Opioid-Related DisordersPhase 4NCT02741076
Discontinuation vs Continuation of Long-term Opioid Therapy in Suboptimal and Optimal Responders With Chronic Pain
A Phase 4 study testing Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER) and Continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER) in people with Opioid-Related Disorders and Opiate Addiction, run by Member Companies of the Opioid PMR Consortium at 61 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect on pain intensity (PI) of structured discontinuation of long-term opioid analgesic therapy compared to continuation of opioid therapy in Suboptimal and Optimal Responders to high-dose, long-term opioid analgesic therapy for chronic low back pain (CLBP). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Opioid-Related Disorders, Opiate Addiction, Narcotic Abuse
- What is being tested?
- Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER) and Continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- 61 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 14 Sep 2016to 27 Apr 2018
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Be male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female aged 18 to 75 years, inclusive.
- Have a clinical diagnosis of non-radicular CLBP (pain that occurs in an area with boundaries between the lowest rib and the crease of the buttocks) of Class 1 or proximal radicular (above the knee) pain of Class 2 based on the Quebec Task Force Classification for Spinal Disorders (subjects with previous surgery or chronic pain syndrome, i.e., classes 9.2 or 10, will be allowed if their pain does not radiate or radiates only proximally) for a minimum of 12 months and
- For the Suboptimal Responder group, pain must have been present for at least several hours a day and have an Average PI score of 6-9 on an 11-point NRS within the past 24 hours of screening.
- For the Optimal Responder group, subjects must have an Average PI score of 1-4 on an 11-point NRS within the past 24 hours of screening.
- Have been taking ER/LA opioids or immediate release opioids (at least 4 times at day) for at least 12 months.
- Have been taking one of the 3 index ER opioid drugs around-the-clock at a twice-a-day frequency for at least 3 consecutive months at a total daily dose within the range shown below.
Show all 15Show fewer
- Daily Dose Range
- Morphine sulfate extended-release: 120-540mg
- Oxycodone extended-release: 80-360mg
- Oxymorphone extended-release: 40-180mg
- Be considered, in the opinion of the Investigator, to be in generally good health other than CLBP at screening based upon the results of a medical history, physical examination, 12-lead ECG, and laboratory profile.
- Speak, read, write, and understand English (to reduce heterogeneity of data), understand the consent form, and be able to effectively communicate with the study staff.
- Have access to the Internet (to access the patient support program).
- Voluntarily provide written informed consent.
- Be willing and able to complete study procedures.
Who cannot join
- Have any clinically significant condition that would, in the opinion of the Investigator, preclude study participation or interfere with the assessment of pain and other symptoms of CLBP or increase the risk of opioid-related AEs.
- Have a primary diagnosis of fibromyalgia, complex regional pain syndrome, neurogenic claudication due to spinal stenosis, spinal cord compression, acute nerve root compression, severe or progressive lower extremity weakness or numbness, bowel or bladder dysfunction as a result of cauda equina compression, diabetic amyotrophy, meningitis, diskitis, back pain because of secondary infection or tumor, or pain caused by a confirmed or suspected neoplasm.
- Have undergone a surgical procedure for back pain within 6 months prior to the Screening Visit.
- Have had a nerve or plexus block, including epidural steroid injections or facet blocks, within 1 month prior to the Screening Visit or botulinum toxin injection in the lower back region within 3 months prior to screening.
- Have a history of confirmed malignancy within past 2 years, with exception of basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been successfully treated.
- Have uncontrolled blood pressure, i.e., subject has a sitting systolic blood pressure >180 mm Hg or <90 mm Hg, or a sitting diastolic blood pressure >110 mmHg or <40 mm Hg at screening.
Show all 18Show fewer
- Have a body mass index (BMI) >45 kg/m2. Anyone with a BMI >40 but <45 will complete a screening tool (STOPBang Questionnaire) to rule out high risk of obstructive sleep apnea.
- Have clinically significant depression based on a score of ≥20 on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8)
- Have suicidal ideation associated with actual intent and a method or plan in the past year: "Yes" answers on items 4 or 5 of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).
- Have a previous history of suicidal behaviors in the past 5 years: "Yes" answer (for events that occurred in the past 5 years) to any of the suicidal behavior items of the C-SSRS.
- Have any lifetime history of serious or recurrent suicidal behavior. (Non-suicidal self-injurious behavior is not a trigger for a risk assessment unless in the Investigator's judgment it is indicated.)
- Have clinically significant abnormality in clinical chemistry, hematology or urinalysis, including serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase/aspartate aminotransferase or serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase/alanine aminotransferase ≥3 times the upper limit of the reference range or a serum creatinine >2 mg/dL at screening.
- Have severe enough psychiatric or substance abuse disorder to compromise the subject's safety or scientific integrity of the study.
- Have on-going litigation associated with back pain or pending applications for workers compensation or disability issues or subjects who plan on filing litigation or claims within the next 12 months; subjects with settled past litigations will be allowed as will subjects who have been on workers compensation or disability claims for at least 3 months.
- Have used a monoamine oxidase inhibitor within 14 days prior to the start of study medication.
- Are taking agonist-antagonists (pentazocine, butorphanol or nalbuphine), buprenorphine, methadone, barbiturates, or more than one type of benzodiazepine within 1 month prior to screening.
- Have a positive urine drug test (UDT) for illicit drugs (including marijuana), non-prescribed controlled substances (opioid or non-opioid), or alcohol at screening.
- Have taken any investigational drug within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit or are currently enrolled in another investigational drug study.
Trial locations and contacts
61 sites in 1 country.
61 sites in 1 country
United States61 sites
Healthcare Research Network II
Blue Island, Illinois
Coastal Pain and Spinal Diagnostics
Carlsbad, California
Interventional Pain and Spine Specialists
Chester, Virginia
Mountain View Clinical Research
Denver, Colorado
Care Research Center
Doral, Florida
Brandywine Clinical Research
Downingtown, Pennsylvania
Aviva Research
Escondido, California
G & L Research
Foley, Alabama
Prestige Clinical Research
Franklin, Ohio
Healthcare Research Network
Hazelwood, Missouri
Comprehensive Pain Specialists
Hendersonville, Tennessee
Direct Helpers Research Center
Hialeah, Florida
Eastern Research
Hialeah, Florida
Biopharma Informatic Research Center
Houston, Texas
Coastal Medical Group
Houston, Texas
Global Clinical Trials
Irvine, California
New Phase Research and Development
Knoxville, Tennessee
The Helm Center for Pain Management
Laguna Woods, California
Red Rock Clinical Research
Las Vegas, Nevada
Alexander Ford, MD
Los Angeles, California
Samaritan Center for Medical Research
Los Gatos, California
Georgia Institute for Clinical Research
Marietta, Georgia
Sestron Clinical Research
Marietta, Georgia
Finlay Medical Research
Miami, Florida
Future Clinical Research
Miami, Florida
South Florida Clinical Research
Miami, Florida
Empire Clinical Research
Miami Lakes, Florida
North Star Medical Research
Middleburg Heights, Ohio
Horizon Research Partners
Mobile, Alabama
Catalina Research Institute
Montclair, California
Healthscan Clinical Trials
Montgomery, Alabama
OnSite Clinical Solutions
Mooresville, North Carolina
North Country Clinical Research
Oceanside, California
Cutting Edge Research Group
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Medical Research International
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
SP Research
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Mid-American Psysiatrists
Overland Park, Kansas
Founders Research Corporation
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Center for Pain and Supportive Care
Phoenix, Arizona
The Pain Center of Arizona
Phoenix, Arizona
Westview Clinical Research
Placentia, California
Martin E Hale, MD
Plantation, Florida
Foothills Pain Management Clinic
Pomona, California
Healthy Concepts
Rapid City, South Dakota
Healing Hands of Virginia
Richmond, Virginia
Northern California Research
Sacramento, California
Highland Clinical Research
Salt Lake City, Utah
Breakthrough Clinical Trials
San Bernardino, California
Optimus Medical Group
San Francisco, California
WK River Cities Clinical Research Center
Shreveport, Louisiana
Indiana Pain and Spine Clinic
South Bend, Indiana
Carolina Center for Advanced Management of Pain
Spartanburg, South Carolina
St Louis Clinical Trials
St Louis, Missouri
Florida Medical Pain Management
St. Petersburg, Florida
Clinical Research of West Florida
Tampa, Florida
Oakland Medical Research
Troy, Michigan
Quality of Life Medical and Research Centers
Tucson, Arizona
MedVadis Research Corporation
Watertown, Massachusetts
Palm Beach Research Center
West Palm Beach, Florida
Clinical Trials of America
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
The Center for Clinical Research
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Clinical Trial of Structured Opioid Discontinuation Versus Continued Opioid Therapy in Suboptimal and Optimal Responders to High-dose Long-term Opioid Analgesic Therapy for Chronic Pain.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect on pain intensity (PI) of structured discontinuation of long-term opioid analgesic therapy compared to continuation of opioid therapy in Suboptimal and Optimal Responders to high-dose, long-term opioid analgesic therapy for chronic low back pain (CLBP).
Read the detailed description
This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study which consisted of a common Screening Visit for all subjects, then different schedules for Optimal and Suboptimal Responders, followed by a common schedule for the Blinded Structured Opioid Discontinuation Period (BSODP) and Follow-up Period.
The original protocol (10 Jan 2016) was amended twice: Amendment 1 (07 Jul 2016) and Amendment 2 (08 Feb 2017). Screening of subjects only started after Amendment 1 approval. Approximately half the subjects were screened under Amendment 1 and half under Amendment 2. The original statistical analysis plan (SAP) was amended twice as well based on the protocol amendments. The current SAP is version 1.3, dated 11 April 2018, which added a section to list the analyses that were not being completed as a result of the premature termination of this study.
The duration of the entire study for each subject was approximately 33 to 37 weeks. For Suboptimal Responders: the study duration included Screening Period of up to 3 weeks, Run-in Period of 1 week, Baseline Period of 1 week, Blinded Structured Opioid Discontinuation Period of 24 weeks, and Follow-up Period of 4 weeks.
For Optimal Responders: the study duration included Screening Period of up to 3 weeks, Observation Period of 1 week, Taper Period up to 2 weeks, Open Label Titration Period of 3 weeks, Blinded Structured Opioid Discontinuation Period of 24 weeks, and Follow-up Period of 4 weeks.
The primary endpoint was the change in the mean Average PI score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) from Baseline to the 1 week period before the Week 12 visit. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics (number of observations [n], mean, standard deviation, median, first and third quartiles, minimum, and maximum for continuous variables; and frequency and percentage for categorical variables). Due to the inability to recruit a sufficient number of subjects over an acceptable period of time, the study was terminated prematurely and efficacy analyses were reduced and only a brief summary of the statistical analyses of the primary endpoint in each group (Suboptimal Responders and Optimal Responders) were performed.
- Conditions
- Opioid-Related Disorders, Opiate Addiction, Narcotic Abuse, Drug Abuse
- Being tested
- Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER)
- Medical subject headings
- Opioid-Related Disorders, Narcotic-Related Disorders, Substance-Related Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER)Drug
Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER)
Continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER)Drug
Continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Structured discontinuation opioid therapy Suboptimal Responder | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER); Drug: Continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER) |
| Structured discontinuation opioid therapy Optimal responders | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER); Drug: Continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER) |
| Continuation of opioid therapy Suboptimal responders | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER); Drug: Continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER) |
| Structured Continuation of opioid therapy Optimal responders | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER); Drug: Continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in the Mean Average Pain Intensity (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)
Baseline is defined as the mean of the available Average PI scores on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) over the 7-day Baseline Period. For the scheduled post-randomization visits, mean Average Pain Intensity is defined as the means of the respective PI scores over the 7 days preceding the visit. If there is only one daily PI score available, the mean is not calculated, and the data point is considered missing.
PI = Pain Intensity. Higher scores indicate more pain intensity; lower scores less pain intensity. Scale range 0-10.
Measured: From baseline to the 1 week period prior to the Week 12 visit
Secondary outcomes (12)
Change in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)
Baseline is defined as the mean of the available Average PI scores on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) over the 7-day Baseline Period. For the scheduled post-randomization visits, mean Average Pain Intensity is defined as the means of the respective PI scores over the 7 days preceding the visit. If there is only one daily PI score available, the mean is not calculated, and the data point is considered missing.
PI = Pain Intensity. Higher scores indicate more pain intensity; lower scores less pain intensity. Scale range 0-10.
Measured: From baseline to weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24
Number of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)
Percent pain intensity difference (PID) relative to baseline is defined as 100* ((baseline Average PI - mean Average PI at visit)/baseline Average PI). The percentages are based on number of subjects in the Intent-to-Treat set per treatment group. PI is measured on the Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS). Higher scores indicate more pain intensity; lower scores less pain intensity. Scale range 0-10.
This outcome measure applies only to Suboptimal Responders.
Measured: Weeks 12 and 24
Number of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)
Percent pain intensity difference (PID) relative to baseline is defined as 100* ((baseline Average PI - mean Average PI at visit)/baseline Average PI). The percentages are based on number of subjects in the Intent-to-Treat set per treatment group. PI is measured on the Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS). Higher scores indicate more pain intensity; lower scores less pain intensity. Scale range 0-10.
This outcome measure applies only to Optimal Responders.
Measured: Weeks 12 and 24
Change From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)
The MOS Sleep Scale is a 12-item questionnaire which measures sleep quality in 7 scales over the past 4 weeks: sleep disturbance, snoring, sleep short of breath or headache, sleep adequacy, sleep somnolence, and 2 sleep problems indexes. In addition, the average hours of sleep over the past 4 weeks is recorded as a raw measure and also coded as an optimal sleep index.
The MOS is scored and the sleep scales calculated according to the MOS Sleep Scale User's Manual v1.0 (Spritzer and Hays, 2003). The scores on the dimensions and the sleep indices were converted to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores reflecting more of the attribute implied by the name (e.g. greater sleep disturbance, greater sleep adequacy of sleep).
Measured: Weeks 12 and 24
Participants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)
Optimal Sleep Index is based on the average number of hours of sleep each night during the past 4 weeks. Index=1 represents 7-8 hours and Index=0 represents < 7 hours or > 8 hours.
Measured: 4 weeks prior to baseline and prior to 12 and 24 week visits
Change From Baseline in the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)
The PHQ-8 is an 8-item questionnaire that aims at assessing the level of mood of a subject. Each item is scored from 0 = "not at all" to 3= "nearly every day"; the total score, which is the sum of the score for each item, can be from 0 to 24. A score ≥10 is considered major depression and ≥20 is severe major depression.
Measured: Weeks 12 and 24
Number of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)
The PHQ-8 is an 8-item questionnaire that aims at assessing the level of depression of a subject. Each item is scored from 0 = "not at all" to 3= "nearly every day"; the total score, which is the sum of the scores for each item, can be from 0 to 24. A score >= 10 is considered major depression and >= 20 is severe major depression.
Measured: Baseline, 12 and 24 week visit
Participant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized Instrument
The EQ-5D-5L is a self-administered general measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments.The EQ-5D-5L measures quality of life in 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain/discomfort, and Anxiety/depression. Each is rated in 5 levels from no problems/pain/anxiety to being unable/extreme pain/extreme anxiety. The responses for each category are summarized by treatment and visit with frequencies and percentages reporting each level.
Measured: Baseline and weeks 12, 24
Participant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L Standardized Instrument)
The EQ-5D-5L is a self-administered general measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments. The visual analog scale (VAS) rates the subject's health on a 0-100 scale from the worst imaginable health state to the best imaginable health state.
Measured: Baseline to 12 and 24 week visit
Digit Symbol Substitution Test
Overall neuropsychological function is assessed using the DSST, a test that is sensitive to brain damage, dementia, age, and depression, and is a widely used instrument for measuring the neuropsychological effects of opioid therapy. The digits (1-9) are paired with symbols, and the test consists of matching the symbol for a series of digits as fast as possible. Score is number of correct symbols in 90 seconds. A decrease from baseline detects deterioration in processing speed. An increase from baseline detects improvement in processing speed.
Measured: Change from Baseline to 12 and 24 week visit
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses the participant's level of improvement/worsening from the beginning to the end of treatment. Participants are asked to select the category of change that most closely describes any change experienced in the pain of their painful areas from the beginning of the Blinded Structured Opioid Discontinuation Period to Week 12 and to Week 24. The scale has levels describing change as: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse.
Measured: Baseline to 12 and 24 week visit
Sexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for Women
For the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)(15-items) each question is scored on a scale of 0 or 1 to 5, with 0 as no sexual attempts, 1 as the highest frequency, and 5 as the lowest, except where 1=1-2, 2=3-4, 3=5-6, 4=7-10 attempts, and 5=11 or more attempts. Missing responses are scored as 0. For the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)(19 items) each question is scored on a scale of 0-5 or 1-5. The FSFI examines the following 6 domains with minimum and maximum scores as indicated: desire(1.2-6.0), arousal(0-6.0), lubrication(0-6.0), orgasm(0-6.0), satisfaction(0.8-6.0), and pain(0-6.0). A computational formula sums the scores within each domain and multiplies that sum by a prescribed weighting factor: desire 0.6, arousal 0.3, lubrication 0.3, orgasm 0.4, satisfaction 0.4, pain 0.4. Higher scores indicate greater functionality. The single final score range is 2.0 to 36, which is reported as an average for each group of female study participants as change from baseline.
Measured: Change from Baseline to 12 and 24 week visit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Study start14 Sep 2016
- Primary completion27 Apr 2018
- Study completion27 Apr 2018
Why it stopped: Inability to recruit sufficient no. of subjects over an acceptable time period
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Opioid-Related DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Member Companies of the Opioid PMR Consortium
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02741076
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2065-5
- Status last verified
- Oct 2019
- First submitted
- 10 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 6 Nov 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Nov 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Clinical Trial of Structured Opioid Discontinuation Versus Continued Opioid Therapy in Suboptimal and Optimal Responders to High-dose Long-term Opioid Analgesic Therapy for Chronic Pain.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02741076
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2065-5
- Conditions
- Opioid-Related Disorders, Opiate Addiction, Narcotic Abuse, Drug Abuse
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Inability to recruit sufficient no. of subjects over an acceptable time period
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Member Companies of the Opioid PMR ConsortiumIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 14 Sep 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Apr 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 Nov 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect on pain intensity (PI) of structured discontinuation of long-term opioid analgesic therapy compared to continuation of opioid therapy in Suboptimal and Optimal Responders to high-dose, long-term opioid analgesic therapy for chronic low back pain (CLBP).
Detailed description
This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study which consisted of a common Screening Visit for all subjects, then different schedules for Optimal and Suboptimal Responders, followed by a common schedule for the Blinded Structured Opioid Discontinuation Period (BSODP) and Follow-up Period.
The original protocol (10 Jan 2016) was amended twice: Amendment 1 (07 Jul 2016) and Amendment 2 (08 Feb 2017). Screening of subjects only started after Amendment 1 approval. Approximately half the subjects were screened under Amendment 1 and half under Amendment 2. The original statistical analysis plan (SAP) was amended twice as well based on the protocol amendments. The current SAP is version 1.3, dated 11 April 2018, which added a section to list the analyses that were not being completed as a result of the premature termination of this study.
The duration of the entire study for each subject was approximately 33 to 37 weeks. For Suboptimal Responders: the study duration included Screening Period of up to 3 weeks, Run-in Period of 1 week, Baseline Period of 1 week, Blinded Structured Opioid Discontinuation Period of 24 weeks, and Follow-up Period of 4 weeks.
For Optimal Responders: the study duration included Screening Period of up to 3 weeks, Observation Period of 1 week, Taper Period up to 2 weeks, Open Label Titration Period of 3 weeks, Blinded Structured Opioid Discontinuation Period of 24 weeks, and Follow-up Period of 4 weeks.
The primary endpoint was the change in the mean Average PI score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) from Baseline to the 1 week period before the Week 12 visit. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics (number of observations [n], mean, standard deviation, median, first and third quartiles, minimum, and maximum for continuous variables; and frequency and percentage for categorical variables). Due to the inability to recruit a sufficient number of subjects over an acceptable period of time, the study was terminated prematurely and efficacy analyses were reduced and only a brief summary of the statistical analyses of the primary endpoint in each group (Suboptimal Responders and Optimal Responders) were performed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Structured discontinuation opioid therapy Suboptimal Responder | Experimental | Drug: Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Drug: Continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER) |
| Structured discontinuation opioid therapy Optimal responders | Experimental | Drug: Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Drug: Continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER) |
| Continuation of opioid therapy Suboptimal responders | Experimental | Drug: Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Drug: Continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER) |
| Structured Continuation of opioid therapy Optimal responders | Experimental | Drug: Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Drug: Continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Be male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female aged 18 to 75 years, inclusive.
- Have a clinical diagnosis of non-radicular CLBP (pain that occurs in an area with boundaries between the lowest rib and the crease of the buttocks) of Class 1 or proximal radicular (above the knee) pain of Class 2 based on the Quebec Task Force Classification for Spinal Disorders (subjects with previous surgery or chronic pain syndrome, i.e., classes 9.2 or 10, will be allowed if their pain does not radiate or radiates only proximally) for a minimum of 12 months and
- Have been taking ER/LA opioids or immediate release opioids (at least 4 times at day) for at least 12 months.
- Have been taking one of the 3 index ER opioid drugs around-the-clock at a twice-a-day frequency for at least 3 consecutive months at a total daily dose within the range shown below.
- Daily Dose Range
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Have any clinically significant condition that would, in the opinion of the Investigator, preclude study participation or interfere with the assessment of pain and other symptoms of CLBP or increase the risk of opioid-related AEs.
- Have a primary diagnosis of fibromyalgia, complex regional pain syndrome, neurogenic claudication due to spinal stenosis, spinal cord compression, acute nerve root compression, severe or progressive lower extremity weakness or numbness, bowel or bladder dysfunction as a result of cauda equina compression, diabetic amyotrophy, meningitis, diskitis, back pain because of secondary infection or tumor, or pain caused by a confirmed or suspected neoplasm.
- Have undergone a surgical procedure for back pain within 6 months prior to the Screening Visit.
- Have had a nerve or plexus block, including epidural steroid injections or facet blocks, within 1 month prior to the Screening Visit or botulinum toxin injection in the lower back region within 3 months prior to screening.
- Have a history of confirmed malignancy within past 2 years, with exception of basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been successfully treated.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER)Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER) | Drug | Continuation of opioid therapy Suboptimal responders, Structured Continuation of opioid therapy Optimal responders, Structured discontinuation opioid therapy Optimal responders, Structured discontinuation opioid therapy Suboptimal Responder |
| Continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER)Continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER) | Drug | Continuation of opioid therapy Suboptimal responders, Structured Continuation of opioid therapy Optimal responders, Structured discontinuation opioid therapy Optimal responders, Structured discontinuation opioid therapy Suboptimal Responder |
Primary outcome
Change in the Mean Average Pain Intensity (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)
Time frame: From baseline to the 1 week period prior to the Week 12 visit
Baseline is defined as the mean of the available Average PI scores on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) over the 7-day Baseline Period. For the scheduled post-randomization visits, mean Average Pain Intensity is defined as the means of the respective PI scores over the 7 days preceding the visit. If there is only one daily PI score available, the mean is not calculated, and the data point is considered missing. PI = Pain Intensity. Higher scores indicate more pain intensity; lower scores less pain intensity. Scale range 0-10.
12 secondary outcomes
Change in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)
Time frame: From baseline to weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24
Number of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)
Time frame: Weeks 12 and 24
Number of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS)
Time frame: Weeks 12 and 24
Change From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)
Time frame: Weeks 12 and 24
Participants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS)
Time frame: 4 weeks prior to baseline and prior to 12 and 24 week visits
Change From Baseline in the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)
Time frame: Weeks 12 and 24
Number of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8)
Time frame: Baseline, 12 and 24 week visit
Participant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized Instrument
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 12, 24
Participant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L Standardized Instrument)
Time frame: Baseline to 12 and 24 week visit
Digit Symbol Substitution Test
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 12 and 24 week visit
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time frame: Baseline to 12 and 24 week visit
Sexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for Women
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 12 and 24 week visit
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Nov 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Opioid-Related Disorders
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Development of an Interview-Informed Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) for Opioid Use in the Era of Fentanyl
Substance Use Disorders (SUDs)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Wellcome Leap Psilocybin for OUD
Opioid Use Disorder
Recruiting
Opioid and Pain Treatment in Indigenous Communities (OPTIC) Trial
Opioid Use Disorder, Opioid Misuse
Active, not recruiting
EXHIT ENTRE Implementation Trial of High Intensity Versus Low Intensity Strategy
Substance Use Disorders, Opioid Use Disorder, Severe
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
61 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER) and Continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER) in people with Opioid-Related Disorders and Opiate Addiction, run by Member Companies of the Opioid PMR Consortium at 61 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 61 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Nov 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in the Mean Average Pain Intensity (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) (time frame: From baseline to the 1 week period prior to the Week 12 visit). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Nov 2019.