AzTrials
AzTrials

Aortic Dissection Type BNCT02726841

Hybrid Treatment of Type B Aortic Dissection

A study testing Open thoracoabdominal aortic repair + abdominal stenting and Classic thoracoabdominal aortic repair in people with Aortic Dissection Type B, run by Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Authors hypothesize that thoracoabdominal aortic repair combined with bare metal stent implantation is superior over standard thoracoabdominal aortic repair. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Aortic Dissection Type B
What is being tested?
Open thoracoabdominal aortic repair + abdominal stenting and Classic thoracoabdominal aortic repair
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
160 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2013to Jan 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with chronic aortic dissection type B
  • Aortic size in descending thoracoabdominal aorta (TAA) > 55 mm

Who cannot join

  • concomitant cardiac pathology
  • concomitant oncology diseases in the last 5 years
  • acute aortic dissection
  • aortic size in visceral zone >45 mm
  • connectivity tissue diseases

About this study

Official title: Superiority Trial of Type b Aortic Dissection Treatment Combined With Implantation of Bare Metal Stent in Abdominal Part of Aorta Versus Conventional Type b Treatment

Authors hypothesize that thoracoabdominal aortic repair combined with bare metal stent implantation is superior over standard thoracoabdominal aortic repair.

Read the detailed description

Main hypothesis of this study is that thoracoabdominal aortic repair combined with bare metal stent implantation is better permanent neurological deficits, perioperative bleeding, malperfusion of viscera over conventional thoracoabdominal aortic repair.

Being tested
Open thoracoabdominal aortic repair + abdominal stenting, Classic thoracoabdominal aortic repair
Keywords
Thoracic aorta, Abdominal aorta, Stents

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Open thoracoabdominal aortic repair + abdominal stentingProcedure or surgery

    Also called Hybrid thoracoabdominal aortic repair

    Thoracoabdominal aortic dissection (TAAD) repair + bare aortic stent (Djumbodis) implantation

  • Classic thoracoabdominal aortic repairProcedure or surgery

    Also called Conventional TAAD repair

    Thoracoabdominal aortic dissection (TAAD) repair

Study groups in NCT02726841
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Hybrid TAAD repairExperimentalThe group includes patients who underwent open thoracoabdominal aortic repair + abdominal stenting.
Receives: Procedure: Open thoracoabdominal aortic repair + abdominal stenting
Conventional TAAD repairActive comparatorThe group includes patients who underwent classic thoracoabdominal aortic repair with dacron prosthesis.
Receives: Procedure: Classic thoracoabdominal aortic repair

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Permanent neurological events

    Quantity of permanent neurological events such as stroke and paraplegia by 30th day after procedure.

    Measured: 30 days

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Perioperative bleeding

    Volume of perioperative and postoperative bleeding in ICU

    Measured: 5 days after procedure

  2. Mortality

    Postoperative mortality will be measured during 6 months after procedure

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Visceral malperfusion

    Clinical evidences of visceral malperfusion (acute or achronic abdomen ischemia) during 6 months after procedure (Yes or No)

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Apr 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2013
  3. Primary completionJan 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
160 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02726841
Sponsor's protocol ID
TAAD+bare stent
Status last verified
Sep 2017
First submitted
27 Jan 2016
Last updated
13 Sep 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Open thoracoabdominal aortic repair + abdominal stenting and Classic thoracoabdominal aortic repair in people with Aortic Dissection Type B, run by Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Permanent neurological events (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in