AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveNCT02719639

OTIVACTO Regional Center Vienna (RCV) Non-Interventional Study (NIS)

An observational study of Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 9 sites in 9 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Real-world data on the effects of a fixed-dose combination Long-acting beta agonists + long-acting antimuscarinic agent (LABA+LAMA) therapy with tiotropium and olodaterol administered in a single device, in COPD patients who need treatment with two long-acting bronchodilators, is not available. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
How many people
7,443 participants
Where
9 sitesin 9 countries
Study dates
1 Apr 2016to 31 May 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: COPDS patients

Who may be able to join

  • Written informed consent prior to participation
  • Female and male patients with more or equal to 40 years of age
  • Patients diagnosed with COPD and requiring long-acting dual bronchodilation (LAMA + LABA) treatment according to approved Spiolto Respimat Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guideline recommendation

Who cannot join

  • Patients with contraindications according to Spiolto Respimat SmPC
  • Patients who have been treated with a LABA/LAMA combination (free and fixed dose) in the previous 6 months
  • Patients continuing LABA- Inhalative Corticosteroids (ICS) treatment should not be additionally treated with Spiolto Respimat in order to avoid a double dosing of long-acting beta-agonists
  • Patients for whom further follow-up is not possible at the enrolling site during the planned study period of approx. 6 weeks
  • Pregnancy and lactation
  • Patients currently listed for lung transplantation
  • Current participation in any clinical trial or any other non-interventional study of a drug or device

Trial locations and contacts

9 sites in 9 countries.

9 sites in 9 countries

Austria1 site
  • Study site

    Multiple Locations

Other trials in Austria

Czechia1 site
  • Study site

    Multiple Locations

Other trials in Czechia

Hungary1 site
  • Study site

    Multiple Locations

Other trials in Hungary

Israel1 site
  • Study site

    Multiple Locations

Other trials in Israel

Romania1 site
  • Study site

    Multiple Locations

Other trials in Romania

Russia1 site
  • Study site

    Multiple Locations

Other trials in Russia

Slovakia1 site
  • Study site

    Multiple Locations

Other trials in Slovakia

Slovenia1 site
  • Study site

    Multiple Locations

Other trials in Slovenia

Switzerland1 site
  • Study site

    Multiple Locations

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Assessment of Physical Functioning and Handling of Spiolto Respimat in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Requiring Long-acting Dual Bronchodilation in Routine Clinical Practice.

Real-world data on the effects of a fixed-dose combination Long-acting beta agonists + long-acting antimuscarinic agent (LABA+LAMA) therapy with tiotropium and olodaterol administered in a single device, in COPD patients who need treatment with two long-acting bronchodilators, is not available. This is a self-controlled study design enrolling consented COPD patients who will be treated with Spiolto Respimat according to the approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC).

Read the detailed description

Purpose:

Study Design:

Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Patients With Therapeutic Success After Approximately 6 Weeks.

    The therapeutic success was defined as a minimum of 10- point increase in the Physical Functioning (PF-10) score between visit 1 (baseline visit at the start of the study) and visit 2 (final visit approximately 6 weeks after visit 1), having approximately time period of 6 weeks between the evaluated questionnaires. PF-10 score measures changes in physical functioning - serving as a surrogate for physical activity and exercise capacity - in COPD patients.

    Measured: Approximately 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Change in the Physical Functioning (PF-10) Score From Baseline (visit1) to Approximately 6 Weeks (visit2)

    Change in PF-10 score was determined by taking into account the individual change of each patient between visit 1 and visit 2. The PF-10 used for assessing the primary outcome is a sub-domain of the validated Short Form (SF)-36 quality of life questionnaire and consists of 10 questions evaluating the experienced restrictions while conducting usual activities. Each question of the PF-10 may be answered with "yes, limited a lot", "yes, limited a little", or "No, not limited at all", with a score of 1, 2, or 3, respectively. The scores will be summed up between 10 and 30. The final sum of the individual scores was standardized to a range of 0 to 100 using the formula: 100*(sum-10)/20. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability. If less than half of the scale items were missing, missing values were replaced with the mean of the other values. If half or more than half was missing, no score was calculated.

    Measured: Baseline and week 6

  2. General Condition of the Patients Evaluated by the Physician, (Physician's Global Evaluation (PGE) Score) at Baseline (visit1) and Approximately 6 Weeks (visit2).

    This outcome measures general condition of the patient evaluated by the physician (PGE score) at visit 1 (baseline visit at the start of the study) and visit 2 (final visit approximately 6 weeks after visit 1) evaluated on an 8-point scale with the scores "Poor (1,2)", "Satisfactory (3, 4)", "Good (5, 6)" and "Excellent (7, 8)". More the score, the better is the general condition of patient.

    Measured: Baseline and week 6

  3. Patient's Overall Satisfaction With Treatment Spiolto® Respimat® at Visit 2 (Approximately 6 Weeks)

    At visit 2 patients were asked for their overall satisfaction with the Spiolto® Respimat® device. The patients were given range of responses from very satisfied to very dissatisfied and responses were recorded including unanswered cases.

    Measured: Approximately 6 weeks

  4. Patient's Satisfaction With Inhaling From Device Spiolto® Respimat® at Visit 2 (Approximately 6 Weeks)

    At visit 2 patients were asked how satisfied they were with inhaling from the Spiolto® Respimat® device. The patients were given range of responses from very satisfied to very dissatisfied and responses were recorded including unanswered cases.

    Measured: Approximately 6 weeks

  5. Patient's Satisfaction With Handling Inhalation Device Spiolto® Respimat® at Visit 2 (Approximately 6 Weeks)

    At visit 2 patients were asked how satisfied they were with handling the Spiolto® Respimat® device. The patients were given range of responses from very satisfied to very dissatisfied and responses were recorded including unanswered cases.

    Measured: Approximately 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Mar 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Apr 2016
  3. Primary completion31 May 2017
  4. Study completion31 May 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
7,443 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02719639
Sponsor's protocol ID
1237.44
Status last verified
Jan 2019
First submitted
1 Mar 2016
Last updated
9 Jan 2019

Publications

  • Taube C, Bayer V, Zehendner CM, Valipour A. Assessment of Patient Experiences with Respimat(R) in Everyday Clinical Practice. Pulm Ther. 2020 Dec;6(2):371-380. doi: 10.1007/s41030-020-00127-4. Epub 2020 Aug 28.

    PubMed 32857327

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 9 sites in 9 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 9 sites in Austria, Czechia, Hungary, Israel, Romania and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Jan 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Patients With Therapeutic Success After Approximately 6 Weeks. (time frame: Approximately 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02719639, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in