Multiple MyelomaMELODYNCT02732925
To Compare Conservative Management Vs. Balloon Kyphoplasty in the Treatment of VCFs in Patients With Multiple Myeloma
A study testing Arm 2 Balloon Kyphoplasty and Conservative Management in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether surgical treatment, balloon kyphoplasty is more effective compared to conservative treatment alone (sham procedure) when assessing clinical, translational, radiological \& patient outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Myeloma
- What is being tested?
- Arm 2 Balloon Kyphoplasty and Conservative Management
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 2 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 9 Jun 2017to 28 Mar 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 and ≤80 years old
- Diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma
- Confirmed acute (MRI, a detectable low signal T1 ± oedema) painful vertebral compression fracture(s) VAS score is ≥6
- The patient is able to read and understand the Patient Information Sheet and study procedures
- The patient is able and willing to give written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Contraindications to anaesthesia
- Cord Compression or large epidural mass necessitating conservative management before balloon kyphoplasty
- Pain unrelated to vertebral collapse
- Infection at the site
- Presence of overt instability as judged by the principle investigator
- Known pregnancy at time of screening
Show all 9Show fewer
- Severe Cardiopulmonary insufficiency
- Osteoblastic lesions
- Any co-morbidity, (e.g., diabetes, heart condition, obesity, psychiatric illness) which, in the opinion of the investigator, is of a severe enough nature to; interfere with the patient's ability to complete the study assessments; or present an unacceptable risk to the patient's safety to undergo study treatment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Royal National Orthopaedic NHS Trust, Brockley Hill
Stanmore, UK, HA7 4LP
About this study
Official title: Multiple Myeloma Spinal Disease Study; A Multi-centre, Prospective, Single Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Study to Compare Conservative Management Alone Vs. Balloon Kyphoplasty With the Treatment of VCFs in Patients With Multiple Myeloma
The purpose of this study is to determine whether surgical treatment, balloon kyphoplasty is more effective compared to conservative treatment alone (sham procedure) when assessing clinical, translational, radiological \& patient outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma.
Subjects will be recruited to the study if they have VAS score ≥ 6 and has given informed consent to participate in the Melody Study will be randomised to Arm 1 Sham Procedure and Conservative treatment or Arm 2 Balloon Kyphoplasty and Conservative treatment. Subjects recruited to Arm 1 (Sham Procedure and Conservative treatment) can cross over into Arm 2 (Balloon Kyphoplasty and Conservative Treatment) if they have a VAS score ≥ 6 between 8-12 weeks.
Read the detailed description
Multiple myeloma (MM) accounts for 10% of the malignant haematological diseases and approximately 1% of all cancer-related deaths in Western countries. MM is characterised by the accumulation of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow leading to impaired haematopoiesis and the highest incidence of bone involvement among the malignant diseases. MM bone disease is the result of increased destruction of bone that cannot be compensated for by new bone formation. Approximately 80% of patients with MM develop skeletal complications including bone pain, hypercalcemia, osteoporosis, osteolytic lesions and pathologic fractures. Vertebral fractures may be associated with spinal cord compression and neurological complications requiring surgery and/or radiotherapy. Osteolytic bone destruction is the most debilitating manifestation of MM, has a severe impact on patients' quality of life and is responsible for increased morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, bone resorption activity has been shown to be an independent risk factor for overall survival in patients with symptomatic MM. Moreover, myeloma-associated lytic bone lesions do not repair, even in patients who are disease free for years.
More than 50% of patients develop vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) either by the time of diagnosis or during the course of the diagnosed disease. These fractures can compromise the spinal cord and patients' height and stature, cause angulation of the spine, increasing sternum pressure, eventually resulting in sternal fractures and compromising the pulmonary capacity. 9% loss in predicted forced vital capacity is associated with each vertebral fracture. Deformity, Insomnia, depression, substantial physical, functional and psychological impairment and ultimately disability can be the result of severe vertebral compression fractures poorly managed at presentation.
Management of spinal MM bone disease
- Bisphosphonates he use of bisphosphonates, which inhibit bone reabsorption, for the treatment of MM bone disease has led to an improvement in the quality of life for patients with MM.
- Conservative (non-surgical) management (this is standard of care management for patients with multiple myeloma)
- Pain relief
- Systemic chemotherapy for Myeloma disease
- Bed rest
- Radiotherapy
- Physiotherapy
- Standard surgical procedures
- Open surgical decompression Anterior or posterior decompression and stabilisation through internal fixation hardware and bone grafting (in <0.5% with gross spinal deformity or neurologic impairment). Higher morbidity and mortality in MM patients because of comorbid conditions related to age, disease associated end-organ damage and immunosuppression B. Minimally invasive - Cement Augmentation
- Percutaneous Vertebroplasty
- Percutaneous Kyphoplasty (i.e. Balloon Kyphoplasty)
COST BURDEN, HEALTH ECONOMIC IMPACT AND COST UTILITY ANALYSIS There is little evidence on differences across health systems in choice and outcome of multiple myeloma being treated with conservative treatment, chemotherapy and spinal surgery are three of many treatment options for managing multiple myeloma. The true cost associated with current therapies in addition to supportive care, is significant and poses a tremendous financial burden to both patient and health care providers.
There is therefore a need to begin to systematically optimise the guidance for treatment for this subgroup of patients especially when comparing the two treatment arms in this study, conservative treatment alone versus surgical treatment, balloon kyphoplasty.
This study will determine the cost burden, health economic impact and cost utility analysis by combining the quality of life measurements, the cost analysis will allow a calculation of the relative cost-effectiveness of conservative treatment standard of care versus standard of care plus balloon kyphoplasty.17
RATIONALE FOR CURRENT STUDY
Osteolytic lesions of vertebral bodies are frequent problems in multiple myeloma patients predisposing to severe pain, vertebral fractures and consequent neurological complications.Open surgical procedures to stabilise or correct deformed vertebral bodies are associated with major complications in this group of immunocompromised patients. In addition, open procedures are often not possible, due to a severely impaired strength of the bone tissue, which does not allow the safe application of screws and plates. As a result the standard management to reduce the local pain secondary to vertebral compression fracture has for many years been with pain relief, radiotherapy and the other elements of conservative management listed above. The development of minimally invasive procedures such as kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty has been demonstrated to be an additional effective treatment option to improve mobility and quality of life and to reduce pain.
Percutaneous vertebroplasty involves the injection of acrylic bone cement into the vertebral body in order to relieve pain and/or stabilise the fractured vertebrae and in some cases, restore vertebral height.
Percutaneous Kyphoplasty (or Balloon Kyphoplasty) is performed by inserting a balloon-like device (inflatable bone tamp) through a channel created by a hand drill in the fractured vertebrae. The tamp is positioned and inserted into the vertebral body. The balloon is then inflated slowly until normal height of the vertebral body is restored or the balloon reaches its maximum volume. The procedure is intended to restore vertebral height and correct kyphosis. It may also help to improve pulmonary and gastrointestinal function and reduce the likelihood of subsequent vertebral compression fractures. The inflation of the balloon tamp creates a cavity in the vertebral body so that when the bone tamp is withdrawn, bone cement can be injected into the cavity at a lower pressure, potentially reducing the risk of cement leakage. The cement increases the strength of the vertebra and is intended to provide pain relief.
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Being tested
- Arm 2 Balloon Kyphoplasty, Conservative Management
- Keywords
- Vertebral Compression Fracture, Balloon Kyphoplasty, Conservative treatment, Sham procedure, VCFs, Multiple Myeloma
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Myeloma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Arm 2 Balloon KyphoplastyDevice
Arm 2 Balloon Kyphoplasty (Medtronic LCC) and Conservative Treatment
Subjects will be blinded and randomised to Arm 2 and will undergo a general anaesthetic and undergo a balloon kyphoplasty surgical procedure. They will also be treated with conservative management.
Below is a list of the conservative management they will be managed by their Doctor:
- Bisphosphonates
- Pain relief
- Systemic chemotherapy for Myeloma disease
- Bed rest
- Radiotherapy
- Physiotherapy
Conservative ManagementProcedure or surgery
Patients recruited to Arm 1 and Arm 2 will undergo conservative management for Multiple Myeloma recommended by their Consultant Hematologist.
- Concomitant treatment with bisphosphonates
- Pain relief as required
- Systemic chemotherapy for Myeloma disease
- Bed rest
- Radiotherapy
- Physiotherapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 - Sham Procedure | Sham comparator | Sham Procedure \& Conservative Treatment
Subjects will be blinded and randomised to Arm 1 and will undergo a general anaesthetic and undergo a sham procedure. They will also be treated under conservative management alone.
Below is a list of the conservative management they will be managed by their Doctor:
1. Bisphosphonates
2. Pain relief
3. Systemic chemotherapy for Myeloma disease
4. Bed rest
5. Radiotherapy
6. Physiotherapy
This is a non interventional as conservative treatment (standard of care for multiple myeloma patients) is used. Receives: Procedure: Conservative Management |
| Arm 2 - Balloon Kyphoplasty | Active comparator | Balloon Kyphoplasty \& Conservative Treatment - Interventional Arm
Subjects will be blinded and randomised to Arm 2 (balloon kyphoplasty) and will undergo a general anaesthetic and undergo a balloon kyphoplasty surgical procedure. They will also be treated with conservative management.
Below is a list of the conservative management they will be managed by their Doctor:
1. Bisphosphonates
2. Pain relief
3. Systemic chemotherapy for Myeloma disease
4. Bed rest
5. Radiotherapy
6. Physiotherapy
This is a interventional arm (balloon kyphoplasty procedure) and the patient will receive conservative treatment (standard of multiple myeloma patients) is used. Receives: Device: Arm 2 Balloon Kyphoplasty; Procedure: Conservative Management |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the effect of sham procedure & conservative management alone (arm 1) versus balloon kyphoplasty (arm 2) on patient reported pain scores as assessed by VAS (at week 4)
Measured: At week 4
Secondary outcomes (5)
the effect of conservative management alone versus balloon kyphoplasty on patient reported pain scores as assessed by VAS (at weeks 1, 8, 12, 16, 26, year 1 and year 2)
Measured: At week 1, 8, 12, 26, year 1 and year 2
the pain relief requirements of conservative management alone versus balloon kyphoplasty using a daily pain diary (capturing usage of pain relief by type)
Measured: At week 1, 8, 12, 26, year 1 and year 2
the effect of conservative management alone versus balloon kyphoplasty on patient reported Quality Of Life outcomes
Measured: At week 1, 8, 12, 26, year 1 and year 2
procedure related complications of conservative management alone versus balloon kyphoplasty
recording of any adverse events
Measured: At week 1, 8, 12, 26, year 1 and year 2
the cost utility of the conservative management alone versus the balloon kyphoplasty
Data collected for all intervention groups from the study will be assessed to compare the overall cost of care for conservative management vs. kyphoplasty
Measured: at 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Study start9 Jun 2017
- Primary completion28 Mar 2018
- Study completion28 Mar 2018
Why it stopped: Difficulties with recruitment due to change in referral rates.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Multiple MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 2 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Iva Hauptmannova, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust
- Investigators
- Chara Kyriakou, MD PhD, Principal investigator, RNOHSean Molloy, FRCS MSc, Principal investigator, RNOH
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02732925
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RNOH - Melody Study
- Acronym
- MELODY
- Status last verified
- Apr 2018
- First submitted
- 3 Nov 2014
- Last updated
- 6 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multiple Myeloma Spinal Disease Study; A Multi-centre, Prospective, Single Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Study to Compare Conservative Management Alone Vs. Balloon Kyphoplasty With the Treatment of VCFs in Patients With Multiple Myeloma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02732925
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MELODY / RNOH - Melody Study
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Keywords
- Vertebral Compression Fracture, Balloon Kyphoplasty, Conservative treatment, Sham procedure, VCFs, Multiple Myeloma
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Difficulties with recruitment due to change in referral rates.
- Enrolment
- 2 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 9 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Mar 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether surgical treatment, balloon kyphoplasty is more effective compared to conservative treatment alone (sham procedure) when assessing clinical, translational, radiological \& patient outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma.
Subjects will be recruited to the study if they have VAS score ≥ 6 and has given informed consent to participate in the Melody Study will be randomised to Arm 1 Sham Procedure and Conservative treatment or Arm 2 Balloon Kyphoplasty and Conservative treatment. Subjects recruited to Arm 1 (Sham Procedure and Conservative treatment) can cross over into Arm 2 (Balloon Kyphoplasty and Conservative Treatment) if they have a VAS score ≥ 6 between 8-12 weeks.
Detailed description
Multiple myeloma (MM) accounts for 10% of the malignant haematological diseases and approximately 1% of all cancer-related deaths in Western countries. MM is characterised by the accumulation of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow leading to impaired haematopoiesis and the highest incidence of bone involvement among the malignant diseases. MM bone disease is the result of increased destruction of bone that cannot be compensated for by new bone formation. Approximately 80% of patients with MM develop skeletal complications including bone pain, hypercalcemia, osteoporosis, osteolytic lesions and pathologic fractures. Vertebral fractures may be associated with spinal cord compression and neurological complications requiring surgery and/or radiotherapy. Osteolytic bone destruction is the most debilitating manifestation of MM, has a severe impact on patients' quality of life and is responsible for increased morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, bone resorption activity has been shown to be an independent risk factor for overall survival in patients with symptomatic MM. Moreover, myeloma-associated lytic bone lesions do not repair, even in patients who are disease free for years.
More than 50% of patients develop vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) either by the time of diagnosis or during the course of the diagnosed disease. These fractures can compromise the spinal cord and patients' height and stature, cause angulation of the spine, increasing sternum pressure, eventually resulting in sternal fractures and compromising the pulmonary capacity. 9% loss in predicted forced vital capacity is associated with each vertebral fracture. Deformity, Insomnia, depression, substantial physical, functional and psychological impairment and ultimately disability can be the result of severe vertebral compression fractures poorly managed at presentation.
Management of spinal MM bone disease
- Bisphosphonates he use of bisphosphonates, which inhibit bone reabsorption, for the treatment of MM bone disease has led to an improvement in the quality of life for patients with MM.
- Conservative (non-surgical) management (this is standard of care management for patients with multiple myeloma)
- Pain relief
- Systemic chemotherapy for Myeloma disease
- Bed rest
- Radiotherapy
- Physiotherapy
- Standard surgical procedures
- Open surgical decompression Anterior or posterior decompression and stabilisation through internal fixation hardware and bone grafting (in <0.5% with gross spinal deformity or neurologic impairment). Higher morbidity and mortality in MM patients because of comorbid conditions related to age, disease associated end-organ damage and immunosuppression B. Minimally invasive - Cement Augmentation
- Percutaneous Vertebroplasty
- Percutaneous Kyphoplasty (i.e. Balloon Kyphoplasty)
COST BURDEN, HEALTH ECONOMIC IMPACT AND COST UTILITY ANALYSIS There is little evidence on differences across health systems in choice and outcome of multiple myeloma being treated with conservative treatment, chemotherapy and spinal surgery are three of many treatment options for managing multiple myeloma. The true cost associated with current therapies in addition to supportive care, is significant and poses a tremendous financial burden to both patient and health care providers.
There is therefore a need to begin to systematically optimise the guidance for treatment for this subgroup of patients especially when comparing the two treatment arms in this study, conservative treatment alone versus surgical treatment, balloon kyphoplasty.
This study will determine the cost burden, health economic impact and cost utility analysis by combining the quality of life measurements, the cost analysis will allow a calculation of the relative cost-effectiveness of conservative treatment standard of care versus standard of care plus balloon kyphoplasty.17
RATIONALE FOR CURRENT STUDY
Osteolytic lesions of vertebral bodies are frequent problems in multiple myeloma patients predisposing to severe pain, vertebral fractures and consequent neurological complications.Open surgical procedures to stabilise or correct deformed vertebral bodies are associated with major complications in this group of immunocompromised patients. In addition, open procedures are often not possible, due to a severely impaired strength of the bone tissue, which does not allow the safe application of screws and plates. As a result the standard management to reduce the local pain secondary to vertebral compression fracture has for many years been with pain relief, radiotherapy and the other elements of conservative management listed above. The development of minimally invasive procedures such as kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty has been demonstrated to be an additional effective treatment option to improve mobility and quality of life and to reduce pain.
Percutaneous vertebroplasty involves the injection of acrylic bone cement into the vertebral body in order to relieve pain and/or stabilise the fractured vertebrae and in some cases, restore vertebral height.
Percutaneous Kyphoplasty (or Balloon Kyphoplasty) is performed by inserting a balloon-like device (inflatable bone tamp) through a channel created by a hand drill in the fractured vertebrae. The tamp is positioned and inserted into the vertebral body. The balloon is then inflated slowly until normal height of the vertebral body is restored or the balloon reaches its maximum volume. The procedure is intended to restore vertebral height and correct kyphosis. It may also help to improve pulmonary and gastrointestinal function and reduce the likelihood of subsequent vertebral compression fractures. The inflation of the balloon tamp creates a cavity in the vertebral body so that when the bone tamp is withdrawn, bone cement can be injected into the cavity at a lower pressure, potentially reducing the risk of cement leakage. The cement increases the strength of the vertebra and is intended to provide pain relief.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 - Sham Procedure | Sham comparator | Procedure: Conservative ManagementSham Procedure \& Conservative Treatment Subjects will be blinded and randomised to Arm 1 and will undergo a general anaesthetic and undergo a sham procedure. They will also be treated under conservative management alone. Below is a list of the conservative management they will be managed by their Doctor: 1. Bisphosphonates 2. Pain relief 3. Systemic chemotherapy for Myeloma disease 4. Bed rest 5. Radiotherapy 6. Physiotherapy This is a non interventional as conservative treatment (standard of care for multiple myeloma patients) is used. |
| Arm 2 - Balloon Kyphoplasty | Active comparator | Device: Arm 2 Balloon Kyphoplasty, Procedure: Conservative ManagementBalloon Kyphoplasty \& Conservative Treatment - Interventional Arm Subjects will be blinded and randomised to Arm 2 (balloon kyphoplasty) and will undergo a general anaesthetic and undergo a balloon kyphoplasty surgical procedure. They will also be treated with conservative management. Below is a list of the conservative management they will be managed by their Doctor: 1. Bisphosphonates 2. Pain relief 3. Systemic chemotherapy for Myeloma disease 4. Bed rest 5. Radiotherapy 6. Physiotherapy This is a interventional arm (balloon kyphoplasty procedure) and the patient will receive conservative treatment (standard of multiple myeloma patients) is used. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 and ≤80 years old
- Diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma
- Confirmed acute (MRI, a detectable low signal T1 ± oedema) painful vertebral compression fracture(s) VAS score is ≥6
- The patient is able to read and understand the Patient Information Sheet and study procedures
- The patient is able and willing to give written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Contraindications to anaesthesia
- Cord Compression or large epidural mass necessitating conservative management before balloon kyphoplasty
- Pain unrelated to vertebral collapse
- Infection at the site
- Presence of overt instability as judged by the principle investigator
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 2 Balloon KyphoplastyArm 2 Balloon Kyphoplasty (Medtronic LCC) and Conservative Treatment Subjects will be blinded and randomised to Arm 2 and will undergo a general anaesthetic and undergo a balloon kyphoplasty surgical procedure. They will also be treated with conservative management. Below is a list of the conservative management they will be managed by their Doctor: 1. Bisphosphonates 2. Pain relief 3. Systemic chemotherapy for Myeloma disease 4. Bed rest 5. Radiotherapy 6. Physiotherapy | Device | Arm 2 - Balloon Kyphoplasty |
| Conservative ManagementPatients recruited to Arm 1 and Arm 2 will undergo conservative management for Multiple Myeloma recommended by their Consultant Hematologist. * Concomitant treatment with bisphosphonates * Pain relief as required * Systemic chemotherapy for Myeloma disease * Bed rest * Radiotherapy * Physiotherapy | Procedure or surgery | Arm 1 - Sham Procedure, Arm 2 - Balloon Kyphoplasty |
Primary outcome
the effect of sham procedure & conservative management alone (arm 1) versus balloon kyphoplasty (arm 2) on patient reported pain scores as assessed by VAS (at week 4)
Time frame: At week 4
5 secondary outcomes
the effect of conservative management alone versus balloon kyphoplasty on patient reported pain scores as assessed by VAS (at weeks 1, 8, 12, 16, 26, year 1 and year 2)
Time frame: At week 1, 8, 12, 26, year 1 and year 2
the pain relief requirements of conservative management alone versus balloon kyphoplasty using a daily pain diary (capturing usage of pain relief by type)
Time frame: At week 1, 8, 12, 26, year 1 and year 2
the effect of conservative management alone versus balloon kyphoplasty on patient reported Quality Of Life outcomes
Time frame: At week 1, 8, 12, 26, year 1 and year 2
procedure related complications of conservative management alone versus balloon kyphoplasty
Time frame: At week 1, 8, 12, 26, year 1 and year 2
the cost utility of the conservative management alone versus the balloon kyphoplasty
Time frame: at 2 years
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Difficulties with recruitment due to change in referral rates.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Apr 2018.
Related trials for Multiple Myeloma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Study of Eque-cel in Subjects With Len-refractory RRMM (FUMANBA-03)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Window of Opportunity Trial to Learn if Linvoseltamab is Safe and Well Tolerated, and How Well it Works in Adult Participants With Recently Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Have Not Already Received Treatment
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chara Kyriakou, MD PhD principal investigator
RNOH
Sean Molloy, FRCS MSc principal investigator
RNOH
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Arm 2 Balloon Kyphoplasty and Conservative Management in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Difficulties with recruitment due to change in referral rates.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the effect of sham procedure & conservative management alone (arm 1) versus balloon kyphoplasty (arm 2) on patient reported pain scores as assessed by VAS (at week 4) (time frame: At week 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2018.