AzTrials
AzTrials

Aortic Valve StenosisQUALITY-AVRNCT02726087

Quality of Life After Ministernotomy Versus Full Sternotomy Aortic Valve Replacement

A study testing ministernotomy and Full sternotomy in people with Aortic Valve Stenosis and Heart Valve Diseases, run by Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y Salud at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a single-center, single-blind, all comer, randomized controlled trial. Patients scheduled for isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) due to aortic stenosis at "Virgen de la Victoria Universitary Hospital", Málaga, Spain, will be eligible. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
ministernotomy and Full sternotomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
96 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
20 Mar 2016to 20 Oct 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • Severe aortic stenosis defined as aortic valve area of less than 1 cm2 or index area of 0.6 cm2/m2 or mean gradient greater than 40 mmHg by echocardiography or double lesion with predominant stenosis.
  • Referred for medically indicated aortic valve replacement
  • Provide written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Left ventricular ejection fraction less than 0.40
  • Presence of any coexisting severe valvular disorder
  • Previous cardiac surgery
  • Urgent or emergent surgery
  • Infective endocarditis
  • Need for concomitant procedures other than isolated myectomy
  • Severe COPD
  • Severe thorax deformity.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen de La Victoria

    Málaga, 29010

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Health-related Quality of Life, Satisfaction and Outcomes After Ministernotomy Versus Full Sternotomy Aortic Valve Replacement. A Randomized Controlled Trial (QUALITY-AVR TRIAL)

This is a single-center, single-blind, all comer, randomized controlled trial. Patients scheduled for isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) due to aortic stenosis at "Virgen de la Victoria Universitary Hospital", Málaga, Spain, will be eligible. Ninety-six patients will be randomly assigned to either partial upper sternotomy (ministernotomy, 48 patients) or full sternotomy AVR (48 patients). Sample size was determined for an Alpha error of 0.05,and Beta error of 0.1 for a power of 90% in detecting 0.10 difference points in quality of life EQ-5D-5L-index or 10 points in EQ-5D-5L-Visual Analogic Scale (QOL).

Read the detailed description

This is a single-center, single-blind, all comer, randomized controlled trial. Patients scheduled for isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) due to aortic stenosis at "Virgen de la Victoria Universitary Hospital", Málaga, Spain, will be eligible. Ninety-six patients will be randomly assigned to either partial upper sternotomy (ministernotomy, 48 patients) or full sternotomy AVR (48 patients). Sample size was determined for an Alpha error of 0.05,and Beta error of 0.1 for a power of 90% in detecting 0.10 difference points in quality of life EQ-5D-5L-index or 10 points in EQ-5D-5L-Visual Analogic Scale.

Inclusion criteria is severe aortic stenosis referred for medically indicated isolated aortic valve replacement due to aortic stenosis in patients >18 years.

Exclusion criteria are left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40%, previous cardiac surgery, urgent/emergent surgery, infective endocarditis, need of concomitant procedures other than isolated Morrow miectomy and thorax deformity.

CE-marked and FDA-approved mechanical (Sorin Carbomedics®) and stented bioprosthetic aortic valves will be implanted (Carpentier Edwards Perimount® and Sorin Crown®). Perceval S Sutureless bioprosthetic valves (LivaNova®) could be used if needed in very small aortic annulus or high risk patients Quality of Life postoperative outcomes will be assessed, as QOL measurements and health status with the EQ-5D-5L® questionnaire (QOL index, health visual analogic scale, severity index and health index), repeatedly assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 1-6-12 months. Clinical postoperative complications and outcomes will be registered at 1 month and 1 year as main secondary and safety end-point (combined end-point of 4 and 6 major complications) Patient Satisfaction will be assessed with a 20 question cardiac-surgery specific satisfaction questionnaire (SATISCORE®).

Survival will be assessed at 1 year. Clinical pre and postoperative characteristics will be registered. Routine blood sampling will be performed pre- and postoperatively. All available data will be collected prospectively. Informed consent) will be obtained from patients meeting the inclusion criteria before the initiation of any study-specific procedures.

The Institutional Review Board Ethic Comittee approved this study.

Being tested
ministernotomy, Full sternotomy
Keywords
Ministernotomy, aortic valve stenosis, quality of life, satisfaction, cardiac surgery
Medical subject headings
Aortic Valve Stenosis, Heart Valve Diseases, Aortic Valve Disease, Personal Satisfaction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ministernotomyProcedure or surgery

    Partial upper "J" hemisternotomy trough 4th right intercostal space)

  • Full sternotomyProcedure or surgery

    Conventional full median sternotomy

Study groups in NCT02726087
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ministernotomyExperimentalMinimally invasive aortic valve replacement with Partial "J" upper hemisternotomy through right 4th intercostal space, performed according to current standard of care practice.
Receives: Procedure: ministernotomy
full sternotomyActive comparatorFull sternotomy AVR through a standard median sternotomy, performed according to current standard of care practice.
Receives: Procedure: Full sternotomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Differences between intervention groups in change from baseline Questionnaire EQ-5D-5L® Index at 1, 6 or 12 months

    Questionnaire EQ-5D-5L® for quality of life

    Measured: baseline-1-6-12 months

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Differences between intervention groups in change from baseline Questionnaire EQ-5D-5L® Visual Analogic Scale for pain at 1, 6 or 12 months

    Questionnaire EQ-5D-5L® for quality of life

    Measured: baseline-1-6-12 months

  2. Early postoperative combined endpoint of 6 complications

    All cause Mortality, acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular or transient ischemic accident, acute renal failure AKIN (acute kidney injury classification) greater or equal than 2, nosocomial infections (Pneumonia, early endocarditis, mediastinitis, sepsis) and need of any reintervention

    Measured: 1 month

  3. Satiscore Questionnaire

    Satisfaction in cardiac surgery

    Measured: 1-6 months

  4. Differences between intervention groups in change from baseline Questionnaire EQ-5D-5L® severity index at 1, 6 and 12 months

    Questionnaire EQ-5D-5L® for quality of life

    Measured: baseline-1-6-12 months

  5. Differences between intervention groups in change from baseline Questionnaire EQ-5D-5L® health index (severity index inverse) at 1, 6 and 12 months

    Questionnaire EQ-5D-5L® for quality of life

    Measured: baseline-1-6-12 months

  6. Late postoperative combined endpoint of 6 complications

    All cause Mortality, acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular or transient ischemic accident, acute renal failure AKIN (acute kidney injury classification) greater or equal than 2, nosocomial infections (Pneumonia, early endocarditis, mediastinitis, sepsis) and need of any reintervention

    Measured: 1-5 years

  7. Total in-Hospital and Intensive Care Unit stay (in days)

    Measured: From date of surgery until the date of discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 1 year

  8. Cardiopulmonary bypass time in minutes and cross-clamp ischemic heart time in minutes needed in the surgery

    Measured: day 1 after surgery

  9. Mechanical Ventilatory Support time needed after surgery (in hours)

    Measured: 7 days

  10. Transfusional requirements (number of red packed cells, fresh frozen plasma and platelets)

    Measured: First 72 hours after surgery

  11. New York Heart Association functional class scale for heart failure

    To assess heart failure status between participants

    Measured: baseline-1-6-12 months

  12. Number of participants alive (Survival)

    To assess first year mortality

    Measured: 6-12 months

  13. Number of participants alive (Survival)

    To assess 5 year mortality

    Measured: 5 years

  14. Early postoperative combined endpoint of 4 complications

    All cause Mortality, acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular or transient ischemic accident, and acute renal failure AKIN (acute kidney injury classification) greater or equal than 2,

    Measured: 1 month

  15. Late postoperative combined endpoint of 4 complications

    All cause Mortality, acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular or transient ischemic accident, and acute renal failure AKIN (acute kidney injury classification) greater or equal than 2,

    Measured: 1-5 years year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Apr 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start20 Mar 2016
  3. Primary completion20 May 2019
  4. Study completion20 Oct 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
96 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02726087
Sponsor's protocol ID
CALIDAD-SVAO
Acronym
QUALITY-AVR
Status last verified
Feb 2020
First submitted
13 Mar 2016
Last updated
5 Feb 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Rodriguez-Caulo EA, Guijarro-Contreras A, Otero-Forero J, Mataro MJ, Sanchez-Espin G, Guzon A, Porras C, Such M, Ordonez A, Melero-Tejedor JM, Jimenez-Navarro M. Quality of life, satisfaction and outcomes after ministernotomy versus full sternotomy isolated aortic valve replacement (QUALITY-AVR): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Feb 17;19(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2486-x.

    PubMed 29454380

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ministernotomy and Full sternotomy in people with Aortic Valve Stenosis and Heart Valve Diseases, run by Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y Salud at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Differences between intervention groups in change from baseline Questionnaire EQ-5D-5L® Index at 1, 6 or 12 months (time frame: baseline-1-6-12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02726087, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in