Alcohol DrinkingREDARTNCT02720237
Reducing Hazardous Alcohol Use & Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Viral Load
A study testing Brief Intervention, Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) Intervention and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Intervention in people with Alcohol Drinking and HIV, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in Vietnam.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two interventions [a Brief Intervention (BI) and a Motivational Enhancement Therapy+Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (MET+CBT) Intervention], against each other and with an assessment-only control, in improving both alcohol- and HIV-related outcomes, among… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Alcohol Drinking, HIV
- What is being tested?
- Brief Intervention, Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) Intervention and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 441 participants
- Where
- 1 siteVietnam
- Study dates
- Mar 2016to 19 Jun 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Currently a client on ART at the clinic
- Hazardous drinking, measured using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) instrument: AUDIT-C score >= 4 for men, AUDIT-C score >=3 for women
- Plan on residing in Thai Nguyen province for the next 24 months
Who cannot join
- Unwilling to provide informed consent
- Unable to participate in study activities due to psychological disturbance, cognitive impairment or threatening behavior
- Unwilling to provide locator information
- Currently participating in other HIV, drug use or alcohol programs or interventions
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Vietnam1 site
Thai Nguyen Center for Preventive Medicine
Thai Nguyen, Thai Nguyen
About this study
Official title: Reducing Hazardous Alcohol Use & Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Viral Load: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) in Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Clinics in Vietnam
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two interventions [a Brief Intervention (BI) and a Motivational Enhancement Therapy+Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (MET+CBT) Intervention], against each other and with an assessment-only control, in improving both alcohol- and HIV-related outcomes, among hazardous and heavy drinking HIV-infected antiretroviral therapy (ART) clinic clients in Thai Nguyen, Vietnam.
Read the detailed description
This study is a three-arm randomized controlled trial among hazardous and heavy drinking HIV-infected ART clinic clients in Thai Nguyen province, Vietnam. It compares the effects of two evidence-based, culturally adapted, behavioral interventions [a Brief Intervention (BI) and a Motivational Enhancement Therapy+Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (MET+CBT) Intervention] both against each other and compared with an assessment-only standard of care arm, in order to understand the relative effectiveness of each intervention in reducing alcohol use and suppressing HIV viral load.
The Brief Intervention (BI) consists of 2 individual sessions and 2 booster phone sessions delivered by a trained counselor and is based on Project Treat. Content of BI sessions includes review of drinking patterns, harmful effects of drinking, and alcohol use behavior change strategies. The MET+CBT Intervention consists of 6 sessions delivered by a trained counselor. The MET+CBT Intervention uses a client-centered, motivational interviewing approach and focuses on skills-building for alcohol use behavior change, including drinking refusal skills, skills to cope with and manage cravings and triggers, and developing positive thoughts and attitudes. It also includes review of drinking patterns and harmful effects of drinking.
This study will also measure the incremental cost-effectiveness of each intervention as compared to current counseling services offered in ART clinics in Vietnam.
Investigators hypothesize that: 1) Each intervention will be more effective than an assessment-only arm on percent days alcohol abstinent and percent virally suppressed at the 12-month assessment; 2) The BI will be equivalently effective to the MET+CBT Intervention on percent days alcohol abstinent; 3) The effect of each intervention on alcohol abstinence and viral suppression will be mediated by alcohol use readiness to change and/or coping skills acquisition; 4) The MET+CBT Intervention will be more effective than the BI on alcohol abstinence and viral suppression separately among participants with more severe alcohol use, people who inject drugs, and participants with depressive symptoms; 5) The alcohol reduction interventions (BI and MET+CBT Intervention) will be highly cost-effective compared to assessment-only standard of care; and 6) The BI will be highly cost-effective relative to the MET+CBT Intervention.
Understanding the relative effectiveness of each intervention in improving both alcohol- and HIV-related outcomes will provide insight into the optimal application of alcohol programs in resource-limited settings.
- Conditions
- Alcohol Drinking, HIV
- Being tested
- Brief Intervention, Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) Intervention, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Intervention
- Keywords
- Alcohol use, HIV, Viral Load, ART
- Medical subject headings
- Alcohol Drinking
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Brief InterventionBehavioural
Also called BI
In-person individual sessions (occurring one month apart) and booster phone sessions (occurring 2-3 weeks after each in-person session), delivered by a trained counselor.
Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) InterventionBehavioural
Also called MET
In-person individual sessions (one session per week) and optional group sessions, delivered by a trained counselor.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) InterventionBehavioural
Also called CBT
In-person individual sessions (one session per week) and optional group sessions, delivered by a trained counselor.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Brief Intervention | Experimental | Brief Intervention (2 in-person sessions and 2 phone sessions), study assessment visits, and standard of care from providers at the ART clinic Receives: Behavioral: Brief Intervention |
| MET+CBT Intervention | Experimental | MET+CBT Intervention (6 in-person sessions and 3 optional group sessions), study assessment visits, and standard of care from providers at the ART clinic Receives: Behavioral: Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) Intervention; Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Intervention |
| Assessment-Only Control | No intervention | Study assessment visits and standard of care from providers at the ART clinic |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Alcohol use
Percent days abstinent from alcohol
Measured: 12 months
HIV viral load
Percent HIV viral suppression
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Number of participants who report a high level of readiness to change for alcohol use reduction
Readiness to change is assessed using a brief "Readiness to Change" questionnaire based on Rollnick et al. (1996), where response is captured using a 10-point Likert scale.
Measured: 12 months
Number of participants who report a high level of coping skills for alcohol abstinence
Coping skills are assessed using the alcohol abstinence self-efficacy scale of DiClemente et al. (1994), where response is captured using a 10-point Likert scale.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2016
- Primary completion19 Jun 2018
- Study completion19 Jun 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Alcohol DrinkingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of North Carolina, Chapel HillThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 441 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Thai Nguyen Center for Preventive Medicine, Johns Hopkins University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Vivian F Go, PhD, Principal investigator, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02720237
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 14-0225b
- Other IDs
- 1R01DA037440-01
- Acronym
- REDART
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 15 Mar 2016
- Last updated
- 12 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Chen JS, Hutton HE, Tran HV, Quang VN, Nguyen MX, Sripaipan T, Dowdy DW, Latkin CA, Chander G, Frangakis C, Go VF. Efficacy of Two Evidence-Based Alcohol Consumption Interventions on Positive, Negative, and Neutral Days Among Hazardous Alcohol Users Living with HIV in Vietnam. AIDS Behav. 2024 Feb;28(2):421-428. doi: 10.1007/s10461-023-04234-6. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
PubMed 38085428Hershow RB, Reyes HLMN, Ha TV, Chander G, Mai NVT, Sripaipan T, Dowdy DW, Latkin C, Hutton HE, Pettifor A, Maman S, Frangakis C, Go VF. Evaluating the effects of two alcohol reduction counseling interventions on intimate partner violence perpetration: secondary analysis of a three-arm randomized controlled trial among Vietnamese men with HIV. Addiction. 2021 Oct;116(10):2712-2723. doi: 10.1111/add.15496. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
PubMed 33788329Go VF, Hutton HE, Ha TV, Chander G, Latkin CA, Mai NVT, Quynh BX, Nguyen V, Sripaipan T, Lancaster KE, Blackburn N, Hershow RB, Dowdy DW, Frangakis C. Effect of 2 Integrated Interventions on Alcohol Abstinence and Viral Suppression Among Vietnamese Adults With Hazardous Alcohol Use and HIV: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2017115. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17115.
PubMed 32945875
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Reducing Hazardous Alcohol Use & Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Viral Load: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) in Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Clinics in Vietnam
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02720237
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REDART / 14-0225b
- Conditions
- Alcohol Drinking, HIV
- Keywords
- Alcohol use, HIV, Viral Load, ART
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 441 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel HillUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Thai Nguyen Center for Preventive Medicine, Johns Hopkins University
- Study start
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two interventions [a Brief Intervention (BI) and a Motivational Enhancement Therapy+Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (MET+CBT) Intervention], against each other and with an assessment-only control, in improving both alcohol- and HIV-related outcomes, among hazardous and heavy drinking HIV-infected antiretroviral therapy (ART) clinic clients in Thai Nguyen, Vietnam.
Detailed description
This study is a three-arm randomized controlled trial among hazardous and heavy drinking HIV-infected ART clinic clients in Thai Nguyen province, Vietnam. It compares the effects of two evidence-based, culturally adapted, behavioral interventions [a Brief Intervention (BI) and a Motivational Enhancement Therapy+Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (MET+CBT) Intervention] both against each other and compared with an assessment-only standard of care arm, in order to understand the relative effectiveness of each intervention in reducing alcohol use and suppressing HIV viral load.
The Brief Intervention (BI) consists of 2 individual sessions and 2 booster phone sessions delivered by a trained counselor and is based on Project Treat. Content of BI sessions includes review of drinking patterns, harmful effects of drinking, and alcohol use behavior change strategies. The MET+CBT Intervention consists of 6 sessions delivered by a trained counselor. The MET+CBT Intervention uses a client-centered, motivational interviewing approach and focuses on skills-building for alcohol use behavior change, including drinking refusal skills, skills to cope with and manage cravings and triggers, and developing positive thoughts and attitudes. It also includes review of drinking patterns and harmful effects of drinking.
This study will also measure the incremental cost-effectiveness of each intervention as compared to current counseling services offered in ART clinics in Vietnam.
Investigators hypothesize that: 1) Each intervention will be more effective than an assessment-only arm on percent days alcohol abstinent and percent virally suppressed at the 12-month assessment; 2) The BI will be equivalently effective to the MET+CBT Intervention on percent days alcohol abstinent; 3) The effect of each intervention on alcohol abstinence and viral suppression will be mediated by alcohol use readiness to change and/or coping skills acquisition; 4) The MET+CBT Intervention will be more effective than the BI on alcohol abstinence and viral suppression separately among participants with more severe alcohol use, people who inject drugs, and participants with depressive symptoms; 5) The alcohol reduction interventions (BI and MET+CBT Intervention) will be highly cost-effective compared to assessment-only standard of care; and 6) The BI will be highly cost-effective relative to the MET+CBT Intervention.
Understanding the relative effectiveness of each intervention in improving both alcohol- and HIV-related outcomes will provide insight into the optimal application of alcohol programs in resource-limited settings.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Brief Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Brief InterventionBrief Intervention (2 in-person sessions and 2 phone sessions), study assessment visits, and standard of care from providers at the ART clinic |
| MET+CBT Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) Intervention, Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) InterventionMET+CBT Intervention (6 in-person sessions and 3 optional group sessions), study assessment visits, and standard of care from providers at the ART clinic |
| Assessment-Only Control | No intervention | –Study assessment visits and standard of care from providers at the ART clinic |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Currently a client on ART at the clinic
- Hazardous drinking, measured using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) instrument: AUDIT-C score >= 4 for men, AUDIT-C score >=3 for women
- Plan on residing in Thai Nguyen province for the next 24 months
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Unwilling to provide informed consent
- Unable to participate in study activities due to psychological disturbance, cognitive impairment or threatening behavior
- Unwilling to provide locator information
- Currently participating in other HIV, drug use or alcohol programs or interventions
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Brief InterventionAlso: BIIn-person individual sessions (occurring one month apart) and booster phone sessions (occurring 2-3 weeks after each in-person session), delivered by a trained counselor. | Behavioural | Brief Intervention |
| Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) InterventionAlso: METIn-person individual sessions (one session per week) and optional group sessions, delivered by a trained counselor. | Behavioural | MET+CBT Intervention |
| Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) InterventionAlso: CBTIn-person individual sessions (one session per week) and optional group sessions, delivered by a trained counselor. | Behavioural | MET+CBT Intervention |
Primary outcome
Alcohol use
Time frame: 12 months
Percent days abstinent from alcohol
HIV viral load
Time frame: 12 months
Percent HIV viral suppression
2 secondary outcomes
Number of participants who report a high level of readiness to change for alcohol use reduction
Time frame: 12 months
Number of participants who report a high level of coping skills for alcohol abstinence
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Oct 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38085428Chen JS, Hutton HE, Tran HV, Quang VN, Nguyen MX, Sripaipan T, Dowdy DW, Latkin CA, Chander G, Frangakis C, Go VF. Efficacy of Two Evidence-Based Alcohol Consumption Interventions on Positive, Negative, and Neutral Days Among Hazardous Alcohol Users Living with HIV in Vietnam. AIDS Behav. 2024 Feb;28(2):421-428. doi: 10.1007/s10461-023-04234-6. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33788329Hershow RB, Reyes HLMN, Ha TV, Chander G, Mai NVT, Sripaipan T, Dowdy DW, Latkin C, Hutton HE, Pettifor A, Maman S, Frangakis C, Go VF. Evaluating the effects of two alcohol reduction counseling interventions on intimate partner violence perpetration: secondary analysis of a three-arm randomized controlled trial among Vietnamese men with HIV. Addiction. 2021 Oct;116(10):2712-2723. doi: 10.1111/add.15496. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32945875Go VF, Hutton HE, Ha TV, Chander G, Latkin CA, Mai NVT, Quynh BX, Nguyen V, Sripaipan T, Lancaster KE, Blackburn N, Hershow RB, Dowdy DW, Frangakis C. Effect of 2 Integrated Interventions on Alcohol Abstinence and Viral Suppression Among Vietnamese Adults With Hazardous Alcohol Use and HIV: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2017115. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17115.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Alcohol Drinking
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingPhase 1
Environment and Alcohol: A Pilot Study
Alcohol Use Disorder
Not yet recruiting
A MRT to Optimize a JITAI for Alcohol Craving and Suicide Ideation
Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), Suicide Ideation
RecruitingPhase 2
Study on Thiamine Supplementation to REduce braiN Injury Associated With Chronic Alcohol Use in Outpatients With Alcohol Use Disorder
Alcohol Use Disorder
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Longitudinal Cohort Study to Evaluate Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Disease in Haiti
Hypertension, Diabetes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Vivian F Go, PhD principal investigator
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Brief Intervention, Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) Intervention and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Intervention in people with Alcohol Drinking and HIV, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in Vietnam.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Vietnam. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Alcohol use (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02720237, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Oct 2018.