Type 1 Diabetes MellitusPhase 3NCT02705053
At Home Study of a Zone-Model Predictive Control (MPC) Controller and a Health Monitoring System (HMS) With the Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) System and Run-to-Run Adaptation
A Phase 3 study testing CGM and Insulin Pump in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Sansum Diabetes Research Institute at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This clinical trial is a study to assess the performance of an automated glucose control system (Artificial Pancreas, AP) device in home settings for subjects with type 1 diabetes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- CGM and Insulin Pump
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2016to Aug 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinical diagnosis, based on investigator assessment, of type 1 diabetes for at least one year and using insulin for at least 1 year and an insulin pump for at least 6 months
- Willing to wear the study CGM device for the duration of the study
- Age ≥21 to <65 years
- HbA1c <10.0%; if HbA1c <6.0% then total daily insulin must be ≥0.5 U/kg
- For females, not currently known to be pregnant. If female and sexually active, must agree to use a form of contraception to prevent pregnancy while a participant in the study. A negative urine pregnancy test will be required for all premenopausal women who are not surgically sterile. Subjects who become pregnant will be discontinued from the study.
- Demonstration of proper mental status and cognition for the study
Show all 12Show fewer
- Currently using insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio to calculate meal bolus sizes
- Hypoglycemia awareness as demonstrated by a Clarke Hypoglycemia Unawareness score of 2 or lower
- Access to internet and cell phone service at home, and a computer for downloading device data
- Availability of care partner committed to participating in training activities, knowledgeable at all times of the participant's location, and being available to provide assistance when system is being used at night
- Commitment to maintaining uninterrupted availability via cell phone and avoiding any overnight travel for the duration the period using the closed-loop system
- An understanding of and willingness to follow the protocol and sign the informed consent
Who cannot join
- Admission for diabetic ketoacidosis in the 12 months prior to enrollment
- Severe hypoglycemia resulting in seizure or loss of consciousness in the 12 months prior to enrollment
- History of a seizure disorder (except hypoglycemic seizure), unless written clearance is received from a neurologist
- Coronary artery disease or heart failure, unless written clearance is received from a cardiologist
- History of cardiac arrhythmia (except for benign premature atrial contractions and benign premature ventricular contractions which are permitted)
- Cystic fibrosis
Show all 22Show fewer
- A known medical condition that in the judgment of the investigator might interfere with the completion of the protocol such as the following examples:
- Inpatient psychiatric treatment in the past 6 months for either the subject or the subject's primary care giver (i.e., parent or guardian)
- Presence of a known adrenal disorder
- Abnormal liver function test results (Transaminase >2 times the upper limit of normal); testing required for subjects taking medications known to affect liver function or with diseases known to affect liver function
- Abnormal renal function test results (calculated GFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2); testing required for subjects with diabetes duration of greater than 5 years post onset of puberty
- Active gastroparesis
- If on antihypertensive, thyroid, anti-depressant or lipid lowering medication, lack of stability on the medication for the past 2 months prior to enrollment in the study
- Uncontrolled thyroid disease (TSH undetectable or >10 mlU/L); testing required within three months prior to admission for subjects with a goiter or who are on thyroid hormone replacement, and within one year otherwise
- Abuse of alcohol or recreational drugs
- Infectious process not anticipated to resolve prior to study procedures (e.g. meningitis, pneumonia, osteomyelitis)
- A recent injury to body or limb, muscular disorder, use of any medication, any carcinogenic disease, or other significant medical disorder if that injury, medication or disease in the judgment of the investigator will affect the completion of the protocol
- Current use of the following drugs and supplements:
- Acetaminophen
- Beta blockers
- Oral or injectable glucocorticoids
- Any other medication that the investigator believes is a contraindication to the subject's participation
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
William Sansum Diabetes Center
Santa Barbara, California, 93111
About this study
This clinical trial is a study to assess the performance of an automated glucose control system (Artificial Pancreas, AP) device in home settings for subjects with type 1 diabetes. Specifically, the investigators will test zone model predictive control AP that will be enhanced by run-to-run optimizations of basal rates (BR) and insulin to carbohydrate ratios (CR).
Read the detailed description
This clinical trial is a study to assess the performance of an automated glucose control system (Artificial Pancreas, AP) device in home settings for subjects with type 1 diabetes. Specifically, the investigators will test zone model predictive control AP that will be enhanced by run-to-run optimizations of basal rates (BR) and insulin to carbohydrate ratios (CR). This protocol builds on the investigators previously validated Zone-MPC and Health Monitoring System (HMS) algorithms (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01929798) integrated into the Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) system (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02463682). The same AP system used in NCT02463682 will now be used with algorithmic adjustment of CR's prior to closed-loop initiation, and continued BR and CR algorithmic optimization during closed-loop use for a longer duration.
The system will be evaluated on up to 12 subjects per site (n=36 subjects) for 15 weeks at 3 different sites (William Sansum Diabetes Center, University of Virginia, and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN).
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- CGM and Insulin Pump, Closed-Loop Control System
- Keywords
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Artificial Pancreas, Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CGM and Insulin PumpDevice
Dexcom G4 Platinum CGM with Share AP Receiver Roche Accu-Chek insulin pump.
Closed-Loop Control SystemDevice
The devices that will be used in the Closed-Loop Control System include the following components:
DiAs - a smart-phone medical platform; Dexcom G4 Platinum connected to DiAs via Bluetooth CGM receiver; Roche Accu-Chek insulin pump connected to DiAs via wireless Bluetooth; Remote Monitoring Server connected to DiAs via 3G or local Wi-Fi network, and Zone-MPC and HMS algorithms running on DiAs (MPC and HMS)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor-Augmented Pump Open-Loop Care (Week 2) | Active comparator | The subjects' Sensor-Augmented Pump Open-Loop Care for the second week of the study before any adjustments to pump settings, using a CGM and Insulin Pump. Receives: Device: CGM and Insulin Pump |
| Closed-Loop Control System with Zone MPC and HMS | Experimental | The artificial pancreas system will be allowed to employ its Model Predictive Control algorithm to make decisions about insulin delivery based on CGM glucose levels. The Health Monitoring System algorithm uses the same CGM data as the MPC control algorithm but utilizes a separate algorithm for trending and predictions of future glucose values. Using a redundant and independent algorithm is an important safety feature of the overall AP device. Algorithmic adjustment of carbohydrate ratios prior to closed-loop initiation, and continued basal rate and carbohydrate ratio algorithmic optimization during closed-loop use will occur. Receives: Device: Closed-Loop Control System |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (%) from baseline (week 2) to end of week 15 (end of study), with A1c measured at weeks 7 and 11 as well for repeated measures.
The primary endpoint is change in HbA1c from baseline (end of week 2) to end of week 15 (end of study). HbA1c will be measured at weeks 7 and 11 as well following each adaptation period, so the overall design of the study includes 4 repeated measures and a baseline-end of study contrast.
Measured: 13 Weeks
Secondary outcomes (10)
Time within the target range for glucose 70-180 mg/dl overall
Time within the target range for glucose 70-180 mg/dl overall, compared between sensor-augmented pump use (open loop care, week 2) and adapted closed-loop control (final week of each month) to determine the feasibility of long-term system use.
Measured: 1 week
Time within the tight target range for glucose 80-140 mg/dl overnight
Time within the tight target range for glucose 80-140 mg/dl overnight, compared between sensor-augmented pump use (open loop care, week 2) and adapted closed-loop control (final week of each month) to determine the feasibility of long-term system use.
Measured: 1 week
Time within the target range for glucose 70-150 mg/dl postprandial within 5 hours following meals
Time within the target range for glucose 70-150 mg/dl postprandial within 5 hours following meals, compared between sensor-augmented pump use (open loop care, week 2) and adapted closed-loop control (final week of each month) to determine the feasibility of long-term system use.
Measured: 1 week
Markers of hypo- and hyperglycemia
Markers of hypo- and hyperglycemia, compared between sensor-augmented pump use (open loop care, week 2) and adapted closed-loop control (final week of each month) to determine the feasibility of long-term system use. These markers include LBGI (Low blood glucose index) and HBGI (High blood glucose index.
Measured: 1 week
Insulin Doses Given
Change in insulin doses given, compared between sensor-augmented pump use (open loop care, week 2) and adapted closed-loop control (final week of each month) to determine the feasibility of long-term system use.
Measured: 1 week
Treatments for hypoglycemia
Treatments for hypoglycemia between the open and closed-loop phases of the study, compared between sensor-augmented pump use (open loop care, week 2) and adapted closed-loop control (final week of each month) to determine the feasibility of long-term system use.
Measured: 1 week
Number of alerts given by the HMS to prevent hypoglycemia
Number of alerts given by the HMS to prevent hypoglycemia during closed-Loop control.
Measured: 12 weeks
Outside interventions needed.
Outside interventions needed to aid with treatment during closed-Loop control.
Measured: 12 weeks
Failure analysis of the devices/connectivity issues that may occur (# disconnects and device restarts).
Failure analysis of the devices/connectivity issues that may occur during closed-Loop control. This includes number of CGM communication losses with 3 or more missed points, and number of times the entire system required a restart
Measured: 12 weeks
Time with glucose ≤ 70 mg/dL, overall
Time with glucose ≤ 70 mg/dL, compared between sensor-augmented pump use (open loop care, week 2) and adapted closed-loop control (final week of each month) to determine the feasibility of long-term system use.
Measured: 1 week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2016
- Primary completionAug 2016
- Study completionAug 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 1 Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Harvard University, University of California, Santa Barbara, Mayo Clinic, University of Virginia, University of Padova
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Francis J Doyle III, PhD, Principal investigator, Harvard UniversityEyal Dassau, PhD, Principal investigator, Harvard UniversityJordan E Pinsker, MD, Principal investigator, Sansum Diabetes Research InstituteAnanda Basu, MD, Principal investigator, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MNYogish Kudva, MD, Principal investigator, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MNBoris Kovatchev, PhD, Principal investigator, University of VirginiaSue Brown, MD, Principal investigator, University of VirginiaStephen Patek, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Virginia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02705053
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- G150063_2
- Status last verified
- Oct 2016
- First submitted
- 25 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 14 Oct 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Dassau E, Pinsker JE, Kudva YC, Brown SA, Gondhalekar R, Dalla Man C, Patek S, Schiavon M, Dadlani V, Dasanayake I, Church MM, Carter RE, Bevier WC, Huyett LM, Hughes J, Anderson S, Lv D, Schertz E, Emory E, McCrady-Spitzer SK, Jean T, Bradley PK, Hinshaw L, Laguna Sanz AJ, Basu A, Kovatchev B, Cobelli C, Doyle FJ 3rd. Twelve-Week 24/7 Ambulatory Artificial Pancreas With Weekly Adaptation of Insulin Delivery Settings: Effect on Hemoglobin A1c and Hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care. 2017 Dec;40(12):1719-1726. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1188. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
PubMed 29030383
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Oct 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- At Home Study of a Zone-Model Predictive Control (MPC) Controller and a Health Monitoring System (HMS) With the Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) System and Run-to-Run Adaptation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02705053
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- G150063_2
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- Keywords
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Artificial Pancreas, Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sansum Diabetes Research InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Harvard University, University of California, Santa Barbara, Mayo Clinic, University of Virginia, University of Padova
- Study start
- Feb 2016
- Primary completion
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This clinical trial is a study to assess the performance of an automated glucose control system (Artificial Pancreas, AP) device in home settings for subjects with type 1 diabetes. Specifically, the investigators will test zone model predictive control AP that will be enhanced by run-to-run optimizations of basal rates (BR) and insulin to carbohydrate ratios (CR).
Detailed description
This clinical trial is a study to assess the performance of an automated glucose control system (Artificial Pancreas, AP) device in home settings for subjects with type 1 diabetes. Specifically, the investigators will test zone model predictive control AP that will be enhanced by run-to-run optimizations of basal rates (BR) and insulin to carbohydrate ratios (CR). This protocol builds on the investigators previously validated Zone-MPC and Health Monitoring System (HMS) algorithms (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01929798) integrated into the Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) system (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02463682). The same AP system used in NCT02463682 will now be used with algorithmic adjustment of CR's prior to closed-loop initiation, and continued BR and CR algorithmic optimization during closed-loop use for a longer duration.
The system will be evaluated on up to 12 subjects per site (n=36 subjects) for 15 weeks at 3 different sites (William Sansum Diabetes Center, University of Virginia, and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor-Augmented Pump Open-Loop Care (Week 2) | Active comparator | Device: CGM and Insulin PumpThe subjects' Sensor-Augmented Pump Open-Loop Care for the second week of the study before any adjustments to pump settings, using a CGM and Insulin Pump. |
| Closed-Loop Control System with Zone MPC and HMS | Experimental | Device: Closed-Loop Control SystemThe artificial pancreas system will be allowed to employ its Model Predictive Control algorithm to make decisions about insulin delivery based on CGM glucose levels. The Health Monitoring System algorithm uses the same CGM data as the MPC control algorithm but utilizes a separate algorithm for trending and predictions of future glucose values. Using a redundant and independent algorithm is an important safety feature of the overall AP device. Algorithmic adjustment of carbohydrate ratios prior to closed-loop initiation, and continued basal rate and carbohydrate ratio algorithmic optimization during closed-loop use will occur. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Clinical diagnosis, based on investigator assessment, of type 1 diabetes for at least one year and using insulin for at least 1 year and an insulin pump for at least 6 months
- Willing to wear the study CGM device for the duration of the study
- Age ≥21 to <65 years
- HbA1c <10.0%; if HbA1c <6.0% then total daily insulin must be ≥0.5 U/kg
- For females, not currently known to be pregnant. If female and sexually active, must agree to use a form of contraception to prevent pregnancy while a participant in the study. A negative urine pregnancy test will be required for all premenopausal women who are not surgically sterile. Subjects who become pregnant will be discontinued from the study.
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Admission for diabetic ketoacidosis in the 12 months prior to enrollment
- Severe hypoglycemia resulting in seizure or loss of consciousness in the 12 months prior to enrollment
- History of a seizure disorder (except hypoglycemic seizure), unless written clearance is received from a neurologist
- Coronary artery disease or heart failure, unless written clearance is received from a cardiologist
- History of cardiac arrhythmia (except for benign premature atrial contractions and benign premature ventricular contractions which are permitted)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CGM and Insulin PumpDexcom G4 Platinum CGM with Share AP Receiver Roche Accu-Chek insulin pump. | Device | Sensor-Augmented Pump Open-Loop Care (Week 2) |
| Closed-Loop Control SystemThe devices that will be used in the Closed-Loop Control System include the following components: DiAs - a smart-phone medical platform; Dexcom G4 Platinum connected to DiAs via Bluetooth CGM receiver; Roche Accu-Chek insulin pump connected to DiAs via wireless Bluetooth; Remote Monitoring Server connected to DiAs via 3G or local Wi-Fi network, and Zone-MPC and HMS algorithms running on DiAs (MPC and HMS) | Device | Closed-Loop Control System with Zone MPC and HMS |
Primary outcome
Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (%) from baseline (week 2) to end of week 15 (end of study), with A1c measured at weeks 7 and 11 as well for repeated measures.
Time frame: 13 Weeks
The primary endpoint is change in HbA1c from baseline (end of week 2) to end of week 15 (end of study). HbA1c will be measured at weeks 7 and 11 as well following each adaptation period, so the overall design of the study includes 4 repeated measures and a baseline-end of study contrast.
10 secondary outcomes
Time within the target range for glucose 70-180 mg/dl overall
Time frame: 1 week
Time within the tight target range for glucose 80-140 mg/dl overnight
Time frame: 1 week
Time within the target range for glucose 70-150 mg/dl postprandial within 5 hours following meals
Time frame: 1 week
Markers of hypo- and hyperglycemia
Time frame: 1 week
Insulin Doses Given
Time frame: 1 week
Treatments for hypoglycemia
Time frame: 1 week
Number of alerts given by the HMS to prevent hypoglycemia
Time frame: 12 weeks
Outside interventions needed.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Failure analysis of the devices/connectivity issues that may occur (# disconnects and device restarts).
Time frame: 12 weeks
Time with glucose ≤ 70 mg/dL, overall
Time frame: 1 week
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Oct 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29030383Dassau E, Pinsker JE, Kudva YC, Brown SA, Gondhalekar R, Dalla Man C, Patek S, Schiavon M, Dadlani V, Dasanayake I, Church MM, Carter RE, Bevier WC, Huyett LM, Hughes J, Anderson S, Lv D, Schertz E, Emory E, McCrady-Spitzer SK, Jean T, Bradley PK, Hinshaw L, Laguna Sanz AJ, Basu A, Kovatchev B, Cobelli C, Doyle FJ 3rd. Twelve-Week 24/7 Ambulatory Artificial Pancreas With Weekly Adaptation of Insulin Delivery Settings: Effect on Hemoglobin A1c and Hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care. 2017 Dec;40(12):1719-1726. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1188. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Clinical Application of Stem Cell Educator Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Study of High Density Lipoprotein Function in Type 1 Diabetic Patients With Nephropathy
Type 1 Diabetes
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A First-In-Human Study of ARO-INHBE in Adults With Obesity With and Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Obesity
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate Effect of AZD6234 in Adult Participants With Obesity or Overweight With Weight-related Comorbidity Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Obesity or Overweight
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of 4th Generation Safety-engineered CAR T Cells Targeting Sarcomas
Sarcoma, Osteoid Sarcoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Francis J Doyle III, PhD principal investigator
Harvard University
Eyal Dassau, PhD principal investigator
Harvard University
Jordan E Pinsker, MD principal investigator
Sansum Diabetes Research Institute
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing CGM and Insulin Pump in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Sansum Diabetes Research Institute at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (%) from baseline (week 2) to end of week 15 (end of study), with A1c measured at weeks 7 and 11 as well for repeated measures. (time frame: 13 Weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02705053, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Oct 2016.