AzTrials
AzTrials

Spinal FracturesNCT02719340

Short Segment Fixation in Thoracolumbar Osteoporotic Fracture

An observational study of Spinal Fractures, run by National Cheng-Kung University Hospital.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Although long-segment posterior spinal fixation might provide more rigid fixation, the procedure increases perioperative morbidities in the elderly. The present study reviews the results of short-segment decompression and reconstruction in thoracolumbar fragile fractures. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Spinal Fractures
What is being tested?
short segment fixation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
20 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Nov 2010to Dec 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Twenty elderly patients (60-89 years, mean 73.2 years) with osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fractures and neurological compromise

Who may be able to join

  • osteoporotic burst fracture at a single level of the thoracolumbar region
  • dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and T-score value less than -2.5

Who cannot join

  • translational displacement at the fracture site (fracture-dislocation)
  • loss of structural integrity within the posterior osteoligamentous complex (such as flexion-distraction ligament disruption)
  • spondylolisthesis of the adjacent vertebrae
  • malignancy
  • chronic steroid administration
  • previous spinal surgery
  • prior vertebroplasty and infection

About this study

Official title: Short-segment Decompression and Reconstruction for Thoracolumbar Osteoporotic Fractures With Neurological Deficits: Clinical and Radiological Results of Minimum 2-year Follow-up

Although long-segment posterior spinal fixation might provide more rigid fixation, the procedure increases perioperative morbidities in the elderly. The present study reviews the results of short-segment decompression and reconstruction in thoracolumbar fragile fractures.

Read the detailed description

This study included 20 elderly patients with osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fractures and neurological compromise. The participants were followed-up for a period of 40.6 (24-68) months. A visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to measure back pain and disability. Radiologic assessment and neurological status were also analyzed.

Being tested
short segment fixation
Medical subject headings
Spinal Fractures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • short segment fixationProcedure or surgery

    posterior short-segment decompression and reconstruction (instrumentation on 1 level above and 1 level below the fractured vertebrae with posterolateral fusion)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    Functional outcome after surgery was evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    Measured: at least 2 years

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Frankel's grade system

    Frankel's grade system was used for assessment of neurologic function

    Measured: at least 2 years

  2. Local kyphosis and vertebral wedge angle were measured as radiologic assessment (units of measure: degree)

    Digital radiographs of the vertebral bodies were reviewed using the picture archiving and communication system (PACS).

    Measured: at least 2 years

  3. anterior vertebral height

    Measurements of the anterior vertebral height (AVH) ratio (% of normal)

    Measured: at least 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Mar 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2010
  3. Primary completionOct 2011
  4. Study completionDec 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02719340
Sponsor's protocol ID
SSF-TLF-103
Status last verified
Mar 2016
First submitted
18 Feb 2016
Last updated
25 Mar 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Spinal Fractures, run by National Cheng-Kung University Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (time frame: at least 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Mar 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in