Diabetes MellitusNCT02732886
Betafoam Diabetes Mellitus Foot Study
A study testing Medifoam® and Betafoam® in people with Diabetes Mellitus and Foot Ulcer, run by Mundipharma Korea Ltd at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
This study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Medifoam® and Betafoam®, which is a new dressing that contains povidone-iodine, in patients with diabetes foot ulcer. 70 patients (35 each arm) are targeted to be enrolled in this study. Treatment follow periods are 8weeks. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Foot Ulcer
- What is being tested?
- Medifoam® and Betafoam®
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 71 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 29 Mar 2016to 29 Sep 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult of age ≥19 years at the time of informed consent
- Foot ulcers related to diabetes mellitus:
- Present
- Type I or II diabetes mellitus with HbA1c <10%, or serum creatinine ≤ 200 μmol/l
- Wagner grade I-II (Partial- or full- thickness and not involving bone, tendon, or capsule (probing to tendon or capsule)
- Post -debridement ulcer bed size ≥ 1*1cm2
Show all 9Show fewer
- No clinical signs of infection \& necrosis
- Site at anywhere below ankle
- No vascular abnormalities of the foot by palpation (i.e. the dorsalis pedis should be examined by the physician and characterized as present or absent)
Who cannot join
- Pregnant \& lactating females
- Known allergy to the dressing product including povidone iodine
- Known hyperthyroidism or other acute thyroid diseases
- Subject with clinical infection who should be administered antibiotics continuously after enrolment
- Subject has any condition(s) that seriously compromises the patient's ability to complete this study.
- Subject has participated in interventional study utilizing an investigational drug within the previous 30 days
Show all 9Show fewer
- Subjects with known immune-suppressed state; who undergo chemotherapy or with end-stage renal disease requiring haemodialysis or had kidney transplant surgery previously and with immunosuppressant specifically
- Subjects requiring skin grafting per physician's discretion
- Vulnerable subjects as defined by Good Clinical Practice guidelines.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Pilot Study to Compare Efficacy of Medifoam® and Betafoam® as a New Dressing Including Povidone-iodine, in Patients With Diabetes Foot Ulcer
This study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Medifoam® and Betafoam®, which is a new dressing that contains povidone-iodine, in patients with diabetes foot ulcer. 70 patients (35 each arm) are targeted to be enrolled in this study. Treatment follow periods are 8weeks.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Foot Ulcer
- Being tested
- Medifoam®, Betafoam®
- Keywords
- foam dressing
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Foot Ulcer
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Medifoam®Device
Also called Medifoam
Foam Dressing
Betafoam®Device
Also called Betafoam
Foam dressing including Betadine iodine
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Betafoam® | Experimental | Brand name: Betafoam® Generic term: Wound dressing with 3% povidone iodine Receives: Device: Betafoam® |
| Medifoam® | Active comparator | Brand name: Medifoam® Generic term: Wound dressing Receives: Device: Medifoam® |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of subjects with a target ulcer which achieves complete wound closure in 8 weeks
Skin re-epithelialization without drainage or dressing requirements
Measured: 8 weeks
Secondary outcomes (7)
Proportion of subjects with a target ulcer which achieves complete wound closure in 4 weeks
Skin re-epithelialization without drainage or dressing requirements
Measured: 4 weeks
Wound infection rate until completion of skin re-epithelialization
Wound infection rate until the completion of skin re-epithelialization in each subject by recording the signs and symptoms of infection at every visit
Measured: 8 weeks
Patient's level of satisfaction with treatment measured weekly using numeric rating scale (NRS)
Level of patient's satisfaction with the application and removal of dressing, as measured using numeric rating scale (NRS). This is done weekly from Visits 3 to 17.
Measured: 8 weeks
Number of days till completion of wound healing from baseline
Measured: 8 weeks
Total number of the dressing change and mean number of dressing change per day compared to wound healing period
Measured: 8 weeks
Safety as determined through collection of adverse events
Measured: 8 weeks
Change amount and change rate of the target ulcer size after using the investigational device
The area of the target ulcer is calculated with a film drawn to the shape of the wound at the target ulcer, by using the Visitrak digital planimetry.
Measured: 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Study start29 Mar 2016
- Primary completion29 Sep 2017
- Study completion29 Sep 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 71 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mundipharma Korea Ltd
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hyongjin Jung, Dr. PhD., Principal investigator, Inje University Sangye Paik Hospital,
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02732886
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BTF15-KR-402
- Status last verified
- Nov 2017
- First submitted
- 15 Mar 2016
- Last updated
- 30 Nov 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Gwak HC, Han SH, Lee J, Park S, Sung KS, Kim HJ, Chun D, Lee K, Ahn JH, Kwak K, Chung HJ. Efficacy of a povidone-iodine foam dressing (Betafoam) on diabetic foot ulcer. Int Wound J. 2020 Feb;17(1):91-99. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13236. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
PubMed 31773882
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Nov 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Pilot Study to Compare Efficacy of Medifoam® and Betafoam® as a New Dressing Including Povidone-iodine, in Patients With Diabetes Foot Ulcer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02732886
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BTF15-KR-402
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Foot Ulcer
- Keywords
- foam dressing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 71 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mundipharma Korea LtdIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 29 Mar 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Sep 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Medifoam® and Betafoam®, which is a new dressing that contains povidone-iodine, in patients with diabetes foot ulcer. 70 patients (35 each arm) are targeted to be enrolled in this study. Treatment follow periods are 8weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Betafoam® | Experimental | Device: Betafoam®Brand name: Betafoam® Generic term: Wound dressing with 3% povidone iodine |
| Medifoam® | Active comparator | Device: Medifoam®Brand name: Medifoam® Generic term: Wound dressing |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Adult of age ≥19 years at the time of informed consent
- Foot ulcers related to diabetes mellitus:
- No clinical signs of infection \& necrosis
- Site at anywhere below ankle
- No vascular abnormalities of the foot by palpation (i.e. the dorsalis pedis should be examined by the physician and characterized as present or absent)
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Pregnant \& lactating females
- Known allergy to the dressing product including povidone iodine
- Known hyperthyroidism or other acute thyroid diseases
- Subject with clinical infection who should be administered antibiotics continuously after enrolment
- Subject has any condition(s) that seriously compromises the patient's ability to complete this study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Medifoam®Also: MedifoamFoam Dressing | Device | Medifoam® |
| Betafoam®Also: BetafoamFoam dressing including Betadine iodine | Device | Betafoam® |
Primary outcome
Proportion of subjects with a target ulcer which achieves complete wound closure in 8 weeks
Time frame: 8 weeks
Skin re-epithelialization without drainage or dressing requirements
7 secondary outcomes
Proportion of subjects with a target ulcer which achieves complete wound closure in 4 weeks
Time frame: 4 weeks
Wound infection rate until completion of skin re-epithelialization
Time frame: 8 weeks
Patient's level of satisfaction with treatment measured weekly using numeric rating scale (NRS)
Time frame: 8 weeks
Number of days till completion of wound healing from baseline
Time frame: 8 weeks
Total number of the dressing change and mean number of dressing change per day compared to wound healing period
Time frame: 8 weeks
Safety as determined through collection of adverse events
Time frame: 8 weeks
Change amount and change rate of the target ulcer size after using the investigational device
Time frame: 8 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Nov 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31773882Gwak HC, Han SH, Lee J, Park S, Sung KS, Kim HJ, Chun D, Lee K, Ahn JH, Kwak K, Chung HJ. Efficacy of a povidone-iodine foam dressing (Betafoam) on diabetic foot ulcer. Int Wound J. 2020 Feb;17(1):91-99. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13236. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hyongjin Jung, Dr. PhD. principal investigator
Inje University Sangye Paik Hospital,
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Medifoam® and Betafoam® in people with Diabetes Mellitus and Foot Ulcer, run by Mundipharma Korea Ltd at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of subjects with a target ulcer which achieves complete wound closure in 8 weeks (time frame: 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02732886, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Nov 2017.