AzTrials
AzTrials

COPDNCT02722629

Prevalence of Respiratory Aspiration in Patients With COPD

A study testing FEESST in people with COPD, run by Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires at 1 site in Argentina.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the study is to estimate the prevalence of respiratory aspiration in patients with COPD, in a tertiary hospital of Buenos Aires. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
COPD
What is being tested?
FEESST
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
330 participants
Where
1 siteArgentina
Study dates
Jun 2016to Jul 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients over 64 years diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease guide GOLD criteria (FEV1 / FVC ratio post bronchodilator <0.70)

Who cannot join

  • Refusal to participate or to process oral informed consent
  • Contraindication for the FEESST (history of vasovagal episodes, bilateral nasal obstruction, impaired homeostasis or frequent bleeding, dyskinesia, maxillofacial trauma or recent neck).
  • Impaired understanding or cognition that hinder the consent or performing diagnostic tests required.
  • Diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease associated with swallowing disorders known: Parkinson, stroke with neurologic sequelae.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Argentina1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Peron 4190

    Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D., C1199ABB

    Diego H Giunta, MD, +54 9 11 5825-6489, diego.giunta@hospitalitaliano.org.ar

    Cristina M Elizondo, MD, +54 9 11 5745-8048, cristina.elizondo@hospitalitaliano.org.ar

    Recruiting

Other trials in Argentina

About this study

Official title: Prevalence of Respiratory Aspiration in Patients With COPD: Cross-sectional Study

The aim of the study is to estimate the prevalence of respiratory aspiration in patients with COPD, in a tertiary hospital of Buenos Aires.

Read the detailed description

Primary objective To estimate the prevalence of respiratory aspiration in patients with COPD, in a tertiary hospital of Buenos Aires.

Secondary objective

  1. To assess the association between the presence of aspiration and the usual degree of dyspnea in patients with COPD.
  2. To assess the association between the presence of aspiration and the amount of regular annual exacerbations in patients with COPD.
  3. To evaluate the association between the presence of aspiration and degree of severity according to GOLD criteria in patients with COPD.
  4. Compare the estimated aspiration in COPD patients with known prevalence of pulmonary aspiration in the general population in the same age patient prevalence

Patients will be recruited consecutively in the outpatient clinic of Pulmonology and Medical Clinic, where a first encounter with the patient will be agreed. Additionally, the investigators will cite patients identified as COPD in the Electronic Medical Records.

During the first meeting the informed consent process to enter the protocol will take place, then the same baseline characteristics of the patient is taken into an online form. Finally given a shift within 15 days after the first meeting for the FEEST, and if the patient did not have a spirometry over the past year to update a new turn. Both studies will be conducted without any cost.

In patients with impaired swallowing or aspiration presence is detected, we will inform the doctor to assess the need for additional studies. In turn, the patients will be referred to speech therapy services for rehabilitation of swallowing.

Conditions
COPD
Being tested
FEESST
Keywords
COPD, Respiratory Aspiration, COPD acute exacerbation
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Respiratory Aspiration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • FEESSTProcedure or surgery

    Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing with Sensory Testing

Study groups in NCT02722629
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Aspiration in COPD patientsExperimentalAll COPD patient will be evaluated systematically by FEESST (Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing with Sensory Testing) with direct evaluation of aspiration by direct observation.
Receives: Procedure: FEESST

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Presence of any consistence Airway Aspiration

    Direct observation of any consistence food (liquid/semisolid/solid) penetration or aspiration by direct inspection with Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing with Sensory Testing.

    There is no follow-up period as this is a prevalence study. All measurements will be done at time 0. The only experimental feature (according to ClinicalTrials.gov definitions) is that we use FEEST to detect evidence of airway aspiration and this is not a routine examination in COPD patients.

    Measured: Baseline (Time 0)

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Aspiration Risk

    Direct observation of indirect signs of high risk for aspiration with Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing with Sensory Testing.

    There is no follow-up period as this is a prevalence study. All measurements will be done at time 0. The only experimental feature (according to ClinicalTrials.gov definitions) is that we use FEEST to detect evidence of airway aspiration and this is not a routine examination in COPD patients.

    Measured: Baseline (Time 0)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Mar 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2016
  3. Primary completionJun 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
330 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02722629
Sponsor's protocol ID
2671
Status last verified
Mar 2016
First submitted
9 Mar 2016
Last updated
22 Aug 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Lopez AD, Shibuya K, Rao C, Mathers CD, Hansell AL, Held LS, Schmid V, Buist S. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current burden and future projections. Eur Respir J. 2006 Feb;27(2):397-412. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00025805. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16452599
  • Ciapponi A, Alison L, Agustina M, Demian G, Silvana C, Edgardo S. The epidemiology and burden of COPD in Latin America and the Caribbean: systematic review and meta-analysis. COPD. 2014 Jun;11(3):339-50. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2013.836479. Epub 2013 Oct 10.

    PubMed 24111903
  • Steidl E, Ribeiro CS, Goncalves BF, Fernandes N, Antunes V, Mancopes R. Relationship between Dysphagia and Exacerbations in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Literature Review. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Jan;19(1):74-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1376430. Epub 2014 Nov 6.

    PubMed 25992155
  • Macri MR, Marques JM, Santos RS, Furkim AM, Melek I, Rispoli D, de Alencar Nunes MC. Clinical and fiberoptic endoscopic assessment of swallowing in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jul;17(3):274-8. doi: 10.7162/S1809-97772013000300007.

    PubMed 26106452
  • Yamauchi Y, Yasunaga H, Matsui H, Hasegawa W, Jo T, Takami K, Fushimi K, Nagase T. Comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes between aspiration pneumonia and community-acquired pneumonia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. BMC Pulm Med. 2015 Jul 8;15:69. doi: 10.1186/s12890-015-0064-5.

    PubMed 26152178

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing FEESST in people with COPD, run by Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires at 1 site in Argentina.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Argentina. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Diego DG Giunta, MD (+54 11 49590200 ext. 4806, diego.giunta@hospitalitaliano.org.ar), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Presence of any consistence Airway Aspiration (time frame: Baseline (Time 0)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02722629, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Aug 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in