MigrainesNCT02748577
Pain Processing in Adults With Migraines
A study testing Questionnaires and Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Pain Measurements in people with Migraines, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Primary Objective of this study: To assess experimental heat pain responses (pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, pain catastrophizing, emotional reactivity) in migraineurs vs. healthy controls. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Migraines
- What is being tested?
- Questionnaires and Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Pain Measurements
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 121 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 24 Aug 2016to 16 Jul 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Inclusion criteria for Healthy Controls:
- ≥18yo;
- Inclusion Criteria for Migraineurs:
- ≥18yo with >1 yr of migraines and currently 4-20 days/month with migraines, although no migraine within 48 hrs of study visit.
Who cannot join
- Any major unstable medical/psychiatric illness (e.g., hospitalization within 90 days, suicide risk, etc.)
- Severe clinical depression/anxiety
- Chronic pain condition (e.g., fibromyalgia, migraines for healthy controls, etc.) or sensory abnormalities (e.g., neuropathy, Raynaud's, etc.)
- Diagnosis of medication overuse headache or chronic migraine.
- Migraineurs will be studied after being headache-free for at least 48 hours (interictally).
- Participants may be currently taking migraine medications, as long as they do not have a diagnosis of medication overuse headache.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Pregnant subjects will be excluded from all portions of the study due to possible unknown risks of frankly noxious stimuli.
- Due to unknown risks and potential harm to the unborn fetus, sexually active women of childbearing potential must use a reliable method of birth control while participating in this study
- Volunteers with no pain ratings to frankly noxious stimuli (temperatures > 49°C) or excessive responses to threshold temperatures (~43°C)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
About this study
Primary Objective of this study: To assess experimental heat pain responses (pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, pain catastrophizing, emotional reactivity) in migraineurs vs. healthy controls.
The current tools of migraine pain measurement are inadequate to distinguish the overall burden of suffering, as there is an over reliance on a single numerical pain score to represent the entire pain experience. Measuring and targeting the affective component, in addition to the sensory component of pain, may capture this discrepancy in disease burden. The affective component of migraine pain may be just as important as the sensory component to target and measure since it significantly impacts outcomes, disability, and has therapeutic treatment implications.
Read more
Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a robust lab paradigm (not a clinical experience) that delivers one painful noxious thermal stimuli and asks for simultaneous pain intensity and pain unpleasantness scores. By using this in the research, investigators will be able to differentiate the sensory (pain quality-what the pain feels like) from the affective (how awful/unpleasant the pain feels) components of experimental pain in normal controls vs. migrainuers.
No previous studies have evaluated differences in experimental pain intensity vs. pain unpleasantness in migraineurs vs. controls. As migraine pain uniquely involves many altered sensory phenomenon (e.g., photophobia, phonophobia), it cannot be assumed that responses to experimental pain in migraine will be the same as other clinical pain syndromes. Further, different clinical pain syndromes have distinct responses to pain intensity vs. pain unpleasantness.
Read the detailed description
Investigators will conduct a cross-sectional study in migraineurs (interictally, i.e., between migraine attacks) and healthy controls to compare responses to experimental heat pain intensity and unpleasantness and correlate these results to differences in emotional reactivity and pain catastrophizing.
- Conditions
- Migraines
- Being tested
- Questionnaires, Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Pain Measurements
- Keywords
- Migraines, Pain responses
- Medical subject headings
- Migraine Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
QuestionnairesOther
Before the experimental session, participants will use REDCap to complete several questionnaires used to assess outcomes.
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Pain MeasurementsOther
Investigators will administer noxious thermal stimulation to assess pain threshold temperatures and assess responses to pain on measures of pain intensity and pain unpleasantness
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Migraine | Experimental | Participants with migraines will complete one study visit where they will complete several questionnaires and will also complete Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Pain Measurements. They must be migraine-free during the visit and no migraine within 48 hrs of study visit Receives: Other: Questionnaires; Other: Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Pain Measurements |
| Healthy Controls | Active comparator | Healthy Controls will complete one study visit where they will complete several questionnaires and will complete Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Pain Measurements. Receives: Other: Questionnaires; Other: Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Pain Measurements |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Heat Pain Intensity coefficient and intercept from stimulus response curve
Using the logarithmic equation: log (VAS pain ratings)=log (t - 35) * coefficient + intercept where t represents stimulus temperature, we will generate stimulus-response curves for each subject
Measured: One visit
Heat Pain Unpleasantness coefficient and intercept from stimulus response curve
Using the logarithmic equation: log (VAS pain ratings)=log (t - 35) * coefficient + intercept where t represents stimulus temperature, we will generate stimulus-response curves for each subject
Measured: One visit
Pain Catastophizing score
Score on the Pain Catastrophizing instrument
Measured: One Visit
Difficulty in Emotions Regulation score
Score on the Difficulty in Emotions Regulation score
Measured: One Visit
Secondary outcomes (12)
Heat Pain Threshold Temperature
Temperature of heat pain threshold
Measured: One Visit
Anxiety
Score on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) instrument
Measured: One Visit
Depression
Score on the Patient Health related questionnaire-depression module (PHQ-9) instrument
Measured: One Visit
Mindfulness
Score on the Five Factor Mindfulness (FFM) instrument
Measured: One Visit
Stress
Score on the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) instrument
Measured: One Visit
Hope
Score on the Herth Hope Index instrument
Measured: One Visit
Optimism
Score on the Life Orientation Test instrument
Measured: One Visit
Social Connectedness
Score on the Social Connectedness Scale instrument
Measured: One Visit
Flourishing
Score on the Flourishing scale instrument
Measured: One Visit
Resilience
Score on the Brief Resilience scale instrument
Measured: One Visit
Sleep
Score on the NIH Promis Measure of sleep disturbance instrument
Measured: One Visit
Global Health
Score on the 1st question of the NIH Promis Global Health measure
Measured: One Visit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Study start24 Aug 2016
- Primary completion16 Jul 2019
- Study completion16 Jul 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for MigrainesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Wake Forest University Health SciencesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 121 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Rebecca E Wells, MD, MPH, Principal investigator, Wake Forest University Health Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02748577
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00027845
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 11 Apr 2016
- Last updated
- 12 May 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pain Processing in Adults With Migraines
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02748577
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00027845
- Conditions
- Migraines
- Keywords
- Migraines, Pain responses
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 121 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 24 Aug 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Jul 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary Objective of this study: To assess experimental heat pain responses (pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, pain catastrophizing, emotional reactivity) in migraineurs vs. healthy controls.
The current tools of migraine pain measurement are inadequate to distinguish the overall burden of suffering, as there is an over reliance on a single numerical pain score to represent the entire pain experience. Measuring and targeting the affective component, in addition to the sensory component of pain, may capture this discrepancy in disease burden. The affective component of migraine pain may be just as important as the sensory component to target and measure since it significantly impacts outcomes, disability, and has therapeutic treatment implications.
Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a robust lab paradigm (not a clinical experience) that delivers one painful noxious thermal stimuli and asks for simultaneous pain intensity and pain unpleasantness scores. By using this in the research, investigators will be able to differentiate the sensory (pain quality-what the pain feels like) from the affective (how awful/unpleasant the pain feels) components of experimental pain in normal controls vs. migrainuers.
No previous studies have evaluated differences in experimental pain intensity vs. pain unpleasantness in migraineurs vs. controls. As migraine pain uniquely involves many altered sensory phenomenon (e.g., photophobia, phonophobia), it cannot be assumed that responses to experimental pain in migraine will be the same as other clinical pain syndromes. Further, different clinical pain syndromes have distinct responses to pain intensity vs. pain unpleasantness.
Detailed description
Investigators will conduct a cross-sectional study in migraineurs (interictally, i.e., between migraine attacks) and healthy controls to compare responses to experimental heat pain intensity and unpleasantness and correlate these results to differences in emotional reactivity and pain catastrophizing.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Migraine | Experimental | Other: Questionnaires, Other: Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Pain MeasurementsParticipants with migraines will complete one study visit where they will complete several questionnaires and will also complete Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Pain Measurements. They must be migraine-free during the visit and no migraine within 48 hrs of study visit |
| Healthy Controls | Active comparator | Other: Questionnaires, Other: Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Pain MeasurementsHealthy Controls will complete one study visit where they will complete several questionnaires and will complete Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Pain Measurements. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Inclusion criteria for Healthy Controls:
- Inclusion Criteria for Migraineurs:
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Any major unstable medical/psychiatric illness (e.g., hospitalization within 90 days, suicide risk, etc.)
- Severe clinical depression/anxiety
- Chronic pain condition (e.g., fibromyalgia, migraines for healthy controls, etc.) or sensory abnormalities (e.g., neuropathy, Raynaud's, etc.)
- Diagnosis of medication overuse headache or chronic migraine.
- Migraineurs will be studied after being headache-free for at least 48 hours (interictally).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| QuestionnairesBefore the experimental session, participants will use REDCap to complete several questionnaires used to assess outcomes. | Other | Healthy Controls, Migraine |
| Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Pain MeasurementsInvestigators will administer noxious thermal stimulation to assess pain threshold temperatures and assess responses to pain on measures of pain intensity and pain unpleasantness | Other | Healthy Controls, Migraine |
Primary outcome
Heat Pain Intensity coefficient and intercept from stimulus response curve
Time frame: One visit
Using the logarithmic equation: log (VAS pain ratings)=log (t - 35) * coefficient + intercept where t represents stimulus temperature, we will generate stimulus-response curves for each subject
Heat Pain Unpleasantness coefficient and intercept from stimulus response curve
Time frame: One visit
Using the logarithmic equation: log (VAS pain ratings)=log (t - 35) * coefficient + intercept where t represents stimulus temperature, we will generate stimulus-response curves for each subject
Pain Catastophizing score
Time frame: One Visit
Score on the Pain Catastrophizing instrument
Difficulty in Emotions Regulation score
Time frame: One Visit
Score on the Difficulty in Emotions Regulation score
12 secondary outcomes
Heat Pain Threshold Temperature
Time frame: One Visit
Anxiety
Time frame: One Visit
Depression
Time frame: One Visit
Mindfulness
Time frame: One Visit
Stress
Time frame: One Visit
Hope
Time frame: One Visit
Optimism
Time frame: One Visit
Social Connectedness
Time frame: One Visit
Flourishing
Time frame: One Visit
Resilience
Time frame: One Visit
Sleep
Time frame: One Visit
Global Health
Time frame: One Visit
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 May 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Migraines
Active, not recruiting
MMA Embolization for Refractory Chronic Migraine
Migraine Disorders
Active, not recruiting
Intra-Nasal Mechanical Stimulation (INMEST) as a Potential Preventative Treatment for Migraine
Migraine
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Elismetrep (K-304) in the Acute Treatment of Migraine
Migraine
RecruitingPhase 3
A Long-Term Safety Study of Elismetrep (K-304) in the Acute Treatment of Migraine
Acute Migraine
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Elismetrep (K-304) in the Acute Treatment of Migraine
Migraine
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rebecca E Wells, MD, MPH principal investigator
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Questionnaires and Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) Pain Measurements in people with Migraines, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Heat Pain Intensity coefficient and intercept from stimulus response curve (time frame: One visit). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 May 2020.