AzTrials
AzTrials

Patient Safety During Central Venous CatheterizationNCT02711761

Ideal Depth of Guide Wire for Central Catheterization

A study testing central venous catheterization in people with Patient Safety During Central Venous Catheterization, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

prospective randomized double-blind controlled study Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
central venous catheterization
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
69 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Sep 2015to May 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients receiving general anesthesia requiring central venous catheterization via right internal jugular vein.
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologist) physical status class I or II

Who cannot join

  • at the pre-anesthetic evaluation, history of any arrhythmia
  • when monitoring before the induction of anesthesia in the operating room, newly arrhythmia is observed.
  • abnormal electrolyte at the pre-anesthetic evaluation
  • too difficult to access right internal jugular vein for central catheterization (too short neck, infection at the site of right internal jugular vein, ventriculoperitoneal shunt or chemo-port existence at the site of right internal jugular vein. too close site to operating field)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Seoul National University Boramae Hospital

    Seoul, Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Ideal Depth of Guide Wire for Right Internal Jugular Vein During Central Line Insertion

prospective randomized double-blind controlled study

Read the detailed description

Total of 69 ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologist) physical status class I or II patients will be enrolled.

Randomly assigned to three group according to the depth of guide-wire prior to tissue dilation during central catheterization via right internal jugular vein. (Group 1: 15 cm / Group 2: 17.5 cm / Group 3: 20 cm)

Central catheterization will be performed by anesthesiologists who be blinded to this study protocol.

An investigator will monitor and record whether any arrhythmia will occur.

The incidence of occurrence of arrhythmia will be compared between three groups.

Being tested
central venous catheterization

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • central venous catheterizationDevice

    15 cm: The depth of guide wire prior to tissue dilation during central venous catheterization will be 15 cm.

    17.5 cm: The depth of guide wire prior to tissue dilation during central venous catheterization will be 17.5 cm.

    20 cm: The depth of guide wire prior to tissue dilation during central venous catheterization will be 20 cm.

Study groups in NCT02711761
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
15 cmExperimentalThe depth of guide wire will be 15 cm from puncture site of skin prior to tissue dilation during central venous catheterization
Receives: Device: central venous catheterization
17.5 cmExperimentalThe depth of guide wire will be 17.5 cm from puncture site of skin prior to tissue dilation during central venous catheterization
Receives: Device: central venous catheterization
20 cmActive comparatorThe depth of guide wire will be 20 cm from puncture site of skin prior to tissue dilation during central venous catheterization
Receives: Device: central venous catheterization

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of arrhythmia

    Measured: during central venous catheterization

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Mar 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2015
  3. Primary completionMar 2016
  4. Study completionMay 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
69 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02711761
Sponsor's protocol ID
16-2015-105
Status last verified
Jul 2016
First submitted
14 Mar 2016
Last updated
11 Jul 2016
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing central venous catheterization in people with Patient Safety During Central Venous Catheterization, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of arrhythmia (time frame: during central venous catheterization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2016.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in