AzTrials
AzTrials

Diffuse Apneic OxygenationENDAONCT02737917

EmergeNcy Department Apneic Oxygenation Versus Usual Care During Rapid Sequence Intubation

A study testing Oxygen in people with Diffuse Apneic Oxygenation, run by New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To determine the impact, if any the application of oxygen during the apnea period of rapid sequence intubation has on patients being intubated in the emergency department. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Diffuse Apneic Oxygenation
What is being tested?
Oxygen
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
206 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2016to Dec 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Any patient greater than 18 years of age that presents to the Lincoln medical and Mental Health Center Emergency Department requiring endotracheal intubation.

Who cannot join

  • Patients will be excluded from the primary outcome analysis, but included in the intention to treat analysis for the secondary outcome if they are not pre-oxygenated to the standard RSI protocol of 3 minutes with 100% fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) by means of bag valve mask, HFNC and/or non-rebreather; patients will be excluded from the study in general if they are in cardiac or traumatic arrest or they are intubated without an apneic period (awake intubation)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Lincoln Medical Center

    The Bronx, New York, 10451

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: EmergeNcy Department Apneic Oxygenation Versus Usual Care During Rapid Sequence Intubation : A Randomized Controlled Trial (The ENDAO Trial)

To determine the impact, if any the application of oxygen during the apnea period of rapid sequence intubation has on patients being intubated in the emergency department.

Read the detailed description

Hypoxia may occur during rapid sequence intubation (RSI) of emergency department patients (1-4). This condition may increase the risk of the patient suffering a cardiac arrest secondary to securing the airway. A part of RSI is pre-oxygenation, which is defined as placing the patient on 100% fraction of inspired O2 for 3 minutes prior to administering the induction agents (i.e. sedative and neuromuscular blocker) in order to increase the amount of oxygen present in the functional residual capacity of the patients lungs to prolong oxygen saturating during the apneic period of endotracheal intubation (5-9). In the last decade, physicians have developed a process known as diffuse apneic oxygenation (DAO) in order to mitigate the risk of oxygen desaturation during this apneic period. The process entails leaving the patient on high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen during the act of visualizing the vocal cords and placing the endotracheal tube. Over the years the practice has started to become more common in emergency departments, operating rooms and ICU's all over the world. Recently, a randomized controlled trial (called The FELLOW Trial) of this practice demonstrated no difference in desaturation rates between those patients that received DAO and those that did not (usual practice) in patients in the ICU (10). Some have commented that the findings of this study cannot be applied to emergency department patients, and so evidence is lacking in regards to this population.

Purpose of the study:

Although studies have started to investigate the efficacy of DAO in preventing desaturation during RSI, evidence is still lacking in the emergency department patient population. The primary question being asked is: does diffuse apneic oxygenation increase the average lowest arterial oxygen saturation during rapid sequence intubation when compared to usual care? Secondary question being asked is: does diffuse apneic oxygenation decrease the incidence of desaturation in general, as well as hypoxemia and severe hypoxemia? The third question being asked is: does diffuse apneic oxygenation increase the time to desaturation?

Being tested
Oxygen, Standard of care

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OxygenOther

    15 L of oxygen will be delivered to the patient by nasal cannula during the apnea period of rapid sequence intubation.

  • Standard of careOther

    Rapid sequence intubation

Study groups in NCT02737917
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Diffuse apneic oxygenationExperimentalThis group of patients will receive the standard of care treatment of rapid sequence intubation (pre-oxygenation, induction and intubation) plus the application of oxygen.
Receives: Other: Oxygen; Other: Standard of care
Usual careOtherThis group of patients will receive the standard of care treatment of rapid sequence intubation (pre-oxygenation, induction and intubation)
Receives: Other: Standard of care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean (Average) Arterial Oxygen Saturation

    the average oxygen saturation as measured by peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2)

    Measured: within 2 minutes of confirmation of endotracheal tube placement

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Rates of Desaturation

    number of patients per group that desaturated to less than 90% and less than 80%

    Measured: within 2 minutes of confirmation of endotracheal tube placement

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Apr 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2016
  3. Primary completionDec 2016
  4. Study completionDec 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
206 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02737917
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB #16-003
Acronym
ENDAO
Status last verified
Mar 2019
First submitted
5 Apr 2016
Last updated
19 Mar 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: No plan to make individual participant data available

Publications

  • Jaber S, Amraoui J, Lefrant JY, Arich C, Cohendy R, Landreau L, Calvet Y, Capdevila X, Mahamat A, Eledjam JJ. Clinical practice and risk factors for immediate complications of endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a prospective, multiple-center study. Crit Care Med. 2006 Sep;34(9):2355-61. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000233879.58720.87.

    PubMed 16850003
  • Griesdale DE, Bosma TL, Kurth T, Isac G, Chittock DR. Complications of endotracheal intubation in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Oct;34(10):1835-42. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1205-6. Epub 2008 Jul 5.

    PubMed 18604519
  • Simpson GD, Ross MJ, McKeown DW, Ray DC. Tracheal intubation in the critically ill: a multi-centre national study of practice and complications. Br J Anaesth. 2012 May;108(5):792-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer504. Epub 2012 Feb 6.

    PubMed 22315326
  • De Jong A, Molinari N, Terzi N, Mongardon N, Arnal JM, Guitton C, Allaouchiche B, Paugam-Burtz C, Constantin JM, Lefrant JY, Leone M, Papazian L, Asehnoune K, Maziers N, Azoulay E, Pradel G, Jung B, Jaber S; AzuRea Network for the Frida-Rea Study Group. Early identification of patients at risk for difficult intubation in the intensive care unit: development and validation of the MACOCHA score in a multicenter cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Apr 15;187(8):832-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201210-1851OC.

    PubMed 23348979
  • Baillard C, Fosse JP, Sebbane M, Chanques G, Vincent F, Courouble P, Cohen Y, Eledjam JJ, Adnet F, Jaber S. Noninvasive ventilation improves preoxygenation before intubation of hypoxic patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Jul 15;174(2):171-7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200509-1507OC. Epub 2006 Apr 20.

    PubMed 16627862
  • Mort TC. Preoxygenation in critically ill patients requiring emergency tracheal intubation. Crit Care Med. 2005 Nov;33(11):2672-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000187131.67594.9e.

    PubMed 16276196
  • Mort TC, Waberski BH, Clive J. Extending the preoxygenation period from 4 to 8 mins in critically ill patients undergoing emergency intubation. Crit Care Med. 2009 Jan;37(1):68-71. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318192845e.

    PubMed 19050620
  • Vourc'h M, Asfar P, Volteau C, Bachoumas K, Clavieras N, Egreteau PY, Asehnoune K, Mercat A, Reignier J, Jaber S, Prat G, Roquilly A, Brule N, Villers D, Bretonniere C, Guitton C. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen during endotracheal intubation in hypoxemic patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2015 Sep;41(9):1538-48. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3796-z. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

    PubMed 25869405
  • Weingart SD, Levitan RM. Preoxygenation and prevention of desaturation during emergency airway management. Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Mar;59(3):165-75.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

    PubMed 22050948
  • Semler MW, Janz DR, Lentz RJ, Matthews DT, Norman BC, Assad TR, Keriwala RD, Ferrell BA, Noto MJ, McKown AC, Kocurek EG, Warren MA, Huerta LE, Rice TW; FELLOW Investigators; Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Randomized Trial of Apneic Oxygenation during Endotracheal Intubation of the Critically Ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb 1;193(3):273-80. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201507-1294OC.

    PubMed 26426458
  • Ramachandran SK, Cosnowski A, Shanks A, Turner CR. Apneic oxygenation during prolonged laryngoscopy in obese patients: a randomized, controlled trial of nasal oxygen administration. J Clin Anesth. 2010 May;22(3):164-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2009.05.006.

    PubMed 20400000

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Oxygen in people with Diffuse Apneic Oxygenation, run by New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Mar 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean (Average) Arterial Oxygen Saturation (time frame: within 2 minutes of confirmation of endotracheal tube placement). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02737917, which also lists 11 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in