Atrial FibrillationNCT02714907
Clinical Data Validation of Novel Wireless Cortrium C3 Monitor for Continuous Electrocardiogram Measurements
A study testing Cortrium C3 device and Holter device in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Cortrium at 2 sites in Denmark.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to validate the quality of the ECG-signal acquired with the Cortrium C3 monitor. The intention is to evaluate whether the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation based on the ECG signal from the C3 monitor concurs with the current monitoring methods used in clinical practice. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Fibrillation
- What is being tested?
- Cortrium C3 device and Holter device
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 158 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesDenmark
- Study dates
- Feb 2016to Jul 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinical diagnosis of atrial fibrillation
- Investigation of atrial fibrillation
Who cannot join
- Language difficulties
- Impaired cognitive function.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Denmark2 sites
Department of Cardiology, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospitals
Frederiksberg, 2000
Aleris-Hamlet Private Hospital
Søborg, 2860
About this study
The purpose of this study is to validate the quality of the ECG-signal acquired with the Cortrium C3 monitor. The intention is to evaluate whether the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation based on the ECG signal from the C3 monitor concurs with the current monitoring methods used in clinical practice.
Read the detailed description
Development of new cost effective mobile devices and wireless technology has great potential in supervision of critically ill patients in wards as well as ambulant. Through continuous wireless monitoring in both the hospital and the patients home, detection of heart arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation (AF) will be possible.
AF is the cause of a sizeable amount of strokes (15% of all, and more than 35% of the population over 80 years of age), which can be prevented through anticoagulation treatment if provided in time. Thus, many patients are referred to cardiologic ambulatory to be examined for AF, and are subjected to heart monitoring with a so-called Holter or event monitor. This entails the patient be equipped with several electrodes on the chest, to which leads are attached and connected to a sizable and bulky box. The patient carries this box around hanging from the shoulder, belt or something similar for one or several days. It is then required of the patient to come back and deliver the device, after which the data must be read and analysed, in order to work out a further plan for the patient. During admission, a similar system can be attached for continuous heart monitoring.
Cortrium (http://cortrium.com) has developed a wireless technology, where a small C3 monitor is attached to the chest with standard electrodes and the leads are built into the actual monitor. The quality of the signal has been tested on healthy adults, but is yet to be tested on patients suffering from arrhythmias
The purpose of this study is to validate the quality of the ECG-signal acquired with the Cortrium C3 monitor. The intention is to evaluate whether the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation based on the ECG signal from the C3 monitor concurs with the current monitoring methods used in clinical practice.
The measurements are performed on patients under investigation for AF at cardiology ambulatory Y at Frederiksberg-Bispebjerg Hospital and Aleris-Hamlet Hospital, Copenhagen. The patients are outfitted with a C3 monitor simultaneous with the use of the conventional ambulatory apparatus. This is a "Holter monitor" (Rozinn station RZ152+12 and RZ153+ from ScottCare Holter for Windows 2010 (CE0120) and "EventCare SA version" (CE0120), both bought via SEMCA Ap, Skævinge, Denmark.
Recordings with the usual apparatus are analysed in the usual fashion in the cardiology ambulatory. A copy of the recordings is registered anonymously and paired with the simultaneous recordings from the C3. The diagnosis is made by two observers, blinded to both patient identity and data source. Thus, data will not be personally identifiable. Validation is performed in collaboration with the department of cardiology.
Statistics:
With simultaneous supervision of 77 patients with increased incidence of AF it will be possible to determine whether the C3 is capable of detecting AF in at least 95% of the cases which Holter detects. Since the incidence of AF Is lower in the total patient group referred to Holter monitoring, we plan to include 150 patients to acquire the usable number of examinations.
Economic Conditions Helen Dominguez is the unfunded, and the responsible consultant of the study. Opeon Aps delivers C3 monitors for this clinical trial as well as brochure guides for patients and health care personnel. There are no economic benefits connected with the present clinical trial.
Publication of Results:
Opeon ApS (owner of Cortrium) is responsible for processing the material for publication of results in an international peer-reviewed journal as well as in the Danish popular scientific press related to new Medical equipment. Positive, negative and inconclusive results will be published.
Recruitment of Participants:
Patients who have planned ambulatory arrhythmia recording for diagnosis of intermittent AF will be asked by telephone to consider participating in the study.
After reading the participant information flyer, the subjects are invited to in-depth verbal information in the ambulatory. If the subjects accept to participate and provide a signed informed consent, they outfitted with a C3 monitor along with the standard Holter apparatus.
The study only includes subjects scheduled for Holter monitoring referred for atrial fibrillation examination, quantification of paroxysms, or heart rate during paroxysms.
Ethical Considerations:
Ethical Considerations: If the patient agrees to take part in the study, the main disadvantages are that it entails attachment of another three electrodes for the C3 monitor, increasing the risk of skin irritation, and receiving additional instructions for two devices. Since ECG recordings are non-invasive, and the C3 recordings do not result in further ambulatory visits than otherwise planned, we estimated that the strain on the patients is very limited.
The use of C3 for estimation of AF in future patients will decrease the trouble of loose leads. For this reason, using the C3 will also simplify the work of the healthcare personnel during the attachment procedure. Overall it may lead to an increase in quality as well as increase the capacity for examining cardiac arrhythmia in the cardiology ambulatory.
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Being tested
- Cortrium C3 device, Holter device
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cortrium C3 deviceDevice
Data is read from Cortrium C3 monitor
Holter deviceDevice
Date is read from Holter device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| AF assessed from Cortrium C3 data | Experimental | Atrial fibrillation assessed from Cortrium C3 device data Receives: Device: Cortrium C3 device; Device: Holter device |
| AF assessed from Holter data | Experimental | Atrial fibrillation assessed from Holter data Receives: Device: Cortrium C3 device; Device: Holter device |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Atrial fibrillation
Expert readings of long-term ECG reports to assess number of AF paroxysms.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Heart rate (BPM) during atrial fibrillation
Expert readings of long-term ECG reports to assess heart rate in BPM.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2016
- Primary completionJul 2017
- Study completionJul 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (21)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 158 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cortrium
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Aleris-Hamlet Hospitaler København
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Helena Helena, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospitals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02714907
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-15006113
- Status last verified
- Jan 2020
- First submitted
- 11 Mar 2016
- Last updated
- 27 Jan 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Saito T, Tamura K, Uchida D, Saito T, Togashi M, Nitta T, Sugisaki Y. Histopathological features of the resected left atrial appendage as predictors of recurrence after surgery for atrial fibrillation in valvular heart disease. Circ J. 2007 Jan;71(1):70-8. doi: 10.1253/circj.71.70.
PubMed 17186981Syed TM, Halperin JL. Left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: state of the art and current challenges. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007 Aug;4(8):428-35. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio0933.
PubMed 17653115Saltman AE, Gillinov AM. Surgical approaches for atrial fibrillation. Cardiol Clin. 2009 Feb;27(1):179-88, x. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2008.09.012.
PubMed 19111773Gillinov AM. Advances in surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2007 Feb;38(2 Suppl):618-23. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000247934.04848.79.
PubMed 17261702Al-Saady NM, Obel OA, Camm AJ. Left atrial appendage: structure, function, and role in thromboembolism. Heart. 1999 Nov;82(5):547-54. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.5.547.
PubMed 10525506Fitzmaurice D. Atrial fibrillation and coagulation: who and when? Blood Rev. 2009 Nov;23(6):241-4. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
PubMed 19709791Furberg CD, Psaty BM, Manolio TA, Gardin JM, Smith VE, Rautaharju PM. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in elderly subjects (the Cardiovascular Health Study). Am J Cardiol. 1994 Aug 1;74(3):236-41. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90363-8.
PubMed 8037127Page RL, Wilkinson WE, Clair WK, McCarthy EA, Pritchett EL. Asymptomatic arrhythmias in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 1994 Jan;89(1):224-7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.1.224.
PubMed 8281651Healey JS, Connolly SJ, Gold MR, Israel CW, Van Gelder IC, Capucci A, Lau CP, Fain E, Yang S, Bailleul C, Morillo CA, Carlson M, Themeles E, Kaufman ES, Hohnloser SH; ASSERT Investigators. Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):120-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105575.
PubMed 22236222Israel CW, Gronefeld G, Ehrlich JR, Li YG, Hohnloser SH. Long-term risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation as documented by an implantable monitoring device: implications for optimal patient care. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jan 7;43(1):47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.027.
PubMed 14715182Thakkar S, Bagarhatta R. Detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or flutter in patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack by Holter monitoring. Indian Heart J. 2014 Mar-Apr;66(2):188-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2014.02.009. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
PubMed 24814113Cotter PE, Martin PJ, Ring L, Warburton EA, Belham M, Pugh PJ. Incidence of atrial fibrillation detected by implantable loop recorders in unexplained stroke. Neurology. 2013 Apr 23;80(17):1546-50. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828f1828. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
PubMed 23535493Sanna T, Diener HC, Passman RS, Di Lazzaro V, Bernstein RA, Morillo CA, Rymer MM, Thijs V, Rogers T, Beckers F, Lindborg K, Brachmann J; CRYSTAL AF Investigators. Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 26;370(26):2478-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1313600.
PubMed 24963567Fuster V, Ryden LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA, Halperin JL, Le Heuzey JY, Kay GN, Lowe JE, Olsson SB, Prystowsky EN, Tamargo JL, Wann S; Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; Committee for Practice Guidelines, European Society of Cardiology; European Heart Rhythm Association; Heart Rhythm Society. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation). Eur Heart J. 2006 Aug;27(16):1979-2030. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl176. No abstract available.
PubMed 16885201Lazzaro MA, Krishnan K, Prabhakaran S. Detection of atrial fibrillation with concurrent holter monitoring and continuous cardiac telemetry following ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012 Feb;21(2):89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.05.006. Epub 2010 Jul 24.
PubMed 20656504
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jan 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Data Validation of Novel Wireless Cortrium C3 Monitor for Continuous Electrocardiogram Measurements
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02714907
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H-15006113
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 158 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CortriumIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Aleris-Hamlet Hospitaler København
- Study start
- Feb 2016
- Primary completion
- Jul 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to validate the quality of the ECG-signal acquired with the Cortrium C3 monitor. The intention is to evaluate whether the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation based on the ECG signal from the C3 monitor concurs with the current monitoring methods used in clinical practice.
Detailed description
Development of new cost effective mobile devices and wireless technology has great potential in supervision of critically ill patients in wards as well as ambulant. Through continuous wireless monitoring in both the hospital and the patients home, detection of heart arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation (AF) will be possible.
AF is the cause of a sizeable amount of strokes (15% of all, and more than 35% of the population over 80 years of age), which can be prevented through anticoagulation treatment if provided in time. Thus, many patients are referred to cardiologic ambulatory to be examined for AF, and are subjected to heart monitoring with a so-called Holter or event monitor. This entails the patient be equipped with several electrodes on the chest, to which leads are attached and connected to a sizable and bulky box. The patient carries this box around hanging from the shoulder, belt or something similar for one or several days. It is then required of the patient to come back and deliver the device, after which the data must be read and analysed, in order to work out a further plan for the patient. During admission, a similar system can be attached for continuous heart monitoring.
Cortrium (http://cortrium.com) has developed a wireless technology, where a small C3 monitor is attached to the chest with standard electrodes and the leads are built into the actual monitor. The quality of the signal has been tested on healthy adults, but is yet to be tested on patients suffering from arrhythmias
The purpose of this study is to validate the quality of the ECG-signal acquired with the Cortrium C3 monitor. The intention is to evaluate whether the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation based on the ECG signal from the C3 monitor concurs with the current monitoring methods used in clinical practice.
The measurements are performed on patients under investigation for AF at cardiology ambulatory Y at Frederiksberg-Bispebjerg Hospital and Aleris-Hamlet Hospital, Copenhagen. The patients are outfitted with a C3 monitor simultaneous with the use of the conventional ambulatory apparatus. This is a "Holter monitor" (Rozinn station RZ152+12 and RZ153+ from ScottCare Holter for Windows 2010 (CE0120) and "EventCare SA version" (CE0120), both bought via SEMCA Ap, Skævinge, Denmark.
Recordings with the usual apparatus are analysed in the usual fashion in the cardiology ambulatory. A copy of the recordings is registered anonymously and paired with the simultaneous recordings from the C3. The diagnosis is made by two observers, blinded to both patient identity and data source. Thus, data will not be personally identifiable. Validation is performed in collaboration with the department of cardiology.
Statistics:
With simultaneous supervision of 77 patients with increased incidence of AF it will be possible to determine whether the C3 is capable of detecting AF in at least 95% of the cases which Holter detects. Since the incidence of AF Is lower in the total patient group referred to Holter monitoring, we plan to include 150 patients to acquire the usable number of examinations.
Economic Conditions Helen Dominguez is the unfunded, and the responsible consultant of the study. Opeon Aps delivers C3 monitors for this clinical trial as well as brochure guides for patients and health care personnel. There are no economic benefits connected with the present clinical trial.
Publication of Results:
Opeon ApS (owner of Cortrium) is responsible for processing the material for publication of results in an international peer-reviewed journal as well as in the Danish popular scientific press related to new Medical equipment. Positive, negative and inconclusive results will be published.
Recruitment of Participants:
Patients who have planned ambulatory arrhythmia recording for diagnosis of intermittent AF will be asked by telephone to consider participating in the study.
After reading the participant information flyer, the subjects are invited to in-depth verbal information in the ambulatory. If the subjects accept to participate and provide a signed informed consent, they outfitted with a C3 monitor along with the standard Holter apparatus.
The study only includes subjects scheduled for Holter monitoring referred for atrial fibrillation examination, quantification of paroxysms, or heart rate during paroxysms.
Ethical Considerations:
Ethical Considerations: If the patient agrees to take part in the study, the main disadvantages are that it entails attachment of another three electrodes for the C3 monitor, increasing the risk of skin irritation, and receiving additional instructions for two devices. Since ECG recordings are non-invasive, and the C3 recordings do not result in further ambulatory visits than otherwise planned, we estimated that the strain on the patients is very limited.
The use of C3 for estimation of AF in future patients will decrease the trouble of loose leads. For this reason, using the C3 will also simplify the work of the healthcare personnel during the attachment procedure. Overall it may lead to an increase in quality as well as increase the capacity for examining cardiac arrhythmia in the cardiology ambulatory.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| AF assessed from Cortrium C3 data | Experimental | Device: Cortrium C3 device, Device: Holter deviceAtrial fibrillation assessed from Cortrium C3 device data |
| AF assessed from Holter data | Experimental | Device: Cortrium C3 device, Device: Holter deviceAtrial fibrillation assessed from Holter data |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Clinical diagnosis of atrial fibrillation
- Investigation of atrial fibrillation
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Language difficulties
- Impaired cognitive function.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cortrium C3 deviceData is read from Cortrium C3 monitor | Device | AF assessed from Cortrium C3 data, AF assessed from Holter data |
| Holter deviceDate is read from Holter device | Device | AF assessed from Cortrium C3 data, AF assessed from Holter data |
Primary outcome
Atrial fibrillation
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Expert readings of long-term ECG reports to assess number of AF paroxysms.
Heart rate (BPM) during atrial fibrillation
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Expert readings of long-term ECG reports to assess heart rate in BPM.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jan 2020.
- Background: PubMed 17186981Saito T, Tamura K, Uchida D, Saito T, Togashi M, Nitta T, Sugisaki Y. Histopathological features of the resected left atrial appendage as predictors of recurrence after surgery for atrial fibrillation in valvular heart disease. Circ J. 2007 Jan;71(1):70-8. doi: 10.1253/circj.71.70.
- Background: PubMed 17653115Syed TM, Halperin JL. Left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: state of the art and current challenges. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007 Aug;4(8):428-35. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio0933.
- Background: PubMed 19111773Saltman AE, Gillinov AM. Surgical approaches for atrial fibrillation. Cardiol Clin. 2009 Feb;27(1):179-88, x. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2008.09.012.
- Background: PubMed 17261702Gillinov AM. Advances in surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2007 Feb;38(2 Suppl):618-23. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000247934.04848.79.
- Background: PubMed 10525506Al-Saady NM, Obel OA, Camm AJ. Left atrial appendage: structure, function, and role in thromboembolism. Heart. 1999 Nov;82(5):547-54. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.5.547.
- Background: PubMed 19709791Fitzmaurice D. Atrial fibrillation and coagulation: who and when? Blood Rev. 2009 Nov;23(6):241-4. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
- Background: PubMed 8037127Furberg CD, Psaty BM, Manolio TA, Gardin JM, Smith VE, Rautaharju PM. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in elderly subjects (the Cardiovascular Health Study). Am J Cardiol. 1994 Aug 1;74(3):236-41. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90363-8.
- Background: PubMed 8281651Page RL, Wilkinson WE, Clair WK, McCarthy EA, Pritchett EL. Asymptomatic arrhythmias in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 1994 Jan;89(1):224-7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.1.224.
- Background: PubMed 22236222Healey JS, Connolly SJ, Gold MR, Israel CW, Van Gelder IC, Capucci A, Lau CP, Fain E, Yang S, Bailleul C, Morillo CA, Carlson M, Themeles E, Kaufman ES, Hohnloser SH; ASSERT Investigators. Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):120-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105575.
- Background: PubMed 14715182Israel CW, Gronefeld G, Ehrlich JR, Li YG, Hohnloser SH. Long-term risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation as documented by an implantable monitoring device: implications for optimal patient care. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jan 7;43(1):47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.027.
- Background: PubMed 24814113Thakkar S, Bagarhatta R. Detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or flutter in patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack by Holter monitoring. Indian Heart J. 2014 Mar-Apr;66(2):188-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2014.02.009. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
- Background: PubMed 23535493Cotter PE, Martin PJ, Ring L, Warburton EA, Belham M, Pugh PJ. Incidence of atrial fibrillation detected by implantable loop recorders in unexplained stroke. Neurology. 2013 Apr 23;80(17):1546-50. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828f1828. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
Horizon 360 Protocol for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation With the Sphere-360™ Catheter and Affera™ Mapping and Ablation System (Horizon 360)
Paroxysmal AF
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Concomitant Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Pulsed Field Ablation-Asia
Concomitant Procedures, Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
CONVERGE Post-Approval Study (PAS)
Chronic Atrial Fibrillation
Recruiting
Early Closure of Left Atrial Appendage for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke Despite Anticoagulation Therapy
Ischemic Stroke, Atrial Fibrillation
RecruitingPhase 2
Safety in Adult Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Treated With Anticoagulation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Helena Helena, MD, PhD principal investigator
Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospitals
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cortrium C3 device and Holter device in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Cortrium at 2 sites in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Atrial fibrillation (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02714907, which also lists 21 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2020.