AzTrials
AzTrials

Shoulder Impingement SyndromeGAMENCT02705521

Comparing Gamification With Remote Monitoring Against Standard Rehabilitation, for Patients After Arthroscopic Subacromial Decompression Surgery

A study testing Exergames- Laptop and MIcrosoft Kinect in people with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome and Subacromial Impingement Syndrome, run by Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust at 3 sites in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomised prospective controlled trial will investigate patients with impingement syndrome who undergo arthroscopic subacromial decompression. The intervention group will receive physiotherapy aided by automated sensor-based technology which will help them perform exergames and track their rehabilitation… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Exergames- Laptop and MIcrosoft Kinect
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
71 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
29 Mar 2016to Dec 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • A diagnosis of impingement syndrome based upon history, clinical examination and radiological findings that require arthroscopic subacromial decompression.
  • The patient has access to the internet to allow for the remote monitoring element of the intervention.
  • The patient needs to be able to use the sensor based technology safely, as judged by the research team.
  • The patient is willing to consent to follow-up over a twelve month period.
  • The patient has capacity to consent to the study.

Who cannot join

  • Aged less than 18 or greater than 70
  • Patients who are unwilling or unable to consent
  • Previous arthroscopic shoulder surgery
  • Patients undergoing radiotherapy
  • Patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes
  • Patients not fit for general anaesthetic
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Patients with significant cardiac dysfunction
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Acute illness
  • History of stroke / neuromuscular conditions preventing the use of Exergames
  • Patient is currently enrolled in another clinical trial.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United Kingdom3 sites
  • Royal Bolton Hospital

    Bolton, Lancashire, BL4 OJR

  • Trafford General Hospital

    Manchester, Lancashire, M45 5SL

  • Salford Royal Hospital

    Manchester, Lancashire, M6 8HD

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Multi-centre, Randomised, Controlled Study Comparing Gamification With Remote Monitoring Against Standard Rehabilitation, for Patients After Arthroscopic Subacromial Decompression Surgery

This randomised prospective controlled trial will investigate patients with impingement syndrome who undergo arthroscopic subacromial decompression. The intervention group will receive physiotherapy aided by automated sensor-based technology which will help them perform exergames and track their rehabilitation progress. The control group will be treated by standard physiotherapy protocols. The two groups will be compared using patient reported outcome measures and assessment of shoulder range of movement before and after the shoulder surgery.

Data will be collected on patient experience, engagement with the rehabilitation process and the usability of the sensor-based technology through the use exergames. This will guide development of methods to quantify patient activation and engagement.

Read more

Hypothesis:

  1. There will be a significant clinical difference in post-surgical improvement measured by patient reported outcomes when physiotherapy is aided by automated sensor-based technology to perform Exergames and track progress, compared to standard physiotherapy protocols.
  2. There will be a significant difference in post-surgical improvement in range of shoulder movement and patient improvement, measured by patient reported out-comes when physiotherapy is aided by automated sensor-based technology to perform exergames and track progress, compared to standard physiotherapy protocols.
Read the detailed description

Background:

Musculoskeletal problems are one of the most common reasons for seeking medical advice, with estimates of up to 20% of adults annually consulting their general practitioner. The prevalence of shoulder problems in the population is approximately 2.5%(Jordon et al 2010). In 2012/13, there were over 7.1 million outpatient appointments for trauma and orthopaedics in England (accounting for 9.3% of all outpatient attendances) and over 4 million of these visits were followup after the initial consultation (Hospital Episode Statistics). The average cost for each outpatient follow up is £76. At a time when the NHS is under considerable financial burden we are constantly looking at ways and means of reducing the number of outpatient appointments and the length of time for which a patient required followup. By improving rehabilitation protocols patients may complete their recovery more rapidly which may reduce clinician patient face-to-face interactions. This may free up this valuable resource which can be directed towards more complex clinical requirements.

Patient Engagement:

One of the major factors that influence patient outcomes is their engagement with the rehabilitation program.

Rehabilitation professionals have long suspected that a patient's motivation plays an important role in determining the outcome of therapy, despite the lack of a clear definition of the phenomenon (Maclean et al. 2002). It is estimated that up to 65% of patients are non/partially adherent to their home exercise program (Meichenbaum 1987). Classically, patients have completed home exercise diaries. However, studies have suggested that these are often completed retrospectively. This may encourage patients to exaggerate the amount of activity performed. Hoelscher at al (1984), timed patients at home performing a relaxation exercise program and compared this to patient reported duration. They found that the latter tended to suggest a higher level of adherence. The Exergames programmes actively track patient interaction with the software. Each activity records the length of interaction, progress through rehabilitation allowing the clinician to have a clearer indication of patient engagement in rehabilitation.

Patient activation describes the knowledge, skills and confidence a person has in managing their own health and health care. Intervening to increase activation can improve a patient's engagement and health outcomes. This is an important factor in helping patients manage their health (Kings Fund 2015). As a part of this study we will quantify patient engagement. Through this we can develop and validate a new tool to comprehensively measure patient outcomes using four domains. These will be Patient reported pain and function (P), shoulder range of movement i.e.

Kinematics (K), patient activation or engagement (E) and patient experience (X).

Gamification:

Traditional evaluation of the patient's range of motion usually occurs in a clinic, often using subjective and informal methods of angle measurement. This has the potential to create discrepancies in findings between clinicians. To reduce the use of healthcare resources, make the clinical assessment more convenient for the patient, to improve the quality of the information collected and the assessment conducted, electronic measurement has the potential to perform repeatable validated objective results.

If combined with appropriate principles of gamification, these measurements can become a part of the rehabilitation process with potentially faster clinical improvement and comprehensive analysis of patient generated outcomes. In light of this, there has been a wave of support for the implementation of gaming elements in healthcare technologies.

'Gamification' involves the incorporation of game mechanics in a non-game setting and a tailored user interface for better learning which encourages engagement (King 2013). Reward systems, competition and immediate feedback improve user experience and have been implemented in healthcare related fields where patients have become a niche target group (Lin 2013). This may in turn increase patient activation allowing them to manage their own health.

MIRA:

MIRA Rehab is a company who has developed software designed for the rehabilitation of medical conditions.

Combined with a Microsoft Kinect sensor it accurately traces the range of motion in the shoulder. MIRA uses games which are built based upon the best clinical practice and expertise from specialist clinicians. The MIRA programme enables patients to progress through different levels within the games whilst engaging in their rehabilitation programme.

Research Design and Methodology:

Methodology:

90 patients will be recruited to a 3 month rehabilitation programme following a standard subacromial decompression

+/biceps tenotomy for impingement syndrome. Patients will be randomised into two groups:

  1. Standard postoperative physiotherapy regime without the use of accessory software (Treatment as usual Group).
  2. Postoperative regime of physiotherapy plus Exergames utilizing principles of gamification.

Power calculation:

A sample size calculation was performed using Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) sample data collected on patients previously undergoing arthroscopic subacromial decompression. [Alpha error set at 0.05, and beta error at 0.8, mean difference of 5 points12 in the OSS, standard deviation 6.96] Based upon this, a sample size of 32 patients in each group would be required.

A second sample size calculation was performed based on the disabilities of arm shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome measure. [Alpha error set at 0.05, and beta error at 0.8, mean difference of 15 points in the DASH13, standard deviation 23] Based upon this, a sample size of 37 patients in each group would be required.

Therefore, a target of 45 patients per group was chosen to allow for some participants withdrawing from the study (20%).

Treatment as usual Group:

Patients will attend physiotherapy on a weekly basis for assessment. They will be assessed for progression and be provided with a home exercise program. Range of motion in their shoulder will be collected on a weekly basis using the MIRA technology. Patients will be required to complete an exercise diary documenting the exercises performed as well as duration and frequency.

Treatment as usual plus Exergames Group:

Prior to commencing the study the physiotherapists will set up and initially demonstrate the Exergames to the intervention participants in the home setting. This will ensure the safety of the patients and address any technological issues that may arise. Patients will attend physiotherapy on a weekly basis as well as partaking in a set of tailored Exergames to play in the home system. The MIRA software will record the patient engagement with the system including number of sessions and duration of play. Patients will also be asked to complete an exercise diary.

VISIT SUMMARY

Baseline (Clinic Consultation):

Patient's eligibility to participate in the study will be assessed; inclusion/ exclusion criteria must be met. The Patient Information Sheet will be given to the patient when they are listed for surgery. Prior to their surgery date, the patient will be contacted by a member of the research team, to see if they would like to participate in the study. Patient will be asked to give their consent to the study on the day of surgery. Past medical history will be reviewed and patient demographics will be documented. Relevant questions and scoring will be taken for baseline reference.

+ 24 hours (following baseline assessments) The patient reported outcome measures questionnaires will be repeated by all patients.

Day 1 Patient attends hospital for surgical treatment. Confirmation of study consent must be confirmed. A study diary will be dispensed to patient. Study coordinator will give full explanation regarding completion of the diary.

Day 7,14,21,28,35,42,49,56,63,70,77.

Patient must attend physiotherapy clinic at day 7,14,21,28,35,42,49,56,63,70,77. A scheduled visit window to allow flexibility is +/- 2 days. Patient is to continue with their post-operative physiotherapy regime depending on the treatment group they have been randomised. Range of Movement will be assessed and documented by the research physiotherapist. Each patient diary will be reviewed and assessed.

Day 84/85 Patient diary will be reviewed and returned. On completion of the 12 week programme all patients (N=90) will complete all outcome questionnaires, Patients randomised to Exergames arm will complete a Systems Usability score for the MIRA software. Range of movement will be recorded by MIRA and documented by the research physio-therapist.

Day 365 One year post surgery all patients (N=90) will complete the scoring questionnaires.

Being tested
Exergames- Laptop and MIcrosoft Kinect
Keywords
shoulder, impingement, rehabilitation, physiotherapy, gamification, activation, engagement
Medical subject headings
Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Exergames- Laptop and MIcrosoft KinectDevice

    Also called Microsoft Kinect, MIRA Rehab

    Following surgery each patient will have a set of games for them to play using their affecting shoulder. These games have been designed by physiotherapists and shoulder surgeons to improve the functional range of movement in their shoulder

Study groups in NCT02705521
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Treatment as usual groupNo interventionPatients will attend physiotherapy on a weekly basis for assessment (standard physiotherapy). They will be assessed for progression and be provided with a home exercise program. Range of motion in their shoulder will be collected on a weekly basis using the MIRA technology. Patients will be required to complete an exercise diary documenting the exercises performed as well as duration and frequency.
Treatment as usual plus Exergames groupExperimentalPatients will attend physiotherapy on a weekly basis for assessment (standard physiotherapy). Rather than use a home exercise program patients will be provided with a laptop computer and kinect sensor. they will use the new technology to play 'Exergames' each program will be tailored to the patients progress and patients can play the system as often as they wish. Patients will be required to complete an exercise diary documenting the exercises performed as well as duration and frequency.
Receives: Device: Exergames- Laptop and MIcrosoft Kinect

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Oxford shoulder score

    Patients will be assessed for a significant difference in the OSS at 3 at 12 months compared with the treatment as usual group.

    Measured: 3 months and twelve months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score

    Patients will be assessed for a significant difference in the DASH score at 3 at 12 months compared with the treatment as usual group.

    Measured: 3 months and 12 months

  2. The European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ5D)

    Patients will be assessed for a significant difference in the EQ5D at 3 at 12 months compared with the treatment as usual group.

    Measured: 3 months and 12 months

  3. Visual analogue Scale for pain (VAS)

    Patients will be assessed for a significant difference in the EQ5D at 3 at 12 months compared with the treatment as usual group.

    Measured: 3 months and 12 months

  4. Shoulder range of movement

    Patients will be assessed using the MIRA software to see if there is a statistically significant difference in the cardinal ranges of motion in the shoulder joint

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Mar 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start29 Mar 2016
  3. Primary completionDec 2017
  4. Study completionDec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
71 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02705521
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRAS 179371
Acronym
GAME
Status last verified
Oct 2021
First submitted
5 Mar 2016
Last updated
5 Oct 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Bigliani LU, Ticker JB, Flatow EL, Soslowsky LJ, Mow VC. The relationship of acromial architecture to rotator cuff disease. Clin Sports Med. 1991 Oct;10(4):823-38.

    PubMed 1934099
  • Kuhn JE. Exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff impingement: a systematic review and a synthesized evidence-based rehabilitation protocol. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Jan-Feb;18(1):138-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Oct 2.

    PubMed 18835532
  • Jordan KP, Kadam UT, Hayward R, Porcheret M, Young C, Croft P. Annual consultation prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jul 2;11:144. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-144.

    PubMed 20598124
  • Olley LM, Carr AJ. The use of a patient-based questionnaire (the Oxford Shoulder Score) to assess outcome after rotator cuff repair. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 May;90(4):326-31. doi: 10.1308/003588408X285964.

    PubMed 18492399
  • Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A. The concept of patient motivation: a qualitative analysis of stroke professionals' attitudes. Stroke. 2002 Feb;33(2):444-8. doi: 10.1161/hs0202.102367.

    PubMed 11823650
  • King D, Greaves F, Exeter C, Darzi A. 'Gamification': influencing health behaviours with games. J R Soc Med. 2013 Mar;106(3):76-8. doi: 10.1177/0141076813480996. No abstract available.

    PubMed 23481424
  • Lin RJ, Zhu X. Leveraging social media for preventive care-A gamification system and insights. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;180:838-42.

    PubMed 22874310
  • Cloke DJ, Watson H, Purdy S, Steen IN, Williams JR. A pilot randomized, controlled trial of treatment for painful arc of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Jan-Feb;17(1 Suppl):17S-21S. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.07.005.

    PubMed 18069016
  • Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Jul;78(4):593-600.

    PubMed 8682827
  • Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10.

    PubMed 2868172

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Exergames- Laptop and MIcrosoft Kinect in people with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome and Subacromial Impingement Syndrome, run by Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust at 3 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Oxford shoulder score (time frame: 3 months and twelve months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02705521, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Oct 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in