KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATIONTReg KidneyNCT02730715
Effect of Thymoglobulin Versus Basiliximab on Regulatory T Cell Function in Live Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients
An observational study of KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study aims to study the effects that two standard of care immunosuppression induction regimens have on regulatory T cells (Treg) in live donor renal transplant recipients. Both regimens are currently used in this hospital for early immunosuppression induction but the effects on Treg numbers and function is not… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION
- What is being tested?
- Basiliximab and Thymoglobulin
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2010to Apr 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Live donor renal transplant recipients
Who may be able to join
- adult patients receiving first live donor kidney transplant. 0-10% panel reactive antibody
Who cannot join
- HIV positive, hepatitis C positive, pregnancy, inability to provide informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
About this study
This study aims to study the effects that two standard of care immunosuppression induction regimens have on regulatory T cells (Treg) in live donor renal transplant recipients. Both regimens are currently used in this hospital for early immunosuppression induction but the effects on Treg numbers and function is not well understood and likely will impact long term immune function.
Read the detailed description
This study aims to study the effects that two standard-of-care immunosuppression induction regimens have on regulatory T cells (Treg) in live donor renal transplant recipients. These two regimens use anti-T cell antibodies: thymoglobulin is a polyclonal anti-T cell preparation and basiliximab is a monoclonal anti-cluster of differentiation (CD) 25 antibody. Both are currently used in this hospital for early immunosuppression induction but the effects on Treg numbers and function is not well understood and may impact long term immune function. The investigators wish to study the effects that these standard regimens have on Treg numbers, function, and FoxP3 methylation status (an indicator of Treg function). Live donor renal transplant patients with no panel reactive antibodies (PRA) have low risk of early allograft rejection and in various transplant centers are treated with no anti-T cell immunosuppression induction or induction with thymoglobulin or basiliximab as standard of care. Most patients in this hospital receive thymoglobulin but basiliximab is used as well. There are no proven long term benefits to either approach but each seems to lower the risk of short term acute cellular rejection. Both of these agents have been shown to affect numbers of Tregs (as they are T cell subsets) but data does not exist on the duration of these effects or the effects that these agents have on Treg potency or Treg FoxP3 methylation status. Since Tregs are believed to be important in long term control of immune responses, it is possible that the reason these agents do not improve long term results in spite of their short term improvement in rejection rate is due to effects on Treg.
T cell depletion by antibody has become standard of care in the majority of renal transplant programs in the country (including Penn) and this may have reduced short term acute rejection episodes within the first year of transplant. There have unfortunately not been corresponding improvements in long term outcomes and, in fact, the average half life of a renal graft is minimally changed in 2010 compared to 1995. This has been attributed to unresolved issues in diagnosing and treating what is described as "chronic allograft nephropathy" - which in real terms, is probably a longstanding chronic rejection that may be in part due to a mixed T and B cell antigraft response. Despite the fact that these agents are used regularly in clinical transplantation, little is known about their effects on regulatory T cell (Treg) numbers and suppressive activity and nothing is known about effects on the methylation status of Tregs, which seems to correlate with their function. These are novel questions that are a) relevant to clinical practice since these agents are being used in renal transplantation already, b) may yield information that could alter best practices, and c) will yield more basic information about Tregs in human transplantation that will be relevant to future study. There have been few papers that have looked predominantly at a few immunosuppressive agents and numbers of Tregs (this is a low quality statistic since the markers of Tregs are shared by other cell types and thus the "numbers" can be hard to interpret) but little about function or methylation. The investigators propose to randomize 30 live donor kidney recipients to receive either thymoglobulin or basiliximab immunosuppression and thereafter receive standard of care maintenance immunosuppression determined by the clinical team. Both of these regimens are used as standard of care in this hospital. The investigators will enroll only patients with low immunological risk (0-10% PRA) and who are receiving an Blood Type (ABO) compatible transplant. After the initial randomization, all further decisions regarding immunosuppression will be made by the clinical team independent of the study. The investigators will draw blood samples pre-transplant, 3 months after transplant, and 6 months and 12 months after transplant.
- Conditions
- KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION
- Being tested
- Basiliximab, Thymoglobulin
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BasiliximabDrug
Also called Simulect
Periodic blood collection to monitor Treg cells
ThymoglobulinDrug
Also called Anti-thymocyte globulin
Periodic blood collection to monitor Treg cells
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Thymoglobulin | blood specimen collection Receives: Drug: Thymoglobulin | |
| Basiliximab | blood specimen collection Receives: Drug: Basiliximab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Absolute Treg number Cells
Each sample will be measured by flow cytometry. Data will be analyzed for each treatment arm using nonparametric statistical tests and expressed as the medium value and inter-quartile range.
Measured: 5 years
Treg function tested by flow cytometry.
T cells and Tregs will be isolated. T cells will be labeled with CFSE and induced to proliferate by addition of CD3 mAb. Data will be evaluated by nonparametric methods.
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Treg methylation
An indicator of Treg function will be determined by purifying Tregs and monitoring methylation after bisulphate conversion and DNA sequencing. Percentages of methylated CpG sites/samples and will be compared by nonparametric statistics.
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2010
- Primary completionApr 2020
- Study completionApr 2020
Why it stopped: Insufficient amount of T Cell collection
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATIONStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of PennsylvaniaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pennsylvania
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Matthew L Levine, MD, Principal investigator, University of Pennsylvania
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02730715
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 811893
- Acronym
- TReg Kidney
- Status last verified
- Aug 2022
- First submitted
- 24 Mar 2016
- Last updated
- 1 Sep 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Sep 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Thymoglobulin Versus Basiliximab on Regulatory T Cell Function in Live Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02730715
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TReg Kidney / 811893
- Conditions
- KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Insufficient amount of T Cell collection
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PennsylvaniaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to study the effects that two standard of care immunosuppression induction regimens have on regulatory T cells (Treg) in live donor renal transplant recipients. Both regimens are currently used in this hospital for early immunosuppression induction but the effects on Treg numbers and function is not well understood and likely will impact long term immune function.
Detailed description
This study aims to study the effects that two standard-of-care immunosuppression induction regimens have on regulatory T cells (Treg) in live donor renal transplant recipients. These two regimens use anti-T cell antibodies: thymoglobulin is a polyclonal anti-T cell preparation and basiliximab is a monoclonal anti-cluster of differentiation (CD) 25 antibody. Both are currently used in this hospital for early immunosuppression induction but the effects on Treg numbers and function is not well understood and may impact long term immune function. The investigators wish to study the effects that these standard regimens have on Treg numbers, function, and FoxP3 methylation status (an indicator of Treg function). Live donor renal transplant patients with no panel reactive antibodies (PRA) have low risk of early allograft rejection and in various transplant centers are treated with no anti-T cell immunosuppression induction or induction with thymoglobulin or basiliximab as standard of care. Most patients in this hospital receive thymoglobulin but basiliximab is used as well. There are no proven long term benefits to either approach but each seems to lower the risk of short term acute cellular rejection. Both of these agents have been shown to affect numbers of Tregs (as they are T cell subsets) but data does not exist on the duration of these effects or the effects that these agents have on Treg potency or Treg FoxP3 methylation status. Since Tregs are believed to be important in long term control of immune responses, it is possible that the reason these agents do not improve long term results in spite of their short term improvement in rejection rate is due to effects on Treg.
T cell depletion by antibody has become standard of care in the majority of renal transplant programs in the country (including Penn) and this may have reduced short term acute rejection episodes within the first year of transplant. There have unfortunately not been corresponding improvements in long term outcomes and, in fact, the average half life of a renal graft is minimally changed in 2010 compared to 1995. This has been attributed to unresolved issues in diagnosing and treating what is described as "chronic allograft nephropathy" - which in real terms, is probably a longstanding chronic rejection that may be in part due to a mixed T and B cell antigraft response. Despite the fact that these agents are used regularly in clinical transplantation, little is known about their effects on regulatory T cell (Treg) numbers and suppressive activity and nothing is known about effects on the methylation status of Tregs, which seems to correlate with their function. These are novel questions that are a) relevant to clinical practice since these agents are being used in renal transplantation already, b) may yield information that could alter best practices, and c) will yield more basic information about Tregs in human transplantation that will be relevant to future study. There have been few papers that have looked predominantly at a few immunosuppressive agents and numbers of Tregs (this is a low quality statistic since the markers of Tregs are shared by other cell types and thus the "numbers" can be hard to interpret) but little about function or methylation. The investigators propose to randomize 30 live donor kidney recipients to receive either thymoglobulin or basiliximab immunosuppression and thereafter receive standard of care maintenance immunosuppression determined by the clinical team. Both of these regimens are used as standard of care in this hospital. The investigators will enroll only patients with low immunological risk (0-10% PRA) and who are receiving an Blood Type (ABO) compatible transplant. After the initial randomization, all further decisions regarding immunosuppression will be made by the clinical team independent of the study. The investigators will draw blood samples pre-transplant, 3 months after transplant, and 6 months and 12 months after transplant.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Thymoglobulin | – | Drug: Thymoglobulinblood specimen collection |
| Basiliximab | – | Drug: Basiliximabblood specimen collection |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Live donor renal transplant recipients
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- adult patients receiving first live donor kidney transplant. 0-10% panel reactive antibody
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- HIV positive, hepatitis C positive, pregnancy, inability to provide informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BasiliximabAlso: SimulectPeriodic blood collection to monitor Treg cells | Drug | Basiliximab |
| ThymoglobulinAlso: Anti-thymocyte globulinPeriodic blood collection to monitor Treg cells | Drug | Thymoglobulin |
Primary outcome
Absolute Treg number Cells
Time frame: 5 years
Each sample will be measured by flow cytometry. Data will be analyzed for each treatment arm using nonparametric statistical tests and expressed as the medium value and inter-quartile range.
Treg function tested by flow cytometry.
Time frame: 5 years
T cells and Tregs will be isolated. T cells will be labeled with CFSE and induced to proliferate by addition of CD3 mAb. Data will be evaluated by nonparametric methods.
1 secondary outcome
Treg methylation
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Insufficient amount of T Cell collection). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Sep 2022.
Related trials for KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Pegcetacoplan for the Prevention of Recurrent C3G or Primary IC-MPGN in Kidney Transplant Recipients
C3 Glomerulopathy (C3G), Primary Immune-Complex Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN), Recurrent Glomerular Disease After Kidney Transplantation
Not yet recruiting
Bioimpedance and Multiparametric Ultrasound-Guided Fluid Management After Kidney Transplantation
Kidney Transplantation, Delayed Graft Function
RecruitingPhase 2/3
CIRTEN-Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplant Recipients
Kidney Pancreas Transplantation
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Dd-cfDNA in Routine Patient Care in Kidney Transplant Recipients"
Renal Transplantation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Microbiota Changes Related to Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation
End-stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Kidney Transplantation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Matthew L Levine, MD principal investigator
University of Pennsylvania
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Insufficient amount of T Cell collection). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Absolute Treg number Cells (time frame: 5 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Sep 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 5 Nov 2026.