RelapseOrthRe10tionNCT02742493
RCT for the Effectiveness of 3 Orthodontic Retention Schemes on Post-treatment Stability and Gingival Recession
A study testing 0.028 bonded to canines, 0.027 7-strand bonded to all 6 and removable Hawley-type in people with Relapse and Gingival Recession, run by University of Athens at 1 site in Greece.
Trial summary
The present study aims to assess the effectiveness of three different retention schemes used to maintain tooth position after orthodontic treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances (stability) and to evaluate possible association between retention scheme and gingival recessions on the lingual surfaces of the lower… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 to 16 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Relapse, Gingival Recession
- What is being tested?
- 0.028 bonded to canines, 0.027 7-strand bonded to all 6 and removable Hawley-type
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGreece
- Study dates
- 16 Mar 2016to 1 Nov 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 to 16 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Both sexes
- Age between 10 and 16 years
- At the finishing stage of orthodontic treatment, programmed for debonding
- Class I to Class II molar relationship before the beginning of orthodontic treatment
- Non-extraction treatment plan with fixed straight-wire appliances
- Space deficiencies and irregularity of no more than 6mm in the maxillary/ mandibular arch (Irregularity Index)
Who cannot join
- No missing teeth, impacted teeth or other dental anomalies
- No congenital anomalies/ syndromes
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Greece1 site
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Athens
Athens, Goudi, 11527
About this study
Official title: A Single-center, 3-arm, Parallel-group Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Three Orthodontic Retention Schemes in Preventing Post-treatment Mandibular Arch Changes and Gingival Recession in Children and Adolescents
The present study aims to assess the effectiveness of three different retention schemes used to maintain tooth position after orthodontic treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances (stability) and to evaluate possible association between retention scheme and gingival recessions on the lingual surfaces of the lower anterior teeth seen for up to 5 years post-treatment. Moreover the possible association between primary relapse tendency and long term occlusal stability will be evaluated.
Read the detailed description
This is a randomized, controlled, single-center, equivalence trial with three parallel groups and an allocation ratio of 1:1:1, that aims to investigate the effectiveness of 3 orthodontic retention schemes on post-treatment mandibular arch stability and gingival recession.
- Conditions
- Relapse, Gingival Recession
- Being tested
- 0.028 bonded to canines, 0.027 7-strand bonded to all 6, removable Hawley-type
- Keywords
- relapse, irregularity, recession, retention
- Medical subject headings
- Recurrence, Gingival Recession
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
0.028 bonded to caninesOther
lower fixed canine and canine retainer (0.028 stainless steel bonded to canines) and upper removable Hawley (Intervention A)
0.027 7-strand bonded to all 6Other
lower fixed canine to canine retainer (7-strand Twistflex 0.027 bonded to all six anterior teeth) and upper removable Hawley (Intervention B)
removable Hawley-typeOther
lower Hawley-type and upper Hawley removable retainer (Control)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 0.028 bonded to canines | Experimental | lower fixed canine and canine retainer and upper removable Hawley (Intervention A) Receives: Other: 0.028 bonded to canines |
| 0.027 7-strand bonded to all 6 | Experimental | lower fixed canine to canine retainer and upper removable Hawley (Intervention B) Receives: Other: 0.027 7-strand bonded to all 6 |
| removable Hawley-type | Active comparator | lower hawley-type and upper hawley removable retainer (Control) Receives: Other: removable Hawley-type |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in Little's Irregularity Index in the mandible (mm)
Measured: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Changes in Intercanine width in the mandible (mm)
Measured: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Changes in Interpremolar width in the mandible (mm)
Measured: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Changes in Intermolar width in the mandible (mm)
Measured: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Changes in Arch length in the mandible (mm)
Measured: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Secondary outcomes (8)
Changes in Gingival Recessions on the lingual surfaces of the six lower anterior teeth
Measured: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Changes in Intercanine width in the maxilla (mm)
Measured: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Changes in Interpremolar width in the maxilla (mm)
Measured: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Changes in Intermolar width in the maxilla (mm)
Measured: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Changes in Arch length in the maxilla (mm)
Measured: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Changes in Overbite and Overjet (mm)
Measured: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Accidental bond failures of fixed retainers or breakages of removable ones
Measured: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Leveling or torque related problems of the lower anterior teeth
Measured: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Study start16 Mar 2016
- Primary completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for RelapseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Athens
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Iosif Sifakakis, University of Athens
- Investigators
- Iosif Sifakakis, Lecturer, Principal investigator, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02742493
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 294
- Acronym
- OrthRe10tion
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 14 Apr 2016
- Last updated
- 14 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Single-center, 3-arm, Parallel-group Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Three Orthodontic Retention Schemes in Preventing Post-treatment Mandibular Arch Changes and Gingival Recession in Children and Adolescents
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02742493
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OrthRe10tion / 294
- Conditions
- Relapse, Gingival Recession
- Keywords
- relapse, irregularity, recession, retention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AthensUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Mar 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The present study aims to assess the effectiveness of three different retention schemes used to maintain tooth position after orthodontic treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances (stability) and to evaluate possible association between retention scheme and gingival recessions on the lingual surfaces of the lower anterior teeth seen for up to 5 years post-treatment. Moreover the possible association between primary relapse tendency and long term occlusal stability will be evaluated.
Detailed description
This is a randomized, controlled, single-center, equivalence trial with three parallel groups and an allocation ratio of 1:1:1, that aims to investigate the effectiveness of 3 orthodontic retention schemes on post-treatment mandibular arch stability and gingival recession.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 0.028 bonded to canines | Experimental | Other: 0.028 bonded to canineslower fixed canine and canine retainer and upper removable Hawley (Intervention A) |
| 0.027 7-strand bonded to all 6 | Experimental | Other: 0.027 7-strand bonded to all 6lower fixed canine to canine retainer and upper removable Hawley (Intervention B) |
| removable Hawley-type | Active comparator | Other: removable Hawley-typelower hawley-type and upper hawley removable retainer (Control) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 10 to 16 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Both sexes
- Age between 10 and 16 years
- At the finishing stage of orthodontic treatment, programmed for debonding
- Class I to Class II molar relationship before the beginning of orthodontic treatment
- Non-extraction treatment plan with fixed straight-wire appliances
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- No missing teeth, impacted teeth or other dental anomalies
- No congenital anomalies/ syndromes
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 0.028 bonded to canineslower fixed canine and canine retainer (0.028 stainless steel bonded to canines) and upper removable Hawley (Intervention A) | Other | 0.028 bonded to canines |
| 0.027 7-strand bonded to all 6lower fixed canine to canine retainer (7-strand Twistflex 0.027 bonded to all six anterior teeth) and upper removable Hawley (Intervention B) | Other | 0.027 7-strand bonded to all 6 |
| removable Hawley-typelower Hawley-type and upper Hawley removable retainer (Control) | Other | removable Hawley-type |
Primary outcome
Changes in Little's Irregularity Index in the mandible (mm)
Time frame: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Changes in Intercanine width in the mandible (mm)
Time frame: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Changes in Interpremolar width in the mandible (mm)
Time frame: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Changes in Intermolar width in the mandible (mm)
Time frame: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Changes in Arch length in the mandible (mm)
Time frame: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
8 secondary outcomes
Changes in Gingival Recessions on the lingual surfaces of the six lower anterior teeth
Time frame: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Changes in Intercanine width in the maxilla (mm)
Time frame: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Changes in Interpremolar width in the maxilla (mm)
Time frame: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Changes in Intermolar width in the maxilla (mm)
Time frame: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Changes in Arch length in the maxilla (mm)
Time frame: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Changes in Overbite and Overjet (mm)
Time frame: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Accidental bond failures of fixed retainers or breakages of removable ones
Time frame: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Leveling or torque related problems of the lower anterior teeth
Time frame: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jan 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Relapse
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
The Safety and Efficacy of Daratumumab in Patients With Refractory Aplastic Anemia
Aplastic Anemia, Refractory
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study of YTS109 Cell Injection in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia, Anti-CD19 STAR T-cell Therapy
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-12 Genetically Engineered Myeloid Cells in Participants With Relapsed, Refractory Solid Tumors
Relapsed Solid Tumor Malignancies, Refractory Solid Tumor Malignancies
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Iosif Sifakakis, Lecturer principal investigator
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 0.028 bonded to canines, 0.027 7-strand bonded to all 6 and removable Hawley-type in people with Relapse and Gingival Recession, run by University of Athens at 1 site in Greece.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in Little's Irregularity Index in the mandible (mm) (time frame: 1 year in retention, 2 years in retention, 5 years in retention). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jan 2025.