AzTrials
AzTrials

Meniere's DiseasePhase 3AVERTS-2NCT02717442

Study of OTO-104 in Subjects With Unilateral Meniere's Disease

A Phase 3 study testing OTO-104 in people with Meniere's Disease, run by Otonomy, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of OTO-104 for the treatment of Meniere's disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Meniere's Disease
What is being tested?
OTO-104
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
176 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
21 Mar 2016to 15 Sep 2017
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject has a diagnosis of unilateral Meniere's disease by 1995 American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (AAOHNS) criteria and reports active vertigo for the 2 months prior to the study lead-in period.
  • Subject has experienced active vertigo during the lead-in period.
  • Subject has documented asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss.
  • Subject agrees to maintain their current treatments for Meniere's disease while on-study.

Who cannot join

  • Subject is pregnant or lactating.
  • Subject has a history of immunodeficiency disease.
  • Subject has a history of previous endolymphatic sac surgery.
  • Subject has a history of previous use of intratympanic (IT) gentamicin in the affected ear.
  • Subject has a history of tympanostomy tubes with evidence of perforation or lack of closure.
  • Subject has experienced an adverse reaction to IT injection of steroids.
  • Subject has used an investigational drug or device in the 3 months prior to screening.
  • Subject has previously been randomized to a trial of OTO-104.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Many sites in Europe. Refer to the contact info listed below.

    San Diego, California, 92121

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study of OTO-104 Given as a Single Intratympanic Injection in Subjects With Unilateral Meniere's Disease

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of OTO-104 for the treatment of Meniere's disease.

Being tested
OTO-104, Placebo
Keywords
Meniere's Disease, Vertigo
Medical subject headings
Meniere Disease, Vertigo

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OTO-104Drug

    Single intratympanic injection of 12 mg OTO-104

  • PlaceboDrug

    Single intratympanic injection of placebo

Study groups in NCT02717442
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OTO-104Experimental12 mg dexamethasone
Receives: Drug: OTO-104
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The Number of DVD at Week 12 (the 4-week [28 Days] Interval From Week 9 Through Week 12) - FAS-1 Population

    In the Full Analysis Set (FAS)-1 population, the number of DVDs at Week 12 (the 4-week [28 days] interval from Week 9 through Week 12) was compared between OTO-104 and placebo. Week 12 = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in.

    Measured: 3 months

  2. The Number of DVD at Week 12 (the 4-week [28 Days] Interval From Week 9 Through Week 12) - FAS-2 Population

    The number of DVDs at Week 12 (the 4-week [28 days] interval from Week 9 through Week 12) was compared between OTO-104 and placebo. Week 12 = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in.

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Effect of Vertigo on Daily Activities - Number of Days Sick at Home or Bedridden at Week 12 (Month 3): FAS-1

    Week 12 = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in.

    Questionnaire - subjects were instructed to record the effect on their daily activities of their total vertigo experienced that day using a 5-point scoring system:

    0 = normal activity

    1. = slight limitation
    2. = moderate limitation
    3. = sick at home
    4. = bedridden

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Effect of Vertigo on Daily Activities - Number of Days Sick at Home or Bedridden at Week 12 (Month 3): FAS-2

    Week 12 = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in.

    Questionnaire - subjects were instructed to record the effect on their daily activities of their total vertigo experienced that day using a 5-point scoring system:

    0 = normal activity

    1. = slight limitation
    2. = moderate limitation
    3. = sick at home
    4. = bedridden

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Otoscopic Examination - Tympanic Membrane Perforation at Week 12 (Month 3)

    Otoscopic examinations were conducted at each visit. It was considered important to understand if the tympanic perforation that resulted from the IT injection at the Baseline visit persisted at the end of study visit (Week12 [Month 3]). Week 12 = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in.

    Measured: 3 months

  4. Audiometry - Shift in Air-Bone Gap at 500 Hz From Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3)

    The number of subjects with a change in air-bone gap from Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3) from no impairment (<=10 dB) to impairment (>10 dB) when measure at 500 Hz. Week 12 = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in.

    Measured: 3 Months

  5. Audiometry - Shift in Air-Bone Gap at 1000 Hz From Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3)

    The number of subjects with a change in air-bone gap from Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3) from no impairment at baseline (<= 10 dB) to impairment at Month 3 (>10 dB) when measured at 1000 Hz. Week 12 (Month 3) = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in.

    Measured: 3 months

  6. Audiometry - Shift in Air-Bone Gap at 2000 Hz From Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3)

    The number of subjects with a change in air-bone gap from Baseline to Week 12 (Month 3) from no impairment at baseline (<= 10 dB) to impairment at Month 3 (>10 dB) when measured at 2000 Hz. Week 12 (Month 3) = 12 weeks after dosing at the Baseline visit. The Baseline visit occurred at the end of lead-in. No intervention was administered during lead-in.

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Mar 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start21 Mar 2016
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2017
  4. Study completion15 Sep 2017

Why it stopped: Negative Efficacy Results from the recently completed Phase 3 study 104-201506

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
176 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02717442
Sponsor's protocol ID
104-201508
Acronym
AVERTS-2
Status last verified
Dec 2022
First submitted
10 Mar 2016
Last updated
13 Jan 2023
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Phillips J, Mikulec AA, Robinson JM, Skarinsky D, Anderson JJ. Efficacy of Intratympanic OTO-104 for the Treatment of Meniere's Disease: The Outcome of Three Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Studies. Otol Neurotol. 2023 Jul 1;44(6):584-592. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003886. Epub 2023 Apr 22.

    PubMed 37185596

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing OTO-104 in people with Meniere's Disease, run by Otonomy, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Jan 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The Number of DVD at Week 12 (the 4-week [28 Days] Interval From Week 9 Through Week 12) - FAS-1 Population (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02717442, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jan 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in