AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerNCT02702050

Effect of Mechanical Stimulation on Mastectomy Scars

A study testing Mechanical stimulation (LPG system; Cellu M6 Integral I) and Conventional treatment in people with Breast Cancer, run by The Queen Elizabeth Hospital at 1 site in Hong Kong.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of mechanical stimulation on mastectomy scars in: (i) alleviating scar appearance - pigmentation, vascularity, pliability and thickness, (ii) reducing shoulder morbidities, (iii) improving arm functions, and (iv) enhancing quality of life, in women with breast… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer
What is being tested?
Mechanical stimulation (LPG system; Cellu M6 Integral I) and Conventional treatment
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
108 participants
Where
1 siteHong Kong
Study dates
Mar 2016to 29 Mar 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women aged 18 years old or above with mastectomy performed in recent 6 weeks;
  • Able to attend physiotherapy treatment and follow-ups during the study period.

Who cannot join

  • Altered mental state for cooperation and informed consent;
  • Signs and symptoms of mastectomy scar infections or inflammations;
  • Unhealed mastectomy wounds;
  • History of lymphoedema;
  • Diagnosed bilateral breast cancers;
  • Unstable medical or cardiovascular conditions;
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Pre-existing arm impairments/dysfunctions that will affect testing or exercising the affected arm;
  • Receiving radiotherapy during the study period;
  • Known sensitivity to mechanical stimulation;
  • Skin cancer on the treatment area;
  • Unclear cut margins of the cancer;
  • Known metastasis to other areas;
  • HIV positive.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Hong Kong1 site
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital

    Hong Kong

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial to Investigate the Effect of Mechanical Stimulation on Mastectomy Scars

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of mechanical stimulation on mastectomy scars in:

(i) alleviating scar appearance - pigmentation, vascularity, pliability and thickness, (ii) reducing shoulder morbidities, (iii) improving arm functions, and (iv) enhancing quality of life, in women with breast cancer after mastectomy.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Breast cancer is common among women. After surgical interventions like mastectomies, women with breast cancer may suffer physical, emotional and psychosocial complications. Evidence suggests that comprehensive physiotherapy program, including patient education, manual techniques, therapeutic exercises and compression bandaging, is effective in managing the above complications. Scarring was frequently overlooked in past studies. Besides cosmetic issues, a post mastectomy scar may cause adverse physical, functional, and psychological outcomes. The effects of mechanical stimulation on mastectomy scars have not been well investigated yet.

Objectives:

To investigate the efficacy of mechanical stimulation in:

(i) alleviating scar appearance - pigmentation, vascularity, pliability and thickness, (ii) reducing shoulder morbidities, (iii) improving arm functions, and (iv) enhancing quality of life, in women with breast cancer after mastectomy.

Setting:

Out-patient physiotherapy breast care clinic at the Hong Kong Queen Elizabeth Hospital

Participants:

One hundred and eight women with breast cancer after mastectomy in recent 6 weeks will be recruited.

Methodology:

An assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial will be conducted. 108 women with breast cancer after mastectomy will be recruited from the breast care clinic of the Queen Elizabeth Hospital. They will be randomly allocated by block randomization method into either the mechanical stimulation group (n= 54) or conventional treatment group (n=54).

Both study groups will receive an educational session before commencement of the program. Twelve sessions of 40-minute remedial exercises, 5-minute warm up and 5-minute cool down exercises will be provided within a 6-week period (i.e., two sessions per week) to all subjects. For the mechanical stimulation group, a ten-minute mechanical stimulation program will be provided. For the conventional treatment group, no mechanical stimulation will be given.

Primary outcomes include scar evaluations by the Vancouver Scar Scale and spectrophotometry. Secondary outcomes are composite measurements of shoulder morbidities, including numeric pain rating scale (NPS), shoulder range of movement and hand grip strength; arm function as evaluated by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH-HKPWH) questionnaire; and quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B). Outcome assessments at baseline, immediately after the 6-week program, and 3-month follow-up periods will be conducted by blinded assessors at the breast care clinic.

Data Analysis:

The results will be analyzed using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance with Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 21.0. Alpha level will be set at 0.05.

Potential Clinical Significance of Study:

Improvement of physiotherapy in scar management might potentially improve scar appearance - pigmentation, vascularity, pliability and thickness, decrease shoulder morbidities, improve upper limb functions, and enhance quality of life for women with breast cancer after mastectomy. If the mechanical stimulation protocol is proven to be effective, it will bring about significant advances in physiotherapy practice in post-mastectomy care in an evidence-based manner.

Conditions
Breast Cancer
Being tested
Mechanical stimulation (LPG system; Cellu M6 Integral I), Conventional treatment
Keywords
Physiotherapy, Mechanical Stimulation, Mastectomy Scar
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mechanical stimulation (LPG system; Cellu M6 Integral I)Other

    Also called Therapeutic massager

    For the mechanical stimulation group, an additional ten-minute mechanical stimulation will be provided in each of the twelve sessions of convention treatment program. The device produced skin lift through suction via a treatment head with 2 rollers installed. It was a non-invasive technique which aimed to mobilize soft tissues by creating skin folds and stretching the underlying soft tissues while manipulating the treatment head according to protocol.

  • Conventional treatmentOther

    Twelve sessions of 40-minute remedial exercises, 5-minute warm up and 5-minute cool down exercises, within a 6-week period (i.e., two sessions per week)

Study groups in NCT02702050
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Conventional treatment groupActive comparatorConventional treatment group will receive an educational session before commencement of the program. Twelve sessions of 40-minute remedial exercises, 5-minute warm up and 5-minute cool down exercises will be provided within a 6-week period (i.e., two sessions per week) to all subjects. No mechanical stimulation will be given.
Receives: Other: Conventional treatment
Mechanical stimulation groupExperimentalA 10 minute mechanical stimulation program - 'Mechanical stimulation (LPG system; Cellu M6 Integral I), will be provided after each of the twelve sessions of conventional treatment.
Receives: Other: Mechanical stimulation (LPG system; Cellu M6 Integral I)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Vancouver Scare Scale (VSS) to study scar appearance

    A scar scale to quantify scar appearance by observing the thickness, pliability, pigmentation and vascularity of mastectomy scar. The former two items were rated on ordical scales whereas the later two items in a descriptive manner. Total score ranged from 0 to 13.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Spectrophotometry to measure scar color

    A spectrophotometer (Hunterlab Miniscan Ez4500S, USA) is used to measure level of lightness, redness and yellowness of the mastectomy scar versus adjacent normal skin. Level of redness indicated vascularization and pigmentation represented significance of melanin deposited in a scar.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Numeric pain rating scale (NPS) to study pain over affected breast

    11-item numeric rating scale (NRS) is valid, reliable and appropriate for use in clinical setting for pain measurement

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Shoulder range by goniometry

    Shoulder range of motion (ROM) will be evaluated by measuring active shoulder flexion and abduction

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Grip strength by hand-held dynamometer

    The hand grip strength will be evaluated using the JAMAR Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Arm function

    The Chinese version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH-HKPWH) questionnaire will be used as an outcome measurement for upper extremities disabilities and symptoms.

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Quality of life

    The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B), traditional Chinese version 4 questionnaire would be adopted for measurement of quality of life for women with breast cancer

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Mar 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2016
  3. Primary completion29 Mar 2018
  4. Study completion29 Mar 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
108 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02702050
Sponsor's protocol ID
KC/KE-15-0816/FR-3
Status last verified
Apr 2018
First submitted
26 Feb 2016
Last updated
5 Apr 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Mechanical stimulation (LPG system; Cellu M6 Integral I) and Conventional treatment in people with Breast Cancer, run by The Queen Elizabeth Hospital at 1 site in Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Vancouver Scare Scale (VSS) to study scar appearance (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in