Glioblastoma MultiformePhase 1/2NCT02704858
Safety and Efficacy Study in Recurrent or Progressive Grade III or IV IDH1 Mutated Glioma
A Phase 1/2 study testing Perillyl alcohol in people with Glioblastoma Multiforme, run by Neonc Technologies, Inc. at 11 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This multi-site, Phase 1/2a clinical trial is an open-label study to identify the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of a repeated dose regimen of NEO100 (perillyl alcohol) for the treatment of patients with radiographically-confirmed progression of Grade IV glioma or recurrent primary or secondary Grade IV… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Glioblastoma Multiforme
- What is being tested?
- Perillyl alcohol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 49 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2017to Dec 2026
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- To be eligible to participate in the study, a patient must meet all of the following inclusion criteria:
- Patient must have radiographically-confirmed progression of, or recurrent, primary or secondary Grade IV glioma, including infratentorial (brainstem, cerebellar) glioma (confirmed by biopsy) and subcortical glioma.
- Patient must have radiographically-confirmed progression of, recurrent, primary or secondary Grade III astrocytoma.
- All patients must be on a stable or decreasing dose of steroids for at least five days prior to the date of informed consent.
- Patient must have failed previous radiation treatment or combined treatment with temozolomide and radiation.
- If progression of disease occurs within 90 days of conformal radiation, the progression/recurrence must be outside of the radiation field or proven by biopsy/resection.
Show all 28Show fewer
- Patient must be ≥ 18 years of age.
- Patient must have an ECOG performance status of 0-2 or KPS ≥ 60 (the latter for Phase 1 only).
- Patient must have an expected survival of at least three months.
- Patient must have a baseline MRI with gadolinium within 14 days of first administration of study drug.
- Patient must be willing to provide blood samples for pharmacokinetic study.
- If patient suffers from seizures, (s)he must be controlled on a stable dose of anti- epileptics for 14 days prior to the date of informed consent.
- Patient must have adequate organ and marrow function as defined below:
- Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mcL
- Platelets ≥ 100,000/mcL
- Total bilirubin within normal institutional limits
- AST (SGOT)/ALT (SPGT)≤ 2.5 × institutional upper limit of normal
- Creatinine within normal institutional limits
- Female patients of child-bearing potential and male patients must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) for 30 days prior to the first administration of study drug, for the duration of study participation, and for 90 days following completion of therapy. Should a female patient become pregnant, or suspect she is pregnant, while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately.
- A female of child-bearing potential is any woman (regardless of sexual orientation, having undergone a tubal ligation, or remaining celibate by choice) who meets the following criteria:
- Has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy; or
- Has not been naturally postmenopausal for at least 12 consecutive months (i.e., has had menses at any time in the preceding 12 consecutive months).
- A negative serum pregnancy test will be required of all female patients of child-bearing potential within seven days prior to initiating study drug.
- A serum pregnancy test will be repeated immediately if pregnancy is suspected.
- Patient must have the ability to understand, and the willingness to sign, a written informed consent.
- Phase 2a
- In addition to meeting Inclusion Criteria for the Phase I portion of the study, patients eligible for participation in the Phase 2a portion of the study must additionally meet the following criteria:
- Patients must have a confirmed IDH1 mutation by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rtPCR) or immunohistochemistry (unless continuing into the Phase 2a portion of the study from the Phase I portion of the study).
Who cannot join
- If the patient meets any of the following criteria, the patient must not be enrolled:
- The size of the tumor is > 30mm (length x width), as assessed at the baseline (pre- study) MRI evaluation.
- The tumor is multi-focal, as assessed at the baseline (pre-study) MRI evaluation.
- Patient has completed chemo-radiation within the last 90 days prior to first administration of study drug, unless new contrast enhancement is outside of radiation field, or there is tissue proven recurrence or progression.
- Patient has had surgery within seven days prior to the date of informed consent.
- Patient has had any form of anti-cancer therapy or treatment within 28 days prior to first administration of study drug.
Show all 16Show fewer
- Patient has not recovered from adverse events due to chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiation therapy administered more than 28 days prior to first administration of study drug.
- Patient has had prior treatment with bevacizumab, a chemotherapy wafer implant (Gliadel®), or any other FDA-approved anti-cancer therapy or treatment except temozolomide.
- Patient has had more than one recurrence or progression of his/her tumors.
- Patient has received any other investigational agents within 28 days prior to the first administration of study drug.
- Patient has had prior treatment with perillyl alcohol, administered either intravenously or intranasally.
- Patient has a history of allergic reactions attributed to perillyl alcohol.
- Patient has uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
- Patient must not be pregnant or nursing due to the potential for congenital abnormalities and the potential of this regimen to harm nursing infants.
- Patient has a history of new diagnosis or treatment of cancer other than malignant glioma within five years prior to the date of informed consent, except for basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.
- Leptomeningeal involvement of the patient's tumor.
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 1 country.
11 sites in 1 country
United States11 sites
Georgia Cancer Center (Augusta University)
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44333
Baylor Scott & White Health
Dallas, Texas, 75061
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75235
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Ochsner Health
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
Northwell Health
New York, New York, 10016
Sutter Health Research Institute
San Francisco, California, 94110
Saint John Cancer Institute
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Atlantic Health (Overlook Medical Center)
Summit, New Jersey, 07901
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
About this study
Official title: An Open-Label, Phase 1/2A Dose Escalation Study of Safety and Efficacy of NEO100 in Recurrent or Progressive Grade III or Grade IV Gliomas With IDH1 Mutation
This multi-site, Phase 1/2a clinical trial is an open-label study to identify the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of a repeated dose regimen of NEO100 (perillyl alcohol) for the treatment of patients with radiographically-confirmed progression of Grade IV glioma or recurrent primary or secondary Grade IV glioma. The study will have two phases, Phase 1 and Phase 2a. Phase 1 is a standard cohort dose escalation 3+3 design used to determine the maximum tolerated dose for Phase 2a. There will be up to 24 patients enrolled in Phase 1. There will be 25 patients enrolled in Phase 2a. For both phases of the study, NEO100 will be self-administered four times daily for a 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression, death or patient withdraw from study for any reason, whichever occurs first.
Version 10 of the protocol changed the inclusion criteria for Phase 2a to limit inclusion to those patients with progressive or recurrent primary or secondary Grade IV gliomas expressing IDH1 mutations. Prior to the protocol amendment, 4 patients were enrolled who were IDH1 wild-type. Therefore, an additional 28 patients will be recruited for a total of 32 patients enrolled into Phase 2a of this study to have 35 evaluable cases.
Read more
Version 12 of the protocol expanded the inclusion criteria for Phase 2a to include those patients with progressive or recurrent Grade III Astrocytoma expressing IDH1 mutations.
Review of the literature specific to these patients found the same expected time to progression and death. As a result, the number of patients to enroll remains 32 to have 35 evaluable cases.
Read the detailed description
Malignant glioma, particularly glioblastoma multiforme (GBM, WHO grade IV astrocytic glioma) accounts for over half of all gliomas, which in turn account for 80% of all malignant brain and CNS tumors. In European and North American countries, the incidence rate is approximately four to five new cases per 100,000 people per year.
Most patients with glioblastoma are faced with a dismal prognosis. Advances in neurosurgery, radiation, and chemotherapy during the past decade have provided only small improvements in clinical outcome, with a 5-year survival rate remaining at less than 10%.The first-line treatment of GBM is usually surgery, both to confirm the diagnosis and to remove as much of the tumor as possible. Concurrent temozolomide with radiotherapy followed by adjuvant systemic temozolomide has produced a median survival of 14.6 to 16.6 months, and this regimen is now the standard of care for GBM, as well as grade III anaplastic glioma.
Regardless of the treatment regimen, the aggressive infiltration of glioblastoma throughout the brain typically produces progressive disability, ultimately leading to death in nearly all cases. Innovative treatment is urgently needed.
Molecular profiling is being used to separate patients with GBM into prognostic groups. A mutation affecting codon 132 of the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) gene was found to occur in up to 12% of glioblastomas. A review of sequencing studies on large glioma patient cohorts have found IDH1 mutations present in 6% (range 3-16%).
IDH1 mutation is considered a definitive diagnostic molecular marker of glioblastomas and is considered more reliable and objective than clinical criteria. Long term outcome for patients with high-grade glioma including glioblastoma directly correlates to IDH1 mutation status. IDH1 mutated tumors have been associated with an improved outcome comparable to IDH1 wild-type tumors. IDH1 mutation has remained an independent favorable prognostic marker even after adjustment for age, grade, MGMT status, genomic profile and treatment in multivariate analysis. Median OS for glioblastoma patients following first recurrence is 9.8 months for IDH1 wildtype tumors versus 19.32 months for IDH1 mutated cancers. No increase in PFS was found.
Anaplastic astrocytoma is a rare, malignant brain tumor that arises from a subtype of glial cells that make up the majority of cells in the central nervous system, called astrocytes. Approximately 70-80% of WHO Grades II and III astrocytoma possess IDH mutations. In general, those diagnosed with initial grade III astrocytomas have a higher survival rate than patients with grade IV astrocytomas (5-year survival rate, Grade III, 71 participants, 49.2 ± 6.6 months vs. Grade IV, 216 patients, 9.6 ± 4.4 months). Interestingly, the presence of IDH mutations predict a favorable disease outcome with prolonged median survival in grade IV astrocytoma (IDH wild type: 15 months; IDH mutant: 31 months) and grade III anaplastic astrocytoma (IDH wild type: 20 months; IDH mutant: 65 months).
The reported median overall survival (OS) for glioblastomas is 14-15 months. Patients with initial diagnosis grade III astrocytoma have a considerably higher OS (45.2 ± 5.2 months with chemotherapy and radiotherapy, compared to 31.9 ± 2.7 months with no treatment), and progression free survival (PFS) (42.8 months treated with adjuvant temozolomide, compared to 19.0 months for people not treated with adjuvant temozolomide).
Patients with recurrent Grade III astrocytoma have effectively the same OS to grade IV tumors. A study carried out in 2018 showed 23 out of 100 patients experienced reoccurrence within an average time of 37 months after initial treatment and had an average OS after recurrence of 12.7 months. Additional research confirmed both that a high percentage of anaplastic astrocytomas reoccur and those that do occur have a median OS of approximately 10 months. Finally, 357 patients with highly anaplastic tumours were investigated between 1977 and 1989 (prior to the change in classification of brain tumors by the WHO). A total of 81 of these patients experienced tumour reoccurrence and required secondary treatment. The median OS for these patients was 53 weeks (13.2) months from the start of the secondary treatment. Based upon these studies, it is believed patients with IDH1 mutated recurrent or progressive Grade IV glioblastoma and IDH1 mutated recurrent or progressive Grade III astrocytoma have the same clinical prognosis with respect to progression free survival and overall survival and suitable for study in this protocol.
One reason for the poor prognosis of malignant glioma and astrocytoma patients is the difficulty of penetrating the blood brain barrier (BBB) with chemotherapy agents. Nasal brain delivery of chemotherapy offers a novel, paradigm shifting platform based on technology to deliver chemotherapy via inhalation to the brain tumor. The presumed mechanism of nasal brain delivery from preclinical rodent studies is thought to be via the olfactory and trigeminal nerves. Effective nasal brain delivery has been demonstrated in humans in other diseases. For example, Reger et al. have reported effective delivery of intranasal insulin for Alzheimer's disease.
NEO100 has been demonstrated to open the BBB in a reversible and nontoxic fashion in vitro and in vivo, enabling greatly increased brain entry of all tested therapeutics and was well tolerated in animals. Mechanistic studies revealed effects of NEO100 on different BBB transport pathways. An in vitro BBB, consisting of human astrocytes and brain endothelial cells, has been used to determine trastuzumab penetration when administered with NEO100, greatly increasing trastuzumab penetration. In vivo, IA NEO100-mediated BBB opening resulted in tumor-selective accumulation of trastuzumab , without detectable presence in normal brain tissue, along with increased presence of immune cell populations. IV delivery of trastuzumab or T-DM1 achieved significantly greater overall survival of tumor-bearing mice when combined with IA NEO100.
In a case lesson, after surgical removal of her recurrent GBM tumor, a patient received daily intranasal NEO100 therapy for more than 3 years before a second recurrence emerged. At that time, a final dose of NEO100 was given shortly before the tumor tissue was surgically removed, and the tissue was processed for high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of perillyl alcohol and its primary metabolite, perillic acid. Both molecules could readily be detected in the tumor tissue. This is the first demonstration of perillyl alcohol and perillic acid in brain tumor tissue from any patient. It reveals that intranasal administration of NEO100 is a valid approach to achieve delivery of this agent to a brain tumor. In view of the non-invasive and safe nature of this method, along with tentative indications of activity, these findings add confidence to the notion that intranasal administration of NEO100 holds potential as a new treatment option for brain-localized malignancies.
Perillyl alcohol, also called p-metha1,7-diene-6-ol,or 4-isopropenylcyclo-hexenecarbinol, is a monoterpene, isolated from the essential oils of lavender, peppermint, spearmint, and several other plants and synthesized by the mevalonate pathway. It has been previously demonstrated to have anti-cancer properties in preclinical studies in rodent models for a variety of cancers including mammary, pancreatic, and colon cancer. Although the exact mechanism of perillyl alcohol induced tumor regression is unknown, perillyl alcohol has been reported to modulate cellular processes that control cell growth and differentiation including G1 cell cycle arrest and induction of apoptosis.
Perillyl alcohol has also been shown to inhibit post-translational modification of proteins involved in signal transduction. It has been postulated that the anti-neoplastic activity of perillyl alcohol involves a decrease in the levels of isoprenylated Ras and Ras-related proteins, thereby reducing the physiological functioning of these proteins. Protein isoprenylation involves the post-translational modification of a protein by the covalent attachment of a lipophilic farnesyl isoprenoid group to a cysteine residue at or near the carboxyl terminus. Isoprenoid substrates for prenylprotein transferase enzymes include farnesyl pyrophosphate plus geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate, two intermediates in the mevalonate pathway. This action was attributed to the inhibition of farnesyl protein transferase activity. Farnesylation is the most critical part of the process that leads to the activation of Ras, and farnesyl transferase inhibitors exert their antitumor effect in part by inhibiting Ras-mediated signaling. A study revealed that H-Ras and K-Ras farnesylation were inhibited by perillyl alcohol.
Ras activity is elevated in malignant glioma tumors. Activated Ras stimulates other pathways essential for proliferation and progression through the cell cycle and inhibition of apoptosis in malignant gliomas. Moreover, the formation of malignant gliomas requires the cooperation of both Ras and Akt signaling. This cooperative effect has been demonstrated by somatic-cell gene transfer, during which transfer of either an activated form of K-Ras or Akt alone to neural progenitors was insufficient to form malignant glioma in vivo, but the combined effect of both pathways could initiate gliomagenesis. Thus, based on this known alteration in signal transduction involving K-Ras in malignant glioma, and its ability to induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, perillyl alcohol (NEO100) may be an attractive agent and warrants further clinical development.
Furthermore, intranasal delivery of NEO100 has the additional, potential benefit of direct drug delivery into the brain and avoiding systemic toxicity and first pass metabolism. It is believed the mechanism of action of NEO100 is similar in both patients with progressive or recurrent Grade IV gliomas who have IDH1 mutations and patients with progressive or recurrent Grade III astrocytomas who have IDH1 mutations making inclusion of both populations appropriate for this study.
- Conditions
- Glioblastoma Multiforme
- Being tested
- Perillyl alcohol
- Keywords
- recurrent glioblastoma, recurrent GBM
- Medical subject headings
- Glioblastoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Perillyl alcoholDrug
Also called NEO100
Intranasal administration
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NEO100 Phase 1 | Experimental | Intranasal delivery of NEO100 (perillyl alcohol) four times a day, escalation up to four different doses to determine maximum tolerated dose. Receives: Drug: Perillyl alcohol |
| NEO100 Phase 2A | Experimental | Intranasal delivery of NEO100 (perillyl alcohol) four times a day. Treatment of total of 25 patients at maximum tolerated dose. Receives: Drug: Perillyl alcohol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Phase 1 Primary Outcome: Number of Participants with Abnormal Laboratory Values and/or Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment
Measured: Up to 6 months
Phase 2 Primary Outcome: Number of Participants Who Are Alive Each Month For 6 Months
Measured: Up to 6 months
Phase 2 Primary Outcome: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values and/or Adverse Events That Are Related To Treatment
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study start1 Aug 2017
- Primary completion30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Glioblastoma MultiformeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 49 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Neonc Technologies, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Thomas Chen, MD, PhD, Study chair, NeOnc Technologies Holdings, Inc.Josh Neman, PhD, Study director, NeOnc Technologies Holdings, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02704858
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NEO100-01
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 27 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 14 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Schonthal AH, Peereboom DM, Wagle N, Lai R, Mathew AJ, Hurth KM, Simmon VF, Howard SP, Taylor LP, Chow F, da Fonseca CO, Chen TC. Phase I trial of intranasal NEO100, highly purified perillyl alcohol, in adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Neurooncol Adv. 2021 Feb 12;3(1):vdab005. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab005. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
PubMed 33604574
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-Label, Phase 1/2A Dose Escalation Study of Safety and Efficacy of NEO100 in Recurrent or Progressive Grade III or Grade IV Gliomas With IDH1 Mutation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02704858
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NEO100-01
- Conditions
- Glioblastoma Multiforme
- Keywords
- recurrent glioblastoma, recurrent GBM
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 49 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Neonc Technologies, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This multi-site, Phase 1/2a clinical trial is an open-label study to identify the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of a repeated dose regimen of NEO100 (perillyl alcohol) for the treatment of patients with radiographically-confirmed progression of Grade IV glioma or recurrent primary or secondary Grade IV glioma. The study will have two phases, Phase 1 and Phase 2a. Phase 1 is a standard cohort dose escalation 3+3 design used to determine the maximum tolerated dose for Phase 2a. There will be up to 24 patients enrolled in Phase 1. There will be 25 patients enrolled in Phase 2a. For both phases of the study, NEO100 will be self-administered four times daily for a 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression, death or patient withdraw from study for any reason, whichever occurs first.
Version 10 of the protocol changed the inclusion criteria for Phase 2a to limit inclusion to those patients with progressive or recurrent primary or secondary Grade IV gliomas expressing IDH1 mutations. Prior to the protocol amendment, 4 patients were enrolled who were IDH1 wild-type. Therefore, an additional 28 patients will be recruited for a total of 32 patients enrolled into Phase 2a of this study to have 35 evaluable cases.
Version 12 of the protocol expanded the inclusion criteria for Phase 2a to include those patients with progressive or recurrent Grade III Astrocytoma expressing IDH1 mutations.
Review of the literature specific to these patients found the same expected time to progression and death. As a result, the number of patients to enroll remains 32 to have 35 evaluable cases.
Detailed description
Malignant glioma, particularly glioblastoma multiforme (GBM, WHO grade IV astrocytic glioma) accounts for over half of all gliomas, which in turn account for 80% of all malignant brain and CNS tumors. In European and North American countries, the incidence rate is approximately four to five new cases per 100,000 people per year.
Most patients with glioblastoma are faced with a dismal prognosis. Advances in neurosurgery, radiation, and chemotherapy during the past decade have provided only small improvements in clinical outcome, with a 5-year survival rate remaining at less than 10%.The first-line treatment of GBM is usually surgery, both to confirm the diagnosis and to remove as much of the tumor as possible. Concurrent temozolomide with radiotherapy followed by adjuvant systemic temozolomide has produced a median survival of 14.6 to 16.6 months, and this regimen is now the standard of care for GBM, as well as grade III anaplastic glioma.
Regardless of the treatment regimen, the aggressive infiltration of glioblastoma throughout the brain typically produces progressive disability, ultimately leading to death in nearly all cases. Innovative treatment is urgently needed.
Molecular profiling is being used to separate patients with GBM into prognostic groups. A mutation affecting codon 132 of the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) gene was found to occur in up to 12% of glioblastomas. A review of sequencing studies on large glioma patient cohorts have found IDH1 mutations present in 6% (range 3-16%).
IDH1 mutation is considered a definitive diagnostic molecular marker of glioblastomas and is considered more reliable and objective than clinical criteria. Long term outcome for patients with high-grade glioma including glioblastoma directly correlates to IDH1 mutation status. IDH1 mutated tumors have been associated with an improved outcome comparable to IDH1 wild-type tumors. IDH1 mutation has remained an independent favorable prognostic marker even after adjustment for age, grade, MGMT status, genomic profile and treatment in multivariate analysis. Median OS for glioblastoma patients following first recurrence is 9.8 months for IDH1 wildtype tumors versus 19.32 months for IDH1 mutated cancers. No increase in PFS was found.
Anaplastic astrocytoma is a rare, malignant brain tumor that arises from a subtype of glial cells that make up the majority of cells in the central nervous system, called astrocytes. Approximately 70-80% of WHO Grades II and III astrocytoma possess IDH mutations. In general, those diagnosed with initial grade III astrocytomas have a higher survival rate than patients with grade IV astrocytomas (5-year survival rate, Grade III, 71 participants, 49.2 ± 6.6 months vs. Grade IV, 216 patients, 9.6 ± 4.4 months). Interestingly, the presence of IDH mutations predict a favorable disease outcome with prolonged median survival in grade IV astrocytoma (IDH wild type: 15 months; IDH mutant: 31 months) and grade III anaplastic astrocytoma (IDH wild type: 20 months; IDH mutant: 65 months).
The reported median overall survival (OS) for glioblastomas is 14-15 months. Patients with initial diagnosis grade III astrocytoma have a considerably higher OS (45.2 ± 5.2 months with chemotherapy and radiotherapy, compared to 31.9 ± 2.7 months with no treatment), and progression free survival (PFS) (42.8 months treated with adjuvant temozolomide, compared to 19.0 months for people not treated with adjuvant temozolomide).
Patients with recurrent Grade III astrocytoma have effectively the same OS to grade IV tumors. A study carried out in 2018 showed 23 out of 100 patients experienced reoccurrence within an average time of 37 months after initial treatment and had an average OS after recurrence of 12.7 months. Additional research confirmed both that a high percentage of anaplastic astrocytomas reoccur and those that do occur have a median OS of approximately 10 months. Finally, 357 patients with highly anaplastic tumours were investigated between 1977 and 1989 (prior to the change in classification of brain tumors by the WHO). A total of 81 of these patients experienced tumour reoccurrence and required secondary treatment. The median OS for these patients was 53 weeks (13.2) months from the start of the secondary treatment. Based upon these studies, it is believed patients with IDH1 mutated recurrent or progressive Grade IV glioblastoma and IDH1 mutated recurrent or progressive Grade III astrocytoma have the same clinical prognosis with respect to progression free survival and overall survival and suitable for study in this protocol.
One reason for the poor prognosis of malignant glioma and astrocytoma patients is the difficulty of penetrating the blood brain barrier (BBB) with chemotherapy agents. Nasal brain delivery of chemotherapy offers a novel, paradigm shifting platform based on technology to deliver chemotherapy via inhalation to the brain tumor. The presumed mechanism of nasal brain delivery from preclinical rodent studies is thought to be via the olfactory and trigeminal nerves. Effective nasal brain delivery has been demonstrated in humans in other diseases. For example, Reger et al. have reported effective delivery of intranasal insulin for Alzheimer's disease.
NEO100 has been demonstrated to open the BBB in a reversible and nontoxic fashion in vitro and in vivo, enabling greatly increased brain entry of all tested therapeutics and was well tolerated in animals. Mechanistic studies revealed effects of NEO100 on different BBB transport pathways. An in vitro BBB, consisting of human astrocytes and brain endothelial cells, has been used to determine trastuzumab penetration when administered with NEO100, greatly increasing trastuzumab penetration. In vivo, IA NEO100-mediated BBB opening resulted in tumor-selective accumulation of trastuzumab , without detectable presence in normal brain tissue, along with increased presence of immune cell populations. IV delivery of trastuzumab or T-DM1 achieved significantly greater overall survival of tumor-bearing mice when combined with IA NEO100.
In a case lesson, after surgical removal of her recurrent GBM tumor, a patient received daily intranasal NEO100 therapy for more than 3 years before a second recurrence emerged. At that time, a final dose of NEO100 was given shortly before the tumor tissue was surgically removed, and the tissue was processed for high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of perillyl alcohol and its primary metabolite, perillic acid. Both molecules could readily be detected in the tumor tissue. This is the first demonstration of perillyl alcohol and perillic acid in brain tumor tissue from any patient. It reveals that intranasal administration of NEO100 is a valid approach to achieve delivery of this agent to a brain tumor. In view of the non-invasive and safe nature of this method, along with tentative indications of activity, these findings add confidence to the notion that intranasal administration of NEO100 holds potential as a new treatment option for brain-localized malignancies.
Perillyl alcohol, also called p-metha1,7-diene-6-ol,or 4-isopropenylcyclo-hexenecarbinol, is a monoterpene, isolated from the essential oils of lavender, peppermint, spearmint, and several other plants and synthesized by the mevalonate pathway. It has been previously demonstrated to have anti-cancer properties in preclinical studies in rodent models for a variety of cancers including mammary, pancreatic, and colon cancer. Although the exact mechanism of perillyl alcohol induced tumor regression is unknown, perillyl alcohol has been reported to modulate cellular processes that control cell growth and differentiation including G1 cell cycle arrest and induction of apoptosis.
Perillyl alcohol has also been shown to inhibit post-translational modification of proteins involved in signal transduction. It has been postulated that the anti-neoplastic activity of perillyl alcohol involves a decrease in the levels of isoprenylated Ras and Ras-related proteins, thereby reducing the physiological functioning of these proteins. Protein isoprenylation involves the post-translational modification of a protein by the covalent attachment of a lipophilic farnesyl isoprenoid group to a cysteine residue at or near the carboxyl terminus. Isoprenoid substrates for prenylprotein transferase enzymes include farnesyl pyrophosphate plus geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate, two intermediates in the mevalonate pathway. This action was attributed to the inhibition of farnesyl protein transferase activity. Farnesylation is the most critical part of the process that leads to the activation of Ras, and farnesyl transferase inhibitors exert their antitumor effect in part by inhibiting Ras-mediated signaling. A study revealed that H-Ras and K-Ras farnesylation were inhibited by perillyl alcohol.
Ras activity is elevated in malignant glioma tumors. Activated Ras stimulates other pathways essential for proliferation and progression through the cell cycle and inhibition of apoptosis in malignant gliomas. Moreover, the formation of malignant gliomas requires the cooperation of both Ras and Akt signaling. This cooperative effect has been demonstrated by somatic-cell gene transfer, during which transfer of either an activated form of K-Ras or Akt alone to neural progenitors was insufficient to form malignant glioma in vivo, but the combined effect of both pathways could initiate gliomagenesis. Thus, based on this known alteration in signal transduction involving K-Ras in malignant glioma, and its ability to induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, perillyl alcohol (NEO100) may be an attractive agent and warrants further clinical development.
Furthermore, intranasal delivery of NEO100 has the additional, potential benefit of direct drug delivery into the brain and avoiding systemic toxicity and first pass metabolism. It is believed the mechanism of action of NEO100 is similar in both patients with progressive or recurrent Grade IV gliomas who have IDH1 mutations and patients with progressive or recurrent Grade III astrocytomas who have IDH1 mutations making inclusion of both populations appropriate for this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NEO100 Phase 1 | Experimental | Drug: Perillyl alcoholIntranasal delivery of NEO100 (perillyl alcohol) four times a day, escalation up to four different doses to determine maximum tolerated dose. |
| NEO100 Phase 2A | Experimental | Drug: Perillyl alcoholIntranasal delivery of NEO100 (perillyl alcohol) four times a day. Treatment of total of 25 patients at maximum tolerated dose. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (28 listed)
- To be eligible to participate in the study, a patient must meet all of the following inclusion criteria:
- Patient must have radiographically-confirmed progression of, or recurrent, primary or secondary Grade IV glioma, including infratentorial (brainstem, cerebellar) glioma (confirmed by biopsy) and subcortical glioma.
- Patient must have radiographically-confirmed progression of, recurrent, primary or secondary Grade III astrocytoma.
- All patients must be on a stable or decreasing dose of steroids for at least five days prior to the date of informed consent.
- Patient must have failed previous radiation treatment or combined treatment with temozolomide and radiation.
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- If the patient meets any of the following criteria, the patient must not be enrolled:
- The size of the tumor is > 30mm (length x width), as assessed at the baseline (pre- study) MRI evaluation.
- The tumor is multi-focal, as assessed at the baseline (pre-study) MRI evaluation.
- Patient has completed chemo-radiation within the last 90 days prior to first administration of study drug, unless new contrast enhancement is outside of radiation field, or there is tissue proven recurrence or progression.
- Patient has had surgery within seven days prior to the date of informed consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Perillyl alcoholAlso: NEO100Intranasal administration | Drug | NEO100 Phase 1, NEO100 Phase 2A |
Primary outcome
Phase 1 Primary Outcome: Number of Participants with Abnormal Laboratory Values and/or Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Phase 2 Primary Outcome: Number of Participants Who Are Alive Each Month For 6 Months
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Phase 2 Primary Outcome: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values and/or Adverse Events That Are Related To Treatment
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Sep 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 33604574Schonthal AH, Peereboom DM, Wagle N, Lai R, Mathew AJ, Hurth KM, Simmon VF, Howard SP, Taylor LP, Chow F, da Fonseca CO, Chen TC. Phase I trial of intranasal NEO100, highly purified perillyl alcohol, in adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Neurooncol Adv. 2021 Feb 12;3(1):vdab005. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab005. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Glioblastoma Multiforme
RecruitingPhase 1
A Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Safety of the TheraSphere Glioblastoma (GBM) Device in Patients With Recurrent GBM
Glioblastoma Multiforme, Recurrent Glioblastoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of RNA-lipid Particle (RNA-LP) Vaccines for Newly Diagnosed Pediatric High-Grade Gliomas (pHGG) and Adult Glioblastoma (GBM)
Adult Glioblastoma, High Grade Glioma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
IL-8 Receptor-modified CD70 CAR T Cell Therapy in CD70+ Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Pediatric High-grade Glioma (pHGG) and Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma (ndDIPG)
High-grade Glioma, Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Immune Modulatory DC Vaccine Against Brain Tumor
Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma or Glioblastoma
Recruiting
Tear Fluid for the Detection of Tumor-associated Extracellular Vesicles in Glioblastoma Patients
Glioblastoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thomas Chen, MD, PhD study chair
NeOnc Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Josh Neman, PhD study director
NeOnc Technologies Holdings, Inc.
11 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Perillyl alcohol in people with Glioblastoma Multiforme, run by Neonc Technologies, Inc. at 11 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 28 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Phase 1 Primary Outcome: Number of Participants with Abnormal Laboratory Values and/or Adverse Events That Are Related to Treatment (time frame: Up to 6 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02704858, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Sep 2026.