Refractory PainsPhase 3PROPOPAL2NCT02734511
Efficiency and Safety of a Procedural Sedation by Propofol on Terminally Ill Patients With Refractory Pain
A Phase 3 study testing sedation with propofol in people with Refractory Pains, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Relieving symptoms of patients hospitalized in a palliative care unit is a priority. Although they receive appropriate care, they may still experience pain refractory to analgesia or/and to conservative treatment during care procedures. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Refractory Pains
- What is being tested?
- sedation with propofol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 19 May 2017to 26 Sep 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient hospitalized in the palliative care unit
- Patient whose prognosis is three months or less life expectancy
- Patient treated with step 3 opioids
- Pain experienced during care procedures and refractory to transmucosal fentanyl and equimolar mixture of oxygen and nitrous oxide if the latter is not contraindicated
- The pain scales used are Numeric Rating Scale ≥ 3/10 for patients able to communicate and Algoplus scale > 2 for patients with inability to communicate verbally
- Indication of procedural sedation is agreed upon after collegial consultation and evaluation of the benefit risk balance (principle of double effect)
Show all 9Show fewer
- Age: 18 and above
- Patient must be registered for social security
- Consent must be signed before and by the conscious patient or by his or her trusted person or relative for patients with cognitive impairments or disturbed vigilance
Who cannot join
- contra-indication to soya
- contra-indication to egg lecithin
- Respiratory insufficiency
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Efficiency and Safety of a Procedural Sedation by Propofol Administered by Trained Doctors Who Are Not Anesthesiologists on Terminally Ill Patients With Refractory Pain Hospitalized in a Palliative Care Unit
Relieving symptoms of patients hospitalized in a palliative care unit is a priority. Although they receive appropriate care, they may still experience pain refractory to analgesia or/and to conservative treatment during care procedures. For instance, pain can be caused by the bandaging of carcinological or ischemic wounds, or by the mobilization of traumatic injuries which cannot be specifically treated.
Although these types of situations are rare, they remain unacceptable, especially at the end of life.
Read more
According to current recommendations, a short-term sedation treatment can be administered although detailed procedures for this type of sedation have not been very much documented. In reality, midalozam is often used in those cases but it has drawbacks, which is why the investigators have looked into alternatives.
Propofol, which is already widely used in anesthesia and emergency medicine to manage painful procedures, seems to be an interesting molecule because of its pharmacological properties. It allows to quickly reach deep sedation and thus obtain a certain level of comfort for the patient, but also ensures a prompt awakening as soon as care procedures are over, which limits respiratory side effects.
The results from a preliminary study encouraged us to go further and to present a prospective study conducted in multiple centers in order to evaluate the efficiency and safety of a procedural sedation administered by trained doctors who are not anesthesiologists on terminally ill patients with refractory pain hospitalized in a palliative care unit.
Read the detailed description
At the end of life, some patients may feel pain during care procedures. These painful procedures contribute to the patient's overall suffering. Of course the investigators do not take into account procedures which could be considered as futile medical care and would not bring any comfort to the patient. The procedures that the investigators do consider are necessary and acceptable: basic hygiene care, such as bandaging. Even with the best palliative care, certain pains caused by these procedures can be refractory to analgesics, to Entonox and to other conservative treatments. These pains are ethically unacceptable, especially at the end of life. In these cases, short-term procedural sedation could benefit the patient, as indicated by the Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament (French Agency for the Safety of Health Products). However, there are no documented recommendations on the way to administer these types of sedations because of a lack of scientific studies in that field. It therefore remains an important issue in palliative care research. The sedations consist of a transitory reduction of vigilance which is sufficient enough for the patient not to suffer. They are therefore a major tool to provide sufficient comfort to terminally ill patients while being used as part of a treatment approach. However, they still have drawbacks: patients lose contact with the environment but can also experience respiratory complications (embarrassment, respiratory depression, inhalation). These risks compel the investigators to only use these sedations for terminally ill patients suffering from major refractory pain at the end of life, in which case they consider that comfort is an absolute priority (principle of double effect). The decision to use sedation must be agreed upon after collegial consultation and discussion with the patient and/or his or her relatives. The risk of side effects must be reduced as far as possible without pursuing a reanimation approach which would go against a palliative approach.
Sedation, which was originally exclusively administered by anesthesiologists, has been used by palliative care doctors for many years. At first, midazolam seemed to be the best sedative agent and its use spread although it has not been much documented in that context. However, midazolam has its limits. It cannot provide a very deep sedation because of its respiratory depressant effect and the patient, when under light sedation, often experiences persistent discomfort. Moreover, midazolam requires a long titration period and often causes a sedation which can last several hours, thus reducing the patient's relational life and increasing the risk of congestion and respiratory depression. Investigators are therefore looking for alternatives. According to them, propofol would be a suitable molecule because of its pharmacological properties. Its pharmacokinetic properties allow the patient not only to quickly reach deep sedation and therefore better comfort, but also to wake up as soon as the painful care procedure is completed, thus limiting the risk of respiratory side effects.
Note that it is already used in other situations for procedural sedation by doctors who are not anesthesiologists (pulmonologists, gastroenterologists, emergency doctors).
In a feasibility study, investigators pointed out that propofol could be used in a palliative care unit for transitory sedation administered by an anesthesiologist following a strict protocol and could relieve terminally ill patients at the end of life during painful care procedures in a sufficiently safe way (preliminary results presented at the French Society of Support and Palliative Care conference in 2015).
Investigators aim at showing that a procedural sedation using propofol can be administered by palliative care doctors who are not anesthesiologists but have been trained to follow a precise protocol and that it can bring relief to terminally ill patients with refractory pain experienced during care procedures without causing major side effects.
- Conditions
- Refractory Pains
- Being tested
- sedation with propofol
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Intractable
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
sedation with propofolDrug
induction with propofol at 20mg/kg/h. Then, when the patient is sleeping, dosage is decreased to 6 mg/kg/h
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Drug: sedation with propofol | Experimental | induction with propofol at 20mg/kg/h. Then, when the patient is sleeping, dosage is decreased to 6 mg/kg/h Receives: Drug: sedation with propofol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
success rate of care without severe pain for the patient
Success is defined as the administration of care without severe pain for the patient
Measured: from the beginning of sedation to 2 hours after sedation
success rate of care without major side effects
Major side effects are defined as ''Sentinel AEs'' by the World SIVA (Society of IntraVeinous Anesthesia) International Sedation Task Force
Measured: from the beginning of sedation to 2 hours after sedation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Study start19 May 2017
- Primary completion26 Sep 2019
- Study completion26 Sep 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Refractory PainsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Flora TREMELLAT, MD, Principal investigator, Unité de Soins Palliatifs, CHU de Nice
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02734511
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 16-AOI-07
- Acronym
- PROPOPAL2
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 31 Mar 2016
- Last updated
- 4 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficiency and Safety of a Procedural Sedation by Propofol Administered by Trained Doctors Who Are Not Anesthesiologists on Terminally Ill Patients With Refractory Pain Hospitalized in a Palliative Care Unit
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02734511
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PROPOPAL2 / 16-AOI-07
- Conditions
- Refractory Pains
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 19 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Sep 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Relieving symptoms of patients hospitalized in a palliative care unit is a priority. Although they receive appropriate care, they may still experience pain refractory to analgesia or/and to conservative treatment during care procedures. For instance, pain can be caused by the bandaging of carcinological or ischemic wounds, or by the mobilization of traumatic injuries which cannot be specifically treated.
Although these types of situations are rare, they remain unacceptable, especially at the end of life.
According to current recommendations, a short-term sedation treatment can be administered although detailed procedures for this type of sedation have not been very much documented. In reality, midalozam is often used in those cases but it has drawbacks, which is why the investigators have looked into alternatives.
Propofol, which is already widely used in anesthesia and emergency medicine to manage painful procedures, seems to be an interesting molecule because of its pharmacological properties. It allows to quickly reach deep sedation and thus obtain a certain level of comfort for the patient, but also ensures a prompt awakening as soon as care procedures are over, which limits respiratory side effects.
The results from a preliminary study encouraged us to go further and to present a prospective study conducted in multiple centers in order to evaluate the efficiency and safety of a procedural sedation administered by trained doctors who are not anesthesiologists on terminally ill patients with refractory pain hospitalized in a palliative care unit.
Detailed description
At the end of life, some patients may feel pain during care procedures. These painful procedures contribute to the patient's overall suffering. Of course the investigators do not take into account procedures which could be considered as futile medical care and would not bring any comfort to the patient. The procedures that the investigators do consider are necessary and acceptable: basic hygiene care, such as bandaging. Even with the best palliative care, certain pains caused by these procedures can be refractory to analgesics, to Entonox and to other conservative treatments. These pains are ethically unacceptable, especially at the end of life. In these cases, short-term procedural sedation could benefit the patient, as indicated by the Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament (French Agency for the Safety of Health Products). However, there are no documented recommendations on the way to administer these types of sedations because of a lack of scientific studies in that field. It therefore remains an important issue in palliative care research. The sedations consist of a transitory reduction of vigilance which is sufficient enough for the patient not to suffer. They are therefore a major tool to provide sufficient comfort to terminally ill patients while being used as part of a treatment approach. However, they still have drawbacks: patients lose contact with the environment but can also experience respiratory complications (embarrassment, respiratory depression, inhalation). These risks compel the investigators to only use these sedations for terminally ill patients suffering from major refractory pain at the end of life, in which case they consider that comfort is an absolute priority (principle of double effect). The decision to use sedation must be agreed upon after collegial consultation and discussion with the patient and/or his or her relatives. The risk of side effects must be reduced as far as possible without pursuing a reanimation approach which would go against a palliative approach.
Sedation, which was originally exclusively administered by anesthesiologists, has been used by palliative care doctors for many years. At first, midazolam seemed to be the best sedative agent and its use spread although it has not been much documented in that context. However, midazolam has its limits. It cannot provide a very deep sedation because of its respiratory depressant effect and the patient, when under light sedation, often experiences persistent discomfort. Moreover, midazolam requires a long titration period and often causes a sedation which can last several hours, thus reducing the patient's relational life and increasing the risk of congestion and respiratory depression. Investigators are therefore looking for alternatives. According to them, propofol would be a suitable molecule because of its pharmacological properties. Its pharmacokinetic properties allow the patient not only to quickly reach deep sedation and therefore better comfort, but also to wake up as soon as the painful care procedure is completed, thus limiting the risk of respiratory side effects.
Note that it is already used in other situations for procedural sedation by doctors who are not anesthesiologists (pulmonologists, gastroenterologists, emergency doctors).
In a feasibility study, investigators pointed out that propofol could be used in a palliative care unit for transitory sedation administered by an anesthesiologist following a strict protocol and could relieve terminally ill patients at the end of life during painful care procedures in a sufficiently safe way (preliminary results presented at the French Society of Support and Palliative Care conference in 2015).
Investigators aim at showing that a procedural sedation using propofol can be administered by palliative care doctors who are not anesthesiologists but have been trained to follow a precise protocol and that it can bring relief to terminally ill patients with refractory pain experienced during care procedures without causing major side effects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Drug: sedation with propofol | Experimental | Drug: sedation with propofolinduction with propofol at 20mg/kg/h. Then, when the patient is sleeping, dosage is decreased to 6 mg/kg/h |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patient hospitalized in the palliative care unit
- Patient whose prognosis is three months or less life expectancy
- Patient treated with step 3 opioids
- Pain experienced during care procedures and refractory to transmucosal fentanyl and equimolar mixture of oxygen and nitrous oxide if the latter is not contraindicated
- The pain scales used are Numeric Rating Scale ≥ 3/10 for patients able to communicate and Algoplus scale > 2 for patients with inability to communicate verbally
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- contra-indication to soya
- contra-indication to egg lecithin
- Respiratory insufficiency
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| sedation with propofolinduction with propofol at 20mg/kg/h. Then, when the patient is sleeping, dosage is decreased to 6 mg/kg/h | Drug | Drug: sedation with propofol |
Primary outcome
success rate of care without severe pain for the patient
Time frame: from the beginning of sedation to 2 hours after sedation
Success is defined as the administration of care without severe pain for the patient
success rate of care without major side effects
Time frame: from the beginning of sedation to 2 hours after sedation
Major side effects are defined as ''Sentinel AEs'' by the World SIVA (Society of IntraVeinous Anesthesia) International Sedation Task Force
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jun 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Refractory Pains
RecruitingObservational study
Post Market Evaluation of Real World Outcomes and Durability to Support Implantable Inceptiv™ Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy
Chronic Pain, Intractable Pain
Recruiting
Effect of TMS on Neuropathic Pain for Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury, Neuropathic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Accelerated Theta-Burst Stimulation for Refractory Central Post-Stroke Pain
Central Post-Stroke Pain, Stroke
RecruitingPhase 2
Genicular Artery Embolization for Reducing Pain in Medically Refractory Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis, Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Periganglionic Resiniferatoxin for the Treatment of Intractable Pain Due to Cancer-induced Bone Pain
Intractable Pain, Palliative Care
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Flora TREMELLAT, MD principal investigator
Unité de Soins Palliatifs, CHU de Nice
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing sedation with propofol in people with Refractory Pains, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
success rate of care without severe pain for the patient (time frame: from the beginning of sedation to 2 hours after sedation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2024.