Sickle Cell AnemiaPhase 1NCT02712346
The Role of Endothelin-1 in Sickle Cell Disease
A Phase 1 study testing Ambrisentan in people with Sickle Cell Anemia, run by Augusta University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The primary goal of the study is to determine the safety and tolerability of ambrisentan. It is also expected that ambrisentan will improve blood flow in the lungs, decrease inflammation, and reduce pain in sickle cell patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Sickle Cell Anemia
- What is being tested?
- Ambrisentan
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 26 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2015to 30 Nov 2019
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- SS or Sβo-thalassemia
- Age 18-65 years
- Microalbuminuria (24-hour albumin 150-300 mg) or macroalbuminuria (24-hour albumin >300 mq) OR random urine albumin-creatinine ratio (MA Random) ≥ 30 µg/ mg creatinine
- Subjects can have Stage 1, II, or III chronic kidney disease (CKD)
- Subjects can be on hydroxyurea, ACE inhibitors (ACEi), or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for a period of 3 months or greater
- Females of child bearing potential must agree to use two forms of birth control with one being a barrier method; abstinence is an acceptable form of birth control
Who cannot join
- Other genotypes of SCD
- History of renal transplant
- Chronic kidney disease (Stage IV and V including patients on hemo dialysis or peritoneal dialysis)
- Patients on chronic transfusion therapy
- Uncontrolled/poorly controlled hypertension or history of hypertension pre-dating proteinuria or
- Known history of HIV, Hepatitis C, and/or diabetes
Show all 14Show fewer
- Peripheral edema
- History of congestive heart failure or pulmonary edema
- Recent history of coronary artery disease
- Pregnant or breast feeding
- Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >3-fold upper limit of normal
- Albumin <2.5 gm/dl
- Hemoglobin < 6 gm/dL
- History of non-compliance with medications and clinic visits; or Inability to give informed consent; or Patient deemed ineligible or unsuitable in the judgment of investigators
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The primary goal of the study is to determine the safety and tolerability of ambrisentan. It is also expected that ambrisentan will improve blood flow in the lungs, decrease inflammation, and reduce pain in sickle cell patients. An additional goal is to evaluate the use of select biomarkers in evaluating sickle nephropathy.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that endothelin antagonist (ETA) receptor blockade using ambrisentan is safe, tolerable, and improves kidney function/albuminuria in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). The investigators anticipate a reduction in proteinuria, a decrease in tricuspid regurgitation jet (TRJ) velocity, reduction in inflammatory markers, improvement in forearm blood flow, and improvement in nociception/pain.
The primary efficacy endpoint was chosen as the effect of ETA receptor blockade on the reduction of microalbuminuria based upon findings in diabetic nephropathy, which has a similar pathogenesis to sickle nephropathy. A 30% reduction in proteinuria is rather conservative and realistic based upon the results of studies of ETA receptor blockade in diabetic nephropathy that consistently resulted in 40-45% reduction in proteinuria. Pre-clinical data has shown that changes can be detected in urinary nephrin excretion before overt proteinuria is observed in a model of chronic ET-1 elevation. Furthermore, tubular injury that can occur as a result of an intrarenal vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) should be expected to increase the level of renal tubular injury markers, neutrophil gelantinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), and netrin. Treatment with ambrisentan would be expected to attenuate these changes. Dr. Jennifer Pollock, has extensive experience with all of the biomarker assays including ET-1. Dr. Pollock runs bio-analytical core labs for two PO1s and has published extensively on these and similar methods in human and animal samples.
Additional rationale for this project is based on recent 24-hour urine results for creatinine clearance and total protein excretion from 97 patients with sickle cell anemia (Hb SS) and sickle beta zero thalassemia (SB0-thalassemia) followed in the Augusta Sickle Cell Clinic. These patients ranged in age from 19-63 years (52 females, 45 males). Of these, 17 (18%) had microalbuminuria as defined by a 24-hour albumin excretion of 150-300 mg, 34 (36%) had macroalbuminuria (>300 mg albumin excretion/24-hours), thus 54% of the patients had microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria and only 46% were normo albuminuric. 58 patients (58%) were on chronic hydroxyurea therapy. 9 patients were on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and 20 were on angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) (total 30%). 55 patients (57%) had glomerular hyperfiltration (creatinine clearance of >120 ml/min). There was an age related decline in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) observed. The number of patients with normo albuminuria shows a sharp decline by age indicative of the progression of sickle nephropathy. Recent studies of pain in SCD have led to a change in perception. Approximately 50% of the patients reported experiencing daily, chronic pain. In addition, issues related to centralization and neuropathic pain in this patient population has begun to gain increasing attention. A large body of evidence suggests that endothelin-1 plays an important role in enhancing pain stimuli and nociception in various conditions. This is mediated by ETA receptor. Berkeley SCD transgenic mice do have hyperalgesia as shown in the rationale preliminary data section of Aim 2 and ETA receptor blockade reverses this hyperalgesia towards normal. As part of an ongoing National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) funded study of pain and its genetic correlates (study reference: 1 P20 MD003383-01), the investigators have found that SCD patients display significant hyperalgesia as measured by pressure pain algometer testing. The testing was done at three different anatomic sites in patients (n=38) and controls (n=20) and showed that SCD patients perceived pain at significantly lower pressures compared to controls (masseter: 157.7 kilopascal (kPa) for patients, 214.4 kPa for controls, p=0.017; ulna: 299.1 kPa for patients, 477.5 kPa for controls, p=0.0018; and trapezius: 290.1 kPa for patients, 462.8 kPa for controls, p=0.02). These data suggest that hyperalgesia is present in the vast majority of SCD patients and will constitute an objective parameter to monitor during the study.
Protocol-required assessments performed at every study visit include: physical exam, vital signs, con medication review, study drug accountability, adverse events review, pain diary completion, and pregnancy testing if applicable.
Protocol-required assessments performed at specified study visits include: collection of blood and urine for safety and efficacy testing; electrocardiogram (ECG); echocardiogram (echo); Quantitative Sensory Testing (pressure pain threshold via algometer, cutaneous mechanical pain via monofilament, and thermal testing via Q-Sense Small Fiber Test); transcranial Doppler (TCD); forearm blood flow measurement; skin blood flow measurement; and completion of quality of life questionnaires.
Description of Procedures:
Sensory Testing: Patients will also undergo sensory testing at baseline and at the end of the study period. Sensory testing will include: 1) Pressure pain threshold will be measured by a hand-held, digital algometer as described by Fillingim et al at three different anatomical sites: center of right upper trapezius, right masseter, and the right ulna; 2) Cutaneous mechanical pain testing- Assessment of temporal summation of mechanical pain will be done using nylon monofilaments tested on the dorsum of the hand.; and 3) Thermal sensory testing will be performed using Q-Sense Small Fiber Test, which offers a scientifically validated measure of warm, cool and heat-pain thermal sensory thresholds.
Pain Diaries/Questionnaires: Patients will be asked to complete a daily pain diary as described in the PISCES study. The evaluation of pain diaries will be performed by Dr. Robert Gibson and the research staff. In addition, investigators will also incorporate two pre/post measures that will examine the effects of pain on functional performance and quality of life. The Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) is a well-established functional assessment. This assessment has demonstrated the ability to discriminate between healthy controls and those with wide spread chronic pain. It also demonstrates the ability to measure change following intervention. The investigators will also measure patient's quality of life with the Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement Information System (ASCQ-Me). This quality of life assessment has been specifically developed for sickle cell populations. Dr. Robert Gibson has training and experience with the ASCQ-Me and is certified to administer the AMPS.
Echocardiogram for tricuspid regurgitation jet (TRJ) Velocity Measurement: A transthoracic echocardiogram for the measurement of TRJ velocity and pulmonary artery systolic pressure will be performed at baseline (unless obtained clinically within 6 months of Day 1) and at the end of the study.
Electrocardiogram: An electrocardiogram (ECG) is a test that measures the electrical activity of the heart. An ECG will be done as a safety measure at baseline, Day 8 visit, and end of study, although ambrisentan is not known to prolong corrected QT interval (QTc).
Forearm Blood Flow Measurement: Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) will be performed in accordance to the recent tutorial for ultrasound assessment of FMD. Patients will be tested under fasting conditions in a controlled environment at baseline and at the end of the study period.
Skin Blood Flow Measurement: Skin blood flow will be measured non-invasively using a low frequency laser imaging camera and/or a small skin probe. Ring-shaped probes that are about 1.5 inches wide will be placed on the forearm with sticky tape. One ring will be filled with approximately 2 ml (about 1/2 teaspoon) of water for local heat and the others will be used for iontophoresis. For local heat, investigators will heat the water in the ring to between 42°C (107°F) and 44°C (111°F) and wait approximately 30 minutes for the increase in skin blood flow to become stable. Iontophoresis is a technique that delivers a vasoactive drug about 1 mm deep into the skin using a low level electrical current. The advantage of this technique is that it is non-invasive and the drug does not go into the body, it just remains at the surface of the skin. We will use a 1-2% solution of either acetylcholine, sodium nitroprusside, or N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (vasoactive substances) to increase or decrease skin blood flow. Multiple short currents (10-180 seconds) will be performed approximately 1 minute apart. Investigators will monitor skin blood flow through the ring during the forearm arterial blood flow test described above as well as during local heat and iontophoresis.
Blood and Urine Measurement: Lab tests to be performed for safety/ efficacy assessments at specified study visits include complete blood count (CBC), complete metabolic panel (CMP), spot urine for albumin-creatinine ratio, 24-hour urine, pregnancy testing, biomarkers, and inflammatory markers.
Transcranial Doppler (TCD): Pre- and post-treatment TCD will be performed to assess velocity of cerebral blood flow. This non-invasive test is performed while the subject is lying down and involves use of sound waves to assess macro-circulation in the head. A transducer is used to hear and record the results.
- Conditions
- Sickle Cell Anemia
- Being tested
- Ambrisentan, Placebo
- Keywords
- Sickle Cell Anemia, Sickle Cell Thalassemia, Sickle Beta Thalassemia, Proteinuria, Sickle nephropathy
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia, Sickle Cell, Proteinuria
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AmbrisentanDrug
Also called Letairis
Ambrisentan 5 milligrams a day or a placebo (sugar pill) for twelve weeks
PlaceboDrug
Also called "Sugar Pill"
One inactive pill daily for twelve weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental | Ambrisentan 5 mg PO daily Receives: Drug: Ambrisentan |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | One inactive pill PO daily Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Safety and Tolerability of ambrisentan in patients with sickle cell disease measured by physical exam, vital signs, blood and urine testing, ECG (specified visits), concomitant medication review, adverse events review
Measured: Day 1 (Baseline) through Day 113
Secondary outcomes (9)
Efficacy of ambrisentan in improving kidney function in patients with sickle cell disease measured by blood
measured by blood
Measured: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85, and Day 113
Efficacy of ambrisentan in decreasing TRJ velocity
measured by echocardiogram
Measured: Day 1 (Baseline) and at the end of the 12 week treatment period
Efficacy of ambrisentan in decreasing inflammation
measurement of inflammatory markers in blood
Measured: Day 1 (Baseline) through Day 113
Efficacy of ambrisentan in improving micro-circulation
measured by forearm and skin blood flow measurements
Measured: Day 1 (Baseline) and at the end of the 12 week treatment period
Efficacy of ambrisentan in improving macro-circulation
measured by Transcranial Doppler (TCD)
Measured: Day 1 (Baseline), and at the end of the 12 week treatment period
Efficacy of ambrisentan in improving nociception/pain
performance of quantitative sensory testing
Measured: Day 1 (Baseline), and at the end of the 12 week treatment period
Efficacy of ambrisentan in improving kidney function in patients with sickle cell disease measured by urine testing for microalbuminuria/proteinuria
measured by urine testing for microalbuminuria/proteinuria
Measured: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 15, Day 29, Day 43, Day 57, Day 71, Day 85, and Day 113
Efficacy of ambrisentan in improving nociception/pain
assessment of pain diaries/questionnaires
Measured: Day 1 (Baseline) through the 12 week treatment period
Efficacy of ambrisentan in improving nociception/pain
assessment of adverse events
Measured: Day 1 (Baseline) through the 12 week treatment period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2015
- Primary completion30 May 2019
- Study completion30 Nov 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sickle Cell AnemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 26 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Augusta University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Abdullah Kutlar, Augusta University
- Investigators
- Abdullah Kutlar, MD, Principal investigator, Augusta University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02712346
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Endothelin
- Other IDs
- 5U01HL117684
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 2 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 2 Apr 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Obadina M, Wilson S, Derebail VK, Little J. Emerging Therapies and Advances in Sickle Cell Disease with a Focus on Renal Manifestations. Kidney360. 2023 Jul 1;4(7):997-1005. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000162. Epub 2023 May 31.
PubMed 37254256
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Apr 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Role of Endothelin-1 in Sickle Cell Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02712346
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Endothelin
- Conditions
- Sickle Cell Anemia
- Keywords
- Sickle Cell Anemia, Sickle Cell Thalassemia, Sickle Beta Thalassemia, Proteinuria, Sickle nephropathy
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 26 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Augusta UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Gilead Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Study start
- Sep 2015
- Primary completion
- 30 May 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary goal of the study is to determine the safety and tolerability of ambrisentan. It is also expected that ambrisentan will improve blood flow in the lungs, decrease inflammation, and reduce pain in sickle cell patients. An additional goal is to evaluate the use of select biomarkers in evaluating sickle nephropathy.
Detailed description
The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that endothelin antagonist (ETA) receptor blockade using ambrisentan is safe, tolerable, and improves kidney function/albuminuria in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). The investigators anticipate a reduction in proteinuria, a decrease in tricuspid regurgitation jet (TRJ) velocity, reduction in inflammatory markers, improvement in forearm blood flow, and improvement in nociception/pain.
The primary efficacy endpoint was chosen as the effect of ETA receptor blockade on the reduction of microalbuminuria based upon findings in diabetic nephropathy, which has a similar pathogenesis to sickle nephropathy. A 30% reduction in proteinuria is rather conservative and realistic based upon the results of studies of ETA receptor blockade in diabetic nephropathy that consistently resulted in 40-45% reduction in proteinuria. Pre-clinical data has shown that changes can be detected in urinary nephrin excretion before overt proteinuria is observed in a model of chronic ET-1 elevation. Furthermore, tubular injury that can occur as a result of an intrarenal vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) should be expected to increase the level of renal tubular injury markers, neutrophil gelantinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), and netrin. Treatment with ambrisentan would be expected to attenuate these changes. Dr. Jennifer Pollock, has extensive experience with all of the biomarker assays including ET-1. Dr. Pollock runs bio-analytical core labs for two PO1s and has published extensively on these and similar methods in human and animal samples.
Additional rationale for this project is based on recent 24-hour urine results for creatinine clearance and total protein excretion from 97 patients with sickle cell anemia (Hb SS) and sickle beta zero thalassemia (SB0-thalassemia) followed in the Augusta Sickle Cell Clinic. These patients ranged in age from 19-63 years (52 females, 45 males). Of these, 17 (18%) had microalbuminuria as defined by a 24-hour albumin excretion of 150-300 mg, 34 (36%) had macroalbuminuria (>300 mg albumin excretion/24-hours), thus 54% of the patients had microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria and only 46% were normo albuminuric. 58 patients (58%) were on chronic hydroxyurea therapy. 9 patients were on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and 20 were on angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) (total 30%). 55 patients (57%) had glomerular hyperfiltration (creatinine clearance of >120 ml/min). There was an age related decline in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) observed. The number of patients with normo albuminuria shows a sharp decline by age indicative of the progression of sickle nephropathy. Recent studies of pain in SCD have led to a change in perception. Approximately 50% of the patients reported experiencing daily, chronic pain. In addition, issues related to centralization and neuropathic pain in this patient population has begun to gain increasing attention. A large body of evidence suggests that endothelin-1 plays an important role in enhancing pain stimuli and nociception in various conditions. This is mediated by ETA receptor. Berkeley SCD transgenic mice do have hyperalgesia as shown in the rationale preliminary data section of Aim 2 and ETA receptor blockade reverses this hyperalgesia towards normal. As part of an ongoing National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) funded study of pain and its genetic correlates (study reference: 1 P20 MD003383-01), the investigators have found that SCD patients display significant hyperalgesia as measured by pressure pain algometer testing. The testing was done at three different anatomic sites in patients (n=38) and controls (n=20) and showed that SCD patients perceived pain at significantly lower pressures compared to controls (masseter: 157.7 kilopascal (kPa) for patients, 214.4 kPa for controls, p=0.017; ulna: 299.1 kPa for patients, 477.5 kPa for controls, p=0.0018; and trapezius: 290.1 kPa for patients, 462.8 kPa for controls, p=0.02). These data suggest that hyperalgesia is present in the vast majority of SCD patients and will constitute an objective parameter to monitor during the study.
Protocol-required assessments performed at every study visit include: physical exam, vital signs, con medication review, study drug accountability, adverse events review, pain diary completion, and pregnancy testing if applicable.
Protocol-required assessments performed at specified study visits include: collection of blood and urine for safety and efficacy testing; electrocardiogram (ECG); echocardiogram (echo); Quantitative Sensory Testing (pressure pain threshold via algometer, cutaneous mechanical pain via monofilament, and thermal testing via Q-Sense Small Fiber Test); transcranial Doppler (TCD); forearm blood flow measurement; skin blood flow measurement; and completion of quality of life questionnaires.
Description of Procedures:
Sensory Testing: Patients will also undergo sensory testing at baseline and at the end of the study period. Sensory testing will include: 1) Pressure pain threshold will be measured by a hand-held, digital algometer as described by Fillingim et al at three different anatomical sites: center of right upper trapezius, right masseter, and the right ulna; 2) Cutaneous mechanical pain testing- Assessment of temporal summation of mechanical pain will be done using nylon monofilaments tested on the dorsum of the hand.; and 3) Thermal sensory testing will be performed using Q-Sense Small Fiber Test, which offers a scientifically validated measure of warm, cool and heat-pain thermal sensory thresholds.
Pain Diaries/Questionnaires: Patients will be asked to complete a daily pain diary as described in the PISCES study. The evaluation of pain diaries will be performed by Dr. Robert Gibson and the research staff. In addition, investigators will also incorporate two pre/post measures that will examine the effects of pain on functional performance and quality of life. The Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) is a well-established functional assessment. This assessment has demonstrated the ability to discriminate between healthy controls and those with wide spread chronic pain. It also demonstrates the ability to measure change following intervention. The investigators will also measure patient's quality of life with the Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement Information System (ASCQ-Me). This quality of life assessment has been specifically developed for sickle cell populations. Dr. Robert Gibson has training and experience with the ASCQ-Me and is certified to administer the AMPS.
Echocardiogram for tricuspid regurgitation jet (TRJ) Velocity Measurement: A transthoracic echocardiogram for the measurement of TRJ velocity and pulmonary artery systolic pressure will be performed at baseline (unless obtained clinically within 6 months of Day 1) and at the end of the study.
Electrocardiogram: An electrocardiogram (ECG) is a test that measures the electrical activity of the heart. An ECG will be done as a safety measure at baseline, Day 8 visit, and end of study, although ambrisentan is not known to prolong corrected QT interval (QTc).
Forearm Blood Flow Measurement: Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) will be performed in accordance to the recent tutorial for ultrasound assessment of FMD. Patients will be tested under fasting conditions in a controlled environment at baseline and at the end of the study period.
Skin Blood Flow Measurement: Skin blood flow will be measured non-invasively using a low frequency laser imaging camera and/or a small skin probe. Ring-shaped probes that are about 1.5 inches wide will be placed on the forearm with sticky tape. One ring will be filled with approximately 2 ml (about 1/2 teaspoon) of water for local heat and the others will be used for iontophoresis. For local heat, investigators will heat the water in the ring to between 42°C (107°F) and 44°C (111°F) and wait approximately 30 minutes for the increase in skin blood flow to become stable. Iontophoresis is a technique that delivers a vasoactive drug about 1 mm deep into the skin using a low level electrical current. The advantage of this technique is that it is non-invasive and the drug does not go into the body, it just remains at the surface of the skin. We will use a 1-2% solution of either acetylcholine, sodium nitroprusside, or N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (vasoactive substances) to increase or decrease skin blood flow. Multiple short currents (10-180 seconds) will be performed approximately 1 minute apart. Investigators will monitor skin blood flow through the ring during the forearm arterial blood flow test described above as well as during local heat and iontophoresis.
Blood and Urine Measurement: Lab tests to be performed for safety/ efficacy assessments at specified study visits include complete blood count (CBC), complete metabolic panel (CMP), spot urine for albumin-creatinine ratio, 24-hour urine, pregnancy testing, biomarkers, and inflammatory markers.
Transcranial Doppler (TCD): Pre- and post-treatment TCD will be performed to assess velocity of cerebral blood flow. This non-invasive test is performed while the subject is lying down and involves use of sound waves to assess macro-circulation in the head. A transducer is used to hear and record the results.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental | Drug: AmbrisentanAmbrisentan 5 mg PO daily |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboOne inactive pill PO daily |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- SS or Sβo-thalassemia
- Age 18-65 years
- Microalbuminuria (24-hour albumin 150-300 mg) or macroalbuminuria (24-hour albumin >300 mq) OR random urine albumin-creatinine ratio (MA Random) ≥ 30 µg/ mg creatinine
- Subjects can have Stage 1, II, or III chronic kidney disease (CKD)
- Subjects can be on hydroxyurea, ACE inhibitors (ACEi), or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for a period of 3 months or greater
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Other genotypes of SCD
- History of renal transplant
- Chronic kidney disease (Stage IV and V including patients on hemo dialysis or peritoneal dialysis)
- Patients on chronic transfusion therapy
- Uncontrolled/poorly controlled hypertension or history of hypertension pre-dating proteinuria or
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AmbrisentanAlso: LetairisAmbrisentan 5 milligrams a day or a placebo (sugar pill) for twelve weeks | Drug | Treatment |
| PlaceboAlso: "Sugar Pill"One inactive pill daily for twelve weeks | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Safety and Tolerability of ambrisentan in patients with sickle cell disease measured by physical exam, vital signs, blood and urine testing, ECG (specified visits), concomitant medication review, adverse events review
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) through Day 113
9 secondary outcomes
Efficacy of ambrisentan in improving kidney function in patients with sickle cell disease measured by blood
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85, and Day 113
Efficacy of ambrisentan in decreasing TRJ velocity
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) and at the end of the 12 week treatment period
Efficacy of ambrisentan in decreasing inflammation
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) through Day 113
Efficacy of ambrisentan in improving micro-circulation
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) and at the end of the 12 week treatment period
Efficacy of ambrisentan in improving macro-circulation
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), and at the end of the 12 week treatment period
Efficacy of ambrisentan in improving nociception/pain
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), and at the end of the 12 week treatment period
Efficacy of ambrisentan in improving kidney function in patients with sickle cell disease measured by urine testing for microalbuminuria/proteinuria
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 15, Day 29, Day 43, Day 57, Day 71, Day 85, and Day 113
Efficacy of ambrisentan in improving nociception/pain
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) through the 12 week treatment period
Efficacy of ambrisentan in improving nociception/pain
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) through the 12 week treatment period
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Apr 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37254256Obadina M, Wilson S, Derebail VK, Little J. Emerging Therapies and Advances in Sickle Cell Disease with a Focus on Renal Manifestations. Kidney360. 2023 Jul 1;4(7):997-1005. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000162. Epub 2023 May 31.
Related trials for Sickle Cell Anemia
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Long-term Mitapivat Dosing in Subjects With Stable Sickle Cell Disease: An Extension of a Phase I Pilot Study of Mitapivat
Sickle Cell Disease, Hemolytic Anemia
RecruitingObservational study
HPC Offered for PRESERVE Expansion
Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)
RecruitingPhase 1
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Escalating Doses of Fostamatinib in Subjects With Stable Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disorders, Sickle Cell Disease
RecruitingPhase 4
Clinical and Biomarker Effects of Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Females With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), Vaso-Occlusive Pain Episode in Sickle Cell Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Buprenorphine for the Management of Pain in Children With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), Sickle Cell Disease Vaso-occlusive Crisis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Abdullah Kutlar, MD principal investigator
Augusta University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Ambrisentan in people with Sickle Cell Anemia, run by Augusta University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Safety and Tolerability of ambrisentan in patients with sickle cell disease measured by physical exam, vital signs, blood and urine testing, ECG (specified visits), concomitant medication review, adverse events review (time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) through Day 113). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02712346, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2020.