Pressure UlcerSPA2-ARSFT-DUONCT02735135
Comparison of 2 Mattresses for the Prevention of Bedsores by Measuring Skin Pressure in the Sacral Area
A study testing AIRSOFT DUO for 1 day, SENTRY 1200 for 1 month and SENTRY 1200 for 1 day in people with Pressure Ulcer, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 3 sites in France.
Trial summary
The main objective of this study is to compare the AIRSOFT DUO and the SENTRY 1200 constant pressure mattresses in terms of peak skin pressures measured at the sacral area. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pressure Ulcer
- What is being tested?
- AIRSOFT DUO for 1 day, SENTRY 1200 for 1 month and SENTRY 1200 for 1 day
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Jan 2019to Aug 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
- The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- The patient spends more than 12 hours in bed and verticalisation is possible
- The patient has a stable medical condition (no complication in the last 10 days) and no visible pressure ulcers
- The patient is at risk for pressure ulcers as assessed by a score ≤ 15 on the Braden Scale
- The patient weighs less than 120 kg
Who cannot join
- The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
- The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
- The patient refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
- The subject has a contra-indication for a strictly supine position
- The patient has a knee flexion deformity > 10 °
Show all 9Show fewer
- The patient is in a state of agitation or refuses to cooperate
- The patient's weight is greater than 120 Kg
- The length of stay is less than one month
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
France3 sites
CH de Beziers
Béziers, 34525
Clinique de Soins de suite et réadaptation Saint Basile
Mougins, 06250
CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
Nîmes, 30029
About this study
Official title: Comparison of 2 Mattresses for the Prevention of Bedsores, AIRSOFT DUO and SENTRY 1200 A PRESSION CONSTANTE, by Measuring Skin Pressure in the Sacral Area - a Multicenter Crossover Study
The main objective of this study is to compare the AIRSOFT DUO and the SENTRY 1200 constant pressure mattresses in terms of peak skin pressures measured at the sacral area.
Read the detailed description
The secondary objectives of the study are to compare the two devices in terms of:
- body contact surface area. B. peak pressure at the heel area (combining right and left heels) C. occurrence of pressure ulcers anywhere on the body for 1 month D. patient comfort rated at 1 month (visual analog scale varying from 0-10) E. noise (Likert Scale). F. sleep quality (visual analog scale varying from 0-10).
- Conditions
- Pressure Ulcer
- Being tested
- AIRSOFT DUO for 1 day, SENTRY 1200 for 1 month, SENTRY 1200 for 1 day, AIRSOFT DUO for 1 month
- Keywords
- bedridden
- Medical subject headings
- Pressure Ulcer
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AIRSOFT DUO for 1 dayDevice
The patient is placed on an AIRSOFT DUO mattress for 1 day.
SENTRY 1200 for 1 monthDevice
The patient is placed on a SENTRY 1200 mattress for 1 month.
SENTRY 1200 for 1 dayDevice
The patient is placed on a SENTRY 1200 mattress for 1 day.
AIRSOFT DUO for 1 monthDevice
The patient is placed on an AIRSOFT DUO mattress for 1 month.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Airsoft Duo First | Experimental | Patients randomized to this arm will be placed on an AIRSOFT DUO mattress for day 0. They will then be switched to a SENTRY 1200 mattress until the end of month 1.
Intervention: AIRSOFT DUO for 1 day Intervention: SENTRY 1200 for 1 month Receives: Device: AIRSOFT DUO for 1 day; Device: SENTRY 1200 for 1 month |
| SENTRY 1200 First | Experimental | Patients randomized to this arm will be placed on a SENTRY 1200 mattress for day 0. They will then be switched to an AIRSOFT DUO mattress until the end of month 1.
Intervention: SENTRY 1200 for 1 day Intervention: AIRSOFT DUO for 1 month Receives: Device: SENTRY 1200 for 1 day; Device: AIRSOFT DUO for 1 month |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Peak interface pressures at the sacral area (mmHg)
Measured: Day 0
Peak interface pressures at the sacral area (mmHg)
Measured: Day 1
Secondary outcomes (8)
Body contact surface area (cm^2)
Measured: Day 0
Body contact surface area (cm^2)
Measured: Day 1
Peak pressure at the heel area (mmHg)
Measured: Day 0
Peak pressure at the heel area (mmHg)
Measured: Day 1
Pressure ulcer development (yes/no)
Measured: Month 1
Self-assessment of comfort by the patient (visual analog scale)
Measured: Month 1
Self-assessment for noise (Likert scale)
Measured: Month 1
Self-assessment of sleep quality (visual analog scale)
Measured: Month 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completionJul 2019 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2019 (estimated)
Why it stopped: methodological difficulties
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pressure UlcerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Annie Bauer Confort
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Emilie Viollet, MD, Study director, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02735135
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LOCAL/2016/CEDMH-01
- Other IDs
- 2016-A00188-43
- Acronym
- SPA2-ARSFT-DUO
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 7 Apr 2016
- Last updated
- 25 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of 2 Mattresses for the Prevention of Bedsores, AIRSOFT DUO and SENTRY 1200 A PRESSION CONSTANTE, by Measuring Skin Pressure in the Sacral Area - a Multicenter Crossover Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02735135
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SPA2-ARSFT-DUO / LOCAL/2016/CEDMH-01
- Conditions
- Pressure Ulcer
- Keywords
- bedridden
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: methodological difficulties
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Annie Bauer Confort
- Study start
- Jan 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main objective of this study is to compare the AIRSOFT DUO and the SENTRY 1200 constant pressure mattresses in terms of peak skin pressures measured at the sacral area.
Detailed description
The secondary objectives of the study are to compare the two devices in terms of:
- body contact surface area. B. peak pressure at the heel area (combining right and left heels) C. occurrence of pressure ulcers anywhere on the body for 1 month D. patient comfort rated at 1 month (visual analog scale varying from 0-10) E. noise (Likert Scale). F. sleep quality (visual analog scale varying from 0-10).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Airsoft Duo First | Experimental | Device: AIRSOFT DUO for 1 day, Device: SENTRY 1200 for 1 monthPatients randomized to this arm will be placed on an AIRSOFT DUO mattress for day 0. They will then be switched to a SENTRY 1200 mattress until the end of month 1. Intervention: AIRSOFT DUO for 1 day Intervention: SENTRY 1200 for 1 month |
| SENTRY 1200 First | Experimental | Device: SENTRY 1200 for 1 day, Device: AIRSOFT DUO for 1 monthPatients randomized to this arm will be placed on a SENTRY 1200 mattress for day 0. They will then be switched to an AIRSOFT DUO mattress until the end of month 1. Intervention: SENTRY 1200 for 1 day Intervention: AIRSOFT DUO for 1 month |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
- The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- The patient spends more than 12 hours in bed and verticalisation is possible
- The patient has a stable medical condition (no complication in the last 10 days) and no visible pressure ulcers
- The patient is at risk for pressure ulcers as assessed by a score ≤ 15 on the Braden Scale
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
- The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
- The patient refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
- The subject has a contra-indication for a strictly supine position
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AIRSOFT DUO for 1 dayThe patient is placed on an AIRSOFT DUO mattress for 1 day. | Device | Airsoft Duo First |
| SENTRY 1200 for 1 monthThe patient is placed on a SENTRY 1200 mattress for 1 month. | Device | Airsoft Duo First |
| SENTRY 1200 for 1 dayThe patient is placed on a SENTRY 1200 mattress for 1 day. | Device | SENTRY 1200 First |
| AIRSOFT DUO for 1 monthThe patient is placed on an AIRSOFT DUO mattress for 1 month. | Device | SENTRY 1200 First |
Primary outcome
Peak interface pressures at the sacral area (mmHg)
Time frame: Day 0
Peak interface pressures at the sacral area (mmHg)
Time frame: Day 1
8 secondary outcomes
Body contact surface area (cm^2)
Time frame: Day 0
Body contact surface area (cm^2)
Time frame: Day 1
Peak pressure at the heel area (mmHg)
Time frame: Day 0
Peak pressure at the heel area (mmHg)
Time frame: Day 1
Pressure ulcer development (yes/no)
Time frame: Month 1
Self-assessment of comfort by the patient (visual analog scale)
Time frame: Month 1
Self-assessment for noise (Likert scale)
Time frame: Month 1
Self-assessment of sleep quality (visual analog scale)
Time frame: Month 1
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Apr 2019.
Related trials for Pressure Ulcer
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of ZKARE® Gel and Its Accessory ZKAPI® in the Treatment of Chronic Ulcers.
Chronic Ulcers
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Hypertrophic Scar Prosthetic Pressure in Burn Amputee
Amputation Stump, Burn Injury
RecruitingPhase 4
Clinical Trial Evaluating a Single Layer Amniotic Membrane and Standard of Care in the Management of Nonhealing Pressure Ulcers
Pressure Ulcer, Ulcer, Pressure
Recruiting
Physical Therapy Wound Care Modalities in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
Spinal Cord Injuries, Pressure Injuries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Emilie Viollet, MD study director
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing AIRSOFT DUO for 1 day, SENTRY 1200 for 1 month and SENTRY 1200 for 1 day in people with Pressure Ulcer, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 3 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Peak interface pressures at the sacral area (mmHg) (time frame: Day 0). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Apr 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.