Axial Psoratic ArthritisPhase 3MAXIMISENCT02721966
Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis With Axial Skeleton Involvement
A Phase 3 study testing Secukinumab in people with Axial Psoratic Arthritis, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 94 sites in 18 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab 150 mg or 300 mg in the management of axial manifestations in PsA patients who have failed to respond to at least 2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) over a 4-week period, according to assessment of spondyloarthritis… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Axial Psoratic Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Secukinumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 503 participants
- Where
- 94 sitesin 18 countries
- Study dates
- 3 Oct 2016to 26 Jun 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Written informed consent must be obtained before any assessment is performed
- Diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis classified by Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis (CASPAR) criteria
- Active spinal disease defined by Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI) score ≥ 4
- Spinal Pain visual analog scale (VAS) ≥ 40 (on a VAS 100 scale)
- Inadequate Response to at least 2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs over a 4 weeks period
Who cannot join
- History of exposure to other IL-17 or IL-23 inhibitor biologic drug
- History of exposure to previous biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers or Ustekinumab)
- Current treatment with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) other than Methotrexate
- Subjects taking high potency opioid analgesics (e.g. methadone, hydromorphone, morphine)
- Chest X-ray or chest magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with evidence of ongoing infectious or malignant process, obtained within 3 months prior to screening and evaluated by a qualified physician
- Other protocol-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria may have applied.
Trial locations and contacts
94 sites in 18 countries.
94 sites in 18 countries
Spain16 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
A Coruña, 15006
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08003
Novartis Investigative Site
Córdoba, Andalusia, 14004
Novartis Investigative Site
El Palmar, Murcia, 30120
Novartis Investigative Site
Elche, Alicante, 03203
Novartis Investigative Site
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de G.C, 35020
Novartis Investigative Site
Lugo, Galicia, 27003
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28034
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28040
Novartis Investigative Site
Pontevedra, 36001
Novartis Investigative Site
Salamanca, Castille and León, 37007
Novartis Investigative Site
Santander, Cantabria, 39008
Novartis Investigative Site
Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, 15706
Novartis Investigative Site
Seville, 41010
Novartis Investigative Site
Terrassa, Barcelona, 08221
Novartis Investigative Site
Vitoria-Gasteiz, 01009
Russia11 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Izhevsk, 426009
Novartis Investigative Site
Kazan', 420064
Novartis Investigative Site
Khanty-Mansiysk, 628012
Novartis Investigative Site
Kursk, 305007
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 115093
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 119049
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 123182
Novartis Investigative Site
Novosibirsk, 630099
Novartis Investigative Site
Orenburg, 460000
Novartis Investigative Site
Saratov, 410053
Novartis Investigative Site
Yaroslavl, 150062
United Kingdom9 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG24 9NA
Novartis Investigative Site
Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD5 0NA
Novartis Investigative Site
Devon, Barnstaple, EX31 4JB
Novartis Investigative Site
Hull, HU3 2JZ
Novartis Investigative Site
Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS7 4SA
Novartis Investigative Site
Leytonstone, London, E11 1NR
Novartis Investigative Site
Maidstone, Kent, ME16 9QQ
Novartis Investigative Site
Wigan, WN6 9EP
Novartis Investigative Site
Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP
Poland7 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bialystok, 15 351
Novartis Investigative Site
Bydgoszcz, 85 168
Novartis Investigative Site
Krakow, 31-121
Novartis Investigative Site
Piotrkow Trybunalski, 97-300
Novartis Investigative Site
Poznan, 60 529
Novartis Investigative Site
Poznan, 60-773
Novartis Investigative Site
Warsaw, 02637
France6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Lyon, 69003
Novartis Investigative Site
Nantes, 44000
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, 75651
Novartis Investigative Site
Strasbourg, Cedex, 67098
Novartis Investigative Site
Toulouse, 31059
Novartis Investigative Site
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
Italy6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bergamo, BG, 24128
Novartis Investigative Site
Bologna, 40138
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, MI, 20132
Novartis Investigative Site
Torino, TO, 10126
Novartis Investigative Site
Torino, TO, 10128
Novartis Investigative Site
Verona, VR, 37134
Germany5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 10789
Novartis Investigative Site
Bochum, 44791
Novartis Investigative Site
Cottbus, 03042
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamburg, 22391
Novartis Investigative Site
Magdeburg, 39110
Hungary5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, 1023
Novartis Investigative Site
Eger, 3300
Novartis Investigative Site
Hévíz, 8380
Novartis Investigative Site
Miskolc, H-3529
Novartis Investigative Site
Veszprém, 8200
Bulgaria4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Rousse, 7002
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, 1413
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, 1505
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, 1784
Czechia4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Brno, 63800
Novartis Investigative Site
Bruntál, 792 01
Novartis Investigative Site
Plzen-Bory, 30599
Novartis Investigative Site
Uherské Hradiště, 686 01
Israel4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Haifa, 343621
Novartis Investigative Site
Kfar Saba, 44281
Novartis Investigative Site
Ramat Gan, 52621
Novartis Investigative Site
Tel Aviv, 6423906
Switzerland4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Basel, 4031
Novartis Investigative Site
Fribourg, CH, 1708
Novartis Investigative Site
Sankt Gallen, CH 9007
Novartis Investigative Site
Zurich, CH 8091
Belgium3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Brussels, 1070
Novartis Investigative Site
Brussels, BE-B-1200
Novartis Investigative Site
Leuven, 3000
Romania3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bucharest, 011172
Novartis Investigative Site
Bucharest, 030167
Novartis Investigative Site
Cluj-Napoca, 400006
Estonia2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Tallinn, 10138
Novartis Investigative Site
Tartu, 50406
Finland2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Kuopio, 70100
Novartis Investigative Site
Kuovola, 45100
Greece2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Athens, 115 27
Novartis Investigative Site
Athens, 12462
About this study
Official title: MAXIMISE (Managing AXIal Manifestations in PsorIatic Arthritis With SEcukinumab), a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, 52-week Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab 150 mg or 300 mg s.c. in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis and Axial Skeleton Involvement Who Have Inadequate Response to Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab 150 mg or 300 mg in the management of axial manifestations in PsA patients who have failed to respond to at least 2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) over a 4-week period, according to assessment of spondyloarthritis international society (ASAS) recommendations for the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA).
Read the detailed description
In the anlalysis (CSR), there are 498 patients, as 5 patients were mis-randomized, i.e. had randomization number but did never take study medication. So there were 498 participants, and not 503
- Conditions
- Axial Psoratic Arthritis
- Being tested
- Secukinumab, Secukinumab and Placebo
- Keywords
- Assessment of spondyloarthritis international society, ASAS, axial, Psoriatic Arthritis, PsA, Magnetic resonance imaging, MRI
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Psoriatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SecukinumabBiological
Also called AIN457
Anti IL-17a monoclonal antibody
Secukinumab and PlaceboDrug
Placebo matching AIN457
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| AIN457 150mg | Experimental | Secukinumab dose amount 1 sc injection weekly for 4 weeks followed by Secukinumab dosage amount 1 sc injection every 4 weeks for remaining 44 weeks Receives: Biological: Secukinumab |
| AIN457 300mg | Experimental | Secukinumab dose amount 2 sc injection weekly for 4 weeks followed by Secukinumab dosage amount 2 sc injection every 4 weeks for remaining 44 weeks Receives: Biological: Secukinumab |
| AIN457 Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo sc injection weekly for 4 weeks and at week 8, followed by Secukinumab 150 mg or 300 mg sc injection every 4 week for remaining 40 weeks. Receives: Biological: Secukinumab; Drug: Secukinumab and Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment (300 mg AIN457) as Assessed by the ASAS20 Criteria at Week 12
Purpose of this measure: was to demonstrate that secukinumab 150 mg s.c. is superior to placebo in the achievement of ASAS 20 response at Week 12 after superiority of 300 mg was established
ASAS20 was defined as an improvement of ≥20% and absolute improvement of ≥10 unit (0-100 mm VAS) from baseline in ≥3 of the following 4 domains (and absence of deterioration in any domain): patient's global assessment of disease activity (PTGA), pain assessment (total pain score), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and clinical inflammation (mean of 2 morning stiffness-related scores on the BASDAI)
Measured: at week 12
Secondary outcomes (10)
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment (150 mg AIN457) as Assessed by the ASAS20 Criteria at Week 12
Purpose of this key secondary measure: was to demonstrate that secukinumab 150 mg s.c. is superior to placebo in the achievement of ASAS 20 response at Week 12 after superiority of 300 mg was established. 300mg and 150mg are presented side by side for clarity; and to align with protocol. 300mg data is for Primary outcome; and 150mg data is for key secondary outcome
ASAS20 was defined as an improvement of ≥20% and absolute improvement of ≥10 unit (0-100 mm VAS) from baseline in ≥3 of the following 4 domains (and absence of deterioration in any domain): patient's global assessment of disease activity (PTGA), pain assessment (total pain score), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and clinical inflammation (mean of 2 morning stiffness-related scores on the BASDAI)
Measured: at week 12
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment (150 mg/300 mg AIN457) as Assessed by the ASAS40 Criteria at Week 12
Proportion of patients with response to treatment as assessed by the Assessment of spondyloarthritis international society (ASAS) 40 criteria at week 12.
ASAS40 was defined as an improvement of ≥40% and absolute improvement of ≥20 unit (0-100 mm VAS) from baseline in ≥3 of the following 4 domains (and absence of deterioration in any domain): patient's global assessment of disease activity (PTGA), pain assessment (total pain score), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and clinical inflammation (mean of 2 morning stiffness-related scores on the BASDAI)
Measured: at week 12
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment as Assessed by BASDAI50 at Week 12
Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI) 50 response
BASDAI 50 response is defined as at least 50% improvement (decrease) in total BASDAI score.
Measured: at week 12
Change From Baseline in Spinal Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Pain at Any Time
Change from baseline in Spinal pain visual analog scale (VAS) at week 12
VAS is a straight horizontal line of fixed length, usually 100 mm. The ends are defined as the extreme limits of the parameter to be measured (symptom,pain,health) orientated from the left (worst) to the right (best).
VAS measures pain and stress for on a horizontal line of 100 mm, ranging from very low (0) to very high (100).
Measured: at baseline, at week 12
Change From Baseline in Spinal Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Pain at Night
Change from baseline in Spinal pain visual analog scale (VAS) at week 12
VAS is a straight horizontal line of fixed length, usually 100 mm. The ends are defined as the extreme limits of the parameter to be measured (symptom,pain,health) orientated from the left (worst) to the right (best).
VAS measures pain and stress for on a horizontal line of 100 mm, ranging from very low (0) to very high (100)
Measured: at baseline, at week 12
Change From Baseline Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index Score at Week 12
The Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) enthesitis index score range is 0-16, where 0 is the best outcome, and 16 the worst. The assessor determines whether the site shows tenderness and therefore would count as site with enthesitis. This is done by applying pressure to the site and getting feedback from patient about whether the site is tender.
Measured: baseline and week 12
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 12
The health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) assesses the difficulty a patient has had in the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2-3 items. For each question, level of difficulty is scored from 0 to 3 with 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, and 3=unable to do. The score for each domain is the maximum (worst) score from the items/questions within the domain. Higher score indicates greater disability. Overall score was computed as the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains answered. The total possible score ranged from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Higher overall score indicates greater disability.
Measured: baseline and week 12
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) at Week 12
The FACIT-fatigue scale is a 13-item patient-reported measure of fatigue with a 7-day recall period. Items are scored on a 0 - 4 response scale with anchors ranging from "Not at all" to "Very much so". To score the FACIT-fatigue, all items are summed to create a single fatigue score with a range from 0 to 52.
Measured: baseline and week 12
Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) Health Index at Week 12
Statistical analysis (using ANCOVA) of change from baseline in spondyloarthritis international society (ASAS) Health Index score by visit - treatment period 1
ASAS HI is a disease-specific health-index instrument designed to assess the impact of interventions for SpA, including axSpA. The 17-item instrument has scores ranging from 0 (good health) to 17 (poor health). Each item consists of one question that the participant needs to respond to with either "I agree" (score of 1) or "I do not agree" (score of 0). A score of "1" is given where the item is affirmed, indicating adverse health. All item scores are summed to give a total score or index.
LSMean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, geographic region, baseline CRP status, baseline value, visit, baseline value-by-visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed factors
Measured: baseline and week 12
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment as Assessed by the ACR20 Criteria at Week 12
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 is the % of responders with at least 20% improvement from Baseline for tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1)Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2)C-reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGA-VAS)
Measured: at week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study start3 Oct 2016
- Primary completion26 Jun 2019
- Study completion26 Jun 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Axial Psoratic ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- 498 patients were randomized in this Phase 3b trial. 5 (of 503) were mis-randomized, i.e. received randomization number but never received study medication. This was a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to assess the efficacy of secukinumab 150 mg or 300 mg in patients with AxPsA who had an inadequate response to NSAIDs. The study had 2 treatment periods; a placebo-controlled period from Baseline to Week 12 followed by an active treatment period from Week 12 to Week 52. At Week 12, patients randomized to placebo at Baseline were re-randomized (1:1) to active treatment with secukinumab 150 mg or secukinumab 300 mg.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 503 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02721966
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CAIN457F3302
- Other IDs
- 2016-000814-31, 2016
- Acronym
- MAXIMISE
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 23 Mar 2016
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Publications
Baraliakos X, Pournara E, Coates LC, Navarro-Compan V, Blanco R, O'Brien E, Schulz B, Landewe R. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics in patients with psoriatic arthritis and axial manifestations from the MAXIMISE cohort. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Jan 4;63(1):85-92. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead162.
PubMed 37094184Baraliakos X, Gossec L, Pournara E, Jeka S, Mera-Varela A, D'Angelo S, Schulz B, Rissler M, Nagar K, Perella C, Coates LC. Secukinumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis and axial manifestations: results from the double-blind, randomised, phase 3 MAXIMISE trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 May;80(5):582-590. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218808. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
PubMed 33334727
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- MAXIMISE (Managing AXIal Manifestations in PsorIatic Arthritis With SEcukinumab), a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, 52-week Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab 150 mg or 300 mg s.c. in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis and Axial Skeleton Involvement Who Have Inadequate Response to Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02721966
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MAXIMISE / CAIN457F3302
- Conditions
- Axial Psoratic Arthritis
- Keywords
- Assessment of spondyloarthritis international society, ASAS, axial, Psoriatic Arthritis, PsA, Magnetic resonance imaging, MRI
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 503 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 3 Oct 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Jun 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Aug 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab 150 mg or 300 mg in the management of axial manifestations in PsA patients who have failed to respond to at least 2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) over a 4-week period, according to assessment of spondyloarthritis international society (ASAS) recommendations for the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA).
Detailed description
In the anlalysis (CSR), there are 498 patients, as 5 patients were mis-randomized, i.e. had randomization number but did never take study medication. So there were 498 participants, and not 503
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- 498 patients were randomized in this Phase 3b trial. 5 (of 503) were mis-randomized, i.e. received randomization number but never received study medication. This was a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to assess the efficacy of secukinumab 150 mg or 300 mg in patients with AxPsA who had an inadequate response to NSAIDs. The study had 2 treatment periods; a placebo-controlled period from Baseline to Week 12 followed by an active treatment period from Week 12 to Week 52. At Week 12, patients randomized to placebo at Baseline were re-randomized (1:1) to active treatment with secukinumab 150 mg or secukinumab 300 mg.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| AIN457 150mg | Experimental | Biological: SecukinumabSecukinumab dose amount 1 sc injection weekly for 4 weeks followed by Secukinumab dosage amount 1 sc injection every 4 weeks for remaining 44 weeks |
| AIN457 300mg | Experimental | Biological: SecukinumabSecukinumab dose amount 2 sc injection weekly for 4 weeks followed by Secukinumab dosage amount 2 sc injection every 4 weeks for remaining 44 weeks |
| AIN457 Placebo | Placebo comparator | Biological: Secukinumab, Drug: Secukinumab and PlaceboPlacebo sc injection weekly for 4 weeks and at week 8, followed by Secukinumab 150 mg or 300 mg sc injection every 4 week for remaining 40 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Written informed consent must be obtained before any assessment is performed
- Diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis classified by Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis (CASPAR) criteria
- Active spinal disease defined by Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI) score ≥ 4
- Spinal Pain visual analog scale (VAS) ≥ 40 (on a VAS 100 scale)
- Inadequate Response to at least 2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs over a 4 weeks period
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- History of exposure to other IL-17 or IL-23 inhibitor biologic drug
- History of exposure to previous biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers or Ustekinumab)
- Current treatment with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) other than Methotrexate
- Subjects taking high potency opioid analgesics (e.g. methadone, hydromorphone, morphine)
- Chest X-ray or chest magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with evidence of ongoing infectious or malignant process, obtained within 3 months prior to screening and evaluated by a qualified physician
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SecukinumabAlso: AIN457Anti IL-17a monoclonal antibody | Biological | AIN457 150mg, AIN457 300mg, AIN457 Placebo |
| Secukinumab and PlaceboPlacebo matching AIN457 | Drug | AIN457 Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment (300 mg AIN457) as Assessed by the ASAS20 Criteria at Week 12
Time frame: at week 12
Purpose of this measure: was to demonstrate that secukinumab 150 mg s.c. is superior to placebo in the achievement of ASAS 20 response at Week 12 after superiority of 300 mg was established ASAS20 was defined as an improvement of ≥20% and absolute improvement of ≥10 unit (0-100 mm VAS) from baseline in ≥3 of the following 4 domains (and absence of deterioration in any domain): patient's global assessment of disease activity (PTGA), pain assessment (total pain score), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and clinical inflammation (mean of 2 morning stiffness-related scores on the BASDAI)
10 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment (150 mg AIN457) as Assessed by the ASAS20 Criteria at Week 12
Time frame: at week 12
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment (150 mg/300 mg AIN457) as Assessed by the ASAS40 Criteria at Week 12
Time frame: at week 12
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment as Assessed by BASDAI50 at Week 12
Time frame: at week 12
Change From Baseline in Spinal Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Pain at Any Time
Time frame: at baseline, at week 12
Change From Baseline in Spinal Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Pain at Night
Time frame: at baseline, at week 12
Change From Baseline Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index Score at Week 12
Time frame: baseline and week 12
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 12
Time frame: baseline and week 12
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) at Week 12
Time frame: baseline and week 12
Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) Health Index at Week 12
Time frame: baseline and week 12
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment as Assessed by the ACR20 Criteria at Week 12
Time frame: at week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Oct 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37094184Baraliakos X, Pournara E, Coates LC, Navarro-Compan V, Blanco R, O'Brien E, Schulz B, Landewe R. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics in patients with psoriatic arthritis and axial manifestations from the MAXIMISE cohort. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Jan 4;63(1):85-92. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead162.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33334727Baraliakos X, Gossec L, Pournara E, Jeka S, Mera-Varela A, D'Angelo S, Schulz B, Rissler M, Nagar K, Perella C, Coates LC. Secukinumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis and axial manifestations: results from the double-blind, randomised, phase 3 MAXIMISE trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 May;80(5):582-590. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218808. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
94 sites in 18 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Secukinumab in people with Axial Psoratic Arthritis, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 94 sites in 18 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 94 sites in Spain, Russia, United Kingdom, Poland, France and 13 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Aug 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment (300 mg AIN457) as Assessed by the ASAS20 Criteria at Week 12 (time frame: at week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02721966, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2020.