Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckPhase 3hepaneckNCT02715596
Changes in Body Composition After EPA Supplementation in Head and Neck Patients
A Phase 3 study testing EPA supplementation in people with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck, run by Institut Català d'Oncologia at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Evaluates the effect of EPA supplementation in terms of muscle mass in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck locally advanced Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
- What is being tested?
- EPA supplementation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 54 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 23 Dec 2015to 2 Sep 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- - Age between 18 and 75 years inclusive.
- A performance status 0-1 according to ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) scale at the time of inclusion in the study.
- Expectancy greater than 3 months life.
- Location: oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx,hypopharynx, nasopharynx and sinuses.
- Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck classified as locally advanced (Stage III, IVa-IVb).
- Patients with medical conditions to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) induction followed by radiotherapy (RDT) normo fraction combined with QT or biological.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Neutrophil ≥1500 / mm3, platelet count ≥150,000 / mm3 and hemoglobin ≥10g / dL.
- Adequate liver function: total bilirubin ≤ 1 x ULN; aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 2.5 x ULN; Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≤ 5 x ULN.
- Serum albumin-adjusted calcium ≤ 1.25 x upper limit of normal (ULN).
- Using an effective contraceptive method for patients of both sexes where the risk of conception and / or pregnancy.
- Signature of written informed consent before any study-specific procedures
Who cannot join
- - Metastatic disease (stage IVc).
- Surgery, radiotherapy and / or chemotherapy prior to study disease treatment.
- T3 N0-1 larynx.
- Other stadiums than III or IV without distant metastases and stable disease.
- Another synchronous squamous carcinoma.
- Diagnosis of other malignancy within the past 5 years, except in situ of the cervix and / or adequately treated basal cell carcinoma skin cancer.
Show all 19Show fewer
- Active infection (infection requiring intravenous antibiotic), including active tuberculosis and HIV diagnosed.
- Uncontrolled hypertension defined as systolic blood pressure ≥180mm Hg and / or diastolic blood pressure≥ 130 mm Hg at rest.
- Pregnancy (absence must be confirmed with β-HCG (Human chorionic gonadotropin) serum test) or lactating.
- Systemic, chronic immune and concomitant treatment, or hormonal treatment of cancer.
- Other concomitant antineoplastic treatment.
- Clinically significant coronary artery or a history of myocardial infarction in the last 12 months or high risk of uncontrolled arrhythmia or uncontrolled heart failure.
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that would have required ≥3 hospitalizations in the last 12 months.
- Uncontrolled active peptic ulcer.
- Presence of a psychological or medical illness that prevented the study by the patient or to grant the signature on the informed consent.
- Abuse of known drugs (with the exception of heavy drinking).
- Allergic reaction known against any component of study treatment.
- Previous treatment with monoclonal antibodies or other inhibitors of signal transduction or treatment directed against the EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor).
- Any experimental therapy within 30 days prior to study entry.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site
Institut Catala d'Oncologia- L'Hospitalet
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08908
About this study
Official title: Relationship Between Changes in Body Composition and Supplementation With EPA in Patients Diagnosed With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck Locally Advanced (Stage III-IVb)
Evaluates the effect of EPA supplementation in terms of muscle mass in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck locally advanced
Read the detailed description
This study is designed to evaluate the effect of EPA supplementation on muscle mass in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck locally advanced (stage III-IVb) to assess that supplementation with EPA can maintain muscle mass along the oncologic treatment. Other aims are to evaluate the nutritional status, acute and chronic toxicities related with the loss of muscle mass and the impact of the EPA supplementation on overall and disease-free survival.
- Conditions
- Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
- Being tested
- EPA supplementation, Placebo
- Keywords
- head and neck, eicosapentanoic acid, body composition
- Medical subject headings
- Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EPA supplementationDietary supplement
2.7 g EPA supplementation in a 15 cc emulsion stick-pack
PlaceboOther
placebo in 15 cc emulsion stick-pack
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention A | Experimental | 2.7 g EPA supplementation in a 15 cc emulsion stick-pack Receives: Dietary Supplement: EPA supplementation |
| Intervention B | Placebo comparator | Placebo supplementation in a 15 cc emulsion stick-pack Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The effect of supplementation with EPA on muscle mass during a conservative non-surgical treatment of organ in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck locally advanced.
To evaluate the effect of supplementation with EPA on muscle mass during a conservative non-surgical treatment of organ in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck locally advanced.
Measured: 3 years
Secondary outcomes (13)
the effect of supplementation with EPA on muscle mass after induction chemotherapy using imaging such as CT scan
To evaluate on muscle mass using imaging such as CT scan
Measured: 10 weeks
Evolution of nutritional status of patients over oncology-specific treatment in both arms. using PG-VGS
To assess the evolution of nutritional status using PG-VGS (patient generated subjective global assessment)
Measured: 1 year
The effect of supplementation with EPA regarding acute toxicity during treatment.using the CTCAE v4 criteria
To evaluate the frequency of acute toxicity using the CTCAE v4 criteria
Measured: 1 year
The effect of supplementation with EPA in relation to chronic toxicity 2 years after oncologic treatment. (using the CTCAE v4 criteria)
To evaluate the frequency of chronic toxicity using the CTCAE v4 criteria
Measured: 2 years
The impact of supplementation with EPA in the loco-regional control at 2 years after completing cancer treatment.
To evaluate whether the effect of supplementation with EPA influences the loco-regional control using a CT scan
Measured: 2 years
The effect of supplementation with EPA on the perceptions of patients through quality of life validated questionnaires.
- To evaluate and compare the effect of supplementation with EPA on the perceptions of patients through quality of life questionnaires (QLQ) validated such as QLA-C30
Measured: 2 year
The adherence to EPA. (using record EPA/placebo dispensing and return and blood samples at baseline and throughout the cancer treatment)
To assess adherence to EPA using record EPA/placebo dispensing and return and blood samples at baseline and throughout the cancer treatment of the EPA concentration in the erythrocyte membrane
Measured: 1 year
The functional status of patients throughout the treatment. (functional status using hand grip)
To evaluate the functional status using hand grip
Measured: 1 year
The need for nutritional support and nutritional intervention required during cancer treatment among patients supplemented with EPA or placebo.
To compare the need for nutritional support and nutritional intervention required using data collection sheet with the different types of nutritional support, days of each nutritional intervention and adherence to it.
Measured: 1 year
The impact of supplementation with EPA on the recurrence-free survival at 2 years after completing cancer treatment.
To evaluate whether the effect of supplementation with EPA influences the recurrence-free survival using a CT scan
Measured: 2 years
The impact of supplementation with EPA on the overall survival at 2 years after completing cancer treatment.
To evaluate whether the effect of supplementation with EPA influences the overall survival using a CT scan
Measured: 2 years
The effect of supplementation with EPA on the perceptions of patients through quality of life validated questionnaires.
To evaluate and compare the effect of supplementation with EPA on the perceptions of patients through quality of life questionnaires (QLQ) validated such as QLQ-H\&N35
Measured: 2 years
The functional status of patients throughout the treatment. (functional status using performance status scale)
To evaluate the functional status using performance status scale
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study start23 Dec 2015
- Primary completion1 Mar 2019
- Study completion2 Sep 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- eicosapentanoic acid (EPA) versus placebo
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institut Català d'Oncologia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ferrer Internacional S.A.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lorena Arribas, RD, MsC, Principal investigator, Institut Català d'Oncologia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02715596
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PR 261/14
- Acronym
- hepaneck
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 12 Feb 2015
- Last updated
- 4 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Arribas L, Hurtos L, Esteve A, Peiro I, Gonzalez-Tampan AR, Choulli M, Antonio M, Vilajosana E, Borbalas AL, Taberna M, Mesia R. Nutritional impact of eicosapentaenoic acid supplementation (EPA) in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. Nutr J. 2025 Sep 26;24(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12937-025-01203-8.
PubMed 41013487
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Relationship Between Changes in Body Composition and Supplementation With EPA in Patients Diagnosed With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck Locally Advanced (Stage III-IVb)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02715596
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- hepaneck / PR 261/14
- Conditions
- Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
- Keywords
- head and neck, eicosapentanoic acid, body composition
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Institut Català d'OncologiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ferrer Internacional S.A.
- Study start
- 23 Dec 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 Sep 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Evaluates the effect of EPA supplementation in terms of muscle mass in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck locally advanced
Detailed description
This study is designed to evaluate the effect of EPA supplementation on muscle mass in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck locally advanced (stage III-IVb) to assess that supplementation with EPA can maintain muscle mass along the oncologic treatment. Other aims are to evaluate the nutritional status, acute and chronic toxicities related with the loss of muscle mass and the impact of the EPA supplementation on overall and disease-free survival.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- eicosapentanoic acid (EPA) versus placebo
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention A | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: EPA supplementation2.7 g EPA supplementation in a 15 cc emulsion stick-pack |
| Intervention B | Placebo comparator | Other: PlaceboPlacebo supplementation in a 15 cc emulsion stick-pack |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- - Age between 18 and 75 years inclusive.
- A performance status 0-1 according to ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) scale at the time of inclusion in the study.
- Expectancy greater than 3 months life.
- Location: oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx,hypopharynx, nasopharynx and sinuses.
- Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck classified as locally advanced (Stage III, IVa-IVb).
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- - Metastatic disease (stage IVc).
- Surgery, radiotherapy and / or chemotherapy prior to study disease treatment.
- T3 N0-1 larynx.
- Other stadiums than III or IV without distant metastases and stable disease.
- Another synchronous squamous carcinoma.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EPA supplementation2.7 g EPA supplementation in a 15 cc emulsion stick-pack | Dietary supplement | Intervention A |
| Placeboplacebo in 15 cc emulsion stick-pack | Other | Intervention B |
Primary outcome
The effect of supplementation with EPA on muscle mass during a conservative non-surgical treatment of organ in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck locally advanced.
Time frame: 3 years
To evaluate the effect of supplementation with EPA on muscle mass during a conservative non-surgical treatment of organ in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck locally advanced.
13 secondary outcomes
the effect of supplementation with EPA on muscle mass after induction chemotherapy using imaging such as CT scan
Time frame: 10 weeks
Evolution of nutritional status of patients over oncology-specific treatment in both arms. using PG-VGS
Time frame: 1 year
The effect of supplementation with EPA regarding acute toxicity during treatment.using the CTCAE v4 criteria
Time frame: 1 year
The effect of supplementation with EPA in relation to chronic toxicity 2 years after oncologic treatment. (using the CTCAE v4 criteria)
Time frame: 2 years
The impact of supplementation with EPA in the loco-regional control at 2 years after completing cancer treatment.
Time frame: 2 years
The effect of supplementation with EPA on the perceptions of patients through quality of life validated questionnaires.
Time frame: 2 year
The adherence to EPA. (using record EPA/placebo dispensing and return and blood samples at baseline and throughout the cancer treatment)
Time frame: 1 year
The functional status of patients throughout the treatment. (functional status using hand grip)
Time frame: 1 year
The need for nutritional support and nutritional intervention required during cancer treatment among patients supplemented with EPA or placebo.
Time frame: 1 year
The impact of supplementation with EPA on the recurrence-free survival at 2 years after completing cancer treatment.
Time frame: 2 years
The impact of supplementation with EPA on the overall survival at 2 years after completing cancer treatment.
Time frame: 2 years
The effect of supplementation with EPA on the perceptions of patients through quality of life validated questionnaires.
Time frame: 2 years
The functional status of patients throughout the treatment. (functional status using performance status scale)
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Sep 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41013487Arribas L, Hurtos L, Esteve A, Peiro I, Gonzalez-Tampan AR, Choulli M, Antonio M, Vilajosana E, Borbalas AL, Taberna M, Mesia R. Nutritional impact of eicosapentaenoic acid supplementation (EPA) in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. Nutr J. 2025 Sep 26;24(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12937-025-01203-8.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Investigate ALE.P02 as a Monotherapy or in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Adult Patients With Selected CLDN1+ Solid Tumors
Squamous Non-small-cell Lung Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
E7 TCR-T Cell Immunotherapy for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Associated Cancers
Cervical Cancer, Throat Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
A Clinical Trial Investigating the Safety, Tolerability, and Therapeutic Effects of BNT113 in Combination With Pembrolizumab Versus Pembrolizumab Alone for Patients With a Form of Head and Neck Cancer Positive for Human Papilloma Virus 16 and Expressing the Protein PD-L1
Unresectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
p16+ Oropharyngeal Cancer Radiation Optimization Trial Reducing Elective Treatment Volumes (PROTEcT)
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx
RecruitingPhase 1
Pembrolizumab Plus Ultrasound-Induced Microbubble Cavitation in Head and Neck Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Small Cell Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lorena Arribas, RD, MsC principal investigator
Institut Català d'Oncologia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing EPA supplementation in people with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck, run by Institut Català d'Oncologia at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The effect of supplementation with EPA on muscle mass during a conservative non-surgical treatment of organ in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck locally advanced. (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02715596, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Sep 2019.