Hidradenitis SuppurativaHOPENCT02739828
Post Marketing Observational Study (PMOS) to Assess Quality of Life in Swedish Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) Patients
An observational study of Hidradenitis Suppurativa, run by AbbVie at 11 sites in Sweden.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to assess quality of life (QoL), skin pain, work productivity/activity and health related problems in Swedish patients with moderate to severe HS before and after 6 months treatment with Adalimumab. Participants will be treated in accordance with normal routine clinical care. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa
- What is being tested?
- Adalimumab
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesSweden
- Study dates
- 7 Apr 2016to 28 Mar 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult patients with moderate or severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of Hidradenitis Suppurativa
- Prescribed Adalimumab according to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC)
- Willingness to sign and date a Patient Information/Informed Consent Form
Who cannot join
- Prior biologic treatment discontinued <6 months before the baseline visit
- Patient not able to understand the language of the provided patient questionnaires
- History of non-compliance with medication or a medical history that could enhance non-compliance with medication, as determined by the investigator
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 1 country.
11 sites in 1 country
Sweden11 sites
Hallands Hospital Halmstad
Halmstad, 301 85
Blekinge Hospital
Karlskrona, SE-37185
Universitetssjukhuset Linköping
Linkoping, Västra Götaland County, 581 85
Skaraborgs Hospital
Skövde, 541 85
Karolinska Univ Sjukhuset
Solna, 17176
Kungsholmens Hudklinik
Stockholm, 112 51
Sodersjukhuset
Stockholm, 11883
Danderyd Hospital
Stockholm, 182 88
Trelleborg Hospital
Trelleborg, 231 85
Norrlands Universitetssjukhus
Umeå, 90185
Akademiska sjukhuset
Uppsala, 751 85
About this study
Official title: Post Marketing Observational Study to Assess Quality of Life Changes in Swedish Patients With Moderate or Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) After 6 Months on Adalimumab Treatment (HOPE Study)
The objective of this study is to assess quality of life (QoL), skin pain, work productivity/activity and health related problems in Swedish patients with moderate to severe HS before and after 6 months treatment with Adalimumab. Participants will be treated in accordance with normal routine clinical care.
- Conditions
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa
- Being tested
- Adalimumab
- Keywords
- Quality of life
- Medical subject headings
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AdalimumabBiological
Also called Humira
Adalimumab
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa | Patients with moderate or severe HS treated prescribed adalimumab according to the Swedish Summary of Product Characteristics and treated as per routine clinical practice. Receives: Biological: Adalimumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 12
DLQI assesses symptoms and impacts of dermatologic diseases on quality of life. DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a more impaired quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Secondary outcomes (30)
Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 4
DLQI assesses symptoms and impacts of dermatologic diseases on quality of life. DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a more impaired quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4
Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 24
DLQI assesses symptoms and impacts of dermatologic diseases on quality of life. DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a more impaired quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 4
The Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain NRS was used to assess the worst and average skin pain due to HS. NRS consists of 2 VAS response questions. Skin pain was rated from 0 (no skin pain) to 10 (skin pain as bad as you can imagine) for each.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 12
The Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain NRS was used to assess the worst and average skin pain due to HS. NRS consists of 2 VAS response questions. Skin pain was rated from 0 (no skin pain) to 10 (skin pain as bad as you can imagine) for each.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 24
The Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain NRS was used to assess the worst and average skin pain due to HS. NRS consists of 2 VAS response questions. Skin pain was rated from 0 (no skin pain) to 10 (skin pain as bad as you can imagine) for each.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4
The EQ-5D is a participant assessment of 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Participants report the extent of their problems with each of the 5 dimensions of health as "some problems/no problems," "some problems/no problems/unable to do," or "none/moderate/extreme."
Measured: Baseline, Week 4
EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12
The EQ-5D is a participant assessment of 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Participants report the extent of their problems with each of the 5 dimensions of health as "some problems/no problems," "some problems/no problems/unable to do," or "none/moderate/extreme."
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24
The EQ-5D is a participant assessment of 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Participants report the extent of their problems with each of the 5 dimensions of health as "some problems/no problems," "some problems/no problems/unable to do," or "none/moderate/extreme."
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 4
The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where increased scores correspond to better HRQL. 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state' and 100 is the 'best imaginable health state'. Change in EQ-5D VAS score was calculated by deducting the final score from the baseline score. Increased scores correspond to better health state.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 12
The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where increased scores correspond to better HRQL. 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state' and 100 is the 'best imaginable health state'. Change in EQ-5D VAS score was calculated by deducting the final score from the baseline score. Increased scores correspond to better health state.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 24
The EQ-5D VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0-100 where increased scores correspond to better HRQL. 0 is the 'worst imaginable health state' and 100 is the 'best imaginable health state'. Change in EQ-5D VAS score was calculated by deducting the final score from the baseline score. Increased scores correspond to better health state.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 4
The HSIA is a disease specific questionnaire measuring the impact the participant experiences associated with HS. HSIA consist of 18 sub-items, 16 of which range from 0 (no impact) to 10 (most negative impact), and 2 items register time at work/school and time away from work/school because of HS. Overall scores are presented as the percent of maximum HS impact (high values indicate a negative HS impact).
Measured: Baseline, Week 4
Change From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 12
The HSIA is a disease specific questionnaire measuring the impact the participant experiences associated with HS. HSIA consist of 18 sub-items, 16 of which range from 0 (no impact) to 10 (most negative impact), and 2 items register time at work/school and time away from work/school because of HS. Overall scores are presented as the percent of maximum HS impact (high values indicate a negative HS impact).
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 24
The HSIA is a disease specific questionnaire measuring the impact the participant experiences associated with HS. HSIA consist of 18 sub-items, 16 of which range from 0 (no impact) to 10 (most negative impact), and 2 items register time at work/school and time away from work/school because of HS. Overall scores are presented as the percent of maximum HS impact (high values indicate a negative HS impact).
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 4
The 'work time missed due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'work time missed due to health problem' was calculated based on 2 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit and (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4) and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4
WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 12
The 'work time missed due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'work time missed due to health problem' was calculated based on 2 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit and (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4) and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 24
The 'work time missed due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'work time missed due to health problem' was calculated based on 2 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit and (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4) and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 4
The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q5/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 12
The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q5/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 24
The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'impairment while working due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q5/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4
The 'overall activity impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall activity impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 1 item: (Q6) to what degree did the disease impair the ability to do regular activities in the past 7 days from visit. The item was measured on a scale from 0 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented from doing regular activities/working). The data was calculated using the formula Q6/10 and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4: Participants Not Employed at Baseline
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12: Participants Not Employed at Baseline
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24: Participants Not Employed at Baseline
The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was assessed using the WPAI-SHP questionnaire. WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant-assessed questionnaire used to assess work and activity impairment due to symptoms of HS. The 'overall work impairment due to health problem' was calculated based on 3 items: (Q2) the number of hours missed from work due to health problems in the past 7 days from visit; (Q4) the number of actual work hours in the past 7 days from visit; and (Q5) to what degree did the disease impair the productivity while working past 7 days from visit. The data was calculated using the formula Q2/(Q2+Q4)+[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4))x(Q5/10)] and converted to percent. Data are presented as impairment percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) Over Time
HiSCR is a clinical endpoint focusing on assessment of HS inflammatory signs and symptoms to determine the clinical effectiveness of adalimumab.
HiSCR requires:
- At least a 50% reduction in the total abscess and inflammatory nodule count (AN count) relative to baseline, and
- No increase in abscess count, and
- No increase in draining fistula count. In first bullet AN count is defined as sum of abscess count and inflammatory nodules count.
Measured: Week 4, 12 and 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Study start7 Apr 2016
- Primary completion28 Mar 2018
- Study completion28 Mar 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Hidradenitis SuppurativaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AbbVieThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- AbbVie Inc., Study director, AbbVie
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02739828
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P15-692
- Acronym
- HOPE
- Status last verified
- May 2018
- First submitted
- 12 Apr 2016
- Last updated
- 9 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Post Marketing Observational Study to Assess Quality of Life Changes in Swedish Patients With Moderate or Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) After 6 Months on Adalimumab Treatment (HOPE Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02739828
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HOPE / P15-692
- Conditions
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa
- Keywords
- Quality of life
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVieIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 7 Apr 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Mar 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 9 Aug 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study is to assess quality of life (QoL), skin pain, work productivity/activity and health related problems in Swedish patients with moderate to severe HS before and after 6 months treatment with Adalimumab. Participants will be treated in accordance with normal routine clinical care.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa | – | Biological: AdalimumabPatients with moderate or severe HS treated prescribed adalimumab according to the Swedish Summary of Product Characteristics and treated as per routine clinical practice. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult patients with moderate or severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Diagnosis of Hidradenitis Suppurativa
- Prescribed Adalimumab according to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC)
- Willingness to sign and date a Patient Information/Informed Consent Form
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Prior biologic treatment discontinued <6 months before the baseline visit
- Patient not able to understand the language of the provided patient questionnaires
- History of non-compliance with medication or a medical history that could enhance non-compliance with medication, as determined by the investigator
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AdalimumabAlso: HumiraAdalimumab | Biological | Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
DLQI assesses symptoms and impacts of dermatologic diseases on quality of life. DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a more impaired quality of life.
30 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 4
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 4
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Skin Pain - NRS at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 4
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
EQ-5D Questionnaire Responses at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 4
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 4
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Change From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in HSIA Overall Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 4
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Work Time Missed Due to Health Problem at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
WPAI-SHP: Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 4
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Impairment While Working Due to Health Problem at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Work Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 4: Participants Not Employed at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 12: Participants Not Employed at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Activity Impairment Due to Health Problem at Week 24: Participants Not Employed at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) Over Time
Time frame: Week 4, 12 and 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Aug 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A 16-Week Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called Ritlecitinib in Adults With Long Lasting Painful Red Skin Lumps, Known by the Medical Term, Hidradenitis Suppurativa, or HS.
Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Study of Early Secukinumab Treatment in Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa Patients
Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Tibulizumab Skin Healing and Inflammation Evaluation for Lasting Defense
Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study With CIT-013 in HS Patients
Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of SPY072 in Adults With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (The SKYLIGHT Trial)
Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
AbbVie Inc. study director
AbbVie
11 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Hidradenitis Suppurativa, run by AbbVie at 11 sites in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Aug 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in DLQI at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline, Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2019.