AzTrials
AzTrials

Developmental DisabilitiesEPONCT02745990

Recombinant Human Erythropoietin Improve Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Extremely Preterm Infants

A study testing Recombinant human erythropoietin and Normal saline in people with Developmental Disabilities, run by Huiqing Sun.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In the ELGAN (Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborn) study, abnormal brain structure and function were associated with intermittent or sustained systemic inflammation (ISSI). Since EPO has anti-inflammatory properties in the kidney and in muscle as well as growth/trophic properties. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 day to 3 days
Conditions the study is for
Developmental Disabilities
What is being tested?
Recombinant human erythropoietin and Normal saline
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
440 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
May 2016to Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 day to 3 days
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Preterm infants admitted to NICU wuth gestational age less than 28 weeks
  • Age less than 3 days;
  • parental informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Major life-threatening anomalies (brain, cardiac, chromosomal anomalies)
  • Hematologic crises such as DIC, or hemolysis due to blood group incompatibilities
  • Polycythemia (hematocrit > 65);
  • Hypertension
  • Seizures
  • Congenital infection

About this study

In the ELGAN (Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborn) study, abnormal brain structure and function were associated with intermittent or sustained systemic inflammation (ISSI). Since EPO has anti-inflammatory properties in the kidney and in muscle as well as growth/trophic properties. Based on its potential for neuroprotection, the prospective randomized and masked study was designed to determine whether rhEPO (500u/kg) was also effective in improving developmental outcomes for extremely low gestational age newborns.

Read the detailed description

Exogenous erythropoietin (EPO) is currently used to reduce or prevent the need for red blood cell transfusions in preterm infants. Just two decades ago, erythropoietin (EPO) receptors were first identified in the brain, and astrocytes were found to be capable of synthesizing EPO . Subsequently, it was found that cultured hippocampal and cerebral cortical neurons exposed to EPO were spared some of the glutamate-induced cell death seen in neurons not exposed to EPO. Thus began the concept that EPO protects the brain against adversity. Several follow-up studies of children who had participated in trials of recombinant EPO for the prevention or treatment of anemia, term newborn encephalopathy,or retinopathy of prematurity have also provided evidence of neuroprotective effects.

In the ELGAN (Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborn) study, abnormal brain structure and function were associated with intermittent or sustained systemic inflammation (ISSI) . Since EPO has anti-inflammatory properties in the kidney and in muscle as well as growth/trophic properties, we reasoned that elevated circulating levels might convey information about reduced risk of brain damage in ELGANs.

Although major neurodevelopmental disabilities such as cerebral palsy (CP), mental disabilities, and learning and attention deficits during school age figure prominently in the outcomes of ELBW infants, successful neuroprotective interventions have yet to be developed. Investagators designed a prospective, randomized, masked study to evaluate rhEPO during initial hospitalization and follow up, and hypothesized that rhEPO recipients would receive fewer transfusions during initial hospitalization in extremely preterm infants. Based on its potential for neuroprotection, our study was designed to determine whether rhEPO (500 u/kg) was also effective in improving developmental outcomes for extremely low gestational age newborns.

The neurodevelopmental outcomes of rhEPO in treating extremely preterm infants are not clear. Investigators propose an early-childhood neurodevelopmental follow-up study to compare long-term effects of the rhEPO as measured by, Bayley Scales of Infant Development III. We plan to follow extremely low gestational age children around 24 months' corrected age (CA) who are enrolled in this study.

Being tested
Recombinant human erythropoietin, Normal saline
Keywords
erythropoietin, preterm, brain injury, cerebral palsy, PVL
Medical subject headings
Developmental Disabilities, Premature Birth, Brain Injuries, Cerebral Palsy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Recombinant human erythropoietinDrug

    Also called Epoietin Beta

    rhEPO is administered 500IU/kg, intravenously within 72h after birth, and every other day up to 32 weeks of corrected age.

  • Normal salineDrug

    Normal salin is administered the same volume with rhEPO intravenously within 72h after birth, and every other day up to 32 weeks of corrected age..

Study groups in NCT02745990
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EPO groupExperimentalIn EPO group, The recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) will be given by 500 U/kg/dose intravenously within 72h after birth, and every other day up to 32 weeks of corrected age.
Receives: Drug: Recombinant human erythropoietin
Normal salinePlacebo comparatorNormal saline is administered the same volume with EPO, intravenously within 72h after birth, and every other day up to 32 weeks of corrected age.
Receives: Drug: Normal saline

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mortality

    To compare the death rate of EPO and control groups at 2 years old

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Incidence of neurological disability

    To assess the incidence of neurological disability of EPO and control groups at 2 years old

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Incidence of MDI<70

    To compare the incidence of MDI<70 via Bayley Scales of Infant Development between the two groups at 2 years old

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Incidence of cerebral palsy

    To compare the incidence of cerebral palsy between the two groups at 2 years old

    Measured: 2 years

  3. Short-term complicatioins

    Retinopathy of prematurity, periventricular leukomalacia,Intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotising enterocolitis and sepsis

    Measured: 3 months

  4. Incidence of blindness

    To compare the incidence of blindness via visual acuity between the two groups at 2 years old

    Measured: 2 years

  5. Incidence of deafness

    To compare the incidence of blindness via auditory brainstem response measurements between the two groups at 2 years old

    Measured: 2 years

  6. Early blood biomarkers for poor neurological outcomes

    To investigate early blood biomarkers via multi-omics to predict poor neurological outcomes

    Measured: 4 weeks

  7. Brain imaging biomarkers for poor neurological outcomes

    To investigate Brain imaging biomarkers via MRI to predict poor neurological outcomes

    Measured: Up to 40 weeks of corrected age

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Apr 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2016
  3. Primary completionDec 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
440 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02745990
Sponsor's protocol ID
CZS-EPO
Acronym
EPO
Status last verified
Aug 2021
First submitted
16 Mar 2016
Last updated
31 Aug 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Rees S, Harding R, Walker D. The biological basis of injury and neuroprotection in the fetal and neonatal brain. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2011 Oct;29(6):551-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2011.04.004. Epub 2011 Apr 15.

    PubMed 21527338
  • Korzeniewski SJ, Allred E, Logan JW, Fichorova RN, Engelke S, Kuban KC, O'Shea TM, Paneth N, Holm M, Dammann O, Leviton A; ELGAN study investigators. Elevated endogenous erythropoietin concentrations are associated with increased risk of brain damage in extremely preterm neonates. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0115083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115083. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 25793991
  • Moore EM, Bellomo R, Nichol AD. Erythropoietin as a novel brain and kidney protective agent. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011 May;39(3):356-72. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1103900306.

    PubMed 21675055
  • Ohls RK, Kamath-Rayne BD, Christensen RD, Wiedmeier SE, Rosenberg A, Fuller J, Lacy CB, Roohi M, Lambert DK, Burnett JJ, Pruckler B, Peceny H, Cannon DC, Lowe JR. Cognitive outcomes of preterm infants randomized to darbepoetin, erythropoietin, or placebo. Pediatrics. 2014 Jun;133(6):1023-30. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-4307. Epub 2014 May 12.

    PubMed 24819566
  • Zhu C, Kang W, Xu F, Cheng X, Zhang Z, Jia L, Ji L, Guo X, Xiong H, Simbruner G, Blomgren K, Wang X. Erythropoietin improved neurologic outcomes in newborns with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatrics. 2009 Aug;124(2):e218-26. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3553. Epub 2009 Jul 27.

    PubMed 19651565
  • Brown MS, Eichorst D, Lala-Black B, Gonzalez R. Higher cumulative doses of erythropoietin and developmental outcomes in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2009 Oct;124(4):e681-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2701. Epub 2009 Sep 28.

    PubMed 19786428
  • Leviton A, Kuban KC, Allred EN, Fichorova RN, O'Shea TM, Paneth N; ELGAN Study Investigators. Early postnatal blood concentrations of inflammation-related proteins and microcephaly two years later in infants born before the 28th post-menstrual week. Early Hum Dev. 2011 May;87(5):325-30. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.01.043. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

    PubMed 21334149
  • O'Shea TM, Shah B, Allred EN, Fichorova RN, Kuban KCK, Dammann O, Leviton A; ELGAN Study Investigators. Inflammation-initiating illnesses, inflammation-related proteins, and cognitive impairment in extremely preterm infants. Brain Behav Immun. 2013 Mar;29:104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2012.12.012. Epub 2013 Jan 4.

    PubMed 23295265
  • Lee SH, Li C, Lim SW, Ahn KO, Choi BS, Kim YS, Moon IS, Kim J, Bang BK, Yang CW. Attenuation of interstitial inflammation and fibrosis by recombinant human erythropoietin in chronic cyclosporine nephropathy. Am J Nephrol. 2005 Jan-Feb;25(1):64-76. doi: 10.1159/000084275. Epub 2005 Mar 2.

    PubMed 15746540
  • Contaldo C, Lindenblatt N, Elsherbiny A, Hogger DC, Borozadi MK, Vetter ST, Lang KS, Handschin AE, Giovanoli P. Erythropoietin requires endothelial nitric oxide synthase to counteract TNF-[alpha]-induced microcirculatory dysfunction in murine striated muscle. Shock. 2011 Mar;35(3):315-21. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181fd0700.

    PubMed 20926979
  • Milne S, McDonald J, Comino EJ. The use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III with clinical populations: a preliminary exploration. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2012 Feb;32(1):24-33. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2011.592572. Epub 2011 Aug 4.

    PubMed 21812743

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Recombinant human erythropoietin and Normal saline in people with Developmental Disabilities, run by Huiqing Sun.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mortality (time frame: 2 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02745990, which also lists 11 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Aug 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in