Healthy VolunteersNCT02746757
Glucagon Like Peptide-1 in Remote Ischemic Conditioning
A study testing Remote conditioning and Exendin 9-39 in people with Healthy Volunteers, run by Karolinska Institutet at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
The study was designed to investigate whether glucagon like peptide-1 is a mediator of protection of endothelial function induced by remote ischemic conditioning in ischemia-reperfusion Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy Volunteers
- What is being tested?
- Remote conditioning and Exendin 9-39
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- May 2015to Jan 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy male volunteers -
Who cannot join
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Sweden1 site
Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital
Stockholm, 17176
About this study
Official title: The Role of Glucagon Like Peptide-1 in the Protective Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning During Ischemia-reperfusion
The study was designed to investigate whether glucagon like peptide-1 is a mediator of protection of endothelial function induced by remote ischemic conditioning in ischemia-reperfusion
Read the detailed description
The mechanism behind the cardioprotective effect of remote preconditioning is incompletely understood. Data from experimental studies suggest that a combination of humoral and neurogenic factors mediate the transition of protective signals from peripheral tissues to the myocardium. A major break-through in the understanding of the signaling was the observation that vagal nerve activation is involved. Key signaling pathways in the target organ are likely to be mediated via the vascular endothelium which is known to play an important role during the early reperfusion period. Thus, animal studies have demonstrated that RIPC stimulates endothelial nitric oxide production secondary to down-regulation of arginase. It remains unclear, however, whether RIPC via activation of endothelial nitric oxide preserves endothelial function in humans. Additional data indicate strongly that glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) provides protection against ischemia-reperfusion injury in experimental animals models as well as in clinical studies. The role of GLP-1 in the protective effect of RIPC has previously not been investigated, however. The present study was therefore designed to determine the involvement of GLP-1 in the protection induced by RIPC via endothelial activation in humans. To this end we use a model of reversible ischemia-reperfusion injury in the forearm, and the GLP-1 antagonist exendin 9-39 (Ex 9-39).
Objective To test the hypothesis that GLP-1 is a mediator of protection of endothelial function induced by RIPC in ischemia-reperfusion.
Endpoints Primary: Change in endothelium dependent vasodilatation induced by RIPC Secondary: Change in plasma GLP-1
Study subjects The study is performed on healthy volunteers 18-60 years of age. All subjects will undergo a screening including medical history and routine clinical examination, and should be free of medication. A screening blood sample includes hemoglobin, leukocyte and platelet count, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides.
Methods Endothelial function is determined in the brachial artery by flow-mediated dilation (FMD). Briefly, non-invasive examination of the radial artery of the non-dominant arm is performed with a 11 MHz (output 12 MHz) linear-array transducer connected to a Vivid E9. The transducer is connected to a flexible tripod to prevent movement of the probe. Images are recorded and saved every third second at end-diastole. Baseline radial artery diameter is recorded for one minute and defined as a mean from 20 images. A blood pressure cuff is placed around the upper part of the forearm, which is inflated to 30 mmHg above systolic pressure or 200 mmHg for 5 min. The diameter of the radial artery is continuously recorded for 3 min during hyperemia following deflation of the cuff. The three frames displaying maximum dilatation at end-diastole (triggered from the ECG) are used to calculate a mean diameter. All images are analyzed with Brachial analyzer (Medical Imaging Applications, Iowa City, IA, USA). FMD is calculated as a percentage increase in diameter from baseline diameter according to the following formula: diameter following cuff deflation-baseline diameter/baseline diameter x 100. All evaluations are performed blinded. A decrease in endothelial function is an established outcome of reperfusion injury.
Study protocol After determining the basal FMD ischemia is induced by inflating a cuff to 200 mmHg on the upper arm for 20 min followed by reperfusion. FMD is determined again 20 min after the start of reperfusion . Each individual is examined on three occasions: A) ischemia-reperfusion without intervention, B) ischemia-reperfusion with intervention by RIPC, C) ischemia-reperfusion with RIPC and administration of Ex 9-39. The order of the examination is randomly assigned by drawing one of three numbers. RIPC is performed in cycles of 5 min of inflation (200 mmHg or 20 mmHg above systolic blood pressure) and 5 min deflation of an automatic blood pressure cuff around the left thigh. Two cycles are performed during ischemia and 2 cycles immediately after reperfusion. The GLP-1 receptor antagonist Ex 9-39 is administered as a bolus of 7500 pmol/kg followed by an iv infusion starting 15 min before the initial FMD and maintained until the second FMD at a rate of 500 pmol/kg/min. The dose is based on previous experiences from studies on humans.
During the experimental protocols the following blood samples are collected for analysis of glucose, insulin, GLP-1.
- Conditions
- Healthy Volunteers
- Being tested
- Remote conditioning, Exendin 9-39
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Remote conditioningOther
Exendin 9-39Drug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ischemia-reperfusion no intervention | No intervention | Ischemia-reperfusion without intervention |
| Ischemia-reperfusion with RIPC | Experimental | Ischemia-reperfusion with intervention by RIPC Receives: Other: Remote conditioning |
| Ischemia-reperfusion with RIPC and Ex 9-39 | Experimental | Ischemia-reperfusion with RIPC and Ex 9-39 Receives: Other: Remote conditioning; Drug: Exendin 9-39 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in endothelium dependent vasodilatation
Measured: 20 min post-reperfusion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2015
- Primary completionDec 2017
- Study completionJan 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Healthy VolunteersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Karolinska InstitutetThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Karolinska Institutet
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, John Pernow, Karolinska Institutet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02746757
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RIPC GLP-1
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 18 Apr 2016
- Last updated
- 7 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Role of Glucagon Like Peptide-1 in the Protective Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning During Ischemia-reperfusion
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02746757
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RIPC GLP-1
- Conditions
- Healthy Volunteers
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Karolinska InstitutetUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study was designed to investigate whether glucagon like peptide-1 is a mediator of protection of endothelial function induced by remote ischemic conditioning in ischemia-reperfusion
Detailed description
The mechanism behind the cardioprotective effect of remote preconditioning is incompletely understood. Data from experimental studies suggest that a combination of humoral and neurogenic factors mediate the transition of protective signals from peripheral tissues to the myocardium. A major break-through in the understanding of the signaling was the observation that vagal nerve activation is involved. Key signaling pathways in the target organ are likely to be mediated via the vascular endothelium which is known to play an important role during the early reperfusion period. Thus, animal studies have demonstrated that RIPC stimulates endothelial nitric oxide production secondary to down-regulation of arginase. It remains unclear, however, whether RIPC via activation of endothelial nitric oxide preserves endothelial function in humans. Additional data indicate strongly that glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) provides protection against ischemia-reperfusion injury in experimental animals models as well as in clinical studies. The role of GLP-1 in the protective effect of RIPC has previously not been investigated, however. The present study was therefore designed to determine the involvement of GLP-1 in the protection induced by RIPC via endothelial activation in humans. To this end we use a model of reversible ischemia-reperfusion injury in the forearm, and the GLP-1 antagonist exendin 9-39 (Ex 9-39).
Objective To test the hypothesis that GLP-1 is a mediator of protection of endothelial function induced by RIPC in ischemia-reperfusion.
Endpoints Primary: Change in endothelium dependent vasodilatation induced by RIPC Secondary: Change in plasma GLP-1
Study subjects The study is performed on healthy volunteers 18-60 years of age. All subjects will undergo a screening including medical history and routine clinical examination, and should be free of medication. A screening blood sample includes hemoglobin, leukocyte and platelet count, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides.
Methods Endothelial function is determined in the brachial artery by flow-mediated dilation (FMD). Briefly, non-invasive examination of the radial artery of the non-dominant arm is performed with a 11 MHz (output 12 MHz) linear-array transducer connected to a Vivid E9. The transducer is connected to a flexible tripod to prevent movement of the probe. Images are recorded and saved every third second at end-diastole. Baseline radial artery diameter is recorded for one minute and defined as a mean from 20 images. A blood pressure cuff is placed around the upper part of the forearm, which is inflated to 30 mmHg above systolic pressure or 200 mmHg for 5 min. The diameter of the radial artery is continuously recorded for 3 min during hyperemia following deflation of the cuff. The three frames displaying maximum dilatation at end-diastole (triggered from the ECG) are used to calculate a mean diameter. All images are analyzed with Brachial analyzer (Medical Imaging Applications, Iowa City, IA, USA). FMD is calculated as a percentage increase in diameter from baseline diameter according to the following formula: diameter following cuff deflation-baseline diameter/baseline diameter x 100. All evaluations are performed blinded. A decrease in endothelial function is an established outcome of reperfusion injury.
Study protocol After determining the basal FMD ischemia is induced by inflating a cuff to 200 mmHg on the upper arm for 20 min followed by reperfusion. FMD is determined again 20 min after the start of reperfusion . Each individual is examined on three occasions: A) ischemia-reperfusion without intervention, B) ischemia-reperfusion with intervention by RIPC, C) ischemia-reperfusion with RIPC and administration of Ex 9-39. The order of the examination is randomly assigned by drawing one of three numbers. RIPC is performed in cycles of 5 min of inflation (200 mmHg or 20 mmHg above systolic blood pressure) and 5 min deflation of an automatic blood pressure cuff around the left thigh. Two cycles are performed during ischemia and 2 cycles immediately after reperfusion. The GLP-1 receptor antagonist Ex 9-39 is administered as a bolus of 7500 pmol/kg followed by an iv infusion starting 15 min before the initial FMD and maintained until the second FMD at a rate of 500 pmol/kg/min. The dose is based on previous experiences from studies on humans.
During the experimental protocols the following blood samples are collected for analysis of glucose, insulin, GLP-1.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ischemia-reperfusion no intervention | No intervention | –Ischemia-reperfusion without intervention |
| Ischemia-reperfusion with RIPC | Experimental | Other: Remote conditioningIschemia-reperfusion with intervention by RIPC |
| Ischemia-reperfusion with RIPC and Ex 9-39 | Experimental | Other: Remote conditioning, Drug: Exendin 9-39Ischemia-reperfusion with RIPC and Ex 9-39 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Healthy male volunteers -
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Remote conditioning | Other | Ischemia-reperfusion with RIPC, Ischemia-reperfusion with RIPC and Ex 9-39 |
| Exendin 9-39 | Drug | Ischemia-reperfusion with RIPC and Ex 9-39 |
Primary outcome
Change in endothelium dependent vasodilatation
Time frame: 20 min post-reperfusion
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Mar 2018.
Related trials for Healthy Volunteers
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Human Subarachnoid Space Using Intrathecal Gadolinium Contrast
Healthy Volunteers
RecruitingObservational study
Survey to Determine Incarcerated Persons' Views on Surrogate Decision Making
Healthy Volunteers
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn How Different Amounts of the Study Medicine Called PF-07985631 Are Tolerated and Act in the Body of Healthy Adults
Healthy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Collection and Distribution of Blood Components From Healthy Donors for In Vitro Research Use
Blood Donors, Apheresis
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Study Brain Mechanisms of Frustration With Magnetoencephalography in Healthy Volunteers
Irritability
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Remote conditioning and Exendin 9-39 in people with Healthy Volunteers, run by Karolinska Institutet at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in endothelium dependent vasodilatation (time frame: 20 min post-reperfusion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Mar 2018.