schuster J, Langhoff R, Schellong S, Weiss N, Scheinert D. COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jul 14;41(27):2541-2552. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa049.
PubMed 31989155
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center Study for the Treatment of Subjects With Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Artery Disease With the Ranger Paclitaxel Coated PTA Balloon Catheter (Study Arm) Versus the IN.PACT Drug Eluting Balloon (Control Arm)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02701543
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CIP_14/001
- Conditions
- Peripheral Artery Disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 414 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of LeipzigUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To compare two different Paclitaxel coated balloons in the treatment of high grade stenotic or occluded lesions in Superficial femoropopliteal artery (SFA )and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery in Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) patients with Rutherford class 2-4.
Detailed description
This study is a prospective, multi-center 1:1 randomized trial. Patients will be stratified according to lesion length (≤ 10 cm/ > 10 cm and < 20 cm / > 20 cm and ≤ 30 cm). Each strata will include approximately 138 patients.
The trial is to investigate the safety and efficacy of the Ranger™ Drug Coated Balloon in comparison to the IN.PACT™ Drug Coated Balloon in patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease.
All enrolled subjects will be followed through to 24 months to assess the incidence of restenosis by ultrasound and major adverse events (MAE). Follow-up visits occur at 1, 6, 12 and 24-month intervals per local standard of care. Telephone follow-up visits will occur at 36, 48 and 60 month.
Up to 414 patients will be enrolled at approximately 10-18 sites in Germany for comparison between the following two groups:
Treatment with the Ranger™ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheter (Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, MA, USA) vs. the IN.PACT™ Drug Eluting Balloon (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MI, USA).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ranger Drug Eluting Balloon | Active comparator | Device: Ranger Drug Eluting BalloonIntervention with Over the Wire (OTW) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA )balloon catheter with a semi-compliant balloon coated with a formulation of 2μg/mm2 paclitaxel and acetyl tri-n-butyl citrate (ATBC) as carrier substance |
| In Pact Drug Eluting Balloon | Active comparator | Device: In Pact Drug Eluting BalloonIntervention with Over the Wire (OTW) peripheral balloon catheter. The balloon surface is coated with a formulation of 3μg/mm2 paclitaxel and urea as carrier substance. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Subject age ≥ 18
- Subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate, and has signed a Medical Ethics Committee approved consent form Subject understands the duration of the study, agrees to attend follow-up visits, and agrees to complete the required testing Rutherford category 2-4.
- Subject has a de novo or restenotic lesion with ≥ 70% stenosis documented angiographically and no prior stent in the target lesion.
- Target lesion length is ≤ 30cm
- Target lesion is at least 1cm below the origin of the profunda femoris and does not exceed the medial femoral epicondyle.
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Failure to successfully cross the target lesion
- Angiographic evidence of severe calcification
- Presence of fresh thrombus in the lesion.
- Presence of aneurysm in the target vessel/s
- Presence of a stent in the target lesion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ranger Drug Eluting BalloonPercutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), in which a balloon is advanced and inflated in the obstructed artery for several seconds to minutes, has become the standard endovascular treatment for peripheral arteries | Device | Ranger Drug Eluting Balloon |
| In Pact Drug Eluting BalloonPercutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), in which a balloon is advanced and inflated in the obstructed artery for several seconds to minutes, has become the standard endovascular treatment for peripheral arteries | Device | In Pact Drug Eluting Balloon |
Primary outcome
Patency rate
Time frame: 1 year
Efficacy: patency rate after one year defined as absence of clinically driven Target Lesion Revascularization (due to symptoms and drop of ABI of ≥ 20% or > 0.15 when compared to post-procedure ) or restenosis with Peak Velocity Ratio > 2.4 evaluated by Duplex Ultrasound
Composite of freedom from device and procedure-related death through 12 months post procedure as well as freedom from both target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization
Time frame: 1 year
Composite of freedom from device and procedure-related death through 12 months post procedure as well as freedom from both target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization
5 secondary outcomes
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) rate
Time frame: 6,12,24 months
Walking capacity
Time frame: 6,12,24 months
binary restenosis
Time frame: 6,12,24 months
improvement shift in Rutherford classification
Time frame: 6,12,24 months
secondary Safety
Time frame: 60 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Dec 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36265942Steiner S, Schmidt A, Zeller T, Tepe G, Thieme M, Maiwald L, Schroder H, Euringer W, Popescu C, Brechtel K, Brucks S, Blessing E, Schuster J, Langhoff R, Schellong S, Weiss N, Beschorner U, Wittig T, Scheinert D. Low-Dose vs High-Dose Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for Femoropopliteal Lesions: 2-Year Results From the COMPARE Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Oct 24;15(20):2093-2102. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31989155Steiner S, Schmidt A, Zeller T, Tepe G, Thieme M, Maiwald L, Schroder H, Euringer W, Ulrich M, Brechtel K, Brucks S, Blessing E, Schuster J, Langhoff R, Schellong S, Weiss N, Scheinert D. COMPARE: prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial of high- vs. low-dose paclitaxel drug-coated balloons for femoropopliteal interventions. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jul 14;41(27):2541-2552. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa049.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Peripheral Artery Disease
Active, not recruiting
SUCCESS (SelUtion, Safety, effiCaCy, hEalth economicS and promS) PTA Study
Peripheral Artery Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
Reducing Adverse Vascular Outcomes With Factor XI Inhibition in Adult Participants With Peripheral Artery Disease
Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD)
Recruiting
The THOR IDE Study
Peripheral Artery Disease, Peripheral Artery Stenosis
Not yet recruiting
Daily Stretching to Improve Walking in Older Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: The STRETCH PAD Study
Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD), Intermittent Claudication
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dierk Scheinert, Prof.Dr. principal investigator
University Leipzig
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ranger Drug Eluting Balloon and In Pact Drug Eluting Balloon in people with Peripheral Artery Disease, run by University of Leipzig at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patency rate (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02701543, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Dec 2023.