Diabetic Macular EdemaPhase 2RUBYNCT02712008
Anti-vasculaR Endothelial Growth Factor plUs Anti-angiopoietin 2 in Fixed comBination therapY: Evaluation for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema
A Phase 2 study testing REGN910-3 and Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) in people with Diabetic Macular Edema, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 51 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of intravitreal (IVT)-administered REGN910-3 compared to intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) in improving best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in participants with diabetic macular edema (DME). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Macular Edema
- What is being tested?
- REGN910-3 and Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 302 participants
- Where
- 51 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 2 Mar 2016to 10 Jul 2017
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men or women ≥18 years of age with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus who have clinically significant DME with central involvement in the study eye
- BCVA ETDRS letter score of 73 to 24 (Snellen equivalent of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye
- Willing and able to comply with clinic visits and study-related procedures
- Provide signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- Evidence of macular edema due to any cause other than diabetes mellitus in either eye
- IVT anti-VEGF in the study eye within 12 weeks of the screening visit
- Panretinal laser photocoagulation or macular laser photocoagulation in the study eye within 3 months of screening
- Note: Other inclusion/ exclusion criteria apply
Trial locations and contacts
51 sites in 1 country.
51 sites in 1 country
United States51 sites
Study site
‘Aiea, Hawaii
Study site
Abilene, Texas
Study site
Albany, New York
Study site
Arcadia, California
Study site
Asheville, North Carolina
Study site
Augusta, Georgia
Study site
Austin, Texas
Study site
Baltimore, Maryland
Study site
Bellevue, Washington
Study site
Beverly Hills, California
Study site
Bloomfield, New Jersey
Study site
Boston, Massachusetts
Study site
Charlotte, North Carolina
Study site
Chicago, Illinois
Study site
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Study site
Dallas, Texas
Study site
Decatur, Georgia
Study site
Edison, New Jersey
Study site
Florence, South Carolina
Study site
Florissant, Missouri
Study site
Fort Worth, Texas
Study site
Germantown, Tennessee
Study site
Grand Rapids, Michigan
Study site
Harlingen, Texas
Study site
Houston, Texas
Study site
Jackson, Michigan
Study site
Kingston, Pennsylvania
Study site
Lakeland, Florida
Study site
Las Vegas, Nevada
Study site
Lexington, Kentucky
Study site
Mesa, Arizona
Study site
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Study site
Mountain View, California
Study site
Nashville, Tennessee
Study site
New Albany, Indiana
Study site
New London, Connecticut
Study site
Oceanside, California
Study site
Palm Desert, California
Study site
Portland, Maine
Study site
Rapid City, South Dakota
Study site
Rochester, New York
Study site
Rockville, Maryland
Study site
San Antonio, Texas
Study site
Shawnee Mission, Kansas
Study site
Tampa, Florida
Study site
Teaneck, New Jersey
Study site
The Woodlands, Texas
Study site
Tucson, Arizona
Study site
West Columbia, South Carolina
Study site
Willow Park, Texas
Study site
Winter Haven, Florida
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled, Phase 2 Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Repeated Doses of Intravitreal REGN910-3 in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema
The primary objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of intravitreal (IVT)-administered REGN910-3 compared to intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) in improving best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in participants with diabetic macular edema (DME).
- Conditions
- Diabetic Macular Edema
- Being tested
- REGN910-3, Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
REGN910-3Drug
Co-formulation for intravitreal (IVT) injection consisting of REGN910 (nesvacumab) and REGN3 (aflibercept)
Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI)Drug
Also called EYLEA® (aflibercept) Injection, BAY86-5321
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| REGN910-3 (3 mg: 2 mg) | Experimental | Participants were administered intravitreal injection of REGN910-3 (3 milligram (mg):2 mg) every 4 weeks (Q4) on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 for 3 initial doses followed by every Week 8 (Q8) dosing beginning at Week 16 up to Week 32. Receives: Drug: REGN910-3 |
| REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) | Experimental | Participants were administered intravitreal injection of REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses up to week 12. Receives: Drug: REGN910-3 |
| Aflibercept 2 mg | Active comparator | Participants were administered intravitreal injection of Aflibercept (IAI) 2 mg Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses up to Week 12. Receives: Drug: Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) |
| REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 to REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q8 | Experimental | Participants were administered intravitreal injection of REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses. At Week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) at Week 16 and Q8 through Week 32. Receives: Drug: REGN910-3 |
| REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 to REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q12 | Experimental | Participants were administered intravitreal injection of REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses. At week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) at Week 20 and Q12 through Week 32. Receives: Drug: REGN910-3 |
| Aflibercept 2 mg Q4 to Aflibercept 2 mg Q8 | Experimental | Participants were administered intravitreal injection of Aflibercept (IAI) 2 mg Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses up to Week 12. At Week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive IAI at Week16 and Q8 through Week 32. Receives: Drug: Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) |
| Aflibercept 2 mg Q4 to Aflibercept 2 mg Q12 | Experimental | Participants were administered intravitreal injection of Aflibercept (IAI) 2 mg Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses up to Week 12. At Week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive IAI at Week 20 and Q12 through Week 32. Receives: Drug: Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) |
| Aflibercept 2 mg Q4 to REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q8 | Experimental | Participants were administered intravitreal injection of Aflibercept (IAI) 2 mg Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses up to Week 12. At week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) at week 16 and Q8 through week 32. Receives: Drug: REGN910-3; Drug: Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score at Week 12
Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol at 4 meters. Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) score was measured using an eye chart and was reported as the number of letters read correctly at a testing distance of 4 meters using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. Change from baseline calculated by subtracting baseline value from observed post-baseline value at Week 12.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score at Week 36
Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol at 4 meters. BCVA score was measured using an eye chart and was reported as the number of letters read correctly at a testing distance of 4 meters using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. Change from baseline calculated by subtracting baseline value from observed post-baseline value at Week 36.
Measured: Baseline, Week 36
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change From Baseline in Central Sub-field Retinal Thickness (CST) Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) at Week 12
Central Sub-field Retinal Thickness (CST) was assessed using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT), a non-invasive diagnostic system providing high-resolution imaging sections of the retina. SD-OCT was performed in the study eye after pupil dilation. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Change from baseline calculated by subtracting baseline value from LOCF post-baseline value at Week 12.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Central Sub-field Retinal Thickness (CST) Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) at Week 36
CST was assessed using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), a non-invasive diagnostic system providing high-resolution imaging sections of the retina. SD-OCT was performed in the study eye after pupil dilation. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Change from baseline calculated by subtracting baseline value from LOCF post-baseline value at Week 36.
Measured: Baseline, Week 36
Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-step Improvement at Week 12 in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) From Baseline
The Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale (DRSS) was used to describe overall retinopathy severity. It measured the 5 levels of diabetic retinopathy ranging from absence of retinopathy to severe retinopathy (none, mild, moderate, severe, and proliferative).
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-step Improvement at Week 36 in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) From Baseline
The Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale (DRSS) was used to describe overall retinopathy severity. It measured the 5 levels of diabetic retinopathy ranging from absence of retinopathy to severe retinopathy (none, mild, moderate, severe, and proliferative).
Measured: Baseline, Week 36
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study start2 Mar 2016
- Primary completion10 Jul 2017
- Study completion10 Jul 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Diabetic Macular EdemaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Regeneron PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 302 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Bayer
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trial Management, Study director, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02712008
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R910-3-DME-1518
- Acronym
- RUBY
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 14 Mar 2016
- Last updated
- 3 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled, Phase 2 Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Repeated Doses of Intravitreal REGN910-3 in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02712008
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RUBY / R910-3-DME-1518
- Conditions
- Diabetic Macular Edema
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 302 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Bayer
- Study start
- 2 Mar 2016
- Primary completion
- 10 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Jul 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 3 Oct 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of intravitreal (IVT)-administered REGN910-3 compared to intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) in improving best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in participants with diabetic macular edema (DME).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 8
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| REGN910-3 (3 mg: 2 mg) | Experimental | Drug: REGN910-3Participants were administered intravitreal injection of REGN910-3 (3 milligram (mg):2 mg) every 4 weeks (Q4) on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 for 3 initial doses followed by every Week 8 (Q8) dosing beginning at Week 16 up to Week 32. |
| REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) | Experimental | Drug: REGN910-3Participants were administered intravitreal injection of REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses up to week 12. |
| Aflibercept 2 mg | Active comparator | Drug: Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI)Participants were administered intravitreal injection of Aflibercept (IAI) 2 mg Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses up to Week 12. |
| REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 to REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q8 | Experimental | Drug: REGN910-3Participants were administered intravitreal injection of REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses. At Week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) at Week 16 and Q8 through Week 32. |
| REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 to REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q12 | Experimental | Drug: REGN910-3Participants were administered intravitreal injection of REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses. At week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) at Week 20 and Q12 through Week 32. |
| Aflibercept 2 mg Q4 to Aflibercept 2 mg Q8 | Experimental | Drug: Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI)Participants were administered intravitreal injection of Aflibercept (IAI) 2 mg Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses up to Week 12. At Week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive IAI at Week16 and Q8 through Week 32. |
| Aflibercept 2 mg Q4 to Aflibercept 2 mg Q12 | Experimental | Drug: Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI)Participants were administered intravitreal injection of Aflibercept (IAI) 2 mg Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses up to Week 12. At Week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive IAI at Week 20 and Q12 through Week 32. |
| Aflibercept 2 mg Q4 to REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q8 | Experimental | Drug: REGN910-3, Drug: Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI)Participants were administered intravitreal injection of Aflibercept (IAI) 2 mg Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses up to Week 12. At week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) at week 16 and Q8 through week 32. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Men or women ≥18 years of age with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus who have clinically significant DME with central involvement in the study eye
- BCVA ETDRS letter score of 73 to 24 (Snellen equivalent of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye
- Willing and able to comply with clinic visits and study-related procedures
- Provide signed informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Evidence of macular edema due to any cause other than diabetes mellitus in either eye
- IVT anti-VEGF in the study eye within 12 weeks of the screening visit
- Panretinal laser photocoagulation or macular laser photocoagulation in the study eye within 3 months of screening
- Note: Other inclusion/ exclusion criteria apply
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| REGN910-3Co-formulation for intravitreal (IVT) injection consisting of REGN910 (nesvacumab) and REGN3 (aflibercept) | Drug | Aflibercept 2 mg Q4 to REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q8, REGN910-3 (3 mg: 2 mg), REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg), REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 to REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q12, REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 to REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q8 |
| Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI)Also: EYLEA® (aflibercept) Injection, BAY86-5321 | Drug | Aflibercept 2 mg, Aflibercept 2 mg Q4 to Aflibercept 2 mg Q12, Aflibercept 2 mg Q4 to Aflibercept 2 mg Q8, Aflibercept 2 mg Q4 to REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q8 |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol at 4 meters. Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) score was measured using an eye chart and was reported as the number of letters read correctly at a testing distance of 4 meters using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. Change from baseline calculated by subtracting baseline value from observed post-baseline value at Week 12.
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score at Week 36
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36
Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol at 4 meters. BCVA score was measured using an eye chart and was reported as the number of letters read correctly at a testing distance of 4 meters using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. Change from baseline calculated by subtracting baseline value from observed post-baseline value at Week 36.
4 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Central Sub-field Retinal Thickness (CST) Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Central Sub-field Retinal Thickness (CST) Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) at Week 36
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36
Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-step Improvement at Week 12 in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-step Improvement at Week 36 in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Oct 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Diabetic Macular Edema
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence in China: Faricimab Use in Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (The Farseeing Study)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Long-Term Follow-Up Study of RGX-314 Administered in the Suprachoroidal Space for Participants With and Without Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetic Retinopathy, DR
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Trial for Intravitreal Injection of 4D-150 in Adults With Diabetic Macular Edema (DME).
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
RecruitingPhase 2
Oral N-Acetylcysteine on Diabetic Macular Edema
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
COMO: A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Masked Study Comparing the Efficacy of EYP-1901 Against Aflibercept in DME
Diabetic Macular Edema, DME
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trial Management study director
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
51 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing REGN910-3 and Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) in people with Diabetic Macular Edema, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 51 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 51 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Oct 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline, Week 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Oct 2018.