Patient EducationNCT02718807
Rapid Prototyping Models for Patient Education
An observational study of Patient Education, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center.
Trial summary
Pre-made rapid prototyping models will be used to increase patient education versus current methodologies. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Patient Education
- What is being tested?
- RP model explanation and questionnaire
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- May 2016to Jan 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Post-partum women and respective co-parents who are greater than 18 years of age and fluent in the English language.
Who may be able to join
- Mother
- Post-partum
- Atraumatic delivery of healthy, live infant at HMC
- Age > 18
- Co-parent
- Co-parent
- Atraumatic delivery of healthy, live infant at HMC
- Age > 18
Who cannot join
- any pregnancy related issues
- fetal loss
- NICU stay > 6 hours
- Emergent cesarean section
- Post-partum hemorrhage
- Hysterectomy
Show all 10Show fewer
- Any other condition requiring unplanned, medical intervention during labor and delivery
- Prior fetal loss or anomaly
- Inability to read or write English
- those who do not consent
About this study
Official title: Use of 3-D Printed Models to Improve Patient Understanding During the Informed Consent Process: A Pilot Study
Pre-made rapid prototyping models will be used to increase patient education versus current methodologies.
Read the detailed description
Post-partum women and their co-parent will have a medical condition explained to them first verbally, followed by a questionnaire, and then with the use of anatomical models created by rapid prototyping, followed by a questionnaire. The two questionnaires will then be compared.
- Conditions
- Patient Education
- Being tested
- RP model explanation and questionnaire
- Keywords
- Patient Care, Education
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RP model explanation and questionnaireOther
Rapid prototyping models of anatomy will be used to demonstrate an anatomic and medical condition and participants will grade the experience on a questionnaire.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Post-partum Women | Post-partum women following an atraumatic pregnancy. Receives: Other: RP model explanation and questionnaire | |
| Co-Parents | Co-parents to post-partum women following an atraumatic pregnancy. Receives: Other: RP model explanation and questionnaire |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference in questionnaire score
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary outcomes (3)
Participant Age
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Participant Education Level
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Participant Gender
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2016
- Primary completionDec 2016
- Study completionJan 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Patient EducationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- James Mooney, MD, Principal investigator, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02718807
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 3980
- Status last verified
- Jan 2022
- First submitted
- 9 Mar 2016
- Last updated
- 11 Feb 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Data will not be shared with participants
Publications
Kinnersley P, Phillips K, Savage K, Kelly MJ, Farrell E, Morgan B, Whistance R, Lewis V, Mann MK, Stephens BL, Blazeby J, Elwyn G, Edwards AG. Interventions to promote informed consent for patients undergoing surgical and other invasive healthcare procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 6;2013(7):CD009445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009445.pub2.
PubMed 23832767Farrell EH, Whistance RN, Phillips K, Morgan B, Savage K, Lewis V, Kelly M, Blazeby JM, Kinnersley P, Edwards A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of audio-visual information aids for informed consent for invasive healthcare procedures in clinical practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jan;94(1):20-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.019. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
PubMed 24041712Challoner A, Erolin C. Creating pathology models from MRI data: a comparison of virtual 3D modelling and rapid prototyping techniques. J Vis Commun Med. 2013 Jun;36(1-2):11-9. doi: 10.3109/17453054.2013.790011.
PubMed 23641760Gonzalez-Cota A, Kruger GH, Raghavan P, Reynolds PI. Computational modeling and prototyping of a pediatric airway management instrument. Anesth Analg. 2010 Sep;111(3):649-52. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e5ea7c. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
PubMed 20581164Mankovich NJ, Cheeseman AM, Stoker NG. The display of three-dimensional anatomy with stereolithographic models. J Digit Imaging. 1990 Aug;3(3):200-3. doi: 10.1007/BF03167610.
PubMed 2085555Mori K, Yamamoto T, Oyama K, Ueno H, Nakao Y, Honma K. Modified three-dimensional skull base model with artificial dura mater, cranial nerves, and venous sinuses for training in skull base surgery: technical note. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2008 Dec;48(12):582-7; discussion 587-8. doi: 10.2176/nmc.48.582.
PubMed 19106500Miller SF, Sanz-Guerrero J, Dodde RE, Johnson DD, Bhawuk A, Gurm HS, Shih AJ. A pulsatile blood vessel system for a femoral arterial access clinical simulation model. Med Eng Phys. 2013 Oct;35(10):1518-24. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.04.010. Epub 2013 May 18.
PubMed 23688608Noecker AM, Chen JF, Zhou Q, White RD, Kopcak MW, Arruda MJ, Duncan BW. Development of patient-specific three-dimensional pediatric cardiac models. ASAIO J. 2006 May-Jun;52(3):349-53. doi: 10.1097/01.mat.0000217962.98619.ab.
PubMed 16760727Schubert C, van Langeveld MC, Donoso LA. Innovations in 3D printing: a 3D overview from optics to organs. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;98(2):159-61. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304446. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
PubMed 24288392Starosolski ZA, Kan JH, Rosenfeld SD, Krishnamurthy R, Annapragada A. Application of 3-D printing (rapid prototyping) for creating physical models of pediatric orthopedic disorders. Pediatr Radiol. 2014 Feb;44(2):216-21. doi: 10.1007/s00247-013-2788-9. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
PubMed 24202430Suzuki M, Ogawa Y, Hagiwara A, Yamaguchi H, Ono H. Rapidly prototyped temporal bone model for otological education. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2004;66(2):62-4. doi: 10.1159/000077796.
PubMed 15162002Zopf DA, Hollister SJ, Nelson ME, Ohye RG, Green GE. Bioresorbable airway splint created with a three-dimensional printer. N Engl J Med. 2013 May 23;368(21):2043-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1206319. No abstract available.
PubMed 23697530
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Feb 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Use of 3-D Printed Models to Improve Patient Understanding During the Informed Consent Process: A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02718807
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 3980
- Conditions
- Patient Education
- Keywords
- Patient Care, Education
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2016
- Primary completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pre-made rapid prototyping models will be used to increase patient education versus current methodologies.
Detailed description
Post-partum women and their co-parent will have a medical condition explained to them first verbally, followed by a questionnaire, and then with the use of anatomical models created by rapid prototyping, followed by a questionnaire. The two questionnaires will then be compared.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Post-partum Women | – | Other: RP model explanation and questionnairePost-partum women following an atraumatic pregnancy. |
| Co-Parents | – | Other: RP model explanation and questionnaireCo-parents to post-partum women following an atraumatic pregnancy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Post-partum women and respective co-parents who are greater than 18 years of age and fluent in the English language.
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Mother
- Post-partum
- Atraumatic delivery of healthy, live infant at HMC
- Age > 18
- Co-parent
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- any pregnancy related issues
- fetal loss
- NICU stay > 6 hours
- Emergent cesarean section
- Post-partum hemorrhage
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RP model explanation and questionnaireRapid prototyping models of anatomy will be used to demonstrate an anatomic and medical condition and participants will grade the experience on a questionnaire. | Other | Co-Parents, Post-partum Women |
Primary outcome
Difference in questionnaire score
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
3 secondary outcomes
Participant Age
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Participant Education Level
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Participant Gender
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Feb 2022.
- Background: PubMed 23832767Kinnersley P, Phillips K, Savage K, Kelly MJ, Farrell E, Morgan B, Whistance R, Lewis V, Mann MK, Stephens BL, Blazeby J, Elwyn G, Edwards AG. Interventions to promote informed consent for patients undergoing surgical and other invasive healthcare procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 6;2013(7):CD009445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009445.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 24041712Farrell EH, Whistance RN, Phillips K, Morgan B, Savage K, Lewis V, Kelly M, Blazeby JM, Kinnersley P, Edwards A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of audio-visual information aids for informed consent for invasive healthcare procedures in clinical practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jan;94(1):20-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.019. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
- Background: PubMed 23641760Challoner A, Erolin C. Creating pathology models from MRI data: a comparison of virtual 3D modelling and rapid prototyping techniques. J Vis Commun Med. 2013 Jun;36(1-2):11-9. doi: 10.3109/17453054.2013.790011.
- Background: PubMed 20581164Gonzalez-Cota A, Kruger GH, Raghavan P, Reynolds PI. Computational modeling and prototyping of a pediatric airway management instrument. Anesth Analg. 2010 Sep;111(3):649-52. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e5ea7c. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
- Background: PubMed 2085555Mankovich NJ, Cheeseman AM, Stoker NG. The display of three-dimensional anatomy with stereolithographic models. J Digit Imaging. 1990 Aug;3(3):200-3. doi: 10.1007/BF03167610.
- Background: PubMed 19106500Mori K, Yamamoto T, Oyama K, Ueno H, Nakao Y, Honma K. Modified three-dimensional skull base model with artificial dura mater, cranial nerves, and venous sinuses for training in skull base surgery: technical note. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2008 Dec;48(12):582-7; discussion 587-8. doi: 10.2176/nmc.48.582.
- Background: PubMed 23688608Miller SF, Sanz-Guerrero J, Dodde RE, Johnson DD, Bhawuk A, Gurm HS, Shih AJ. A pulsatile blood vessel system for a femoral arterial access clinical simulation model. Med Eng Phys. 2013 Oct;35(10):1518-24. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.04.010. Epub 2013 May 18.
- Background: PubMed 16760727Noecker AM, Chen JF, Zhou Q, White RD, Kopcak MW, Arruda MJ, Duncan BW. Development of patient-specific three-dimensional pediatric cardiac models. ASAIO J. 2006 May-Jun;52(3):349-53. doi: 10.1097/01.mat.0000217962.98619.ab.
- Background: PubMed 24288392Schubert C, van Langeveld MC, Donoso LA. Innovations in 3D printing: a 3D overview from optics to organs. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;98(2):159-61. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304446. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
- Background: PubMed 24202430Starosolski ZA, Kan JH, Rosenfeld SD, Krishnamurthy R, Annapragada A. Application of 3-D printing (rapid prototyping) for creating physical models of pediatric orthopedic disorders. Pediatr Radiol. 2014 Feb;44(2):216-21. doi: 10.1007/s00247-013-2788-9. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
- Background: PubMed 15162002Suzuki M, Ogawa Y, Hagiwara A, Yamaguchi H, Ono H. Rapidly prototyped temporal bone model for otological education. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2004;66(2):62-4. doi: 10.1159/000077796.
- Background: PubMed 23697530Zopf DA, Hollister SJ, Nelson ME, Ohye RG, Green GE. Bioresorbable airway splint created with a three-dimensional printer. N Engl J Med. 2013 May 23;368(21):2043-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1206319. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Data will not be shared with participants
Related trials for Patient Education
Not yet recruiting
Artificial Intelligence Powered Digital Education Based on the Neuman Systems Model for Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Radiotherap
Breast Cancer, Radiodermatitis
Active, not recruiting
A Mobile App to Improve 24-Hour Movement Guideline Adherence in Preschoolers
Healthy, 24-Hour Movement Guidelines
RecruitingObservational study
Remote Monitoring of Asthma in Children and Young People
Asthma Childhood, Asthma Attack
Not yet recruiting
Sedation and Guided Education for Depression Study
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Not yet recruiting
Manus AI-Assisted Orthodontic Education and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
James Mooney, MD principal investigator
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Patient Education, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Feb 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference in questionnaire score (time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02718807, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Feb 2022.