AzTrials
AzTrials

EmergenciesNCT02743169

Improvement of Ambulance Response Times in Karachi, Pakistan

An observational study of Emergencies, run by Johns Hopkins University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators hypothesize that spatial analysis of the location data of ambulance calls can improve prehospital care provided by Aman Foundation in Karachi, Pakistan by decreasing ambulance response times for high acuity patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Emergencies
What is being tested?
Spatially-Optimized
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
1 Apr 2017to 29 Jun 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adult patients in Karachi, Pakistan who call Aman Foundation and request an ambulance.

Who may be able to join

  • Aman Foundation uses The Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS), a commonly used five-tier triage system that includes the following categories (from least to most acute) "alpha," "bravo," "charlie," "delta," and "echo." For the analyses in Aim 2 and Aim 3, we will only examine calls for "delta" and "echo" patients.

Who cannot join

  • Ambulance calls for transport of patients from one healthcare facility to another or calls in which the patient refused transport will be excluded from the analysis.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Aman Foundation

    Karachi

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Spatial Analysis Optimization of Prehospital Services in Karachi, Pakistan to Improve Ambulance Response Times

The investigators hypothesize that spatial analysis of the location data of ambulance calls can improve prehospital care provided by Aman Foundation in Karachi, Pakistan by decreasing ambulance response times for high acuity patients. In Aim 1, the investigators will develop a conceptual framework for prehospital care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to anchor this project in Aims 2 and 3. In Aim 2, the investigators will analyze the location of calls to identify geographic areas with delayed responses for patients with higher severity of illness. As part of their quality assurance/quality improvement practices, Aman Foundation routinely collects location data from GPS devices in their ambulances for each call. Based on the analyses in Aim 2, in Aim 3 the investigators will position ambulances where there are clusters of delayed ambulance calls for high acuity patients to improve response times. This period will be compared with a previous, control period and will be analyzed to identify possible new clusters.

Read the detailed description

The list of the top causes of death and lost disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) globally includes many conditions that initially present in the emergency setting. These top causes include lower respiratory infections, ischemic heart disease, and acute injury. The morbidity and mortality that result from these causes can be minimized with emergency treatment. A key element to reducing morbidity and mortality from acute illnesses is the time of patient transport to a medical facility, which has been most clearly demonstrated for acute injury.

Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) shoulder a disproportionate burden from acute illnesses, yet it has also been demonstrated that reduced transport times to a hospital decrease the odds of mortality in trauma patients in LMICs. A lack of equipment, poorly developed infrastructure, and long distances have been reported as key barriers in the provision of emergency care. Pakistan is one such LMIC that is burdened by many of these challenges in prehospital care. Emergency medical systems (EMS) have only recently been established in Pakistan, and prior to the last several years, patients were routinely transported to healthcare facilities by relatives, bystanders, or by basic patient transport. Where formal patient transport is available, transport times are often prolonged by distance, traffic congestion, and a lack of public cooperation.

Geographic information systems (GIS) are an analytic method that may serve as a key tool in decreasing the time of transporting acutely ill patients to life-saving medical care. GIS, which links geographic information to public health data, has been used in simulations to decrease ambulance response times and been shown to decrease response times in industrialized countries. However, this has not been replicated in other highly developed countries and has never been demonstrated in an LMIC.

The investigators hypothesize that that spatial analysis of the location data of ambulance calls can improve prehospital care provided by Aman Health Care Services in Karachi, Pakistan by decreasing ambulance response times for high acuity patients.

Aim 1: Develop a conceptual framework for prehospital care in LMICs. As no such framework currently exists in the literature, the investigators will develop a conceptual framework to anchor this project in Aims 2 and 3. The framework will be developed after a consideration of other related health systems frameworks in the literature. The investigators will also consult with experts in the field and with the partners in Karachi to comment on how the framework can be improved.

Aim 2: Analyze the location of calls to identify geographic areas with longer calls and higher severity of illness. Using GIS and spatial analysis, the investigators will analyze Aman Ambulance's existing data on ambulance calls to find areas of Karachi that routinely have long response times.

Aim 3: Position ambulances where there are clusters of delayed ambulance calls for high acuity patients to improve response times. Over a six-month period, ambulances will be repositioned in and around clusters of delays to improve response times. This period will be compared with the same calendar period in the previous year using a logistic regression analysis to determine if there is a decrease in delayed ambulance responses. Spatial analyses will also be performed on data from the intervention period to assess for the presence of clusters of delays.

This study has the potential to use a sustainable method of analyzing routinely collected data on ambulance calls to shorten the time that patients with acute illnesses receive appropriate medical care in Pakistan, a setting in which there are substantial infrastructure and human resource challenges.

Conditions
Emergencies
Being tested
Spatially-Optimized
Keywords
Geographic Information Systems, Spatial Analysis, Emergency Medical Services
Medical subject headings
Emergencies

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Spatially-OptimizedOther

    Spatial analysis of retrospective data will be used to optimize the placement of ambulances to decrease response time from the time the call is received until the time the ambulance arrives at the patient's location.

Study groups in NCT02743169
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard PracticeThis group will consist of ambulance calls under the standard practice of Aman Foundation for ambulance placement.
Post-InterventionThis group will consist of ambulance calls after the spatially-optimized placement of ambulances.
Receives: Other: Spatially-Optimized

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Ambulance Response Time

    Time from when a call comes to the call center to the time the ambulance arrives at the patient.

    Measured: 18 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Apr 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Apr 2017
  3. Primary completion29 Jun 2020
  4. Study completion29 Jun 2020

Why it stopped: Could not acquire data

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02743169
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB00085859
Status last verified
Aug 2020
First submitted
13 Apr 2016
Last updated
26 Aug 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Emergencies, run by Johns Hopkins University at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Ambulance Response Time (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Aug 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in