AzTrials
AzTrials

Emotional StressNCT02729987

Increasing Engagement With Online Stress Management Interventions

A study testing WorkGuru in people with Emotional Stress, run by University of Sussex at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this pilot study is to explore the effect of an online facilitated discussion group on engagement with a stress management intervention delivered to employees in the UK via the Internet. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Emotional Stress
What is being tested?
WorkGuru
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
84 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Apr 2016to Dec 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 18 or over
  • Employed by a participating organisation, ≥ 20 on the Perceived Stress Scale
  • Access to a computer/table and the internet

Who cannot join

  • None

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • WorkGuru

    Brockenhurst, Hampshire, SO42 7RA

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Increasing Engagement With and Effectiveness of an Online CBT Based Stress Management Intervention for Employees Through the Use of an Online Facilitated Bulletin Board: Design of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this pilot study is to explore the effect of an online facilitated discussion group on engagement with a stress management intervention delivered to employees in the UK via the Internet. The investigators primary hypothesis is that the intervention group with access to an online facilitated discussion group (delivered via a message board) will show greater engagement than the intervention group that does not have access to the discussion group. The investigators also hypothesise that participants in the intervention groups will improve significantly on psychological distress and subjective wellbeing measures compared to the waiting list control group, and that the group with access to the online facilitated discussion group will show the greatest improvement.

Read the detailed description

The aim of the pilot study is to identify and address some of the challenges of delivering online psychological interventions in the workplace. There is clear research evidence for the delivery of online psychological interventions within clinical settings (e.g. Andersson \& Cuijpers, 2009), but this evidence does not translate to online interventions delivered in work settings (e.g. Geraedts, Kleiboer, Twisk, Wiezer, van Mechelen, \& Cuijpers, 2014). Evidence suggests that one of the barriers to the efficacy of online interventions may be the low level of engagement and adherence (Cavanagh \& Millings, 2013). This study aims to address this by asking the question: "How can we increase engagement with and adherence to an online intervention delivered in the workplace?"

The pilot study is a three-arm RCT comparing a minimal guided online Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) based stress management intervention (WorkGuru) delivered with and without an online facilitated bulletin board, to a waiting list control. Both active conditions will have access to an online programme with minimal support from a coach. The discussion group condition will also have access to a facilitated online bulletin board. Up to 90 employees from UK based organisations will be recruited to the study.

Inclusion criteria will include age 18 or over, elevated levels of stress (defined as 1SD above the mean norm on the PSS-10 scale), access to a computer or tablet, and the Internet. The primary outcome measure will be engagement, as defined by the number of logins to the site; secondary outcome measures will include further measures of engagement (the number of pages visited, the number of modules completed and self-report engagement) and measures of effectiveness (psychological distress and subjective wellbeing). Possible moderators will include measures of intervention quality (satisfaction, acceptability, credibility, system usability), time pressure, goal conflict, level of distress at baseline, and job autonomy. Measures will be taken at baseline, 2 weeks (credibility and expectancy measures only), 9 weeks (completion of intervention) and 16 weeks (follow-up). Analyses will be conducted on intention to treat and per protocol principles. Data will be collected electronically using Qualtrics survey software.

Being tested
WorkGuru
Keywords
online, internet, CBT, Stress, Work, Internet based treatment
Medical subject headings
Stress, Psychological

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • WorkGuruBehavioural

    A multi-modal stress management intervention accessed over 8 weeks, incorporates CBT, positive psychology and Mindfulness. Delivered via the internet.

Study groups in NCT02729987
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Minimum Support Group (MSG)ExperimentalIntervention group with 8 week access to the online stress management programme with minimal support from a coach (WorkGuru).
Receives: Behavioral: WorkGuru
Discussion GroupExperimentalIntervention group with 8 week access to the online stress management programme with minimal support from a coach, plus access to an online facilitated messaging board (WorkGuru).
Receives: Behavioral: WorkGuru
Waiting List Control (WLC)No interventionControl group with access to the intervention after 16 weeks

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of log-in to the site

    number of times participants log in to the website

    Measured: 9 weeks

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Number of modules completed

    number of modules completed

    Measured: 9 weeks

  2. Number of pages visited

    number of pages visited

    Measured: 9 weeks

  3. Self-report engagement

    1 item self-report engagement

    Measured: 9 weeks

  4. Depressions, anxiety and stress

    Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21)

    Measured: baseline, 9 weeks and 16 weeks

  5. Well-being at work

    16-item Institute of Work Psychology Multi Affect Indicator

    Measured: baseline, 9 weeks and 16 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Apr 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2016
  3. Primary completionOct 2016
  4. Study completionDec 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
84 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02729987
Sponsor's protocol ID
ER/SC587/1
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
18 Mar 2016
Last updated
4 May 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Andersson G, Cuijpers P. Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: a meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther. 2009;38(4):196-205. doi: 10.1080/16506070903318960.

    PubMed 20183695
  • Cavanagh, K., & Millings, A. (2013). Increasing engagement with computerised cognitive behavioural therapies. ICST Transactions on Ambient Systems, 13(2), e3. http://doi.org/10.4108/trans.amsys.01-06.2013.e3

  • Geraedts AS, Kleiboer AM, Twisk J, Wiezer NM, van Mechelen W, Cuijpers P. Long-term results of a web-based guided self-help intervention for employees with depressive symptoms: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jul 9;16(7):e168. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3539.

    PubMed 25008127
  • Carolan S, Harris PR, Greenwood K, Cavanagh K. Increasing engagement with an occupational digital stress management program through the use of an online facilitated discussion group: Results of a pilot randomised controlled trial. Internet Interv. 2017 Aug 24;10:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2017.08.001. eCollection 2017 Dec.

    PubMed 30135747
  • Carolan S, de Visser RO. Employees' Perspectives on the Facilitators and Barriers to Engaging With Digital Mental Health Interventions in the Workplace: Qualitative Study. JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Jan 19;5(1):e8. doi: 10.2196/mental.9146.

    PubMed 29351900
  • Carolan S, Harris PR, Greenwood K, Cavanagh K. Increasing engagement with, and effectiveness of, an online CBT-based stress management intervention for employees through the use of an online facilitated bulletin board: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Dec 15;17(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1733-2.

    PubMed 27978858

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing WorkGuru in people with Emotional Stress, run by University of Sussex at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of log-in to the site (time frame: 9 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02729987, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in