AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseaseSCORE-CTONCT02739685

Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Stents in Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion

A study testing Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold and Everolimus-eluting stent in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by University of Luebeck at 1 site in Germany.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the current study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold to everolimus-eluting stents in patients with chronic total occlusion regarding the antirestenotic efficacy at 8 to 10-month angiographic follow-up. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Artery Disease
What is being tested?
Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold and Everolimus-eluting stent
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
17 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Sep 2016to Jan 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical inclusion criteria:
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Angina pectoris, equivalent symptoms, and/or positive stress test
  • Viable myocardium subtended by chronic total occlusion
  • Negative pregnancy test in women with childbearing potential
  • Angiographic inclusion criteria:
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Chronic total occlusion defined as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow 0 with an estimated duration ≥3 months
  • Successful wire passage and assumption of successful stent/scaffold deployment
  • Target reference vessel diameter 2.5 - 4.0 mm

Who cannot join

  • Clinical exclusion criteria:
  • Limited long-term prognosis with a life-expectancy <12 months
  • Contraindications to antiplatelet therapy
  • Known allergy against cobalt chrome, everolimus, or polylactic acid
  • Angiographic exclusion criteria:
  • Target lesion located in the left main trunk
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Target lesion located in a coronary bypass graft
  • Bifurcation lesion with planned two-stent strategy
  • Indication for coronary artery bypass grafting

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • University of Luebeck

    Lübeck, 23538

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-eluting Stents in Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion

The purpose of the current study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold to everolimus-eluting stents in patients with chronic total occlusion regarding the antirestenotic efficacy at 8 to 10-month angiographic follow-up.

Being tested
Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold, Everolimus-eluting stent
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffoldDevice

    Implantation of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold in chronic total occlusion

  • Everolimus-eluting stentDevice

    Implantation of everolimus-eluting stent in chronic total occlusion

Study groups in NCT02739685
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bioresorbable vascular scaffoldExperimentalImplantation of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold in chronic total occlusion
Receives: Device: Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold
StentActive comparatorImplantation everolimus-eluting stent in chronic total occlusion
Receives: Device: Everolimus-eluting stent

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. In-stent late lumen loss assessed by angiography

    Measured: 8-10 months after the index procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Apr 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2016
  3. Primary completionJan 2017
  4. Study completionJan 2017

Why it stopped: Slow enrollment, access to devices

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
17 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02739685
Sponsor's protocol ID
15-373
Acronym
SCORE-CTO
Status last verified
Sep 2019
First submitted
13 Apr 2016
Last updated
26 Sep 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold and Everolimus-eluting stent in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by University of Luebeck at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Slow enrollment, access to devices). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

In-stent late lumen loss assessed by angiography (time frame: 8-10 months after the index procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in