Thyroid NoduleLARANCT02714946
Laser Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Thyroid Nodules
A study testing Percutaneous Laser Ablation and Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation in people with Thyroid Nodule, run by Campus Bio-Medico University at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus percutaneous laser ablation (LA) for the treatment of solid thyroid nodules. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Thyroid Nodule
- What is being tested?
- Percutaneous Laser Ablation and Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Jan 2016to Jan 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Solitary thyroid nodule or dominating nodule which is well-identifiable in multinodular goiter.
- Compressive and /or cosmetic symptoms caused by thyroid nodule or increase in nodule volume >20% in 1 year even without symptoms
- A nodule volume ≥ 5 ml
- Solid nodule (uniformly compact or nearly completely solid, with a liquid component not exceeding 30%);
- Two thyroid biopsies resulted negative for malignancy
- Calcitonin levels within normal ranges
Who cannot join
- Hyperfunctioning lesion as evaluated biochemically and/or by 99mTc scintigraphy
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Prospective Randomized Comparative Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Ultrasound-guided Laser and Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Benign Thyroid Nodules
The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus percutaneous laser ablation (LA) for the treatment of solid thyroid nodules.
Read the detailed description
Nodular thyroid disease is a common clinical problem whose prevalence increases with age and with a more widespread use of thyroid ultrasonography. Although most thyroid nodules are benign and need only periodic monitoring, some may require treatment for associated pressure and/or cosmetic symptoms. Although thyroid surgery is the main therapeutic approach for compressive thyroid nodules, it may be associated with several drawbacks. Long-term levothyroxine suppression treatment in elderly patients with large nodular goiters is unsatisfactory because it is ineffective. Furthermore, it is associated with adverse effects on bones and the cardiovascular system. Nonsurgical, minimally invasive treatment modalities such as percutaneous laser ablation (LA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have been used to treat thyroid nodules. However no studies comparing LA and RFA have been published so far.
Aims of the study
- To evaluate whether LA and RFA cause a reduction ≥50% in the volume of thyroid nodules after 6 months and 1 year follow-up
- To evaluate whether the features of thyroid nodules as evaluated by thyroid ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, power-doppler and core-biopsy influence LA and RFA outcomes
- To evaluate changes in thyroid function and thyroid autoimmunity after LA and RFA.
- To evaluate differences between LA and RFA in terms of complications, side effects and tolerability.
Patients will be recruited, treated and followed at Santa Maria Goretti Hospital in Latina, Italy, by physicians with expertise in LA and RFA. The scientific coordinator of this study is dr. Silvia Manfrini.
- Conditions
- Thyroid Nodule
- Being tested
- Percutaneous Laser Ablation, Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation
- Keywords
- Thyroid Nodule, Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA), Percutaneous laser ablation (LA)
- Medical subject headings
- Thyroid Nodule
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Percutaneous Laser AblationDevice
Single session with standardized approach: One or two fibers will be used for treatments including one to three illuminations with a fixed output power of 3 W, using the pullback technique. Energy for each emission will be 1200-1800J based on nodule volume. The treatment is performed under local anesthesia and conscious sedation.
Percutaneous Radiofrequency AblationDevice
Single session with standardized approach: A radiofrequency generator and a 17-gauge, 15-cm electrode with a 1-cm active tip will be used. A transisthmic approach along the short axis of the nodule will be used and the nodules will be managed with the moving-shot technique. 60 W of radiofrequency outpower will be used for all nodules. The treatment is performed under local anesthesia and conscious sedation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| LA Arm | Active comparator | Percutaneous Laser Ablation Receives: Device: Percutaneous Laser Ablation |
| RFA Arm | Active comparator | Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation Receives: Device: Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of thyroid nodules with volume reduction at 6 and 12 months after treatment
Differences in the percentage of nodules with greater than 50% base volume reduction at 6 and 12 months
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Basal Volume of Thyroid Nodules as Predictive factor of response to treatment
Basal volume in mL of the nodules will be calculated with the ellipsoid formula
Measured: 12 months
Histopathological features of Thyroid Nodules as Predictive factor of response to treatment
% of amount of fibrosis and colloid components evaluated with score-biopsy
Measured: 12 months
Variation in TSH levels after treatment
Variation in TSH value (mUI/ml) before and after LA and RFA
Measured: 12 months
Variation in AbTPO and AbTg levels after treatment
Variation in AbTPO and AbTg levels (UI/ml) before and after LA and RFA
Measured: 12 months
Complications
Differences in the rate of complications and side effects between LA and RFA
Measured: Up to 1 year follow-up
Tolerability evaluated by McGill Pain Questionnaire
Tolerability will be evaluated by McGill Pain Questionnaire, Melzack 1975, italian version
Measured: 0 and 6 months
Quality of Life
Quality of Life will be evaluated by SF-36 QoL questionnaire after 6 months and 1 year in both arms.
Measured: 6 months and 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2016
- Primary completionSep 2019 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Thyroid NoduleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Campus Bio-Medico University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Silvia Manfrini, Campus Bio-Medico University
- Investigators
- Roberto Cianni, Principal investigator, Santa Maria Goretti Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02714946
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Studio 96-15 CE 93321
- Acronym
- LARA
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 19 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 4 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gharib H, Papini E, Paschke R, Duick DS, Valcavi R, Hegedus L, Vitti P; AACE/AME/ETA Task Force on Thyroid Nodules. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, Associazione Medici Endocrinologi, and European Thyroid Association medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules: executive summary of recommendations. J Endocrinol Invest. 2010;33(5 Suppl):51-6.
PubMed 20543551Pacella CM, Bizzarri G, Guglielmi R, Anelli V, Bianchini A, Crescenzi A, Pacella S, Papini E. Thyroid tissue: US-guided percutaneous interstitial laser ablation-a feasibility study. Radiology. 2000 Dec;217(3):673-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.217.3.r00dc09673.
PubMed 11110927Ahmed M, Brace CL, Lee FT Jr, Goldberg SN. Principles of and advances in percutaneous ablation. Radiology. 2011 Feb;258(2):351-69. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10081634.
PubMed 21273519Papini E, Guglielmi R, Bizzarri G, Graziano F, Bianchini A, Brufani C, Pacella S, Valle D, Pacella CM. Treatment of benign cold thyroid nodules: a randomized clinical trial of percutaneous laser ablation versus levothyroxine therapy or follow-up. Thyroid. 2007 Mar;17(3):229-35. doi: 10.1089/thy.2006.0204.
PubMed 17381356Cesareo R, Pasqualini V, Simeoni C, Sacchi M, Saralli E, Campagna G, Cianni R. Prospective study of effectiveness of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation versus control group in patients affected by benign thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Feb;100(2):460-6. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2186. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
PubMed 25387256
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Randomized Comparative Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Ultrasound-guided Laser and Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Benign Thyroid Nodules
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02714946
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LARA / Studio 96-15 CE 93321
- Conditions
- Thyroid Nodule
- Keywords
- Thyroid Nodule, Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA), Percutaneous laser ablation (LA)
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Campus Bio-Medico UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2016
- Primary completion
- Sep 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus percutaneous laser ablation (LA) for the treatment of solid thyroid nodules.
Detailed description
Nodular thyroid disease is a common clinical problem whose prevalence increases with age and with a more widespread use of thyroid ultrasonography. Although most thyroid nodules are benign and need only periodic monitoring, some may require treatment for associated pressure and/or cosmetic symptoms. Although thyroid surgery is the main therapeutic approach for compressive thyroid nodules, it may be associated with several drawbacks. Long-term levothyroxine suppression treatment in elderly patients with large nodular goiters is unsatisfactory because it is ineffective. Furthermore, it is associated with adverse effects on bones and the cardiovascular system. Nonsurgical, minimally invasive treatment modalities such as percutaneous laser ablation (LA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have been used to treat thyroid nodules. However no studies comparing LA and RFA have been published so far.
Aims of the study
- To evaluate whether LA and RFA cause a reduction ≥50% in the volume of thyroid nodules after 6 months and 1 year follow-up
- To evaluate whether the features of thyroid nodules as evaluated by thyroid ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, power-doppler and core-biopsy influence LA and RFA outcomes
- To evaluate changes in thyroid function and thyroid autoimmunity after LA and RFA.
- To evaluate differences between LA and RFA in terms of complications, side effects and tolerability.
Patients will be recruited, treated and followed at Santa Maria Goretti Hospital in Latina, Italy, by physicians with expertise in LA and RFA. The scientific coordinator of this study is dr. Silvia Manfrini.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| LA Arm | Active comparator | Device: Percutaneous Laser AblationPercutaneous Laser Ablation |
| RFA Arm | Active comparator | Device: Percutaneous Radiofrequency AblationPercutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Solitary thyroid nodule or dominating nodule which is well-identifiable in multinodular goiter.
- Compressive and /or cosmetic symptoms caused by thyroid nodule or increase in nodule volume >20% in 1 year even without symptoms
- A nodule volume ≥ 5 ml
- Solid nodule (uniformly compact or nearly completely solid, with a liquid component not exceeding 30%);
- Two thyroid biopsies resulted negative for malignancy
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Hyperfunctioning lesion as evaluated biochemically and/or by 99mTc scintigraphy
- Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous Laser AblationSingle session with standardized approach: One or two fibers will be used for treatments including one to three illuminations with a fixed output power of 3 W, using the pullback technique. Energy for each emission will be 1200-1800J based on nodule volume. The treatment is performed under local anesthesia and conscious sedation. | Device | LA Arm |
| Percutaneous Radiofrequency AblationSingle session with standardized approach: A radiofrequency generator and a 17-gauge, 15-cm electrode with a 1-cm active tip will be used. A transisthmic approach along the short axis of the nodule will be used and the nodules will be managed with the moving-shot technique. 60 W of radiofrequency outpower will be used for all nodules. The treatment is performed under local anesthesia and conscious sedation | Device | RFA Arm |
Primary outcome
Percentage of thyroid nodules with volume reduction at 6 and 12 months after treatment
Time frame: 12 months
Differences in the percentage of nodules with greater than 50% base volume reduction at 6 and 12 months
7 secondary outcomes
Basal Volume of Thyroid Nodules as Predictive factor of response to treatment
Time frame: 12 months
Histopathological features of Thyroid Nodules as Predictive factor of response to treatment
Time frame: 12 months
Variation in TSH levels after treatment
Time frame: 12 months
Variation in AbTPO and AbTg levels after treatment
Time frame: 12 months
Complications
Time frame: Up to 1 year follow-up
Tolerability evaluated by McGill Pain Questionnaire
Time frame: 0 and 6 months
Quality of Life
Time frame: 6 months and 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Sep 2019.
- Background: PubMed 20543551Gharib H, Papini E, Paschke R, Duick DS, Valcavi R, Hegedus L, Vitti P; AACE/AME/ETA Task Force on Thyroid Nodules. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, Associazione Medici Endocrinologi, and European Thyroid Association medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules: executive summary of recommendations. J Endocrinol Invest. 2010;33(5 Suppl):51-6.
- Background: PubMed 11110927Pacella CM, Bizzarri G, Guglielmi R, Anelli V, Bianchini A, Crescenzi A, Pacella S, Papini E. Thyroid tissue: US-guided percutaneous interstitial laser ablation-a feasibility study. Radiology. 2000 Dec;217(3):673-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.217.3.r00dc09673.
- Background: PubMed 21273519Ahmed M, Brace CL, Lee FT Jr, Goldberg SN. Principles of and advances in percutaneous ablation. Radiology. 2011 Feb;258(2):351-69. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10081634.
- Background: PubMed 17381356Papini E, Guglielmi R, Bizzarri G, Graziano F, Bianchini A, Brufani C, Pacella S, Valle D, Pacella CM. Treatment of benign cold thyroid nodules: a randomized clinical trial of percutaneous laser ablation versus levothyroxine therapy or follow-up. Thyroid. 2007 Mar;17(3):229-35. doi: 10.1089/thy.2006.0204.
- Background: PubMed 25387256Cesareo R, Pasqualini V, Simeoni C, Sacchi M, Saralli E, Campagna G, Cianni R. Prospective study of effectiveness of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation versus control group in patients affected by benign thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Feb;100(2):460-6. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2186. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Thyroid Nodule
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Serum Treg/Th17-Related Cytokines and Systemic Inflammatory Indices in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (DTC), Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
Recruiting
Ultrasound-guided Microwave Ablation of Benign Thyroid Nodules
Thyroid Nodule (Diagnosis)
Not yet recruiting
Endotracheal Tube Versus Transcartilage Needle Electrodes for Nerve Monitoring in Thyroid Surgery
Thyroid Diseases, Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Studies on Tumors of the Thyroid
Hurthle Cell Thyroid Cancer, Tall Cell Variant Thyroid Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Prospective Evaluation of the Pulse Biosciences nPulse™ Vybrance™ Percutaneous Electrode System
Thyroid Nodule, Thyroid Goiter
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Roberto Cianni principal investigator
Santa Maria Goretti Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Percutaneous Laser Ablation and Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation in people with Thyroid Nodule, run by Campus Bio-Medico University at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of thyroid nodules with volume reduction at 6 and 12 months after treatment (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02714946, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Sep 2019.