Chronic Hepatitis BNCT02738554
Off Treatment Durability in Chronic Hepatitis B With Good Immune Control
A study testing Treatment cessation in people with Chronic Hepatitis B, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.
Trial summary
Treatment cessation in chronic hepatitis B is associated with high rates of disease relapse. However patients who achieve the seroclearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) (<0.05 IU/mL) show good off-treatment durability after treatment cessation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Hepatitis B
- What is being tested?
- Treatment cessation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 124 participants
- Where
- 1 siteHong Kong
- Study dates
- Jan 2016to Jan 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥18 years.
- HBsAg-positive patients on entecavir or tenofovir therapy
- Fulfill the European Association for the Study of the Liver of NA cessation:
- HBeAg-positive at NA commencement: stable HBeAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA and completed 12 months of consolidation therapy
- HBeAg-negative: Virological suppression with undetectable HBV DNA (<10 IU/mL) for more than 3 years.
- Normal levels of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) documented on two separate occasions 6 months apart.
- Serum HBsAg between <200 IU/mL prior to NA cessation.
- (At study commencement, in HBeAg-negative patients, we applied the APASL 2016 suggestion for at least 2 years with undetectable HBV DNA documented on three separate occasions 6 months apart. Upon publication of the EASL guidelines in 2017, we further scrutinized the inclusion criteria for HBeAg-negative patients to be viriological suppression with undetectable HBV DNA for more than 3 years. All recruited HBeAg-negative participants prior to the release of the EASL 2017 guidelines fulfilled the updated criteria).
Who cannot join
- Concomitant liver diseases including chronic hepatitis C and D infection, Wilson's disease, autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis.
- Significant alcohol intake (>30 grams per day).
- Prior history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or any radiologic suspicion of HCC.
- Decompensated liver disease (defined as Child's B or C cirrhosis), or presence of cirrhotic complications, including variceal disease, ascites, or history of hepatic encephalopathy.
- Patient previously or currently on interferon therapy.
- History of immunosuppressive therapy or organ transplantation.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Serious medical illness or malignancy.
- Patient previously or currently prescribed interferon therapy.
- Confirmed or radiologic suspicion of HCC.
- Serious medical illness or malignancy. -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Hong Kong1 site
Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong
About this study
Official title: Determining the Optimal Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Level for Treatment Cessation of Nucleoside Analogue Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B: a Prospective Study
Treatment cessation in chronic hepatitis B is associated with high rates of disease relapse. However patients who achieve the seroclearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) (<0.05 IU/mL) show good off-treatment durability after treatment cessation. Through the quantification of HBsAg, the study aims to investigate how low should quantitative HBsAg be before once can achieve successful disease control after treatment cessation.
Read the detailed description
The treatment paradigm of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) has been transformed by the introduction of nucleoside analogue (NA) therapy. Long-term NA therapy can suppress viral replication, improve liver histology, and reduce the risk of liver-related complications and mortality. For the large majority of CHB patients, NAs need to be taken long-term, since the occurrence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance, the established treatment endpoint of CHB, is a rare event. Nonetheless, once HBsAg seroclearance is achieved, virologic suppression and improvement in clinical outcomes remain sustained in almost all patients even after treatment discontinuation.
So far, attempts to discontinue NA therapy before HBsAg seroclearance had yielded variable results. Concerning hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative CHB, prior studies found rates of disease relapse to range from 45% to 66% after treatment cessation. A recent multicenter prospective study involving three Hong Kong institutes (including our center) and 184 patients found the 48-week cumulative rate of virologic relapse to be 91.4%. While variations in relapse rates could be explained by the difference in study design and definition of endpoints, an important factor which could play a role is the serum HBsAg level of recruited subjects.
The quantification of serum HBsAg has recently been advocated as a marker of disease monitoring for CHB [10]. Low levels of serum HBsAg are associated with good immune control of the hepatitis B virus (HBV), with serum HBsAg levels of 100-200 IU/mL being predictive of eventual HBsAg seroclearance in treatment-naïve CHB. Nonetheless , in the abovementioned multicenter prospective study, only 4.8% and 14.1% of study subjects had HBsAg levels <100 IU/mL or <200 IU/mL at the point of treatment cessation - which could explain the study's high rate of disease relapse. In contrast, in another study of retrospective nature which found a lower relapse rate of 66%, 27.6% of patients had HBsAg levels <200 IU/mL at treatment cessation.
Although HBsAg seroclearance is the established treatment endpoint of CHB, patients would still have low amounts of intrahepatic HBV DNA. Moreover, HBsAg seroclearance via a conventional assay (HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL) does not mean absence of serum HBsAg, but merely serum HBsAg at undetectable levels. Using more sensitive assays, detectable HBsAg can be found in 29.1% to 53.2% of such patients. So despite the continued presence of HBV, the off-treatment durability of HBsAg seroclearance would suggest for treatment cessation, viral replication and viral protein production do not need to be totally absent, but at sufficiently low amounts to permit successful host immune control.
Hence, a relevant clinical question would be:
- How low must serum HBsAg be for successful off-treatment durability? Must the "magic figure" of 0.05 IU/mL be reached? Or could an HBsAg level in the >0.05 - 200 IU/mL range be sufficient? This could have implications in drug budgeting. According to data retrieved from the Clinical Data and Analysis Reporting System (CDARS), Hospital Authority, NA prescription headcount in 2014 reached 36,287 prescriptions, with an estimated total drug expenditure of 381 million Hong Kong dollars. A finite duration of therapy for certain patients could help in the reduction of drug expenditure. Other clinical questions include:
- Could a longer duration of NA therapy enhance the success of off-treatment durability? For many available therapy cessation studies, the mean NA therapy duration was approximately 1.5-3 years. There is emerging evidence demonstrating intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) could actually decrease profoundly after more than 5 years of NA therapy ; a low intrahepatic HBV cccDNA level could be the key to successful off-treatment durability.
- Is there any clinical factor that can reliably predict off-treatment virologic relapse? A potential novel marker is the hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), which detects an identical amino-acid sequence shared by HBeAg, hepatitis B core antigen and 22 kDa precore protein . Serum HBcrAg levels reflect the level of HBV disease activity [15], predict the occurrence of liver-related complications , and also correlate well with intrahepatic HBV cccDNA levels , the master intrahepatic reservoir for the production of HBV virions. Low levels of HBcrAg could reflect low levels of intrahepatic HBV cccDNA, meaning a better chance of maintaining off-treatment durability.
Aims and Hypotheses to be Tested:
Primary:
- To determine the optimal HBsAg level for cessation of NA therapy in CHB Secondary:
- To determine the rate of virologic relapse in after treatment cessation in CHB patients with serum HBsAg levels ≤200 IU/mL
- To determine the role of serum HBcrAg in predicting virologic relapse after treatment cessation.
Study Design We propose a prospective observational study following the STROBE guidelines in which we will follow-up study subjects after cessation of NA for 48 weeks. HBsAg-positive patients from our clinic taking either entecavir or tenofovir therapy will be tested for HBsAg levels and screened for study eligibility. Those with serum HBsAg levels <200 IU/mL and fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria listed above will be seen by one of the study investigators, who would explain the study objectives and offer the option of treatment discontinuation.
All enrolled study subjects, after cessation of therapy, will be evaluated at baseline, week 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48, with liver biochemistry, alpha-fetoprotein, HBV DNA, HBsAg and HBcrAg levels determined at each clinic visit. A regular 6-week follow-up will be in place for the first 24 weeks, since approximately 75% of all virologic relapse occurs in the first 24 weeks - the regular monitoring will allow detection of relapse at an early stage. In addition, a dedicated research assistant will follow-up all study subjects and assist on all monitoring logistics. A telephone hotline will be provided to all study subjects if they have any additional queries.
For every HBV DNA measurement of >2,000 IU/mL, as second HBV DNA will be measured after 2 weeks. The primary outcome of the study will be virologic relapse, defined as serum HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL in both 2 measurements of 2 weeks apart, regardless of serum ALT levels, in which the original NA (entecavir or tenofovir) will be recommenced. We chose HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL as the threshold for restarting NA as this is the level in which CHB patients would need to be considered for treatment.
Secondary outcomes of the study include:
- HBV DNA <200 IU/mL at week 48
- Undetectable HBV DNA (<20 IU/mL) at week 48
- HBsAg seroclearance (<0.05 IU/mL) at week 48
NA treatment could also be resumed at the discretion of the study investigators based on special clinical consideration, e.g. the sudden diagnosis of malignancy requiring chemotherapy. Patients will be always given the option of dropping out from the study; nonetheless we do not expect a high dropout rate (3.3% in our previous study).
- Conditions
- Chronic Hepatitis B
- Being tested
- Treatment cessation
- Keywords
- HBV, treatment cessation, HBsAg, HBcrAg, nucleoside analogue, entecavir, tenofovir
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis B, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Treatment cessationOther
Cessation of nucleoside analogue therapy following European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment cessation arm | Other | Cessation of treatment as according to European Association for the Study of the Liver Guidelines for chronic hepatitis B Receives: Other: Treatment cessation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Off-treatment durability
HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL
Measured: up to 48 weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
HBV DNA <200 IU/mL
HBV DNA <200 IU/mL
Measured: up to 48 weeks
HBV DNA <20 IU/mL
HBV DNA <20 IU/mL
Measured: up to 48 weeks
HBsAg seroclearance (<0.05 IU/mL)
HBsAg seroclearance (<0.05 IU/mL)
Measured: up to 48 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2016
- Primary completionJan 2020
- Study completionJan 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Hepatitis BStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The University of Hong KongThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 124 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Hong Kong
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Wai-Kay Seto, The University of Hong Kong
- Investigators
- Wai-Kay Seto, MD, Principal investigator, The University of Hong Kong
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02738554
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UW 15-548
- Status last verified
- Feb 2020
- First submitted
- 8 Apr 2016
- Last updated
- 10 Feb 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Seto WK, Liu KS, Mak LY, Cloherty G, Wong DK, Gersch J, Lam YF, Cheung KS, Chow N, Ko KL, To WP, Fung J, Yuen MF. Role of serum HBV RNA and hepatitis B surface antigen levels in identifying Asian patients with chronic hepatitis B suitable for entecavir cessation. Gut. 2021 Apr;70(4):775-783. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321116. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
PubMed 32759300
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Feb 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Determining the Optimal Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Level for Treatment Cessation of Nucleoside Analogue Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B: a Prospective Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02738554
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UW 15-548
- Conditions
- Chronic Hepatitis B
- Keywords
- HBV, treatment cessation, HBsAg, HBcrAg, nucleoside analogue, entecavir, tenofovir
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 124 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Hong KongUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Treatment cessation in chronic hepatitis B is associated with high rates of disease relapse. However patients who achieve the seroclearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) (<0.05 IU/mL) show good off-treatment durability after treatment cessation. Through the quantification of HBsAg, the study aims to investigate how low should quantitative HBsAg be before once can achieve successful disease control after treatment cessation.
Detailed description
The treatment paradigm of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) has been transformed by the introduction of nucleoside analogue (NA) therapy. Long-term NA therapy can suppress viral replication, improve liver histology, and reduce the risk of liver-related complications and mortality. For the large majority of CHB patients, NAs need to be taken long-term, since the occurrence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance, the established treatment endpoint of CHB, is a rare event. Nonetheless, once HBsAg seroclearance is achieved, virologic suppression and improvement in clinical outcomes remain sustained in almost all patients even after treatment discontinuation.
So far, attempts to discontinue NA therapy before HBsAg seroclearance had yielded variable results. Concerning hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative CHB, prior studies found rates of disease relapse to range from 45% to 66% after treatment cessation. A recent multicenter prospective study involving three Hong Kong institutes (including our center) and 184 patients found the 48-week cumulative rate of virologic relapse to be 91.4%. While variations in relapse rates could be explained by the difference in study design and definition of endpoints, an important factor which could play a role is the serum HBsAg level of recruited subjects.
The quantification of serum HBsAg has recently been advocated as a marker of disease monitoring for CHB [10]. Low levels of serum HBsAg are associated with good immune control of the hepatitis B virus (HBV), with serum HBsAg levels of 100-200 IU/mL being predictive of eventual HBsAg seroclearance in treatment-naïve CHB. Nonetheless , in the abovementioned multicenter prospective study, only 4.8% and 14.1% of study subjects had HBsAg levels <100 IU/mL or <200 IU/mL at the point of treatment cessation - which could explain the study's high rate of disease relapse. In contrast, in another study of retrospective nature which found a lower relapse rate of 66%, 27.6% of patients had HBsAg levels <200 IU/mL at treatment cessation.
Although HBsAg seroclearance is the established treatment endpoint of CHB, patients would still have low amounts of intrahepatic HBV DNA. Moreover, HBsAg seroclearance via a conventional assay (HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL) does not mean absence of serum HBsAg, but merely serum HBsAg at undetectable levels. Using more sensitive assays, detectable HBsAg can be found in 29.1% to 53.2% of such patients. So despite the continued presence of HBV, the off-treatment durability of HBsAg seroclearance would suggest for treatment cessation, viral replication and viral protein production do not need to be totally absent, but at sufficiently low amounts to permit successful host immune control.
Hence, a relevant clinical question would be:
- How low must serum HBsAg be for successful off-treatment durability? Must the "magic figure" of 0.05 IU/mL be reached? Or could an HBsAg level in the >0.05 - 200 IU/mL range be sufficient? This could have implications in drug budgeting. According to data retrieved from the Clinical Data and Analysis Reporting System (CDARS), Hospital Authority, NA prescription headcount in 2014 reached 36,287 prescriptions, with an estimated total drug expenditure of 381 million Hong Kong dollars. A finite duration of therapy for certain patients could help in the reduction of drug expenditure. Other clinical questions include:
- Could a longer duration of NA therapy enhance the success of off-treatment durability? For many available therapy cessation studies, the mean NA therapy duration was approximately 1.5-3 years. There is emerging evidence demonstrating intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) could actually decrease profoundly after more than 5 years of NA therapy ; a low intrahepatic HBV cccDNA level could be the key to successful off-treatment durability.
- Is there any clinical factor that can reliably predict off-treatment virologic relapse? A potential novel marker is the hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), which detects an identical amino-acid sequence shared by HBeAg, hepatitis B core antigen and 22 kDa precore protein . Serum HBcrAg levels reflect the level of HBV disease activity [15], predict the occurrence of liver-related complications , and also correlate well with intrahepatic HBV cccDNA levels , the master intrahepatic reservoir for the production of HBV virions. Low levels of HBcrAg could reflect low levels of intrahepatic HBV cccDNA, meaning a better chance of maintaining off-treatment durability.
Aims and Hypotheses to be Tested:
Primary:
- To determine the optimal HBsAg level for cessation of NA therapy in CHB Secondary:
- To determine the rate of virologic relapse in after treatment cessation in CHB patients with serum HBsAg levels ≤200 IU/mL
- To determine the role of serum HBcrAg in predicting virologic relapse after treatment cessation.
Study Design We propose a prospective observational study following the STROBE guidelines in which we will follow-up study subjects after cessation of NA for 48 weeks. HBsAg-positive patients from our clinic taking either entecavir or tenofovir therapy will be tested for HBsAg levels and screened for study eligibility. Those with serum HBsAg levels <200 IU/mL and fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria listed above will be seen by one of the study investigators, who would explain the study objectives and offer the option of treatment discontinuation.
All enrolled study subjects, after cessation of therapy, will be evaluated at baseline, week 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48, with liver biochemistry, alpha-fetoprotein, HBV DNA, HBsAg and HBcrAg levels determined at each clinic visit. A regular 6-week follow-up will be in place for the first 24 weeks, since approximately 75% of all virologic relapse occurs in the first 24 weeks - the regular monitoring will allow detection of relapse at an early stage. In addition, a dedicated research assistant will follow-up all study subjects and assist on all monitoring logistics. A telephone hotline will be provided to all study subjects if they have any additional queries.
For every HBV DNA measurement of >2,000 IU/mL, as second HBV DNA will be measured after 2 weeks. The primary outcome of the study will be virologic relapse, defined as serum HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL in both 2 measurements of 2 weeks apart, regardless of serum ALT levels, in which the original NA (entecavir or tenofovir) will be recommenced. We chose HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL as the threshold for restarting NA as this is the level in which CHB patients would need to be considered for treatment.
Secondary outcomes of the study include:
- HBV DNA <200 IU/mL at week 48
- Undetectable HBV DNA (<20 IU/mL) at week 48
- HBsAg seroclearance (<0.05 IU/mL) at week 48
NA treatment could also be resumed at the discretion of the study investigators based on special clinical consideration, e.g. the sudden diagnosis of malignancy requiring chemotherapy. Patients will be always given the option of dropping out from the study; nonetheless we do not expect a high dropout rate (3.3% in our previous study).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment cessation arm | Other | Other: Treatment cessationCessation of treatment as according to European Association for the Study of the Liver Guidelines for chronic hepatitis B |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age ≥18 years.
- HBsAg-positive patients on entecavir or tenofovir therapy
- Fulfill the European Association for the Study of the Liver of NA cessation:
- Normal levels of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) documented on two separate occasions 6 months apart.
- Serum HBsAg between <200 IU/mL prior to NA cessation.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Concomitant liver diseases including chronic hepatitis C and D infection, Wilson's disease, autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis.
- Significant alcohol intake (>30 grams per day).
- Prior history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or any radiologic suspicion of HCC.
- Decompensated liver disease (defined as Child's B or C cirrhosis), or presence of cirrhotic complications, including variceal disease, ascites, or history of hepatic encephalopathy.
- Patient previously or currently on interferon therapy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment cessationCessation of nucleoside analogue therapy following European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines | Other | Treatment cessation arm |
Primary outcome
Off-treatment durability
Time frame: up to 48 weeks
HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL
3 secondary outcomes
HBV DNA <200 IU/mL
Time frame: up to 48 weeks
HBV DNA <20 IU/mL
Time frame: up to 48 weeks
HBsAg seroclearance (<0.05 IU/mL)
Time frame: up to 48 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Feb 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32759300Seto WK, Liu KS, Mak LY, Cloherty G, Wong DK, Gersch J, Lam YF, Cheung KS, Chow N, Ko KL, To WP, Fung J, Yuen MF. Role of serum HBV RNA and hepatitis B surface antigen levels in identifying Asian patients with chronic hepatitis B suitable for entecavir cessation. Gut. 2021 Apr;70(4):775-783. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321116. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Hepatitis B
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Sequential Therapy With Daplusiran/Tomligisiran (DAP/TOM) Followed by Bepirovirsen in Participants Living With Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)
Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection, Hepatitis B
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Study of Bepirovirsen in Participants Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection (B-Focus)
Hepatitis B
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Long-term Follow-up Study to Evaluate Durability of Treatment Response in Previous Bepirovirsen Study Participants (B-Sure)
Hepatitis B
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
A Phase I Clinical Trial of CPU-YL01 Injection in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B.
Chronic Hepatitis B
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Wai-Kay Seto, MD principal investigator
The University of Hong Kong
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Treatment cessation in people with Chronic Hepatitis B, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Off-treatment durability (time frame: up to 48 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02738554, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.