AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeNCT02720432

Early Intervention in Infants With Perinatal Stroke

A study testing CIMT, HABIT and baby-massage in people with Stroke, run by University Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This current study proposes to analyze the feasibility and effects of the two most used therapies, constraint-induced movement therapy and hand-arm bimanual intensive training, in very young infants (less than one year) with perinatal stroke and with a high risk to develop hemiplegic CP. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 8 months
Conditions the study is for
Stroke
What is being tested?
CIMT, HABIT and baby-massage
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
29 Jun 2016to Mar 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 8 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Infants with a perinatal stroke confirmed on neonatal imaging and from who the parents speaks Dutch and live in Belgium, will be included in the study. Only infants showing abnormal 'general movements' between 10 and 15 weeks will be eligible for the intervention part.

Who cannot join

  • Infants with severe genetic abnormalities or malformations, with severe visual impairments or with uncontrolled seizures will be excluded.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Ghent University

    Ghent, 9000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Early Intervention in Infants With Perinatal Stroke : CIMT Versus HABIT : a Randomized Clinical Trial

This current study proposes to analyze the feasibility and effects of the two most used therapies, constraint-induced movement therapy and hand-arm bimanual intensive training, in very young infants (less than one year) with perinatal stroke and with a high risk to develop hemiplegic CP.

Read the detailed description

Perinatal stroke constitutes an acute presentation of encephalopathy; manifesting as seizure, altered mental status, and/or neurological deficit; between birth and the twenty-eight postnatal day for which a pattern of ischemic brain injury in an arterial distribution is evident by neuroimaging. Following perinatal stroke, approximately 60% of children develop cerebral palsy (usually presenting as spastic hemiplegia), 30-60% experience epilepsy, 25% show language delay, and up to 22% manifest behavioral problems.

The current most predictive tools for early diagnosis of CP are a combination of brain MRI/cUS and a general movements (GM) assessment in the fidgety period (9). Asymmetry of fidgety GMs around 12 weeks post term can be the first clinical signs of hemiplegia.

There are currently two intensive therapy approaches aiming at improving upper limb performance in adults and children (average age 8 years) with established hemiplegic CP: constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) and Hand-arm bimanual intensive training (HABIT). Those current therapy approaches fundamentally comprise repeated practice of desired movements based on motor learning principles with the adult/ child as an active participant.

Both therapies, in adults and in children with established hemiplegic CP (average age 8 years) are effective and show similar improvements if the dosage of therapy is similar. In contrast, the feasibility and the effects of both therapy approaches at very young age (under age 1 year) is still unknown (22). Exploring these options to treat even before asymmetric hand use has appeared is interesting and promising enough since recent animal studies have demonstrated that there is a critical period of motor system plasticity, and that activity-dependent reorganization of the motor-projection pattern to the hand occurs before about 1 year of age

Conditions
Stroke
Being tested
CIMT, HABIT, baby-massage
Keywords
early intervention, infant
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CIMTOther

    Constraint-induced movement therapy

  • HABITOther

    hand-arm bimanual intensive training

  • baby-massageOther

    instructions for baby-massage

Study groups in NCT02720432
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CIMTExperimentalA soft splint or restraint will be posed to best functioning hand of the infant only during the therapy session. Parents will be educated to perform the therapy, which consists of stimulation of reaching and grasping with the hemiplegic arm. The whole intervention period lasts 18 weeks, separated into 3 blocks of 4 weeks intervention and 2 blocks of 3 weeks of rest. During the intervention weeks parents will perform CIMTfor 30 minutes, 6 days a week.
Receives: Other: CIMT
HABITExperimentalNo restraint will be implemented and instead of promoting unilateral grasping, bimanual grasping will be stimulated. Toys will be precisely selected to stimulate progressed bimanual grasping. The approach of the therapist and parents remain equal. The whole intervention period lasts 18 weeks, separated into 3 blocks of 4 weeks intervention and 2 blocks of 3 weeks of rest. During the intervention weeks parents will perform HABIT for 30 minutes, 6 days a week.
Receives: Other: HABIT
Baby-massageSham comparator3 sessions of baby-massage will be given by a qualified instructor
Receives: Other: baby-massage

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in the score of the Hand assessment for infants (HAI)

    The HAI is the very new assessment tool to evaluate the hand function and asymmetry in infants age from 2 till 8 months post term.

    Measured: before (around 4 months) and after 18 weeks of intervention (around 9 months)

  2. Change in the score of the Infant motor profile

    The IMP is a video-based assessment to evaluate the spontaneous motor behavior of infants from 3 months till independent walking around 18 months of age

    Measured: before (around 4 months) and after 18 weeks of intervention (around 9 months), at one year follow up

  3. Change in the score of the Alberta infant motor scale

    The AIMS is a standardized observational scale to assess the gross motor development from birth till independent walking around 18 months of age.

    Measured: before (around 4 months) and after 18 weeks of intervention (around 9 months), at one year follow up

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Bayley scales for infant development-third edition

    The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third is a validated and extensively used developmental scale for assessing the cognitive, language and motor development from 1 month till 42 months of age.

    Measured: between 22 and 24 months (2 years)

  2. Parental sense of competence scale

    The parenting Sense of Competence scale is a 16-item Likert-scale questionnaire to measure parent's sense of confidence and satisfaction.

    Measured: before intervention (around 4months)

  3. Questionnaire satisfaction and impact

    A questionnaire will be filled out by the parents at the end of the therapy. They will be asked about the satisfaction of the therapy and therapist.

    Measured: after the intervention (around 9 months)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Mar 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start29 Jun 2016
  3. Primary completionMar 2018
  4. Study completionMar 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02720432
Sponsor's protocol ID
2015/1299
Status last verified
Dec 2021
First submitted
2 Mar 2016
Last updated
10 Dec 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CIMT, HABIT and baby-massage in people with Stroke, run by University Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in the score of the Hand assessment for infants (HAI) (time frame: before (around 4 months) and after 18 weeks of intervention (around 9 months)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Dec 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Early Intervention in Infants With Perinatal Stroke | AzTrials