AzTrials
AzTrials

SepsisNCT02706275

Pilot Trial of External Warming in Septic Patients

A study testing External warming in people with Sepsis, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether externally warming critically ill afebrile adult septic patients will improve indices of immune function and/or clinical outcomes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Sepsis
What is being tested?
External warming
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2016to 12 May 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Admitted to a surgical or medical intensive care unit
  • Age greater than 18 years
  • Diagnosis of sepsis within 24 hours of enrollment
  • Requirement for mechanical ventilation with expected duration of mechanical ventilation > 48 hours
  • Goal Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) < 0
  • Maximum baseline temperature (within previous 24 hours) < 38.3°C

Who cannot join

  • Treatment with chemotherapy within 6 months of enrollment
  • Treatment with corticosteroids at a dose > 300 mg/day hydrocortisone (or equivalent)
  • History of solid organ transplant on any immunosuppression medication
  • History of immunological disease
  • History of chronic infection with hepatitis B or C virus
  • History of acute stroke, acute coronary syndrome, or severe head injury requiring osmotic therapy within 7 days prior to enrollment
Show all 10Show fewer
  • History of multiple sclerosis
  • Contraindications to both bladder or esophageal core temperature monitors or to forced air warming blankets
  • Moribund status
  • Sepsis without source control

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Washington University School of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Pilot Randomized Trial of External Warming in Critically Ill Adult Septic Patients

The purpose of this study is to determine whether externally warming critically ill afebrile adult septic patients will improve indices of immune function and/or clinical outcomes.

Conditions
Sepsis
Being tested
External warming
Medical subject headings
Sepsis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • External warmingOther

    External warming via forced air warming to a goal body temperature 1.5°C greater than the baseline minimum temperature (within previous 24 hours) for 48 hours

Study groups in NCT02706275
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Warming GroupExperimentalExternal warming via forced air warming
Receives: Other: External warming
Control GroupNo interventionStandard of care body temperature management

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Monocyte human leukocyte antigen (mHLA-DR) expression

    Measured: 48 hours hours following the start of the intervention period

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Interferon (IFN)-gamma production

    Measured: 48 hours following the start of the intervention period

  2. Number of patients who acquire nosocomial infections

    Number of patients who develop a nosocomial infection (defined as a new infection diagnosed greater than 48 hours after the original sepsis diagnosis) within 30 days of the sepsis diagnosis

    Measured: 30 days after diagnosis of sepsis

  3. Mortality

    Measured: 28 days

  4. Number of patients in whom the intervention is stopped early secondary to hemodynamic changes related to the intervention

    Measured: Through study completion, 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Mar 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2016
  3. Primary completion12 May 2019
  4. Study completion12 May 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02706275
Sponsor's protocol ID
201512121
Status last verified
Apr 2020
First submitted
1 Mar 2016
Last updated
28 Apr 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Drewry AM, Mohr NM, Ablordeppey EA, Dalton CM, Doctor RJ, Fuller BM, Kollef MH, Hotchkiss RS. Therapeutic Hyperthermia Is Associated With Improved Survival in Afebrile Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: A Pilot Randomized Trial. Crit Care Med. 2022 Jun 1;50(6):924-934. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005470. Epub 2022 Feb 7.

    PubMed 35120040

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing External warming in people with Sepsis, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Monocyte human leukocyte antigen (mHLA-DR) expression (time frame: 48 hours hours following the start of the intervention period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02706275, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Apr 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in