Hip ArthrosisNCT02749058
Capsulectomy vs Capsulotomy in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Clinical Outcomes and Proprioception Evaluation
A study testing Capsulectomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty and Capsulotomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty in people with Hip Arthrosis, run by IRCCS San Raffaele at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The purpose of our study is to evaluate the differences in functional activities and proprioception after surgery in subjects who underwent hip prosthesis implant with capsulotomy or capsulectomy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hip Arthrosis
- What is being tested?
- Capsulectomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty and Capsulotomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 94 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Apr 2016to Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Elective unilateral primary hip prosthesis utilizing direct anterior approach
- Age ≥ 18
- Signature of the informed consent
Who cannot join
- Documented peripheral neuropathies
- Documented central nervous system diseases that may compromise the balance and/or proprioception
- Presence of other joint prosthesis in the lower limbs
- Revision hip arthroplasty
- Symptomatic osteoarthritis of other joints in the lower limbs (including the controlateral hip) or the spine
- BMI > 35
- Systemic diseases or clinical conditions that could interfere with the clinical study
- Neuromuscular diseases
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The purpose of our study is to evaluate the differences in functional activities and proprioception after surgery in subjects who underwent hip prosthesis implant with capsulotomy or capsulectomy.
Read the detailed description
Concerning hip arthroplasty surgery, in patients affected by coxarthrosis, there are two different techniques: one is capsulectomy and the second one is capsulotomy with repairing the capsule at the end of the procedure. Both preserving and excising the capsule are accepted methods and the choice whether repairing the capsule or not is up to the surgeon, since studies have not yet demonstrated the superiority of one of the two techniques. Articular capsule has a physiological role in joint stability and proprioception. The presence of proprioceptive nerve endings in hip joint capsule has been observed both in healthy patients and in those affected by coxarthrosis.
If capsulectomy is performed during primary hip arthroplasty, the pseudocapsule that is formed in place of the native capsule will not have any active neurophysiological role in the hip.
For this reason, investigators compare the two surgical techniques with the purpose of highlighting, if existing, the superiority of one technique on the other in terms of better functional recovery and proprioceptive sensibility.
- Conditions
- Hip Arthrosis
- Being tested
- Capsulectomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty, Capsulotomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty
- Keywords
- capsulectomy, capsulotomy
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Hip
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Capsulectomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip ArthroplastyProcedure or surgery
Surgical intervention in which the surgeon will perform anterior capsulectomy during total hip arthroplasty.
Capsulotomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip ArthroplastyProcedure or surgery
Surgical intervention in which the surgeon will perform anterior capsulotomy during total hip arthroplasty. Surgeon will repair the joint capsule.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Capsulectomy | Other | Procedure: Capsulectomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Receives: Procedure: Capsulectomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty |
| Capsulotomy | Other | Procedure: Capsulotomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Receives: Procedure: Capsulotomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
Measured: Before surgery (T0), 50 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T1)
Change in Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
Measured: Before surgery (T0), 90 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T2)
Secondary outcomes (18)
Change in Six minutes walk test distance
Measured: Before surgery (T0), 50 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T1)
Change in Six minutes walk test distance
Measured: Before surgery (T0), 90 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T2)
Change in 30 seconds chair stand test
Measured: Before surgery (T0), 50 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T1)
Change in 30 seconds chair stand test
Measured: Before surgery (T0), 90 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T2)
Hip Proprioception Evaluation Flexion - Measure of the absolute difference between the actual and the subject-replicated target positions.
Measures of hip flexion repositioning error (active and passive repositioning)
Measured: Before surgery (T0), 50 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T1)
Hip Proprioception Evaluation Abduction - Measure of the absolute difference between the actual and the subject-replicated target positions.
Measures of hip abduction repositioning error (active and passive repositioning)
Measured: Before surgery (T0), 50 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T1)
Hip Proprioception Evaluation External Rotation- Measure of the absolute difference between the actual and the subject-replicated target positions.
Measures of hip external rotation repositioning error (active and passive repositioning)
Measured: Before surgery (T0), 50 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T1)
Hip Proprioception Evaluation Flexion- Measure of the absolute difference between the actual and the subject-replicated target positions.
Measures of hip flexion repositioning error (active and passive repositioning)
Measured: Before surgery (T0), 90 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T2)
Hip Proprioception Evaluation Abduction - Measure of the absolute difference between the actual and the subject-replicated target positions.
Measures of hip abduction repositioning error (active and passive repositioning)
Measured: Before surgery (T0), 90 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T2)
Hip Proprioception Evaluation External Rotation- Measure of the absolute difference between the actual and the subject-replicated target positions.
Measures of hip external rotation repositioning error (active and passive repositioning)
Measured: Before surgery (T0), 90 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T2)
Active hip Range Of Motion Flexion- degree
Measures of hip flexion maximal active Range of Motion
Measured: Before surgery (T0), 50 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T1)
Active hip Range Of Motion Abduction- degree
Measures of hip abduction maximal active Range of Motion
Measured: Before surgery (T0), 50 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T1)
Active hip Range Of Motion External Rotation- degree
Measures of hip external rotation maximal active Range of Motion
Measured: Before surgery (T0), 50 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T1)
Active hip Range Of Motion Flexion- degree
Measures of hip flexion maximal active Range of Motion
Measured: Before surgery (T0), 90 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T2)
Active hip Range Of Motion Abduction- degree
Measures of hip abduction maximal active Range of Motion
Measured: Before surgery (T0), 90 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T2)
Active hip Range Of Motion External Rotation- degree
Measures of hip external rotation maximal active Range of Motion
Measured: Before surgery (T0), 90 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T2)
Surgical time- minutes
This will be measured from the time of incision to the time the dressing is applied
Measured: The day of the surgical procedure
Percent hemoglobin drop
Percent hemoglobin drop will be measured by comparing the preoperative hemoglobin to the inpatient nadir hemoglobin.
Measured: Up to 2 weeks after surgery (during inpatient stay)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2016
- Primary completionDec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hip ArthrosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by IRCCS San RaffaeleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 94 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS San Raffaele
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gianfranco Fraschini, IRCCS San Raffaele
- Investigators
- Marco Ometti, MD, Study director, IRCCS San Raffaele
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02749058
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CAP_Feb16
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 14 Apr 2016
- Last updated
- 2 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Hewitt JD, Glisson RR, Guilak F, Vail TP. The mechanical properties of the human hip capsule ligaments. J Arthroplasty. 2002 Jan;17(1):82-9. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.27674.
PubMed 11805930Martin HD, Savage A, Braly BA, Palmer IJ, Beall DP, Kelly B. The function of the hip capsular ligaments: a quantitative report. Arthroscopy. 2008 Feb;24(2):188-95. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.08.024. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
PubMed 18237703Birnbaum K, Prescher A, Hessler S, Heller KD. The sensory innervation of the hip joint--an anatomical study. Surg Radiol Anat. 1997;19(6):371-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01628504.
PubMed 9479711Moraes MR, Cavalcante ML, Leite JA, Macedo JN, Sampaio ML, Jamacaru VF, Santana MG. The characteristics of the mechanoreceptors of the hip with arthrosis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2011 Nov 16;6:58. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-58.
PubMed 22087603Bennell K, Dobson F, Hinman R. Measures of physical performance assessments: Self-Paced Walk Test (SPWT), Stair Climb Test (SCT), Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Chair Stand Test (CST), Timed Up & Go (TUG), Sock Test, Lift and Carry Test (LCT), and Car Task. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S350-70. doi: 10.1002/acr.20538. No abstract available.
PubMed 22588756Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klassbo M, Roos EM. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003 May 30;4:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-4-10. Epub 2003 May 30.
PubMed 12777182Ometti M, Brambilla L, Gatti R, Tettamanti A, La Cava T, Pironti P, Fraschini G, Salini V. Capsulectomy vs capsulotomy in total hip arthroplasty. Clinical outcomes and proprioception evaluation: Study protocol for a randomized, controlled, double blinded trial. J Orthop. 2019 Sep 12;16(6):526-533. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.09.020. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.
PubMed 31680746
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Capsulectomy vs Capsulotomy in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Clinical Outcomes and Proprioception Evaluation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02749058
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CAP_Feb16
- Conditions
- Hip Arthrosis
- Keywords
- capsulectomy, capsulotomy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Suspended
- Enrolment
- 94 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS San RaffaeleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Apr 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of our study is to evaluate the differences in functional activities and proprioception after surgery in subjects who underwent hip prosthesis implant with capsulotomy or capsulectomy.
Detailed description
Concerning hip arthroplasty surgery, in patients affected by coxarthrosis, there are two different techniques: one is capsulectomy and the second one is capsulotomy with repairing the capsule at the end of the procedure. Both preserving and excising the capsule are accepted methods and the choice whether repairing the capsule or not is up to the surgeon, since studies have not yet demonstrated the superiority of one of the two techniques. Articular capsule has a physiological role in joint stability and proprioception. The presence of proprioceptive nerve endings in hip joint capsule has been observed both in healthy patients and in those affected by coxarthrosis.
If capsulectomy is performed during primary hip arthroplasty, the pseudocapsule that is formed in place of the native capsule will not have any active neurophysiological role in the hip.
For this reason, investigators compare the two surgical techniques with the purpose of highlighting, if existing, the superiority of one technique on the other in terms of better functional recovery and proprioceptive sensibility.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Capsulectomy | Other | Procedure: Capsulectomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip ArthroplastyProcedure: Capsulectomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty |
| Capsulotomy | Other | Procedure: Capsulotomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip ArthroplastyProcedure: Capsulotomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Elective unilateral primary hip prosthesis utilizing direct anterior approach
- Age ≥ 18
- Signature of the informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Documented peripheral neuropathies
- Documented central nervous system diseases that may compromise the balance and/or proprioception
- Presence of other joint prosthesis in the lower limbs
- Revision hip arthroplasty
- Symptomatic osteoarthritis of other joints in the lower limbs (including the controlateral hip) or the spine
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Capsulectomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip ArthroplastySurgical intervention in which the surgeon will perform anterior capsulectomy during total hip arthroplasty. | Procedure or surgery | Capsulectomy |
| Capsulotomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip ArthroplastySurgical intervention in which the surgeon will perform anterior capsulotomy during total hip arthroplasty. Surgeon will repair the joint capsule. | Procedure or surgery | Capsulotomy |
Primary outcome
Change in Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
Time frame: Before surgery (T0), 50 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T1)
Change in Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
Time frame: Before surgery (T0), 90 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T2)
18 secondary outcomes
Change in Six minutes walk test distance
Time frame: Before surgery (T0), 50 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T1)
Change in Six minutes walk test distance
Time frame: Before surgery (T0), 90 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T2)
Change in 30 seconds chair stand test
Time frame: Before surgery (T0), 50 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T1)
Change in 30 seconds chair stand test
Time frame: Before surgery (T0), 90 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T2)
Hip Proprioception Evaluation Flexion - Measure of the absolute difference between the actual and the subject-replicated target positions.
Time frame: Before surgery (T0), 50 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T1)
Hip Proprioception Evaluation Abduction - Measure of the absolute difference between the actual and the subject-replicated target positions.
Time frame: Before surgery (T0), 50 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T1)
Hip Proprioception Evaluation External Rotation- Measure of the absolute difference between the actual and the subject-replicated target positions.
Time frame: Before surgery (T0), 50 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T1)
Hip Proprioception Evaluation Flexion- Measure of the absolute difference between the actual and the subject-replicated target positions.
Time frame: Before surgery (T0), 90 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T2)
Hip Proprioception Evaluation Abduction - Measure of the absolute difference between the actual and the subject-replicated target positions.
Time frame: Before surgery (T0), 90 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T2)
Hip Proprioception Evaluation External Rotation- Measure of the absolute difference between the actual and the subject-replicated target positions.
Time frame: Before surgery (T0), 90 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T2)
Active hip Range Of Motion Flexion- degree
Time frame: Before surgery (T0), 50 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T1)
Active hip Range Of Motion Abduction- degree
Time frame: Before surgery (T0), 50 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T1)
Active hip Range Of Motion External Rotation- degree
Time frame: Before surgery (T0), 50 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T1)
Active hip Range Of Motion Flexion- degree
Time frame: Before surgery (T0), 90 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T2)
Active hip Range Of Motion Abduction- degree
Time frame: Before surgery (T0), 90 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T2)
Active hip Range Of Motion External Rotation- degree
Time frame: Before surgery (T0), 90 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T2)
Surgical time- minutes
Time frame: The day of the surgical procedure
Percent hemoglobin drop
Time frame: Up to 2 weeks after surgery (during inpatient stay)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Mar 2023.
- Background: PubMed 11805930Hewitt JD, Glisson RR, Guilak F, Vail TP. The mechanical properties of the human hip capsule ligaments. J Arthroplasty. 2002 Jan;17(1):82-9. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.27674.
- Background: PubMed 18237703Martin HD, Savage A, Braly BA, Palmer IJ, Beall DP, Kelly B. The function of the hip capsular ligaments: a quantitative report. Arthroscopy. 2008 Feb;24(2):188-95. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.08.024. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
- Background: PubMed 9479711Birnbaum K, Prescher A, Hessler S, Heller KD. The sensory innervation of the hip joint--an anatomical study. Surg Radiol Anat. 1997;19(6):371-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01628504.
- Background: PubMed 22087603Moraes MR, Cavalcante ML, Leite JA, Macedo JN, Sampaio ML, Jamacaru VF, Santana MG. The characteristics of the mechanoreceptors of the hip with arthrosis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2011 Nov 16;6:58. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-58.
- Background: PubMed 22588756Bennell K, Dobson F, Hinman R. Measures of physical performance assessments: Self-Paced Walk Test (SPWT), Stair Climb Test (SCT), Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Chair Stand Test (CST), Timed Up & Go (TUG), Sock Test, Lift and Carry Test (LCT), and Car Task. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S350-70. doi: 10.1002/acr.20538. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 12777182Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klassbo M, Roos EM. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003 May 30;4:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-4-10. Epub 2003 May 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31680746Ometti M, Brambilla L, Gatti R, Tettamanti A, La Cava T, Pironti P, Fraschini G, Salini V. Capsulectomy vs capsulotomy in total hip arthroplasty. Clinical outcomes and proprioception evaluation: Study protocol for a randomized, controlled, double blinded trial. J Orthop. 2019 Sep 12;16(6):526-533. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.09.020. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hip Arthrosis
Active, not recruiting
Effectiveness of Therapeutic Exercises on Spinopelvic Mobility
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Hip
Recruiting
SIRI Levels Following PENG Block in Pediatric Hip Surgery
Hip Dysplasia
RecruitingPhase 4
Efficacy of Ketorolac for Postoperative Pain Management in Hip Arthroscopy
Femoracetabular Impingement, Hip Arthroscopy
RecruitingPhase 4
PENG With LFCB vs. ESP Blocks for Pediatric Hip Surgery
Hip Disease, Hip Dysplasia
Recruiting
Intravenous Dexamethasone (0 vs 4 vs 8 mg) as an Adjunct to PENG Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Osteoarthritis, Hip, Hip Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marco Ometti, MD study director
IRCCS San Raffaele
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Capsulectomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty and Capsulotomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty in people with Hip Arthrosis, run by IRCCS San Raffaele at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: paused, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) (time frame: Before surgery (T0), 50 days (plus or minus 3 days) after surgery (T1)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02749058, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Mar 2023.