Chronic Low Back PainCOPESNCT02724930
Cooperative Pain Education and Self-management
A study testing Enhanced facilitation of COPES in people with Chronic Low Back Pain, run by VA Connecticut Healthcare System at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study will test the effectiveness of using enhanced facilitation strategies on implementation of an automated Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system as a means to remotely deliver in-home self-management support to Veterans with chronic pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Low Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- Enhanced facilitation of COPES
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 135 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 25 Jun 2018to 27 Aug 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Veterans COPES:
- Back-pain-related International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 diagnosis
- Pain intensity rating of ≥4 (indicating moderate pain) on the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale on at least two separate outpatient encounters at a CBOC in the prior year
- CBOC patient at VA Boston, VA Palo Alto or Roudebush VA
- Veterans Interviews:
- Those who are eligible for COPES, but who have not been asked to enroll (pre-implementation period)
Show all 11Show fewer
- Those who participate in COPES (post-implementation)
- Those who decline enrollment in COPES (post-implementation)
- CBOC patients at VA Boston, VA Palo Alto or Roudebush VA
- Admin, Champion, Provider Interviews:
- 1. Employed at the project implementation sites
Who cannot join
- Veterans (COPES \& Interviews):
- Diagnosis of cancer, dementia, schizophrenia, and active alcohol or substance abuse
- Psychiatric hospitalization in the past 30 days
- Patients who are designated as fall risks and/or have active diabetic foot ulcers
- Admin, Champion, Provider Interviews:
- 1. Not employed at the project implementation sites
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
VA Boston Healthcare System
Brockton, Massachusetts, 02301
Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
VA Palo Alto Healthcare System
Menlo Park, California, 94025
About this study
This study will test the effectiveness of using enhanced facilitation strategies on implementation of an automated Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system as a means to remotely deliver in-home self-management support to Veterans with chronic pain. The implementation intervention uses an enhanced facilitation approach paired with automated case finding and direct patient outreach to encourage uptake of Cooperative Pain Education and Self-management (COPES). A nested effectiveness study will measure pre-post differences in pain-relevant outcomes (pain intensity, physical functioning and physical activity). The investigators will use a stepped wedge cluster design in which clusters will be randomized to the timing of the introduction of enhanced COPES implementation. Investigators will assess the efficacy of the facilitation based implementation strategy by evaluating COPES uptake in the implementation settings.
Read the detailed description
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for chronic pain is a commonly used evidence-based self-management intervention. Though effective, CBT requires that patients attend multiple in-person visits and that highly trained staff be available to provide care. For these reasons CBT is resource intensive, often inaccessible to Veterans, and delivered unevenly across patients and facilities. In a Veterans Health Administration Office of Health Services Research and Development (HSR\&D) IIR-funded trial, investigators found that CBT delivered primarily via an automated Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system (Cooperative Pain Education and Self-management or COPES) leads to patient-centered outcomes that are comparable to standard United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) approaches in which CBT is delivered in-person by a therapist over ten weekly sessions. In this study, implementation facilitation will be guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) which provides a set of constructs to identify potential barriers and facilitators to implementation. The primary objective of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of the facilitation approach paired with automated case finding and direct patient outreach on uptake of COPES in the clinical care setting. Study investigators will specifically target Veterans who receive care at community-based outpatient clinics (CBOCs) because these sites typically have few or no therapists trained in CBT for chronic pain.
Description of COPES: COPES is a 10-week, IVR-facilitated program of CBT for chronic pain. The primary components of COPES include: 1) a self-help handbook to teach Veterans pain self-management skills and describe the weekly skill practice goals, 2) a pedometer-facilitated progressive walking program (all COPES patients will be given an Omron Go Smart, Model HJ-112 pocket pedometer at the time of enrollment), and 3) daily, automated IVR calls to collect patient-reported pain intensity and pain-related interference, sleep quality, pedometer-measured step count, and adherence to the pain coping skill practice ratings. Participants will also receive a weekly, two to four minute pre-recorded, personalized therapist message via the IVR system based on the participant's IVR-recorded data. Therapists provide feedback on the participant's weekly average pain intensity, sleep, steps, and pain coping skill practice, note any changes from the prior week, and comment on symptom or activity patterns. Therapists also provide reinforcement for goal accomplishment, help patients make connections among pain, pain coping skill practice, and goal accomplishment, and assign a steps and skill practice goal for the upcoming week.
Research Design: Study investigators will test the effectiveness of the facilitation approach to implement COPES as a means to remotely deliver in-home self-management support to Veterans with chronic pain. To evaluate the implementation's success, study investigators will conduct a multi-site, stepped wedge, Hybrid III trial in 17 CBOCs affiliated with three geographically dispersed sites (VA Boston, VA Palo Alto, and Roudebush VA in Indianapolis). Clusters (k=17 CBOCs) will be randomized to 6 different time periods proportional to approximate eligible patient population size. Each CBOC will serve as its own control for a period of time before "transitioning" into enhanced facilitation; the time of this transition is randomized in a stepped fashion. The primary outcome for evaluating implementation success will be patient enrollment in COPES. The secondary outcome will be provider referral. Other outcomes that will be investigated as part of the nested COPES effectiveness study will be Veterans' physical functioning, pain intensity, and physical activity.
Methodology: Study investigators will evaluate the success of the implementation strategy by evaluating the proportion of patients who are offered enrollment in COPES who actually enroll. Additionally, study investigators will conduct a formative evaluation to inform, refine and evaluate implementation of COPES. The evaluation will include interviews with VA staff and patients with chronic back pain at the proposed implementation sites. Interview guides will be based on CFIR model constructs using questions adapted from the CFIR interview guide. Investigators will also measure pre-post differences in pain-relevant outcomes (pain intensity, physical functioning and physical activity).
- Conditions
- Chronic Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- Enhanced facilitation of COPES
- Keywords
- low back pain, chronic pain, cognitive behavior therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain, Chronic Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Enhanced facilitation of COPESBehavioural
Enhanced facilitation of COPES implementation consists of promotional meetings, automated case finding and proactive outreach to recruit patients, marketing and educational materials, local champion, and academic detailing.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Implementation | No intervention | Standard COPES implementation consists of provider education including brief in-person presentations and written material. |
| Implementation Facilitation | Experimental | Enhanced facilitation of COPES implementation.
All clusters start in the standard implementation group and cross-over from the control group to the intervention group in a randomized stepped-wedge fashion at 7 time points over the course of the 33 week implementation. Receives: Behavioral: Enhanced facilitation of COPES |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient enrollment
Patient enrollment measured as the probability an eligible patient enrolls in Cooperative Pain Education and Self-management (COPES).
Measured: Baseline, 6 months post-facilitation, and study end (up to 30 months)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Provider referrals
Provider referrals to COPES measured as the total number of provider referrals and the number of referrals per provider by: site, time point, and overall.
Measured: Baseline, 6 months post-facilitation, and study end (up to 30 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study start25 Jun 2018
- Primary completion27 Aug 2020
- Study completion27 Aug 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 135 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Collaborators
- VA Office of Research and Development
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Alicia A Heapy, PhD, Principal investigator, VA Connecticut Healthcare SystemJohn D Piette, PhD, Principal investigator, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02724930
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0012
- Acronym
- COPES
- Status last verified
- Sep 2022
- First submitted
- 22 Mar 2016
- Last updated
- 22 Sep 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Sep 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cooperative Pain Education and Self-management
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02724930
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COPES / 0012
- Conditions
- Chronic Low Back Pain
- Keywords
- low back pain, chronic pain, cognitive behavior therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 135 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- VA Connecticut Healthcare SystemUS federal agency
- Collaborators
- VA Office of Research and Development
- Study start
- 25 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Aug 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will test the effectiveness of using enhanced facilitation strategies on implementation of an automated Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system as a means to remotely deliver in-home self-management support to Veterans with chronic pain. The implementation intervention uses an enhanced facilitation approach paired with automated case finding and direct patient outreach to encourage uptake of Cooperative Pain Education and Self-management (COPES). A nested effectiveness study will measure pre-post differences in pain-relevant outcomes (pain intensity, physical functioning and physical activity). The investigators will use a stepped wedge cluster design in which clusters will be randomized to the timing of the introduction of enhanced COPES implementation. Investigators will assess the efficacy of the facilitation based implementation strategy by evaluating COPES uptake in the implementation settings.
Detailed description
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for chronic pain is a commonly used evidence-based self-management intervention. Though effective, CBT requires that patients attend multiple in-person visits and that highly trained staff be available to provide care. For these reasons CBT is resource intensive, often inaccessible to Veterans, and delivered unevenly across patients and facilities. In a Veterans Health Administration Office of Health Services Research and Development (HSR\&D) IIR-funded trial, investigators found that CBT delivered primarily via an automated Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system (Cooperative Pain Education and Self-management or COPES) leads to patient-centered outcomes that are comparable to standard United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) approaches in which CBT is delivered in-person by a therapist over ten weekly sessions. In this study, implementation facilitation will be guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) which provides a set of constructs to identify potential barriers and facilitators to implementation. The primary objective of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of the facilitation approach paired with automated case finding and direct patient outreach on uptake of COPES in the clinical care setting. Study investigators will specifically target Veterans who receive care at community-based outpatient clinics (CBOCs) because these sites typically have few or no therapists trained in CBT for chronic pain.
Description of COPES: COPES is a 10-week, IVR-facilitated program of CBT for chronic pain. The primary components of COPES include: 1) a self-help handbook to teach Veterans pain self-management skills and describe the weekly skill practice goals, 2) a pedometer-facilitated progressive walking program (all COPES patients will be given an Omron Go Smart, Model HJ-112 pocket pedometer at the time of enrollment), and 3) daily, automated IVR calls to collect patient-reported pain intensity and pain-related interference, sleep quality, pedometer-measured step count, and adherence to the pain coping skill practice ratings. Participants will also receive a weekly, two to four minute pre-recorded, personalized therapist message via the IVR system based on the participant's IVR-recorded data. Therapists provide feedback on the participant's weekly average pain intensity, sleep, steps, and pain coping skill practice, note any changes from the prior week, and comment on symptom or activity patterns. Therapists also provide reinforcement for goal accomplishment, help patients make connections among pain, pain coping skill practice, and goal accomplishment, and assign a steps and skill practice goal for the upcoming week.
Research Design: Study investigators will test the effectiveness of the facilitation approach to implement COPES as a means to remotely deliver in-home self-management support to Veterans with chronic pain. To evaluate the implementation's success, study investigators will conduct a multi-site, stepped wedge, Hybrid III trial in 17 CBOCs affiliated with three geographically dispersed sites (VA Boston, VA Palo Alto, and Roudebush VA in Indianapolis). Clusters (k=17 CBOCs) will be randomized to 6 different time periods proportional to approximate eligible patient population size. Each CBOC will serve as its own control for a period of time before "transitioning" into enhanced facilitation; the time of this transition is randomized in a stepped fashion. The primary outcome for evaluating implementation success will be patient enrollment in COPES. The secondary outcome will be provider referral. Other outcomes that will be investigated as part of the nested COPES effectiveness study will be Veterans' physical functioning, pain intensity, and physical activity.
Methodology: Study investigators will evaluate the success of the implementation strategy by evaluating the proportion of patients who are offered enrollment in COPES who actually enroll. Additionally, study investigators will conduct a formative evaluation to inform, refine and evaluate implementation of COPES. The evaluation will include interviews with VA staff and patients with chronic back pain at the proposed implementation sites. Interview guides will be based on CFIR model constructs using questions adapted from the CFIR interview guide. Investigators will also measure pre-post differences in pain-relevant outcomes (pain intensity, physical functioning and physical activity).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Implementation | No intervention | –Standard COPES implementation consists of provider education including brief in-person presentations and written material. |
| Implementation Facilitation | Experimental | Behavioral: Enhanced facilitation of COPESEnhanced facilitation of COPES implementation. All clusters start in the standard implementation group and cross-over from the control group to the intervention group in a randomized stepped-wedge fashion at 7 time points over the course of the 33 week implementation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Back-pain-related International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 diagnosis
- Pain intensity rating of ≥4 (indicating moderate pain) on the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale on at least two separate outpatient encounters at a CBOC in the prior year
- CBOC patient at VA Boston, VA Palo Alto or Roudebush VA
- Those who are eligible for COPES, but who have not been asked to enroll (pre-implementation period)
- Those who participate in COPES (post-implementation)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Diagnosis of cancer, dementia, schizophrenia, and active alcohol or substance abuse
- Psychiatric hospitalization in the past 30 days
- Patients who are designated as fall risks and/or have active diabetic foot ulcers
- 1. Not employed at the project implementation sites
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Enhanced facilitation of COPESEnhanced facilitation of COPES implementation consists of promotional meetings, automated case finding and proactive outreach to recruit patients, marketing and educational materials, local champion, and academic detailing. | Behavioural | Implementation Facilitation |
Primary outcome
Patient enrollment
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months post-facilitation, and study end (up to 30 months)
Patient enrollment measured as the probability an eligible patient enrolls in Cooperative Pain Education and Self-management (COPES).
1 secondary outcome
Provider referrals
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months post-facilitation, and study end (up to 30 months)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Sep 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Enrolling by invitation
Effects of 3-dimensional Versus Dynamic Myofascial Release Techniques With Lumbar Mobilization and Exercise Therapy Program in Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain, Myofascial Release
RecruitingPhase 2
A Master Protocol Study (LY900028) of Multiple Intervention-Specific-Appendices (ISAs) in Participants With Chronic Pain
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Diabetic Neuropathic Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alicia A Heapy, PhD principal investigator
VA Connecticut Healthcare System
John D Piette, PhD principal investigator
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Enhanced facilitation of COPES in people with Chronic Low Back Pain, run by VA Connecticut Healthcare System at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient enrollment (time frame: Baseline, 6 months post-facilitation, and study end (up to 30 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2022.