AzTrials
AzTrials

Patient Satisfaction, Diagnostic AccuracyNCT02726594

Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Image Quality in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

An observational study of Patient Satisfaction, Diagnostic Accuracy, run by University of Zurich at 1 site in Switzerland.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this prospective monocentric study is to evaluate the patient comfort in MRI and to measure examination conditions and factors that may affect the image quality and thus the diagnostic accuracy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
How many people
1,000 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
Aug 2015to Dec 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Overall, 1,000 participants will be included in the study, consisting of healthy volunteers (N = 300) as well as patients (N = 700).

Who may be able to join

  • acceptance of study participation
  • age ≥ 18 years.

Who cannot join

  • General established contraindications for MRI (i.e. pacemaker implantation with non-compatible pacemakers and pacemaker leads, implantation of other non-MRI-compatible medical devices, metal parts in the body, etc.)
  • A pregnancy constitutes an exclusion criterion. If there could be a potentially pregnancy, a pregnancy test will be performed
  • claustrophobia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Gustav Andreisek, PD Dr. med. contact

+41 44 255 11

gustav.andreisek@usz.ch

Switzerland1 site, 1 recruiting
  • University Hospital Zurich

    Zurich

    Gustav Andreisek, PD Dr. med., +41 44 255 11, gustav.andreisek@usz.ch

    Recruiting

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

The aim of this prospective monocentric study is to evaluate the patient comfort in MRI and to measure examination conditions and factors that may affect the image quality and thus the diagnostic accuracy. For this purpose a total of 1000 participants enrolled in the study, consisting of healthy volunteers (N = 300) as well as patients (N = 700), that are assigned to the clinically indicated MRI scan. In this study, individual regions of the body are studied by MRI (for example, knee, ankle, head or spine). For all participants of the study, the investigation for each region examined is exactly the same except that a single external factor is changed or is different. Such variable factors may include: the tube diameter of the magnet, weight of the coil, which is closely attached to the examined area of the body, the height adjustment of the table on which the participants lie, the duration of the study protocol and the generated volume during the investigation. Participants are involuntarily subjected to the particular MRI scanner and setting by availability of USZ Radiology disposition. For the evaluation of the data, participants will be matched in terms of the body regions being examined and based on being part of the patient or subject group. Due to the fine different experimental conditions, the influence of these factors on study patient comfort, as wells as the image quality and thus the diagnostic accuracy will investigated. By this approach, the relevant factors will be examined in isolation. Only by exploring the patient's perception/comfort during an MRI scan, the patient-orientated design of the study conditions can be improved and thus the possibilities of modern MRI technology can be fully utilized in clinical practice.

Read the detailed description

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging ( "MRI") is an integral part of medical diagnostics since 20 years. Using MRI soft tissue imaging of body regions such as the brain, abdominal or musculoskeletal, is possible and is clearly superior to other imaging techniques. Due to the complex physical conditions a typical MRI scan will take 30-90 minutes (during which the patient should not do any movements), generates a noise level of 75-100 decibels and requires the placement of the patient in an often as cramped perceived tube scanner. These adverse conditions are not only known to have a significantly negative impact on the patient's comfort, but can also change the image quality and thus reduce the diagnostic accuracy of an investigation.

Motivation: At the University Hospital Zurich (USZ) a total of 10, partly very different MR scanners, are available for clinical imaging. These devices differ by the manufacturer and by the different design of the premises, the equipment, the coil and the table sizes, the logs up to the generated in the examination volume and the room temperature. For example, one of the existing examination rooms at the USZ has been equipped by a manufacturer with a costly patient comfort package. This room serves as a showroom and as a positive example for maximum patient comfort. Our experience shows that, overall, all the MRI scans of all units and the resulting image quality fluctuates greatly and the Patient Feedback for the individual studies is partly quite negative. Improved study conditions are therefore accessible both in terms of patient comfort and improved diagnostic accuracy, our goal.

Current status of research: The working group "Research in Musculoskeletal Radiology" at the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology at the University Hospital Zurich is led by PhD Dr. med. Gustav Andreisek and under his authority already carried out successfully numerous projects in the field of magnetic resonance imaging.

Objectives: The aim of this prospective monocentric study is to evaluate the patient comfort in MRI and to measure examination conditions and factors that may affect the image quality and thus the diagnostic accuracy. For this purpose a total of 1000 participants enrolled in the study, consisting of healthy volunteers (N = 300) as well as patients (N = 700), which are assigned to the clinically indicated MRI scan. In this study, individual regions of the body are studied by MRI (for example, knee, ankle, head or spine). For all participants in the study, the investigation for each region examined is exactly the same except that a single external factor is changed or is different. Such variable factors may include: the tube diameter of the magnet, weight of the coil, which is closely attached to the examined area of the body, the height adjustment of the table on which the participants lie, the duration of the study protocol and the generated volume during the investigation. Participants are involuntarily subjected to the particular MRI scanner and setting by availability of USZ Radiology disposition. For the evaluation of the data, participants will be matched in terms of the body regions being examined and based on being part of the patient or subject group. Due to the fine different experimental conditions, the influence of these factors on study patient comfort, as wells as the image quality and thus the diagnostic accuracy will investigated. By this approach, the relevant factors will be examined in isolation. Only by exploring the patient's perception/comfort during an MRI scan, the patient-orientated design of the study conditions can be improved and thus the possibilities of modern MRI technology can be fully utilized in clinical practice.

Keywords
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Patient Satisfaction
Medical subject headings
Patient Satisfaction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02726594
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PatientsFor the present study, patients who are assigned to the clinically indicated MRI scan, as well as healthy subjects will be included. Healthy volunteers will be recruited through public notices (flyer) (mainly in the district of the University Zurich / USZ). For all patients, the duration of clinical MRI routine examination is 30-90 minutes, depending on the requirements to answer the clinical question. The subjects are interviewed after the MRI scan by a visual analog scale oral and written on various aspects of their perception during the examination. This means an additional expenditure of time of about 10 minutes. The patients arises except for this additional time not a disadvantage by taking part in the study.
SubjectsFor the present study, patients who are assigned to the clinically indicated MRI scan, as well as healthy subjects will be included. Healthy volunteers will be recruited through public notices (flyer) (mainly in the district ETH / USZ). For all patients, the duration of clinical MRI routine examination is 30-90 minutes, depending on the requirements to answer the clinical question. The subjects are interviewed after the MRI scan by a visual analog scale oral and written on various aspects of their perception during the examination. This means an additional expenditure of time of about 10 minutes. The patients arises except for this additional time not a disadvantage by taking part in the study.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient comfort

    by questionnaires

    Measured: procedure

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Image quality

    by analysis of MRI images

    Measured: procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Apr 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2015
  3. Primary completionJun 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,000 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02726594
Sponsor's protocol ID
KEK-ZH-Nr. 2015-0081
Status last verified
Apr 2016
First submitted
29 Mar 2016
Last updated
5 Apr 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Patient Satisfaction, Diagnostic Accuracy, run by University of Zurich at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Gustav Andreisek, PD Dr. med. (+41 44 255 11, gustav.andreisek@usz.ch), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient comfort (time frame: procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in