Common Bile Duct GallstonesPhase 4EHLNCT02703077
Endoscopic Treatment of Difficult Bile Duct Stones: Spyglass + EHL x Balloon Dilation of the Papilla
A Phase 4 study testing Spyglass, Balloon dilation of the papilla and EHL (electrohydraulic lithotripsy) in people with Common Bile Duct Gallstones and Choledocholithiasis, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
This study compare 2 techniques to treat difficult bile duct stones endoscopically Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Common Bile Duct Gallstones, Choledocholithiasis
- What is being tested?
- Spyglass, Balloon dilation of the papilla and EHL (electrohydraulic lithotripsy)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Feb 2016to Feb 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Over 18 years
- Able to give consent
- Submitted to the examination of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), with identification of stones in the bile duct considered difficult.
- Agreed and signed the Term of Consent.
Who cannot join
- Age below 18 years
- Incapable of giving consent
- Pregnant
- Gastrointestinal bypass surgery with previous reconstructions as a Billroth II or Roux-en-Y
- Patients with signs of severe acute cholangitis requiring biliary drainage with fast plastic stent and minimal or no contrast infusion
- Patients with previous liver transplantation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Endoscopy Unit - Clinics Hospital University of Sao Paulo Medical School
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403000
Tomazo Franzini, MD, 551126617579, tomazof@uol.com.br
Eduardo de Moura, PhD, 551126616460, eduardoghdemoura@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Endoscopic Treatment of Difficult Bile Duct Stones: Use of Direct Visualization System ("Spyglass Direct Visualization System") Associated With Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy (EHL) X Hydrostatic Balloon Dilation of the Major Duodenal Papilla
This study compare 2 techniques to treat difficult bile duct stones endoscopically
Read the detailed description
Before enrollment of the patients into the study, the two investigators, EGHM and TAPF, will perform 10 complete cases each of ERCP (Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) + SPYGLASS + EHL, to get more experience with the methods.
This will be a comparative study of methods, prospective, randomized study assessing the successful removal of bile duct stones considered to be difficult between the two proposed methods. A total of 100 patients will be recruited, according to the criteria for inclusion / exclusion of Appendix I. Randomization will be performed using a computer generated system. Fifty patients will be distributed in group 1 (Spyglass + electrohydraulic lithotripsy) and fifty in group 2 (with hydrostatic balloon dilation of the papilla with a extractor balloon sweep). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) will be performed, and after the diagnosis of difficult stone, will be followed by randomization between the two proposed methods. In group 1, the examination with the Direct Visualization System of Bile Ducts ("Spyglass Direct Visualization System") will be held soon after the diagnosis of difficult stone and partial endoscopic papillotomy. After access to the biliary duct with the system described, and the visualization of the stone, it will be introduced gently through the working channel of a spyglass the probe to perform the electrohydraulic lithotripsy. When the fragmentation is complete the system spyglass will be removed and the pieces of stone are removed by conventional endoscopic methods. In group 2, after the diagnosis of difficult calculi and performing the partial endoscopic papillotomy, the papilla (as with papillotomy) will be dilated with a hydrostatic balloon until the maximum size allowed by the diameter of common bile duct, followed by scanning with extractor balloon. In both groups, the stone clearance will be confirmed using Spyglass cholangioscopic exploration of the bile duct. In case of failure in stone removal by some of the methods studied, it will be performed biliary drainage with plastic stent.
- Conditions
- Common Bile Duct Gallstones, Choledocholithiasis
- Being tested
- Spyglass, Balloon dilation of the papilla, EHL (electrohydraulic lithotripsy), ERCP (Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography)
- Medical subject headings
- Gallstones, Choledocholithiasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SpyglassProcedure or surgery
Also called Cholangioscopy, Direct view cholangioscopy
Endoscopic direct view of the bile ducts
Balloon dilation of the papillaProcedure or surgery
Also called Sphincteroplasty
Using a hidrostatic balloon the major papilla will be dilated to facilitate the stone removal
EHL (electrohydraulic lithotripsy)Procedure or surgery
With a probe a direct view lithotripsy will be performed
ERCP (Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography)Procedure or surgery
Endoscopic procedure to identify and treat biliary diseases
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1: ERCP + Spyglass + EHL | Active comparator | This group after the diagnosis of difficult bile duct stones, will be submitted to spyglass cholangioscopy + EHL (electrohydraulic lithotripsy) Receives: Procedure: Spyglass; Procedure: EHL (electrohydraulic lithotripsy); Procedure: ERCP (Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) |
| 2: ERCP + Balloon Dilation | Active comparator | This group after the diagnosis of difficult bile duct stones, will be submitted to Balloon dilation of the papilla Receives: Procedure: Balloon dilation of the papilla; Procedure: ERCP (Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Success of the intervention
Defined as complete stone removal of the bile duct
Measured: intraoperative
Secondary outcomes (4)
Time
From ERCP diagnosis to end of procedure (in minutes)
Measured: intraoperative
Adverse events
All procedure related adverse events
Measured: One week
X-ray time
From ERCP diagnosis to end of procedure in minutes
Measured: intraoperative
Difficulties
Procedure related technique difficulties (operator subjective evaluation) : papilla dilation, Spyglass insertion into bile duct, lithotripsy probe introduction, EHL
Measured: intraoperative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2016
- Primary completionDec 2016 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Common Bile Duct GallstonesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Sao Paulo General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Boston Scientific Corporation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Eduardo Moura, PhD, Study director, University of Sao Paulo Medical School
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02703077
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0784/10
- Acronym
- EHL
- Status last verified
- Feb 2016
- First submitted
- 29 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 9 Mar 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Decision during trial
Publications
Moura EG, Franzini T, Moura RN, Carneiro FO, Artifon EL, Sakai P. Cholangioscopy in bile duct disease: a case series. Arq Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul-Sep;51(3):250-4. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032014000300015.
PubMed 25296087Attam R, Freeman ML. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for large common bile duct stones. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(5):618-23. doi: 10.1007/s00534-009-0134-2. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
PubMed 19551331Stefanidis G, Christodoulou C, Manolakopoulos S, Chuttani R. Endoscopic extraction of large common bile duct stones: A review article. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 May 16;4(5):167-79. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v4.i5.167.
PubMed 22624068Trikudanathan G, Navaneethan U, Parsi MA. Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 14;19(2):165-73. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i2.165.
PubMed 23345939Trikudanathan G, Arain MA, Attam R, Freeman ML. Advances in the endoscopic management of common bile duct stones. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Sep;11(9):535-44. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.76. Epub 2014 May 27.
PubMed 24860928
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Mar 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Endoscopic Treatment of Difficult Bile Duct Stones: Use of Direct Visualization System ("Spyglass Direct Visualization System") Associated With Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy (EHL) X Hydrostatic Balloon Dilation of the Major Duodenal Papilla
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02703077
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EHL / 0784/10
- Conditions
- Common Bile Duct Gallstones, Choledocholithiasis
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Boston Scientific Corporation
- Study start
- Feb 2016
- Primary completion
- Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study compare 2 techniques to treat difficult bile duct stones endoscopically
Detailed description
Before enrollment of the patients into the study, the two investigators, EGHM and TAPF, will perform 10 complete cases each of ERCP (Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) + SPYGLASS + EHL, to get more experience with the methods.
This will be a comparative study of methods, prospective, randomized study assessing the successful removal of bile duct stones considered to be difficult between the two proposed methods. A total of 100 patients will be recruited, according to the criteria for inclusion / exclusion of Appendix I. Randomization will be performed using a computer generated system. Fifty patients will be distributed in group 1 (Spyglass + electrohydraulic lithotripsy) and fifty in group 2 (with hydrostatic balloon dilation of the papilla with a extractor balloon sweep). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) will be performed, and after the diagnosis of difficult stone, will be followed by randomization between the two proposed methods. In group 1, the examination with the Direct Visualization System of Bile Ducts ("Spyglass Direct Visualization System") will be held soon after the diagnosis of difficult stone and partial endoscopic papillotomy. After access to the biliary duct with the system described, and the visualization of the stone, it will be introduced gently through the working channel of a spyglass the probe to perform the electrohydraulic lithotripsy. When the fragmentation is complete the system spyglass will be removed and the pieces of stone are removed by conventional endoscopic methods. In group 2, after the diagnosis of difficult calculi and performing the partial endoscopic papillotomy, the papilla (as with papillotomy) will be dilated with a hydrostatic balloon until the maximum size allowed by the diameter of common bile duct, followed by scanning with extractor balloon. In both groups, the stone clearance will be confirmed using Spyglass cholangioscopic exploration of the bile duct. In case of failure in stone removal by some of the methods studied, it will be performed biliary drainage with plastic stent.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1: ERCP + Spyglass + EHL | Active comparator | Procedure: Spyglass, Procedure: EHL (electrohydraulic lithotripsy), Procedure: ERCP (Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography)This group after the diagnosis of difficult bile duct stones, will be submitted to spyglass cholangioscopy + EHL (electrohydraulic lithotripsy) |
| 2: ERCP + Balloon Dilation | Active comparator | Procedure: Balloon dilation of the papilla, Procedure: ERCP (Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography)This group after the diagnosis of difficult bile duct stones, will be submitted to Balloon dilation of the papilla |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Over 18 years
- Able to give consent
- Submitted to the examination of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), with identification of stones in the bile duct considered difficult.
- Agreed and signed the Term of Consent.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age below 18 years
- Incapable of giving consent
- Pregnant
- Gastrointestinal bypass surgery with previous reconstructions as a Billroth II or Roux-en-Y
- Patients with signs of severe acute cholangitis requiring biliary drainage with fast plastic stent and minimal or no contrast infusion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SpyglassAlso: Cholangioscopy, Direct view cholangioscopyEndoscopic direct view of the bile ducts | Procedure or surgery | 1: ERCP + Spyglass + EHL |
| Balloon dilation of the papillaAlso: SphincteroplastyUsing a hidrostatic balloon the major papilla will be dilated to facilitate the stone removal | Procedure or surgery | 2: ERCP + Balloon Dilation |
| EHL (electrohydraulic lithotripsy)With a probe a direct view lithotripsy will be performed | Procedure or surgery | 1: ERCP + Spyglass + EHL |
| ERCP (Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography)Endoscopic procedure to identify and treat biliary diseases | Procedure or surgery | 1: ERCP + Spyglass + EHL, 2: ERCP + Balloon Dilation |
Primary outcome
Success of the intervention
Time frame: intraoperative
Defined as complete stone removal of the bile duct
4 secondary outcomes
Time
Time frame: intraoperative
Adverse events
Time frame: One week
X-ray time
Time frame: intraoperative
Difficulties
Time frame: intraoperative
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Mar 2016.
- Background: PubMed 25296087Moura EG, Franzini T, Moura RN, Carneiro FO, Artifon EL, Sakai P. Cholangioscopy in bile duct disease: a case series. Arq Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul-Sep;51(3):250-4. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032014000300015.
- Background: PubMed 19551331Attam R, Freeman ML. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for large common bile duct stones. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(5):618-23. doi: 10.1007/s00534-009-0134-2. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
- Background: PubMed 22624068Stefanidis G, Christodoulou C, Manolakopoulos S, Chuttani R. Endoscopic extraction of large common bile duct stones: A review article. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 May 16;4(5):167-79. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v4.i5.167.
- Background: PubMed 23345939Trikudanathan G, Navaneethan U, Parsi MA. Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 14;19(2):165-73. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i2.165.
- Background: PubMed 24860928Trikudanathan G, Arain MA, Attam R, Freeman ML. Advances in the endoscopic management of common bile duct stones. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Sep;11(9):535-44. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.76. Epub 2014 May 27.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Decision during trial
Related trials for Common Bile Duct Gallstones
Recruiting
ChOlecystectomy aFter successFul Endoscopic Common Bile Duct Stone Extraction in Elderly
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Choledocholithiasis
Recruiting
Hyoscine Butylbromide During Transcystic Papillary Balloon Dilation for Choledocholithiasis
Choledocholithiasis, Common Bile Duct Stones
RecruitingObservational study
Influence of Gut Microbiome in Gallstone Disease
Gall Stone, Gall Stones, Common Bile Duct
Recruiting
ChOlanGiography Performed Routinely Versus Selectively During Cholecystectomy: A NAtional Registry-based Randomized Controlled Trial
Cholecystolithiasis, Common Bile Duct Gall Stones
Not yet recruiting
EUS-Guided Gallbladder Drainage Versus Conservative Management in Patients Unfit for Surgery After a Biliary Event Without Cholecystitis. DRECON Study
Cholecystectomy, Gallbladder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eduardo Moura, PhD study director
University of Sao Paulo Medical School
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Spyglass, Balloon dilation of the papilla and EHL (electrohydraulic lithotripsy) in people with Common Bile Duct Gallstones and Choledocholithiasis, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Tomazo Franzini, MD (5511983179968, tomazof@uol.com.br), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Success of the intervention (time frame: intraoperative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02703077, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Mar 2016.